Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

Who's the most autistic?

  • Mikemikev

    Votes: 401 71.7%
  • Autphag

    Votes: 102 18.2%
  • Luke McKee

    Votes: 6 1.1%
  • Donny Long

    Votes: 50 8.9%

  • Total voters
    559
You know I will counter it with the others mike. There was way more disagreement then agreement. The bit about the neanderthals is something I am going to look at later.

Why you parroting things you don't understand just to mindlessly contradict me?

Micheal, I have resisted the urge to be downright mean despite all your provocations, but it's becoming quite obvious what your dialogue here has become:

Kiwi 1: So, what proof do you have the Holocaust didn't happen?
Mike: JEW LIES, AUTISTIC SCREECHING, JEWS ALWAYS LIE!
Kiwi 2: I think we should put up signs warning people about a short Welsh pedophile.
Mike: FUCK YOU!!!!!!!
Kiwi 3: Why do you keep defending Nazis if most Nazis don't even like you?
Mike: AUTISTIC SCREECHING, AUTISTIC SCREECHING, SHUT UP!
Kiwi 4: Micheal, I really think you aren't acting very mature right now.
Mike: LIKE I CARE ABOUT THAT! AUTISTIC SCREECHING, YOU'RE ALL TROLLS!
Kiwi 5: Lol, calm down.
Mike: I AM CALM! AUTISTIC SCREECHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In essence, you've made it clear you hate everyone here, your discourse is limited to mostly insults, and you are still hanging around for reasons that, even with :autism: factored in, still don't make a lot of sense to me.

If you really want to find a forum that is more welcoming, I suggest you look elsewhere, this one is a poor fit for you.

I've been over the Holocaust in detail here. This post is an embarrassment. Perhaps you should take your own advice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why can't we divide clines in categories?
Because clines are too gradual to place into distinct categories. Race isn't discrete, considering there is gene flow between different populations.

We do it with other subspecies.
Yes, we do, but like I said humans don't have subspecies because we're all homo sapiens sapiens, you say it here:

Sapiens sapiens is a subspecies, how is that a concrete category and not race?
Sapiens sapiens is a subspecies of Homo sapiens. It's a concrete category because there's a significant difference between homo sapiens sapiens and what's argued to be our direct ancestors homo sapiens idaltu. There's not enough variation between different races to consider them to be subspecies.

Is human variation primarily clustered or clonal? How do you define both of those categories?
It's a toss up, really. A small fraction of genetic variation does in fact occur between clusters, that's for sure, but then again if you were to walk from Africa all the way to Siberia, there'd be no set location where dark skin ends and light skin begins. I personally don't consider it a black and white issue, although I personally place more emphasis on clines. Fact still remains that two people from the same race are about as different from each other and two people from other races.

IQ indexes intelligence and has excellent predictive validity, the sine qua non of a scientific construct. Your anecdote about score variation being significantly impacted by motivation isn't borne out by the data.
www.sciencemag.org/news/2011/04/what-does-iq-really-measure
 
Because it is the most solid and logical scientific viewpoint.

PS
And not only expounded by the mythical, sinister semitic professors you tell us of.

Mike is the type of person that thinks that a chocolate Labrador Retriever is different than a yellow Labrador Retriever (As well as black
Labrador Retriever) Just because they have different coloured coats.
 
In other words you have no understanding of what you are talking about, and just parrot cultural Marxist fake science you see in magazines. How common!

I don't read or buy magazines. I read books. Many from the 1800s. Before Marx was a factor.


I'd no sooner click a link from you than stick my nipples in a termite nest.
 
Why you parroting things you don't understand just to mindlessly contradict me?

Because you reasoning is based on science that is based on 20s and 30s. Your taking something that a anthropologist said and applying it to genetics. You know anthropologists are still looking for that common ancestor right. So far they haven't found it, closest they got was Lucy
Now that is not to say thay we won't figure this out one day. But so far most of the ancient ancestors to humans remains have been found in africa. With the exception the neanderthal, the first one was found Belgium.
 
I'd no sooner click a link from you than stick my nipples in a termite nest.

Don't worry, I took the hit for you. This comment:
upload_2017-5-23_15-7-53.png


came from that page.
 
Because you reasoning is based on science that is based on 20s and 30s. Your taking something that a anthropologist said and applying it to genetics. You know anthropologists are still looking for that common ancestor right. So far they haven't found it, closest they got was Lucy
Now that is not to say thay we won't figure this out one day. But so far most of the ancient ancestors to humans remains have been found in africa. With the exception the neanderthal, the first one was found Belgium.

There's also the ones found in Asia. Some use that as a bases for Asia to Africa migration.

Edit: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/asian-origin-human-ancestors
 
Now this just got interesting. Because in the Talmud it clearly states that eating with a goy at the dinner table, is like eating with a dog at the dinner table, and I couldn't agree more with that. So your argument still stands, but we Jews are God's chosen and are the superior race, you see.
 
Now this just got interesting. Because in the Talmud it clearly states that eating with a goy at the dinner table, is like eating with a dog at the dinner table, and I couldn't agree more with that. So your argument still stands, but we Jews are God's chosen and are the superior race, you see.

Doesn't it say that non-Jews are no better than dogs? Often stated that a non-Jew is no better than an animal whether they're servants or even pregnant.
 
Doesn't it say that non-Jews are no better than dogs? Often stated that a non-Jew is no better than an animal whether they're servants or even pregnant.
yeah and everything it says is true because it's a holy book and everything a holy book says is true so @Mikemikev better spread his cheeks and get ready for some goyimstyle buttfucking.
 
yeah and everything it says is true because it's a holy book and everything a holy book says is true so @Mikemikev better spread his cheeks and get ready for some goyimstyle buttfucking.

Well least it's better than how Muslims treat non-Muslims. To them, you're no better than an object.
 
Back