Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

[ChurchOfGodBear]

he is not intellectual at all, nor does he have the mental fortitude or courage to form convictions of his own

Indeed, your point that he can't verbalize why he would be better off under such a system is well-founded. You would expect even the most naive of online soldiers to be able to answer that question, even if they had to outright make something up. For that matter, Mike hasn't even articulated what he finds wrong with the world the way it is, requiring his cause in the first place. Because his investment in Nazi ideology is so shallow, I wouldn't be surprised to see him abandon it for something else when it's no longer "edgy" enough to satisfy his ego. As you said, he can't actually construct rational arguments in favor of it, so all he has are the aesthetics and the rhetoric, both of which he only appreciates on the most superficial of levels.

 

[MistressCaridad]

You keep calling Semitic "Communism" and European National Socialism "totalitarian" as if they are the same. How silly.

Okay.
1) I don't think there's any "Semitic" elements in the communism of my home country, dude. Nice try. When you make assumptions it just makes an "ass" out of "u".
2) Communism and Fascism (which, simply put, Nazism is a subset of Fascism and you can play word games all day but that's what it boils down to) are ideologically on opposite ends of the political spectrum (communism being far leftist and fascism being fringe right) but in practice they rarely ever end up as anything else than a totalitarian system. If you can cite a modern example of a working fascist government that isn't a complete dumpster fire, I'll stand corrected on that.
ETA before Mike seizes on this and chimps out: "totalitarian" government does not always mean Soviet style communism. I simply refer to the fact that control is in the hands of one or a few of the ruling party's elites. This can happen anywhere that there aren't checks and balances to keep one person/party from assuming full control.

 

[Mikemikev]

Indeed, your point that he can't verbalize why he would be better off under such a system is well-founded. You would expect even the most naive of online soldiers to be able to answer that question, even if they had to outright make something up. For that matter, Mike hasn't even articulated what he finds wrong with the world the way it is, requiring his cause in the first place. Because his investment in Nazi ideology is so shallow, I wouldn't be surprised to see him abandon it for something else when it's no longer "edgy" enough to satisfy his ego. As you said, he can't actually construct rational arguments in favor of it, so all he has are the aesthetics and the rhetoric, both of which he only appreciates on the most superficial of levels.

Nonsense! I can explain. But why would I explain it to you? Who are you? There is plenty of even better explanations out there than I could create.

Eg. www.prometheism.net/library/CultureOfCritique.pdf

So are you interested in the subject and going to read that? Or did you come here to try to waste my time?

Okay.
1) I don't think there's any "Semitic" elements in the communism of my home country, dude. Nice try. When you make assumptions it just makes an "ass" out of "u".
2) Communism and Fascism (which, simply put, Nazism is a subset of Fascism and you can play word games all day but that's what it boils down to) are ideologically on opposite ends of the political spectrum (communism being far leftist and fascism being fringe right) but in practice they rarely ever end up as anything else than a totalitarian system. If you can cite a modern example of a working fascist government that isn't a complete dumpster fire, I'll stand corrected on that.
ETA before Mike seizes on this and chimps out: "totalitarian" government does not always mean Soviet style communism. I simply refer to the fact that control is in the hands of one or a few of the ruling party's elites. This can happen anywhere that there aren't checks and balances to keep one person/party from assuming full control.

When people try to base their argument on nonsensical left/right simplifications I tend to ignore them.

 

[MistressCaridad]

When people try to base their argument on nonsensical left/right simplifications I tend to ignore them.

When people post fake links that lead to IP phishing sites, I tend to not click on them... your point?
By the way, the dictator of the country I emigrated from was actually pretty anti-Semitic, so you may want to do some research before you pull the "COMMERNISM IS A PLOT OF THE JOOOOOOOOOOS" card again.

 

[unclestryker]

But you're a dime store troll. Why would I waste my time "explaining" your endless confusion?

And you a fake nazi. Because alot of us think this is the case and some of that is coming from actual neo nazis from this site. They can spot fakers.

 

[Mikemikev]

When people post fake links that lead to IP phishing sites, I tend to not click on them... your point?
By the way, the dictator of the country I emigrated from was actually pretty anti-Semitic, so you may want to do some research before you pull the "COMMERNISM IS A PLOT OF THE JOOOOOOOOOOS" card again.

I'm not looking at any of your sources. BTW...meaningless questionable anecdote...you might want to do some research.

And you a fake nazi. Because alot of us think this is the case and some of that is coming from actual neo nazis from this site. They can spot fakers.

So actual neo Nazis with high reputations on neo Nazi sites? Or LARPing faggots? @Null

 

[MistressCaridad]

I'm not looking at any of your sources. BTW...meaningless questionable anecdote...you might want to do some research.

Okay, everyone else, which one should I go with?

1) Liar!
2) No u r
3) Lying like
Or should I just respond with

 

[pickledance]

I'm not looking at any of your sources. BTW...meaningless questionable anecdote...you might want to do some research.

>won't look at sources
>tells others to do research

 

[GethN7]

When people try to base their argument on nonsensical left/right simplifications I tend to ignore them.

Micheal, this is why people find it hard to debate you. If you meet a challenge to your beliefs you don't like, you either ignore it or dismiss it.

If your only response to anything that might shatter or weaken your preconceptions is to reject even thinking about it, you want an echo chamber, not an exchange of views.

 

[Mikemikev]

>won't look at sources
>tells others to do research

When people post fake links that lead to IP phishing sites, I tend to not click on them... your point?
By the way, the dictator of the country I emigrated from was actually pretty anti-Semitic, so you may want to do some research before you pull the "COMMERNISM IS A PLOT OF THE JOOOOOOOOOOS" card again.

 

[MistressCaridad]

We get it Mike, you're good at regurgitating what other people say without being able to put it into your own perspective.

 

[Mikemikev]

Micheal, this is why people find it hard to debate you. If you meet a challenge to your beliefs you don't like, you either ignore it or dismiss it.

If your only response to anything that might shatter or weaken your preconceptions is to reject even thinking about it, you want an echo chamber, not an exchange of views.

That's how I react on this thread which has the purpose of trolling me. I've established all oif the regulars here are dishonest trolls.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

Nonsense! I can explain.

No, you can't. That's been demonstrated a number of times.

But why would I explain it to you?

A leading question, since you can't explain it. And the reason is, your extremely shallow understanding of the subject matter.

Who are you?

I'm not the subject of the thread, for starters.

There is plenty of even better explanations out there than I could create.

I'm positive of that. But when I research those, I think less of you and people who think like you. The facts are just not on your side.

So are you interested in the subject and going to read that? Or did you come here to try to waste my time?

Sorry, sugarlumps, but I don't click your links anymore since you apparently have a fetish for IP addresses (which are nearly useless, by the way). Like I said, the fact that I can read actual arguments by actual scholars and historians doesn't change your standing whatsoever. You're still woefully uneducated on the subject. I mean, @Brad Watson_Miami frequently links to wikipedia articles about his pet subjects... that doesn't make him an expert on those subjects, it merely means he can hit Ctrl+V like a mofo.

 

[pickledance]

Hey mike, you realize you can hover your mouse over a link to see where it goes? I mean that seems like something who thinks they can hack should know.

 

[Mikemikev]

No, you can't. That's been demonstrated a number of times.



A leading question, since you can't explain it. And the reason is, your extremely shallow understanding of the subject matter.


I'm not the subject of the thread, for starters.


I'm positive of that. But when I research those, I think less of you and people who think like you. The facts are just not on your side.


Sorry, sugarlumps, but I don't click your links anymore since you apparently have a fetish for IP addresses (which are nearly useless, by the way). Like I said, the fact that I can read actual arguments by actual scholars and historians doesn't change your standing whatsoever. You're still woefully uneducated on the subject. I mean, @Brad Watson_Miami frequently links to wikipedia articles about his pet subjects... that doesn't make him an expert on those subjects, it merely means he can hit Ctrl+V like a mofo.

Fine, google "Culture of Critique PDF".

Hey mike, you realize you can hover your mouse over a link to see where it goes? I mean that seems like something who thinks they can hack should know.

Sure, but most of your fellow trolls didn't.

 

[GethN7]

That's how I react on this thread which has the purpose of trolling me. I've established all oif the regulars here are dishonest trolls.

I'm one of them, and I've tried to remain polite to you, so I'm afraid you are mistaken, you don't speak for everyone here.

And some here have asked honest questions with no strings attached, and they have gone unanswered.

Finally, you really don't get to complain about being trolled. You knew when you showed up to respond that was a likely response to your own responses, and you marched into the mouth of the dragon anyway.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

Fine, google "Culture of Critique PDF".

But that tells me nothing about how it relates to your views, which is what my point was from the beginning. Please explain what ideas you wish for me to extract from that document, how the document illustrated them (in your own mind) and then my reading it will have some value.

 

[unclestryker]

actual neo Nazis

That is something your not. Like for example your on the internet for the majority of the day. Something neo nazis don't really do. Something they do is work, go out and drink, shoot weapons and fight each other for fun. I mean you can't tell me what's the difference between knights of the southern cross and the AB.

 

[Mikemikev]

I'm one of them, and I've tried to remain polite to you, so I'm afraid you are mistaken, you don't speak for everyone here.

And some here have asked honest questions with no strings attached, and they have gone unanswered.

Finally, you really don't get to complain about being trolled. You knew when you showed up to respond that was a likely response to your own responses, and you marched into the mouth of the dragon anyway.

I don't really have time to address this nonsense. You're defending slanderous filth and you are a disgrace.

But that tells me nothing about how it relates to your views, which is what my point was from the beginning. Please explain what ideas you wish for me to extract from that document, how the document illustrated them (in your own mind) and then my reading it will have some value.

I shows how Jewish academic monopoly has pushed fraudulent science which led to replacement level immigration among Europeans and diaspora Europeans.

 

[GethN7]

I don't really have time to address this nonsense. You're defending slanderous filth and you are a disgrace.

I showed up here knowing what I was getting into, that does not mean they are terrible people for doing what they are allowed to do on this website. If it offends you so greatly, you should leave.