The Gay Pedophile at the Gates

I think the best idea would be to use a steganographic captcha. Autostereograms would probably create the smoothest optical illusion for the puzzle to work, and I imagine it'd be difficult for an algorithm to be able to decipher it on its' own, since there are so few examples of successful iterations.

Take for example, this picture of an ant. To see it, take the picture near to your nose and move back slowly while focusing on the center of the image. You might need to download it and go fullscreen. Going cross-eyed makes it easier for me, while for some people seeing "through" the image helps. Think "looking at the wall behind the monitor instead of looking at the image."

eaw03kb1vww91.jpg

If you can see through the optical illusion and be able to fill in what is being depicted (This is a _____), you get to post images on the site. If not, then you're limited to text-based interactions on the site. To me, this is a much better way of figuring it out.
 
Incongruous said:
I think the best idea would be to use a steganographic captcha. Autostereograms would probably create the smoothest optical illusion for the puzzle to work, and I imagine it'd be difficult for an algorithm to be able to decipher it on its' own, since there are so few examples of successful iterations.

Take for example, this picture of an ant. To see it, take the picture near to your nose and move back slowly while focusing on the center of the image. You might need to download it and go fullscreen. Going cross-eyed makes it easier for me, while for some people seeing "through" the image helps. Think "looking at the wall behind the monitor instead of looking at the image."

View attachment 8127811

If you can see through the optical illusion and be able to fill in what is being depicted (This is a _____), you get to post images on the site. If not, then you're limited to text-based interactions on the site. To me, this is a much better way of figuring it out.
Click to expand...
You're gonna filter out a ton of real users though, I've never been able to get these to work reliably. And I don't see how it would reliably filter out captcha-slave jeets either.
 
Incongruous said:
I think the best idea would be to use a steganographic captcha. Autostereograms would probably create the smoothest optical illusion for the puzzle to work, and I imagine it'd be difficult for an algorithm to be able to decipher it on its' own, since there are so few examples of successful iterations.

Take for example, this picture of an ant. To see it, take the picture near to your nose and move back slowly while focusing on the center of the image. You might need to download it and go fullscreen. Going cross-eyed makes it easier for me, while for some people seeing "through" the image helps. Think "looking at the wall behind the monitor instead of looking at the image."

View attachment 8127811

If you can see through the optical illusion and be able to fill in what is being depicted (This is a _____), you get to post images on the site. If not, then you're limited to text-based interactions on the site. To me, this is a much better way of figuring it out.
Click to expand...
I had a book full of these as a child. Such a cool effect.
 
Incongruous said:
I think the best idea would be to use a steganographic captcha. Autostereograms would probably create the smoothest optical illusion for the puzzle to work, and I imagine it'd be difficult for an algorithm to be able to decipher it on its' own, since there are so few examples of successful iterations.

Take for example, this picture of an ant. To see it, take the picture near to your nose and move back slowly while focusing on the center of the image. You might need to download it and go fullscreen. Going cross-eyed makes it easier for me, while for some people seeing "through" the image helps. Think "looking at the wall behind the monitor instead of looking at the image."

View attachment 8127811

If you can see through the optical illusion and be able to fill in what is being depicted (This is a _____), you get to post images on the site. If not, then you're limited to text-based interactions on the site. To me, this is a much better way of figuring it out.
Click to expand...
Nigga this shit ain't working. Never does. Saw some video on YouTube where it's like a bunch a static with the same effect, and it's supposed to depict bad apple. It did. After 1 fucking hour of staring at the screen and attempting to get this to work. Also doesn't really work on phones, and i mobilefag a lot
 
Alexander II of Russia said:
A gay pedophile furry doing that, surely it will not backfire horribly on him, if No Dong Jones could not defeat the forums that way, then neither a spamming pedophile, he is just digging a hole for himself in real time.
Click to expand...
Lets not forget how close the site came to being destroyed. Liz dong gone is still a dangerous person with tech connections that has a vested interest in ruining the KF. This guy spamming child pornography could easily get the ball rolling on Liz and others claiming that KF is a pedophile haven. Considering how fucking vile even the mere stink of pedophilia is to the average person, thats a dangerous rumor or accusation to have levied against you.
 
Incongruous said:
I think the best idea would be to use a steganographic captcha. Autostereograms would probably create the smoothest optical illusion for the puzzle to work, and I imagine it'd be difficult for an algorithm to be able to decipher it on its' own, since there are so few examples of successful iterations.

Take for example, this picture of an ant. To see it, take the picture near to your nose and move back slowly while focusing on the center of the image. You might need to download it and go fullscreen. Going cross-eyed makes it easier for me, while for some people seeing "through" the image helps. Think "looking at the wall behind the monitor instead of looking at the image."

View attachment 8127811

If you can see through the optical illusion and be able to fill in what is being depicted (This is a _____), you get to post images on the site. If not, then you're limited to text-based interactions on the site. To me, this is a much better way of figuring it out.
Click to expand...
Nah. There are solvers for that.

1762311914147.png
 
Incongruous said:
I think the best idea would be to use a steganographic captcha. Autostereograms would probably create the smoothest optical illusion for the puzzle to work, and I imagine it'd be difficult for an algorithm to be able to decipher it on its' own, since there are so few examples of successful iterations.

Take for example, this picture of an ant. To see it, take the picture near to your nose and move back slowly while focusing on the center of the image. You might need to download it and go fullscreen. Going cross-eyed makes it easier for me, while for some people seeing "through" the image helps. Think "looking at the wall behind the monitor instead of looking at the image."

View attachment 8127811

If you can see through the optical illusion and be able to fill in what is being depicted (This is a _____), you get to post images on the site. If not, then you're limited to text-based interactions on the site. To me, this is a much better way of figuring it out.
Click to expand...

google magic eye solver first result
 
Null said:
This is extremely frustrating because obviously I want new users. I want fresh blood, exciting new stuff for people to talk about, and a zero-friction registration system which allows anyone to jump on and start posting. Unfortunately we're just kind of in this era of the Internet where it's getting impossible to run a little site. The counter-measures to a gay pedophile spending pennies on the dollar for VPN access and captcha solvers are either to purchase enormously expensive enterprise solutions for major services that already make a ton of money, or to close the gate and slowly starve like in a medieval siege.
Click to expand...

I went through some of the automatic captcha solvers. Most of them seem to struggle with recaptcha v3 the most but they will 100% get past it at roughly $1 per 1000 requests on most sites, 2captcha rate of pay per successful bypass is $1.50-$2 per 1000. There are some failures to catch and punish.

One I found, that has less available solvers for it although 2captchas listed price $0/1000 successful is Altcha. That also has the slowest solve speed at +20s, unknown failure rate.

So if we don't want harm the user experience or spend a ton of money is to punish failed captchas by blocking that IP/user for however long you wish and also disabling serverside uploads for new accounts for however long you'd need to spot his latest crop. They can embed stuff still, there's no harm if not actually hosted here.

If the registration captcha gets failed 2-3 times, block it & put the same check on logins (with a forced new sign in upon registration) so there's a doubled chance the solver he's using to fail and get that IP + account if it successfully signed up blocked for awhile.
 
Incongruous said:
Take for example, this picture of an ant. To see it, take the picture near to your nose and move back slowly while focusing on the center of the image. You might need to download it and go fullscreen. Going cross-eyed makes it easier for me, while for some people seeing "through" the image helps. Think "looking at the wall behind the monitor instead of looking at the image."
Click to expand...
I hate these fucking things. They never work for me no matter how much I cross my eyes. I saw what the "solver" turned that image into and then tried to resolve that in the original image again, and nothing. It makes no sense to me and it pisses me off.

They're garbage. People who can "see" these are mutants. :story:
 
Preacher ✝ said:
Perhaps some sort of probationary system where new accounts cannot upload images or embed links? I don't know if that would be unreasonably difficult to implement, but in theory it would simply mean actual new users have to pass both a period of time and a number of posts that are purely text to be eligible for a manually approved full functionality status.
Click to expand...
This could also work as a way for admins to weed out the bots without the hassle of individually reviewing every single new member through a PM. Maybe instead of a text post limit that could be easily spammed out by some jeet, there could be a switch on all accounts that a mod can enable/disable at will. So if a Mod is monitoring/reading through a thread and someone is posting like a normal human being, (so not a jeet or fag), they can simply enable photo upload privileges with 2 clicks, and if they start behaving faggy 2 clicks disables their photo privileges again (and maybe wipes their upload history automatically to safeguard the site?).

Idk, just a thought.
 
Incongruous said:
I think the best idea would be to use a steganographic captcha. Autostereograms would probably create the smoothest optical illusion for the puzzle to work, and I imagine it'd be difficult for an algorithm to be able to decipher it on its' own, since there are so few examples of successful iterations.

Take for example, this picture of an ant. To see it, take the picture near to your nose and move back slowly while focusing on the center of the image. You might need to download it and go fullscreen. Going cross-eyed makes it easier for me, while for some people seeing "through" the image helps. Think "looking at the wall behind the monitor instead of looking at the image."
Click to expand...
Humiliation ritual for all new users, I approve.
 
An amusement in my IT faggotry and it never was for this site, privacy.
The end points I choose for my setup to pick are, were strong for their networking in accessing this site but also privacy. It cracks me the fuck up watching the one thing I'm sensitive too and that is delays, slowness, latency.

It's been a mother fucker for over a month,2, less longer perhaps - here but I ignored it because Null has we are doing work and shit has to get done. That's just how it works.

I'm seeing I have to be very random on my VPN end points to be affected less latency and it's annoying but, life is too busy lately to care. My self hosted ones are fine...but those don't get used for random.



Josh - keep ya head up brother. We are with you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom