BrickSeer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2024
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
/ https://archive.ph/PBXIr“A previous version of the statute under which Ms. Seymour is being prosecuted was found to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court,” the defense argues. “In bringing the current case, the government is relying on an out-of-circuit decision. The defense has spent significant time researching the relevant issues. However, particularly since this is the first case in which undersigned counsel has dealt with these issues — and apparently the first case in this district in which a violation of the animal crush video provisions has been alleged — defense counsel needs additional time for research and drafting of the relevant motions.”
I don't know anything about the current law or whether the legislature cured its deficiencies, but I'm pretty sure the defense is leaning into a constitutional defense. Raising that other than as a formality at the trial court level to preserve it for appeal is an indicator that they believe that according to the statutory language and the set of facts they have, they do not anticipate winning at the trial court level.I'm no legal expert but are they seriously talking about the old animal crush bill from 1999 that was overturned? Is that somehow relevant to the law that's actually being used? I have no idea.


Seymour is being charged under a more specific revision of the 1999 law. The original law was struck down for being too “overbroad” so the 2010 revision added a clause to clarify that the prohibited content must be “obscene.”I'm no legal expert but are they seriously talking about the old animal crush bill from 1999 that was overturned? Is that somehow relevant to the law that's actually being used? I have no idea.
I agree that they are leaning into some sort of constitutional defense or challenge because they are attacking the underlying statute itself.I don't know anything about the current law or whether the legislature cured its deficiencies, but I'm pretty sure the defense is leaning into a constitutional defense. Raising that other than as a formality at the trial court level to preserve it for appeal is an indicator that they believe that according to the statutory language and the set of facts they have, they do not anticipate winning at the trial court level.
The sentencing memos always include this portion about the macaques and it kills me every time. These sweet creatures just want to eat fruit and crabsThe sentencing memorandum for Garrett FitzGerald

They can't stop making it clear that this is a form of extreme domination pornography. The newest individual or small group facilitating custom videos, TGMonkey, also runs a porn group. His own words reveal the kind of content he's into.It's not sexual, guys.




















Her and some of the people responding. One of them likes amputee lolisho, just like our very own Alex Hogendorp.Long time lurker, first time poster.
Found this pooner referencing monkey torture in her art. Should definitely have her hard drive checkedView attachment 8355682
Link / Archive
Link 2 / Archive
Shout out to Mr. Wong’s generous bail guarantorsIn "Motion to Travel" of USA v. Wong (1:25-mj-01512), Wong's defense filed a request for Wong to be able to travel on July 2025. The reasoning is that his partner, Jose Gutierrez, needs Wong's assistance to participate in the Xtravaganza Musical.


He probably thought he wasn’t gonna be doxxed. He wouldn't be the only one to keep posting despite orders to not have internet access, Patrick Naylor is still active on Instagram with a profile that says "fuck tha feds" and was doing other unsavory stuff. I won't say what but it was extremely unhinged and oh yes did we see it.ETA why the fuck is this freak still following monkey pages and why has he posted on instagram as recently as December 22?
I didn't notice this before but Garrett FitzGerald of Scituate has co-conspirator Katrina Broyles Favret at the top of his friends list. It also appears his friends list has dropped in numbers since we last checked.

Yet Null doesn't get to have a Paypal despite having no court orders against him. They're giving Cloudflare a run for their money with how much they knowingly support animal torture and do nothing about it, while dropping services to US-legal content.Although Paypal told us that they can´t collaborate without a court order