That's my only point, the LLC was established in 2019, not for his law firm, his law firm was a sole proprietorship established in 2015. If he had used the LLC for his law firm it would be reflected in him bar registration, it is not.
It is evident to me that the 2019 registration of the Rekieta Law LLC was meant to re-define his law practice as a proper limited liability entity within the state of Minnesota.
You sole point of argument to the contrary seems to be he did not update his contact information with the Bar to add "LLC" in the
ADDRESS FIELD. I think that is pretty weak argument. I don't think the Bar gives a shit as long as the individual lawyer they are licensing is still getting mail at the address provided.
It is pretty clear to me Rekieta Law LLC, registered in Minnesota in 2019, was intended for his firm, and Rekieta Media LLC, registered in Texas the same year, was for the rest of his online presence.
In fact, we
know 100% Rekieta Media LLC, and
not Rekieta Law LLC, was for most of his social media (including his Youtube channel), because it's
still in his channel description:
Also, his Twitter description:
(Never mind the fact this idiot
also allowed Rekieta Media LLC to lapse, but has not updated his shit).
I had previously touched upon the fact that Nick felt the need to spin off social media operations into a separate corporate identity, registered elsewhere, because he he was worried certain KickVic defendants would go after him, and it would be advantageous of him to anchor his YouTube operations (also know as "the domain where he talks the most amount of shit") to a state with strong anti-SLAPP protections. Minnesota's old anti-SLAPP statue was ruled unconstitutional in 2017, Texas still has one (TCPA), and Ty Beard was willing to act as a statutory agent.
He also had a Rekieta Media LLC, based in Texas. That was presumed to be set up to go after Ron Toye, for... reasons. That also lapsed.
Close, but inverse that. He was actually worried Jamie, Monica, Ron, and possibly Funimation we're gonna go after him. At that particular time, it would have been much better to be a defamation defendant in Texas than Minnesota (it might still be, given the revised Minnesota anti-SLAPP is pretty new). There is video posted here previously of him basically admitting to that from some hotel room.
Isn't ethics one of the subjects of the bar exam?
Yes. Obviously, that doesn't mean everybody who takes and pass the bar exam will be ethical though.