💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 155 22.7%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 275 40.2%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 92 13.5%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 162 23.7%

  • Total voters
    684
Well, after doing a little bit of reading you appear to be correct. Most professional licensense are gotten to do business (which Nick did, he established Rekieta Law, the sole proprietorship, in 2015), but it is not a requirement for a lawyer to maintain a business and still be active. I guess the state isn't worried about lawyers paying their taxes.
I don't know what the hell you are going on and on about.

All @Dixieland Buckaroo is saying is that Nick had an LLC for his law firm in Minnesota, and an LLC for his media empire (*snort*) in Texas, and both have lapsed. He's not wrong.

Nothing Nick does nowadays appears to be done behind a corporate veil. Nick is now as corporationless as he is Apeless (and soon, I guess, hairless).

Did he represent April using any letterhead?
He submitted this:

Screenshot_20251207-134748~2.jpg

Name, basic contact details, bar number. No firm, and it doesn't appear to ask for one.
 
It's like, well, that's really interesting, because if I'm not a lawyer, if I'm not a lawyer, then the model rules of professional or Minnesota rules of professional conduct for lawyers cannot apply to me. It's like, if I'm not a lawyer, you can't hold me responsible under the rules. And if I am a lawyer, then I'm telling the truth. So if I'm bound by your rules, then I am a lawyer. I do not represent myself as licensed, but this is a weird artifact of how they do it. You can't apply the rules of professional conduct to non-lawyers. It doesn't work."
I guess everybody is a lawyer in MN then.
 
Nick doesn't seem to understand that if he just said he was a lawyer he would arguably be in the clear, but the "small law firm in central Minnesota" shit sure makes it sound like attorney advertising. That's what almost all of this YouTube lawyer shit starts as. The biggest anomaly with Nick is that he never went through a period where the content was obviously designed to drive law business to him and his associates.

The closest he ever came was with Ty, and with advertising like that who even needs bar complaints... Or something like that?
 
Nick doesn't seem to understand that if he just said he was a lawyer he would arguably be in the clear, but the "small law firm in central Minnesota" shit sure makes it sound like attorney advertising. That's what almost all of this YouTube lawyer shit starts as. The biggest anomaly with Nick is that he never went through a period where the content was obviously designed to drive law business to him and his associates.

The closest he ever came was with Ty, and with advertising like that who even needs bar complaints... Or something like that?
Also this argument has already been resolved against Rekieta. He doesn't have any sort of open complaint about holding himself out falsely, he has been found guilty. He is in the penalty phase for that. That is what he is hiding and dancing around about.
In the same way he is dragging out the HRO because law enforcement and prosecutors have told his lawyer that Rekieta can talk about Aaron but not physically approach him, and so Rekieta constantly pushes it in his usual faggot sociopath way, he is being childish and defiant against law licensing until the hammer falls on that one too.
 
Also this argument has already been resolved against Rekieta. He doesn't have any sort of open complaint about holding himself out falsely, he has been found guilty. He is in the penalty phase for that.
Interesting. Rekieta does not have much inhibition control anymore. When he starts talking more often about a particular topic, it usually means something happened recently that pushed that issue to the front of his mind. So the fact that he was already found guilty of misrepresenting himself as a licensed lawyer explains the sudden spike in his seething about it.
 
Isn't ethics one of the subjects of the bar exam? Every lawyer should know not to present yourself as a practicing lawyer if you're not licensed in good standing (see Nick I just closed your stupid loophole).
 
It's impressive that a grown man who passed law school has regressed this far mentally, but drugs make you retarded. He's got the brain of a barely literate 14 year old.
 
Interesting. Rekieta does not have much inhibition control anymore. When he starts talking more often about a particular topic, it usually means something happened recently that pushed that issue to the front of his mind. So the fact that he was already found guilty of misrepresenting himself as a licensed lawyer explains the sudden spike in his seething about it.
It will be interesting to see how he lies about it when the final verdict against him in terms of penalty is rendered. Presumably some variant of "I quit I wasn't fired" again.
 
It will be interesting to see how he lies about it when the final verdict against him in terms of penalty is rendered. Presumably some variant of "I quit I wasn't fired" again.
I'm more personally interested in how his perturbed mind will explain that the sanction was puppeteered by Aaron Imholte. It is so FuNnY to me that he sees Aaron in every shadow.
 
Legos aside, I genuinely don’t remember this particular chat Nick sent to Pedoton - my life doesn’t revolve around Nick, thankfully - but our heroine @elb saved it.

Nick chatting about Aaron’s daughter, name redacted. I THINK SOMEONE NEEDS TO HANG ON THE WALL.

Someone get the woodchipper for this faggot ASAP. Yes, I’m MATI.View attachment 8258795

Suddenly the cocaine bullet that was found next to Aaron's younger daughter doesn't seem so 'accidental'........
 
Why would Rekieta dingleberry his way thru a lego building stream when that is Kayla's activity anyway? Driving his wife to Matt to be fucked energy tbqh, or else supervising her to prevent truth leaks.
 
2025 Nick is incapable of sitting still. He can't help but sway and jerk. SOME of it is him looking at different monitors, but it's obvious most of it is involuntary.
Rekie-chiatry is an highly emergent field in combined NPD-Brain Injury speciality.

Just what is it with these brain-damaged junkies and all the constant psycho fidgeting?

Nick really does have "a type":

FidgetSpinners.gif

🤔
 
- "favorite child" makes an appearance offscreen
- Nick wants to write a book about his experiences with the Minnesota justice system
- people clamoring for law and order is insane to Nick
- coloring book he wanted to do: artists "got busy", but nowadays he "could just make it" with AI
- Nick claims that the Dorkbert drawing is of his attorney
- frivolous HRO; Nick is confident that he will "ultimately emerge victorious"
- a deadline just passed; next hearing isn't scheduled
- Allegedly about Andy Signore: "a lot of complainants want to tell the court how cool they are", but this is bad because it turns you into a public figure
- "some dork" is saying Nick's holding himself out as a lawyer; sovcit argument again
 
- Nick claims that the Dorkbert drawing is of his attorney
I'm guessing he wouldn't bother lying about this unless he were at least a bit worried that it was going to bite him in the ass. And IMO the only reason he would suddenly start getting worried about that now, months later, is because he's starting to think things aren't going to go his way. Nick's Franks motion was the most retarded and doomed to fail thing in the world but he was still 100% confident he had that in the bag, so if he's starting to think he might not win the HRO battle things must be going VERY poorly.
 
That's my only point, the LLC was established in 2019, not for his law firm, his law firm was a sole proprietorship established in 2015. If he had used the LLC for his law firm it would be reflected in him bar registration, it is not.
It is evident to me that the 2019 registration of the Rekieta Law LLC was meant to re-define his law practice as a proper limited liability entity within the state of Minnesota.

You sole point of argument to the contrary seems to be he did not update his contact information with the Bar to add "LLC" in the ADDRESS FIELD. I think that is pretty weak argument. I don't think the Bar gives a shit as long as the individual lawyer they are licensing is still getting mail at the address provided.

It is pretty clear to me Rekieta Law LLC, registered in Minnesota in 2019, was intended for his firm, and Rekieta Media LLC, registered in Texas the same year, was for the rest of his online presence.

In fact, we know 100% Rekieta Media LLC, and not Rekieta Law LLC, was for most of his social media (including his Youtube channel), because it's still in his channel description:

Screenshot_20251207-142043~2.jpg

Also, his Twitter description:
Screenshot_20251207-153415~2.jpg

(Never mind the fact this idiot also allowed Rekieta Media LLC to lapse, but has not updated his shit).

I had previously touched upon the fact that Nick felt the need to spin off social media operations into a separate corporate identity, registered elsewhere, because he he was worried certain KickVic defendants would go after him, and it would be advantageous of him to anchor his YouTube operations (also know as "the domain where he talks the most amount of shit") to a state with strong anti-SLAPP protections. Minnesota's old anti-SLAPP statue was ruled unconstitutional in 2017, Texas still has one (TCPA), and Ty Beard was willing to act as a statutory agent.

He also had a Rekieta Media LLC, based in Texas. That was presumed to be set up to go after Ron Toye, for... reasons. That also lapsed.
Close, but inverse that. He was actually worried Jamie, Monica, Ron, and possibly Funimation we're gonna go after him. At that particular time, it would have been much better to be a defamation defendant in Texas than Minnesota (it might still be, given the revised Minnesota anti-SLAPP is pretty new). There is video posted here previously of him basically admitting to that from some hotel room.

Isn't ethics one of the subjects of the bar exam?
Yes. Obviously, that doesn't mean everybody who takes and pass the bar exam will be ethical though.
 
Back
Top Bottom