Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

[pickledance]

Fine, google "Culture of Critique PDF".

Reviewing Macdonald’s Separation and Its Discontents in the American Jewish Society Review in 2000, Zev Garber, Professor of Jewish Studies at Los Angeles Valley College, writes that MacDonald works from the assumption that the dual Torah is the blueprint of the eventual Jewish dominion over the world and that he sees contemporary antisemitism, the Holocaust and attacks against Israel as "provoked by Jews themselves. In this scenario, Jews imagine themselves as innocent victims of hatred and violence". Garber concludes that Macdonald's "rambling who-is-who-isn't roundup of Jews responsible for the 'Jewish Problem' borders on the irrational and is conducive to misrepresentation".[24] -Wikipedia, since it's a site you love so very much.

But you totally wouldn't be criticized by the exact same dude for being too jew right:

On neoconservatism
MacDonald published a series of three articles in The Occidental Quarterly on the alleged similarities between neoconservatism and several other influential intellectual and political movements that he claims are Jewish-dominated. He argues that "Taken as a whole, neoconservatism is an excellent illustration of the key traits behind the success of Jewish activism: ethnocentrism, intelligence and wealth, psychological intensity, and aggressiveness."[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_B._MacDonald

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

I shows how Jewish academic monopoly has pushed fraudulent science which led to replacement level immigration among Europeans and diaspora Europeans.

And again, what data did they use and how did they draw that conclusion from that data? The reason I ask is, the document is less important than your interpretation of it. If we're discussing your views, then how you arrived at those views is key.

 

[Cato]

Jewish academic monopoly

Sounds like you're just jealous because Jews are smart. Since you're such a fan of correlations between race and intelligence, it's worth mentioning that as a group they have an unusually high mean intelligence as measured by IQ testing. This is one of the reasons for the disproportionate representation of Jews among Nobel Prize winners and outstanding achievers in general.

Meanwhile you are insecure because you're an academic, professional and social failure.

 

[Mikemikev]

And again, what data did they use and how did they draw that conclusion from that data? The reason I ask is, the document is less important than your interpretation of it. If we're discussing your views, then how you arrived at those views is key.

The data is in the document you fucking clown! You expect me to detail a case like that in a tweet?

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

The data is in the document you fucking clown! You expect me to detail a case like that in a tweet?

Not detail, merely summarize. Again, I'd like to see what you thought of the data and why, noting particular areas where you feel the case is strongest, and possibly accounting for areas where the research methodology may be flawed. The important thing is to see what about this document YOU PERSONALLY found most convincing.

Otherwise, it would be like you were pulling a @Brad Watson_Miami , and referring people to read a source that you, yourself, hadn't actually read. But I'm sure you're better than that, right?

 

[FataBataRang]

So actual neo Nazis with high reputations on neo Nazi sites? Or LARPing faggots? @Null

Says the prison bitch.

 

[Mikemikev]

Sounds like you're just jealous because Jews are smart. Since you're such a fan of correlations between race and intelligence, it's worth mentioning that as a group they have an unusually high mean intelligence as measured by IQ testing. This is one of the reasons for the disproportionate representation of Jews among Nobel Prize winners and outstanding achievers in general.

Meanwhile you are insecure because you're an academic, professional and social failure.

No it's because the nepotistically arranged Jewish academic monopoly pushes fake science with the goal of genociding Europeans. They don't actually come up with much beyond fake politically motivated science.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

No it's because the nepotistically arranged Jewish academic monopoly pushes fake science with the goal of genociding Europeans. They don't actually come up with much beyond fake politically motivated science.

Interesting. So "fake science" is their primary tool in committing genocide? It seems like a rather inefficient means to an end.

 

[Mikemikev]

Not detail, merely summarize. Again, I'd like to see what you thought of the data and why, noting particular areas where you feel the case is strongest, and possibly accounting for areas where the research methodology may be flawed. The important thing is to see what about this document YOU PERSONALLY found most convincing.

Otherwise, it would be like you were pulling a @Brad Watson_Miami , and referring people to read a source that you, yourself, hadn't actually read. But I'm sure you're better than that, right?

I'd say the Boasian case was most striking. What are your thoughts on it? Guilty or not guilty?

Interesting. So "fake science" is their primary tool in committing genocide? It seems like a rather inefficient means to an end.

On the contrary! Look around you.

 

[GethN7]

On the contrary! Look around you.

No offense, Mike, but I almost expected you to add "WAKE UP, SHEEPLE!" to the end of that sentence.

 

[sbm1990]

On the contrary! Look around you.

Take that tinfoil hat off already, you tool.

 

[FataBataRang]

No offense, Mike

You're incredibly kind and patient, GethN7, but I can't understand why you still care if you'll offend the spiteful, empty-headed pedophile midget neo-nazi.

 

[Mikemikev]

Take that tinfoil hat off already, you tool.

I don't believe in "mind beams". I do believe in Jewish academic monopoly pushing fake science. Because there is evidence. You won't look at the evidence.

 

[unclestryker]

The data is in the document you fucking clown!

What did I tell you about citing thousand page tomes, without condensing.

 

[Mikemikev]

You're incredibly kind and patient, GethN7, but I can't understand why you still care if you'll offend the spiteful, empty-headed pedophile midget neo-nazi.

@GethN7 what do you think about what this slimeball just wrote?

What did I tell you about citing thousand page tomes, without condensing.

Lol you can't read a book? You want to discuss this and can't read one single book?

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

I'd say the Boasian case was most striking. What are your thoughts on it? Guilty or not guilty?

Well, for starters, I don't see the necessary connection between the Boasian school of thought and Judiasm. In addition, it's incredibly difficult to draw any sort of conclusion without clearly defining if we are referring to "Jewish" in the religious sense of the word, the ethnic one, or both. And finally, I would say that (given the wide range of dates cited in this chapter) that there seems to be cherry-picking of sources going on.

This is, however, a reasonable start to any point you'd like to make. Care to comment further or clarify?

 

[sbm1990]

I don't believe in "mind beams". I do believe in Jewish academic monopoly pushing fake science. Because there is evidence. You won't look at the evidence.

Its okay Mikey, show me on the doll where the dirty filthy jews touched you.

 

[FataBataRang]

@GethN7 what do you think about what this slimeball just wrote?

You sent repeated abuse his way, Mike. Have you forgotten already?

 

[Cato]

Lol you can't read a book? You want to discuss this and can't read one single book?

Coming from the guy who has responded "TL,DR" to posts that were a few sentences long.

 

[FataBataRang]

Coming from the guy who has responded "TL,DR" to posts that were a few sentences long.

Yet he totally went to college. It's kind of like Chris and his "honor roll".