Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

Who's the most autistic?

  • Mikemikev

    Votes: 401 71.7%
  • Autphag

    Votes: 102 18.2%
  • Luke McKee

    Votes: 6 1.1%
  • Donny Long

    Votes: 50 8.9%

  • Total voters
    559
When people don't want to talk to you do you think it's because they're scared? I'm in the middle of the debating the race concept right now, here. Would you like to contribute some of your brilliant insights?
Oh, Mike, I know how much you've complained about the possibility of Kiwi interference in your debates, and I'd never want to get in the way. Rest assured, I have plenty I'd like to discuss, but I'll wait until you're finished.
 
Lol why are you running away?
Would this be a bad time to point out that I've had several questions I've asked of you, that you've never answer? Not only can you not discuss things with more than one person at once, you can't even keep track of questions asked of you. I've learned that I need to take it easy on you cupcake
 
Ok mike if that's the direction, show me how race and culture are intrinsically linked.

Well let's take one point at a time.

Do you have any views on this?

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/mikemikev-michael-coombs.17243/page-598#post-2293311

Would this be a bad time to point out that I've had several questions I've asked of you, that you've never answer? Not only can you not discuss things with more than one person at once, you can't even keep track of questions asked of you. I've learned that I need to take it easy on you cupcake

You're confusing me not wasting my time answering thousands of random essay questions from random people on the internet with being unable to. It's very polite to even allow multiple opponents in one debate, let alone expecting one person to address multiple subjects simultaneously, while his opponents show no sign of contributing anything. You have no manners.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Dumb
Reactions: Begemot
You call this operationalisation but in regard to what. Biology, sociology, or how about anthropology. Not saying phenomena doesn't exist. Just need to know where you aiming this.
 
You call this operationalisation but in regard to what. Biology, sociology, or how about anthropology. Not saying phenomena doesn't exist. Just need to know where you aiming this.

Operationalisation of a continuum of genomic or ancestral similarity. Which is biology, in this case applied to humans. Do you think that's reasonable?
 
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Begemot
Operationalisation of a continuum of genomic or ancestral similarity. Which is biology, in this case applied to humans. Do you think that's reasonable?

In race no, in culture yes. An example of this would be the middle east. I know this is a foreign concept to a alot people but there was a time where the middle east was sectarian. As they embraced the islamic religion more and more. They're culture went backwards. This phenomenon is nothing new we can see can this in europe in the dark ages. This video by gavin when he was on the JRE (joe rogan experience) explains the finer points of what going in the middle east. But anyway race did not do what your about to see in the middle east, religion and culture did.

 
In race no, in culture yes. An example of this would be the middle east. I know this is a foreign concept to a alot people but there was a time where the middle east was sectarian. As they embraced the islamic religion more and more. They're culture went backwards. This phenomenon is nothing new we can see can this in europe in the dark ages. This video by gavin when he was on the JRE (joe rogan experience) explains the finer points of what going in the middle east. But anyway race did not do what your about to see in the middle east, religion and culture did.


We're talking about race. I'm saying there's a semi-continuous distribution of genomic variation among humans which we can divide at major cluster points and that this corresponds to the traditional race concept. Further we do the same thing with other species (varieties, subspecies, etc.). The only reason we pretend we can't is for fashionable Marxist "equality" reasons, not valid scientific ones. You've completely gone off the point.
 
Yes, what are you using this concept in relation to?

Biological categories are in the first place descriptive of nature, from Linnaen morphological taxonomy to Darwinian genealogical taxonomy to Mayrian genomic taxonomy. The taxonomies are then further informative in increasing order for a range of biological and behavioral traits, such that establishing the category allows one to predict traits. I'm assuming you know the technical definition of informative. Why don't you apply for college biology? I can't answer your questions all day. Unless you want to pay me.
 
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Begemot
behavioral traits

So it does come down to behavior. I can understand where that can be construed as that. But here the thing about that, what would happen that we supplant a (one) person that came from a race that was inherently violent into a place that is does not condone or anything that reinforces the culture that person came from. That person would change, reguardless of race. Its called adaptation something that the human race is very good at and that leads me to another question. How do you factor in adaptation?
 
Back