Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

[Mikemikev]

I'm not interested in Stormfront. The topic (as you can see by the thread title) is you and your views. So that's why I was trying to see your thought process. I gave you several chances to find a discussion arena to your liking, you instead decided to get into arguments over comic books and fish for IP addresses. So, sorry, but I can't feel all that sorry for you when you opted out of the focused discussion you're asking for.

But we established you don't have even the first clue about Jewish monopolization of academia. So in some sense the topic is also you.

 

[Curt Sibling]

But we established you don't have even the first clue about Jewish monopolization of academia. So in some sense the topic is also you.

The topic is a frothing conspiracy formed in the minds of jealous malcontents. It is unworthy of debate.

 

[Florence]

But we established you don't have even the first clue about Jewish monopolization of academia. So in some sense the topic is also you.

Alas, poor Mikey, no-one else believes your insane ramblings.

 

[unclestryker]

Jewish monopolization of academia.

[citation needed] If you were to say that there is a marxist monopolization of academia then I would say you got something there. The evidence of that is everywhere. Unless you think Jews=commie reds.

 

[Mikemikev]

I though Stormfront decided you weren't welcome?

Why do you think so?

 

[unclestryker]

Why do you think so?

You told us, remember. Something about you being heavily moderated on stormfront because of your love of koreans.

 

[FataBataRang]

But we established you don't have even the first clue about Jewish monopolization of academia. So in some sense the topic is also you.

Well, no. If I encountered a hobo on the street who told me he was Jesus, I wouldn't be interested in debating with him either. Would that mean I "don't have the first clue" about his divinity? Of course not. It simply means I don't treat a madman's delusions with the same respect I'd treat the ideas of a normal, functioning person.

Why do you think so?

Because you are a laughingstock wherever you go. Stormfront is no different, and I suspect that time they banned you was because you were making them look bad.

 

[Mikemikev]

I though Stormfront decided you weren't welcome?

Why do you think so?

 

[Curt Sibling]

I wonder - How does Mikes's alleged relations with a non-aryan girlfriend reconcile with his race warrior persona?

Harmless hypocrisy? Or an outright betrayal of the Nordic peoples? You decide!

 

[FataBataRang]

Why do you think so?

Why do you think so?

Why do you think so? Why do you think so? Why do you think so?

no u r

HAHAHAHAHAHA

Lying kike.

 

[Mikemikev]

I wonder - How does Mikes's alleged relations with a non-aryan girlfriend reconcile with his race warrior persona?

Harmless hypocrisy? Or an outright betrayal of the Nordic peoples? You decide!

Yes, because the only two possible positions are being replaced by the Third World or never talking to non-Aryans.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

But we established you don't have even the first clue about Jewish monopolization of academia. So in some sense the topic is also you.

Indeed, and my perspective is that as there is no "monopolization". If you disagree, and that is apparently a key tenant in your theory, then that's a great place to start the discussion. As for that making me the topic... well, that's just silly.
So, to get back to the point, I don't think self-identification is a reasonable criteria for dividing groups of people, because it creates extremely broad categories and makes the criteria very subjective.

 

[FataBataRang]

Yes, because the only two possible positions are being replaced by the Third World or never talking to non-Aryans.

Mikey, your intelligence is easily below third world standards.

Indeed, and my perspective is that as there is no "monopolization". If you disagree, and that is apparently a key tenant in your theory, then that's a great place to start the discussion. As for that making me the topic... well, that's just silly.
So, to get back to the point, I don't think self-identification is a reasonable criteria for dividing groups of people, because it creates extremely broad categories and makes the criteria very subjective.

You do know you're wasting your time trying to talk sense into him, right?

 

[Florence]

Yes, because the only two possible positions are being replaced by the Third World or never talking to non-Aryans.

So you're perfectly happy to cut and run when it suits you? Say what you want about the people at Stormfront (and there's a lot of stuff to say, none of it good) but at least they actually believe in what they're saying.

 

[FataBataRang]

So you're perfectly happy to cut and run when it suits you? Say what you want about the people at Stormfront (and there's a lot of stuff to say, none of it good) but at least they actually believe in what they're saying.

Plus some of them do genuinely care about their own kind, despite their batshit stupid conspiracy theories. Mike just hates everyone.

 

[Curt Sibling]

Yes, because the only two possible positions are being replaced by the Third World or never talking to non-Aryans.

You gave the impression you had a zero tolerance in such matters.

 

[sbm1990]

Yes, because the only two possible positions are being replaced by the Third World or never talking to non-Aryans.

Just admit it, Mike. We all know you're a hypocrite who nobody in their right mind should ever take seriously.

 

[Mikemikev]

Indeed, and my perspective is that as there is no "monopolization". If you disagree, and that is apparently a key tenant in your theory, then that's a great place to start the discussion. As for that making me the topic... well, that's just silly.
So, to get back to the point, I don't think self-identification is a reasonable criteria for dividing groups of people, because it creates extremely broad categories and makes the criteria very subjective.

I just told you I won't discuss here while being mindlessly insulted by every other poster. If you'd like to discuss tell them to check their stupid behavior. And then you'll get banned for not attacking the "lolcow".

 

[MistressCaridad]

[citation needed] If you were to say that there is a marxist monopolization of academia then I would say you got something there. The evidence of that is everywhere. Unless you think Jews=commie reds.

He does indeed think that. In fact he called it "Semitic communism". Lol. Tell that to the Central and South American Communistas who are anti-Semitic as fuck.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

I just told you I won't discuss here while being mindlessly insulted by every other poster. If you'd like to discuss tell them to check their stupid behavior. And then you'll get banned for not attacking the "lolcow".

Well, as we proved this weekend, my PM system works perfectly fine. And, since you have decided you don't want a formal debate, there's no reason for the discussion to be "public". So I see no reason we can't have a side-conversation by PM.