Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

Lol, guess I rustled some jimmies.
Mate, you are annoying people because this thread is 652 pages long and this has been brought up and discussed many times. Everyone here is well aware that Rowling was a classical libshit, which, for the record, also describes many oldfag Kiwifarms posters. People change their minds as more information becomes available.
 
I have nothing to add, other than can we please kill the next nigger that comes in the thread just to whine about Rowling not tweeting that she hates immigration 6 times a day? Thanks.
 
Mate, you are annoying people because this thread is 652 pages long and this has been brought up and discussed many times. Everyone here is well aware that Rowling was a classical libshit, which, for the record, also describes many oldfag Kiwifarms posters. People change their minds as more information becomes available.

Yeah, we shall see.

But even with that said, even aside from her silly libshit stuff, many of Rowling's most retarded critics, before she pissed off the troons, were christian fundamentalists. Whatever silly beliefs Rowling held (or still holds), those people actively looked for retarded reasons to hate her.

Derangement syndrome is derangement syndrome.
 
Lol, guess I rustled some jimmies. It is very true that Joanne is an excellent force in the fight against the looney troons today, but don't pretend that she didn't fuck up pretty bad in the past.


You know what I mean, she never acknowledged it, she pretended it didn't happen and continued to guilt everyone about the mudlsime refugees. But OK then users, have your opinions.
Personally, I think Joanne telling the entire world that we should import infinite rapefugees was a BAD idea. But I guess she's infallible because she named the troon menace. :christine:
1765278202705.gif1765278241425.gif1765278247762.gif
 
"Woke Author Bad", as the title of the thread itself states, is part of the Rowling Derangement Syndrome. Please stop demonstrating it in the thread: we're here to laugh at you too.
 
Good points all around.
I was drunk for the first post and kind of forgot how long ago it was. I guess it's a sore reminder.
Resume your usual activities.

edit: Ugh, yeah I was being a retarded faggot, it was definitely uncouth of me to drag up Joannes 10+ year old shit. I'll try to make it up with a story in the future. I'm semi dreading an upcoming visit with my best friend who is now in a FFM polycule where Harry Potter used to be the gospel of the household. So that will be interesting.
 
Last edited:
edit: Ugh, yeah I was being a retarded faggot, it was definitely uncouth of me to drag up Joannes 10+ year old shit. I'll try to make it up with a story in the future. I'm semi dreading an upcoming visit with my best
If memory serves she's also been one of the few to call out the grave dancing over Kirk to be repellent. Don't know if she said similar about the attempt to kill Trump too.

She's evolved somewhat, don't think she'll be calling for TTD anytime soon but she's changed a lot.

In news another university slapping trigger warnings on Rowling. Hilarious the warning is either talking about "outdated abuse" or saying "language" merits a warning.
A host of classic books for children and young people, including the first in the Harry Potter series, have been marked with trigger warnings at one of the country’s leading universities.
Students at the University of Glasgow have been cautioned that Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone contains “outdated attitudes, abuse and language”.
The work by JK Rowling appears alongside a number of titles, including Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll, the dystopian 2001 novel Noughts & Crosses by Malory Blackman and Edith Nesbit’s 1899 book The Treasure Seekers, assessed as having the potential to cause offence.


Another book deemed to be problematic was First Term at Malory Towers, the Enid Blyton novel from 1946 set in a girls’ boarding school, which has spawned a series of sequels as well as a BBC TV adaptation.

The warnings have been issued to all students taking part in a module entitled British Children’s Literature.

Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, the book which introduced the boy wizard to readers in 1997, has been translated into dozens of languages and has sold more than 120 million copies around the world. The eponymous hero is bullied by his abusive aunt and uncle and forced to sleep in a cupboard under their stairs. Harry goes on to learn that his parents were murdered by Lord Voldemort, a malevolent wizard, and that his own life is in grave danger.

Jeremy Black, the author and former professor of history at the University of Exeter, said the warnings were unnecessary. “Glasgow University’s wish to warn that the values of the past are dangerous and disturbing offers a hilarious commentary on its present mindedness,” he said. “All such trigger warnings do is provide a form of confirmation bias for the follies of the present.”


John Sutherland, emeritus professor of modern English literature at University College London, told the Daily Mail: “In the olden days, the British Library used to have a ‘poison cabinet’, for books judged dangerous to readers. It was large cabinet-sized. Nowadays, with the triggering epidemic, the triggered-lit cabinet would be the size of … King’s Cross station [next door].”
Dame Margaret Drabble, the novelist, said: “Poor, poor students! Exposing themselves at their age to Lewis Carroll and Edith Nesbit and all those ghastly outdated stories glorifying public school. How they must suffer. They will need counselling from all the children who have survived these terrible tales and enjoyed them so much.”

A spokeswoman for the University of Glasgow said: “Content advisories in a university setting help students prepare for critical discussion. Unlike children reading for pleasure, undergraduates analyse these texts in depth, which can highlight outdated attitudes around childhood, race or gender.
“We believe that content advisories have an important role to play in an educational setting, allowing lecturers and students to engage in a positive learning and teaching experience on issues across the whole range of human experience and history. They also ensure we can engage with course content in as sensitive and respectful a way as possible.”

Even the Reddit thread is 50/50 on this nonsense
 
Reminder that Joanne fully supported importing Syrian refugees into the UK whilst being the World's No.1 Feminist as the UK police were covering up Muslim rape gangs that she pretended weren't happening.
Reminder I don't give a shit. She makes men in dresses mald and that's funny. That she does so while the Bri'ish get destroyed at the same time because of policies she'd championed in the past is even funnier.

Edit: didn't see your apology before posting. I still maintain what I said lol
 
So, I just learned of a new drama involving JKR well new to me. Jill Bearup did a video today on Romance Con and Enchantment Con.

Romance Con is apparently a Con to meet your favorite Romance Authors and one of the authors was some broad named Julia Soto she's written a few books and the one from last year did well. Her books are apparently fan fics she wrote that she turned into novels kind of like how 50 Shades of Grey was a Twilight Fan Fic originally. Well, her recent book was originally Hermione and Draco fan fic she wrote. So, since her book was once Harry Potter fan fic the Troon Patrol wanted her cancelled. Now remember she turned them into original characters JK gets no money and she has come out against Rowlings views, and she was still dumped by the Con and other authors apparently dropped out either to protest her being invited or being dropped unsure which. To add another layer the con was being handled by some company that was started by Potter fans, so the company was dropped too.

That company also had a Potter Con named Leaky Con after the name of the OG Potter Board and that con is now Enchantment Con and Troons want that cancelled too even though the people in charge of the event planning company have said they don't support JK.

Also, through this video I learned at another one of these types of cons called Sinners and Stardust a man dressed like a character from some book was mobbed by women who proceed to sexual assault him on the con floor by putting their hands down his pants and grabbing his dick and this wasn't one or two women this was a mob of women. If this shit happened at Comic-Con and it was a female cosplayer being groped by a mob of sweaty nerds, you damn well know this would have been national if not international fucking news.

Here's the video that better explains all of this

 
Last edited:
In news another university slapping trigger warnings on Rowling. Hilarious the warning is either talking about "outdated abuse" or saying "language" merits a warning.
https://archive.ph/ADs5c
I think the warning might be about the abuse that Harry gets from the Dursleys. Unfortunately, this wouldn't even qualify as the dumbest content warning that I've seen today

For example, look at https://www.acmi.net.au/works/66014--the-child-molester/. It's a film called "The Child Molester" and you might think, "well, it's a bit obvious, but I can understand warning people about child molestation." No, it's far, far dumber than that.
Screen Shot 2025-12-09 at 14.19.31.png
First Nations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) people should be aware that this website may contain images, voices, or names of deceased persons in photographs, film, audio recordings or text.
That's right, after the land acknowledgement (I can't believe they're still doing that shit) they warn abbos that some of the actors (or people from real footage) in this 60 year old film about child predators might have died since 1964.

Unfortunately, I fear their warning may be in vain
aei2v5.jpeg
 
So, I just learned of a new drama involving JKR well knew to me. Jill Bearup did a video today on Romance Con and Enchantment Con.

Romance Con is apparently a Con to meet your favorite Romance Authors and one of the authors was some broad named Julia Soto she's written a few books and the one from last year did well. Her books are apparently fan fics she wrote that she turned into novels kind of like how 50 Shades of Grey was a Twilight Fan Fic originally. Well, her recently book was originally Hermione and Draco fan fic she wrote. So, since her book was once Harry Potter fan fic the Troon Patrol wanted her cancelled. Now remember she turned them into original characters JK gets no money and she has come out against Rowlings views, and she was still dumped by the Con and other authors apparently dropped out either to protest her being invited or being dropped unsure which. To add another layer the con was being handled by some company that was started by Potter fans, so the company was dropped too.

That company also had a Potter Con named Leaky Con after the name of the OG Potter Board and that con is now Enchantment Con and Troons want that cancelled too even though the people in charge of the event planning company have said they don't support JK.

Also, through this video I learned at another one of these types of cons called Sinners and Stardust a man dressed like a character from some book was mobbed by women who proceed to sexual assault on the con floor by putting their hands down his pants and grabbing his dick and this wasn't one or two women this was a mob of women. If this shit happened at Comic-Con and it was a female cosplayer being groped by a mob of sweaty nerd, you damn well know this would have been national if not international fucking news.

Here's the video that better explains all of this

Big “I saw Goody Soto with the Devil!” energy.
 
I can't help but laugh at when retards use the claim that ''more people regret getting Harry Potter Tattoos than SRS'' as some sort of gotcha argument.

Even if that was true so what.

Regert getting a Harry Potter Tattoo. Well, you can get it covered up or removed.

Regert getting SRS. Tough shit, you are stuck with an irreversible open surgical wound.
 
I can't help but laugh at when retards use the claim that ''more people regret getting Harry Potter Tattoos than SRS'' as some sort of gotcha argument.

Even if that was true so what.

Regert getting a Harry Potter Tattoo. Well, you can get it covered up or removed.

Regert getting SRS. Tough shit, you are stuck with an irreversible open surgical wound.
There's also the fact that, presumably, a lot more people have gotten Harry Potter Tattoos than their balls chopped off, so in flat rather than per-capita terms, it's hardly surprising.

I wonder if the amount of people who regret them merely because they got them as teens and think they're embarrassing now is enough to clinch that statistic on its own, putting aside all the idpol shit.
 
Back
Top Bottom