AI Derangement Syndrome / Anti-AI artists / Pro-AI technocultists / AI "debate" communities - The Natural Retardation in the Artificial Intelligence communities

Screenshot_20251113_221927_Instagram.jpg
You're a literal faggot if you think this shit would convince AI users to change. Also congrats dumbfuck, you fed into the Meta AI.

I hope AI destroys most IG artists hopes and dreams.
 
Newgrounds has a major cultural artifact in Gaming in the form of Friday Night Funkin that is notably one of the biggest revivals Newground had.
All it did was bring was a bunch of retarded zoomers from twitter to Newgrounds and fucked up that site even further.
 
In fact, a lot of US animators hated how much work in the industry was moved to Asia, cartoons often depicting them as undignified, exploited slave labor.

Completely random, but this was why early Simpsons in season 1 had such odd coloring, like Smithers looking brown on his skin color. The work was done in Asia for coloring, but not animation.
 
According to commies, the rich can replace human workers with AI, do the same work that indie artists do, and use their massive finances in leveraging copyright law in a way that benefits them while punishing those indie artists.
So what's the rebuttal of that propaganda?
I guess I'll attempt a rebuttal "unpacking" of that BS. Not everyone who uses generative AI is rich. Also, if there was not AI, then the rich boogeymen could just hire cheap foreign labor instead. Copyright law as it already was before generative AI already allowed megacorporations to claim exclusive rights to certain intangible content, and the smaller artist already found it hard to compete with them anyway. Finally, "identity" is not a collective, and in the case of "marginalized groups", such is not holy either.

And as for the other claim of AI using a lot of power, that is only during the production. And if a power source like the oh-so-dreaded nuclear is used (leftists do not like atomic power for some reason), it doesn't have a "carbon footprint". And a lot of electricity is used to enable the internet and that "social media", which SJWs live off of.

also:

"the yabbit" on artists:

(warning if disliked: VTuber and maybe annyoing voice)

"Pippa's Unusual Obsession: What Does She Love About Indonesian Artists?" - Azehara Ch

tl;dw: In her experience, Indonesians are good (at business), American artists suck, Japanese artists are hit-or-miss.
 
Last edited:
Counterpoint: Does every opinion just have to be a left/right issue? I think the effect is mostly because most artists traditionally happen to be on the liberal side and artists are the group that currently feels most threatened by the technological advancement. I don't think AI like/dislike is a political stance. It might very well become one because with both left and right the groupthink sadly is very strong and people will just fall in with their flock before going through the effort to actually form an opinion themselves.

It's an ideological stance because the arguments used are political: more often than not, they will say AI wastes natural resources, disproportionally harms PoC, steals water from indigenous people. You cannot be pro-AI in leftist circles, it would be the equivalent of supporting Israel for them.
 
It's an ideological stance because the arguments used are political: more often than not, they will say AI wastes natural resources, disproportionally harms PoC, steals water from indigenous people. You cannot be pro-AI in leftist circles, it would be the equivalent of supporting Israel for them.
It's pretty funny because you can also make the argument that AI art breaks down the barriers and makes it 'affordable' for everyone. Those poor brown SEAmonkeys can finally afford to generate their own anime waifus instead of paying a month's wages to some imperialist white piggu. It's art for the people that isn't gate kept by the elite. Or something along those lines.
 
It's an ideological stance because the arguments used are political: more often than not, they will say AI wastes natural resources, disproportionally harms PoC, steals water from indigenous people. You cannot be pro-AI in leftist circles, it would be the equivalent of supporting Israel for them.
It is true that large data centers consume immense amounts of water, but the real problem is they're often located in jurisdictions that give them enormous tax advantages and on top of that, allow them to basically drain the groundwater to the point people with family homes with wells for generations suddenly can't even get water from them. It's a real problem.

Thing is, this is far from unique to AI. There's also crypto, but then there's also enormous social media platforms that these whiny little bitches use all day long every day. The biggest offenders are things like Google, Meta, X, etc.

By comparison to all the other uses, Kiwi Farms is green as all fuck.
 
I remember John Kricfalusi swearing by a totally USA-based studio in Miami.
Then again, I wonder what would the USA nimation industry and scene would be if animation unions got everything they wanted exactly the way they wanted.
John "I got the pants sued off me for not paying Carbuncle Cartoons" Kricfaluci. That's what killed the original Spumco btw.
He also flew to Vietnam to personally train the outsourced Hanna-Barbera animators working there.
 
View attachment 8166590
You're a literal faggot if you think this shit would convince AI users to change. Also congrats dumbfuck, you fed into the Meta AI.

I hope AI destroys most IG artists hopes and dreams.
What’s hilarious to me is, it’s true. You really could. Drawing is not some magical talent that only a lucky few possess, it’s a skill. A whole lot of being good at drawing is just spending lots of time drawing.

So if anybody can just do this themselves, what exactly makes “artists” entitled to compensation for it? Once somebody learns to draw for themselves, why would they ever pay for you to do it for them?
 
View attachment 8166590
You're a literal faggot if you think this shit would convince AI users to change. Also congrats dumbfuck, you fed into the Meta AI.

I hope AI destroys most IG artists hopes and dreams.
I love that these images are always something you can't make with a pencil, guess you can't be as smug handing over a computer, drawing tablet and expensive art program subscriptions.
 
It's an ideological stance because the arguments used are political: more often than not, they will say AI wastes natural resources, disproportionally harms PoC, steals water from indigenous people. You cannot be pro-AI in leftist circles, it would be the equivalent of supporting Israel for them.
It’s just the same halfwit arguments against cryptocurrencies rehashed to appeal to emotion. They’ll say it damages the environment, but are radio silent when it comes to google actually depleting underground aquifers or streaming platforms using servers that consume much more electricity. They just parrot the same shit over and over.
 
View attachment 8166590
You're a literal faggot if you think this shit would convince AI users to change. Also congrats dumbfuck, you fed into the Meta AI.

I hope AI destroys most IG artists hopes and dreams.
what is it with these people and watermarks? I'm counting 4 in this one. what's the point? how does having "PIZZA" on superman's belt buckle enhance the work in any way? just looks stupid.
 
oh-no-anyway.jpg

I really couldn't give less of a fuck for modern disney. They've fallen off since 2020 and since have made only like one good animated film that being Encanto (which I haven't even watched). Pixar has been carrying them and even they're faltering.
So what I'm saying is: let the people make their AI generated stuff for that is the least of disney's issues.
 
Back
Top Bottom