TED Entertainment Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber, Morgan Kamal Majed, and Kasey Caviness, California 2:25-cv-5564, 2:25-cv-5565,Missouri 4:25-cv-459 - Ethan Klein Suing three women and 10 redditors for Copyright Infringement.

Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber 2:25-cv-05564 — District Court, C.D. California

  • Docket No.
    2:25-cv-05564
  • Court
    District Court, C.D. California
  • Filed
    Jun 18, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Both
  • Last Filing
    Apr 30, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
Does, Alexandra Marwa Saber, Ted Entertainment, Inc.

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 37)

# Date Description Filing
38 Apr 30, 2026 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Response in Opposition to Motion 36, Request for Judicial Notice, 37 (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 05/01/2026)
37 Apr 30, 2026 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Complaint 35 filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit, # 10 Declaration)(Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 05/01/2026)
36 Apr 30, 2026 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Complaint 35 filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 05/01/2026)
35 Apr 16, 2026 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Complaint filed by Defendant Alexandra Marwa Saber. Motion set for hearing on 6/5/2026 at 01:30 PM before Judge Wesley L. Hsu. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Benjamin Kassis, # 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 04/17/2026)
34 Apr 1, 2026 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Stipulation for Hearing,, Stipulation to Amend/Correct, 33 (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 04/02/2026)

Ted Entertainment Inc. v. Morgan Kamal Majed 2:25-cv-05565 — District Court, C.D. California

  • Docket No.
    2:25-cv-05565
  • Court
    District Court, C.D. California
  • Filed
    Jun 18, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Aug 4, 2025

Parties (3)

Parties
Morgan Kamal Majed, Ted Entertainment Inc., Does

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 14)

# Date Description Filing
14 Aug 4, 2025 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXTEND ING THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 13 by Judge John F. Walter. Frogan's deadline to respond to TEI's complaint extended to October 3, 2025. (iv) (Entered: 08/06/2025)
13 Aug 4, 2025 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to October 3, 2025 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 08/05/2025)
12 Jul 17, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc., upon Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed served on 7/14/2025, answer due 8/4/2025. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane Doe - Member of Household in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 07/18/2025)
11 Jun 19, 2025 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) (Entered: 06/20/2025)
10 Jun 19, 2025 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed. (sh) (Entered: 06/20/2025)

Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Caviness 4:25-cv-00459 — District Court, W.D. Missouri

  • Docket No.
    4:25-cv-00459
  • Court
    District Court, W.D. Missouri
  • Filed
    Jun 18, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:101 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Both
  • Last Filing
    Dec 7, 2025

Parties (3)

Parties
Does 1-10, Ted Entertainment, Inc., Kacey Caviness

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
27 Dec 7, 2025 ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron only. In the event that the settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days of the date of this Order. In addition, the Court retains jurisdiction over enforcement of the settlement agreed to by the parties. Signed on 12/8/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 12/08/2025)
26 Dec 1, 2025 STIPULATION of dismissal without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron by Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 12/02/2025)
25 Oct 7, 2025 DESIGNATION OF NEUTRAL by Kacey Caviness, Does 1-10. (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/08/2025)
24 Oct 5, 2025 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed on 10/6/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 10/06/2025)
23 Oct 1, 2025 Joint MOTION for protective order for Approval of Proposed Protective Order filed by Benjamin Kassis on behalf of Kacey Caviness. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/16/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/02/2025)

In re. Subpoenas to Reddit, Inc. and Ddiscord, Inc. 3:25-mc-80296 — District Court, N.D. California

  • Docket No.
    3:25-mc-80296
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. California
  • Filed
    Sep 21, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    890 Other Statutory Actions
  • Cause
    Civil Miscellaneous Case
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Apr 28, 2026

Parties (2)

Parties
Ted Entertainment, Inc., Doe Defendants

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 39)

# Date Description Filing
45 Apr 28, 2026 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS. Signed by Judge Sallie Kim on 4/29/2026. (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2026) (Entered: 04/29/2026) PDF
44 Apr 23, 2026 NOTICE by Doe Defendants and Respondent Ted Entertainment, Inc., of Relevant Related Proceedings (Vulic, Leah) (Filed on 4/24/2026) (Entered: 04/24/2026) PDF
43 Apr 22, 2026 TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 4/20/2026 before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim for Recorded Proceeding - San Francisco. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2026) (Entered: 04/23/2026) PDF
42 Apr 22, 2026 Transcript of Proceedings held on 04/20/26, before Judge Sallie Kim. Court Reporter/Transcriber Echo Reporting, Inc., telephone number echoreporting@yahoo.com. Tape Number: 9:40 - 10:07. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re 41 Transcript Order ) Redaction Request due 5/14/2026. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 5/26/2026. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/22/2026. (Related documents(s) 41 ) (Jauregui, Tara) (Filed on 4/23/2026) (Entered: 04/23/2026)
41 Apr 21, 2026 TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 04/20/2026 before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim by Doe Defendants, for Recorded Proceeding - San Francisco. (Vulic, Leah) (Filed on 4/22/2026) (Entered: 04/22/2026) PDF
Frogan is already spawning parodies. lol

Ethan must be laughing his ass off where he is currently wiping his tears with 100$ dollar bills.
 
Last edited:
I don't think I can say I'm going to rape a specific person without it coming off as a serious threat and not just another edgy forum post.

The only thing that stops the all-mighty Rapeman is being under the age of consent.
This made my choke at lunch.

It's not about lack of consent (since kids can't) that makes Rapeman rape.... it's taking consent AWAY that REALLY gets him off.

Obviously you have to be able to give it first.
 
This made my choke at lunch.

It's not about lack of consent (since kids can't) that makes Rapeman rape.... it's taking consent AWAY that REALLY gets him off.

Obviously you have to be able to give it first.
The rape isn't the part that gets me off, it's punishing evil-doers.
 
“YOU WILL NEVER KNOW!”

LOLOL at the Turkroach acting like he’s the damn CIA and that Ethan won’t eventually find any connections via discovery after he’s done legally nuking Hasan’s orbiters.
I think the eventual claim (or implied claim) is going to be something like "I cracked out five grand to each of their GFMs in visa gift cards which were purchased with cash and submitted pseudonymously from computers at public libraries and never said anything to them about it." He's going to continue to imply that not only did he help them, he did so in a nearly untraceable way so as not to tar these poor women with any of his controversies and a-logs. No matter how much investigation they can do in discovery, there'll always be a fallback position to Hasan's claim. Unless H3 goes through discovery to find every single person who donated to the GFMs and how, but that seems prohibitively expensive and time-consuming.

Thankfully, just about everyone knows Hasan is a greedy, lying turkroach who's full of shit and only ever does things for himself, so no sane person would actually believe his implication.
 
Good news everyone, the neverending spring of sour milk and butthurt whining has provided us with more content.

The H3Snark Mods have filed another gay reply in which they display their snarky attitude to the max.

"TEI offers this unapproved “evidence” in its submission to which Does are not, under the Local Rules, technically permitted to reply. This brazen gamesmanship is disrespectful not only to Does, but to this Court and its Rules, and greatly prejudices Does."
The retards filed their administrative motion requseting leave to file new evidence, and used it to slip in new evidence. Now they are bitching about TEI replying to THEIR motion, in which they show that they actually do have evidence that shows H3Snark did communicate with at least one streamer.

Obviously now its totally disrespectful to the court to file new evidence despite it not being permitted.
lol, those butthurt retards ran laughing into a sawblade.

"Plaintiff’s disregard for procedural rules demonstrates a belief that those rules bind us, but not them. This selective approach to legal accountability reflects a broader pattern of TEI’s malicious, abusive conduct toward us and other critics."
MOMMY! EVIL JEW IS OWNING US TOO HARD! MAKE IT STOP!



Enjoy reading the PDFs, these people are so shameless they could play roles in a spin-off of the series with the same name.
They blatantly tried filing additional evidence despite it being untimely, used the administrative motion to slip in some of said evidence and third party commentary on social media, reddit and KF.

Obviously H3 had to reply and tackle all the various claims the H3Snark Mods made in their filings, and to prove that there is reason to believe coordination between the mods and streamers took place, they present one piece of evidence that demonstrates that communications happened of exactly the kind that shows coordination.

1766148838189.png

Interesting claim that, maybe they should have considered that this type of thing is exactly what a subpoena is intended for.
Discovering exactly who held a Mod role of that subreddit, what accounts they owned/created/deleted and what messages they sent.
Just claiming "nooooooo, thats not TRUEEEEE!" is not gonna help them. The remedy for this is a subpoena to reddit.

All they are doing is making up scenarios that "evil jews wants to humiliate us!" while completely ignoring that the judge will decide if the subpoena are issued based on the merits of the underlying case, which is the copyright infringement to which one accused has already publicly declared herself guilty of.

They are guilty as sin.
 

Attachments

I mean this should be setting right up for the mods to get bitch-slapped by the court system but after judge/system malfeasance screwed Vic and have allowed Rekieta to get away with his bullshit (eacaping consequences in his case AND manipulating the court against Aaron), I have no hope the right thing will be done here.
 
I mean this should be setting right up for the mods to get bitch-slapped by the court system but after judge/system malfeasance screwed Vic and have allowed Rekieta to get away with his bullshit (eacaping consequences in his case AND manipulating the court against Aaron), I have no hope the right thing will be done here.
Luckily this is a civil action and Ethan will take this all the way with appeals if necessary.
He is a good faith reason to request the subpoena, offered insurances to deal with the information in good faith and be held in contempt if he does anything malicious with the data. Even if the court should rule against Ethan, he will prevail on appeal, because the judge would have to ignore BOTH precedents for evaluating the merits of the case to base the decision on.
 
I mean this should be setting right up for the mods to get bitch-slapped by the court system but after judge/system malfeasance screwed Vic and have allowed Rekieta to get away with his bullshit (eacaping consequences in his case AND manipulating the court against Aaron), I have no hope the right thing will be done here.
Counterpoint: Vic and Rekieta weren't jewish
 
Counterpoint: Vic and Rekieta weren't jewish
The point with Rekieta is he's escaped consequences. If your ((zomgjoose)) sperging held true, he'd be celebrating Hanukkah right now. But he's not Jewish yet has gotten away scot-free. So, congrats on your baseless laugh stickers I guess and enjoy your jihad.

the judge would have to ignore BOTH precedents for evaluating the merits of the case to base the decision on.
Judges love ignoring legal precedents nowadays if their personal politics/whims don't agree.
 
Luckily this is a civil action and Ethan will take this all the way with appeals if necessary.
He is a good faith reason to request the subpoena, offered insurances to deal with the information in good faith and be held in contempt if he does anything malicious with the data. Even if the court should rule against Ethan, he will prevail on appeal, because the judge would have to ignore BOTH precedents for evaluating the merits of the case to base the decision on.
Judges can be just as lazy and retarded as you or I. See the Greer's current lolsuit vs. the Farms. Nothing is guaranteed in court.
 
Judges can be just as lazy and retarded as you or I. See the Greer's current lolsuit vs. the Farms. Nothing is guaranteed in court.
That is true, but Greer has not won anything and nothing has gone up to appeal either.
The tard-shield Greer is being provided with is stupid, I agree, but thats just one case in one court with one retarded judge right now.
 
Screenshot_20251220_105133_Chrome.jpg
"We are the only ones with true and accurate knowledge of a specific set of facts that are germane to a lawsuit"

That's a great way for a court to enforce a subpoena against you. Brilliant move....

They draw themselves deeper and deeper into the mire with every filing.




Screenshot_20251220_105400_Chrome.jpg
This is a weird statement to me. They appear to acknowledge that Denims isn't talking to them, otherwise they'd have access to the RFP and the responses from Denims.

They appear to not know what else she turned over or if Ethan is going to accept her production as acceptable.
 
Last edited:
That is true, but Greer has not won anything and nothing has gone up to appeal either.
The tard-shield Greer is being provided with is stupid, I agree, but thats just one case in one court with one retarded judge right now.
The retarded judge in Vic's case and the conspiring judge in Rekieta's criminal case. Those are two more I thought of in 1 second just based on lolcow cases I'm familiar with, not even lolcow cases in general.

The judicial system is not some kind of paragon of impartial authority. It's a bureaucracy who's primary goal is keep the legal system opaque to the masses so it can continue in perpetuity. That's what gives its members their smug sense of superiority and job security after all. It contains a cross-section of society just like every other job.

Don't put the gavel on a pedestal.
 
They appear to not know what else she turned over or if Ethan is going to accept her production as acceptable.
Would be very dumb of them to admit they are in communication with her, coordinating.

At this point it would not surprise me if they admitted to that in a filing as well. They are doing a very good job presenting things that make the subpoena more likely.
 
Would be very dumb of them to admit they are in communication with her, coordinating.

At this point it would not surprise me if they admitted to that in a filing as well. They are doing a very good job presenting things that make the subpoena more likely.
I expected them to tip their hand and infer they had knowledge of the contents of the RFP because they share so much unintentionally.
 
View attachment 8309526
"We are the only ones with true and accurate knowledge of a specific set of facts that are germane to a lawsuit"

That's a great way for a court to enforce a subpoena against you. Brilliant move....

They draw themselves deeper and deeper into the mire with every filing.




View attachment 8309527
This is a weird statement to me. They appear to acknowledge that Denims isn't talking to them, otherwise they'd have access to the RFP and the responses from Denims.

They appear to not know what else she turned over or if Ethan is going to accept her production as acceptable.
I know LUS has said his piece about the H3Snark mod's lawyer and California's whole 'You can bypass law school if you go apprentice somewhere' route instead. To sum his thoughts up, while he's sure there are good lawyers who go that route, this lawyer (and they're handling of this case) really would have benefited if they attended law school. That they're fucking up on the procedural stuff, incessantly sending hundreds of pages they claim as evidence, etc.

My questions are:

- Have you ever dealt with lawyers who bypass law school? Google says California, Vermont, Washington, Virginia so I'm not sure how often you'd see it since you live in the God forsaken state known as Ohio.

--- If so, what were your thoughts? Genuine retards or did they seem like they knew what they were doing?

- What are your thoughts on the whole 'bypass law school' thing in general? I may have caught you commenting on it during a stream a few weeks ago, but...you know...attention span and all that.

- What's your view on this Reddit lawyer? Brain damage? Out of their depth? Do you think they even have any angles/tactics in mind that we just don't see? ( :optimistic: ) My personal theory is the lawyer has a relationship of some form with one of the mods, and the lawyer is basically a mouth piece that's dumb enough to sign this shit with their name.

Any of the other resident Jews who specialize theirselves in the art of law should feel free to chime in. I vaguely remember learning about this 'bypass law school' thing a few years ago and my first thoughts were 'oh, DEI'. In general, I like the idea on paper since I'm a big believer in apprenticeship over book learning, but law is one field where I'm a bit more iffy. Considering the entire industry is knowing and understanding words on paper, how they're applicable, how/when to reference them, etc., and a apprenticeship is great for learning how an organization practically does things, but then you're starting frame of reference is inherently more narrow. Which means you're kinda fucked if you apprentice under a shitty practice or person.
 
- What's your view on this Reddit lawyer? Brain damage? Out of their depth? Do you think they even have any angles/tactics in mind that we just don't see? ( :optimistic: ) My personal theory is the lawyer has a relationship of some form with one of the mods, and the lawyer is basically a mouth piece that's dumb enough to sign this shit with their name.
Some clients decide they want an "aggressive fighter" for a lawyer, and some lawyers aim to deliver that experience, especially because it adds greatly to the hours you can bill for, even if it sometimes means you end up resorting to fairly ridiculous positions. It gives the client emotional frisson, and when it doesn't work you can blame it on the judge.

Having one of those guys on the other side is good for business, since it means way more filings, hearings, and research needed to counter positions so retarded it's hard to find appellate opinions directly on point because the cases rarely get that far, while still being necessary to your own client's defense and therefore justified.
 
That is true, but Greer has not won anything and nothing has gone up to appeal either.
Not only has it gone up to appeal, but Greer won on appeal in a Tenth Circuit case now being cited in multiple briefs before the Supreme Court.
The tard-shield Greer is being provided with is stupid, I agree, but thats just one case in one court with one retarded judge right now.
There have been no fewer than seven judges on that case. All but the first (Tena Campbell) have been complete imbeciles.
This is a weird statement to me. They appear to acknowledge that Denims isn't talking to them, otherwise they'd have access to the RFP and the responses from Denims.
At least for a change it's actually an argument directly relevant to something at issue instead of just a bunch of disjointed troonbabble.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom