💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 155 22.7%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 275 40.2%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 92 13.5%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 162 23.7%

  • Total voters
    684
I still don't think there was anything wrong with handing the case to Ty. Referring cases to your friends is the done thing in the legal profession and by all appearances Ty should have been able to handle that case. He was both an experienced litigator and a local guy with local experience. His total failure to adjust under fire was flabbergasting at the time and indicates that his true experience probably lies in negotiation/client relations rather than courtroom stuff. Which then begs the question why he didn't ride his associates like normal?
I get what you are saying, but I think the point here that's being made is that Nick cared less about whether Vic prevailed, and more about the $$$.

One of the things that clinches it for me is he wanted Vic to come on his show to discuss the case. As a lawyer yourself, surely you would agree that is a monumentally fucktarded idea. There is a good reason why "due to active litigation, we/I can not discuss this matter" is boilerplate language in these situations.

Also, for a long time now I have believed that the referral to Ty was colored, at least in part, by a desire to have Ty as a frequent guest on his show (which is exactly what happened). If Vic hired some other attorney Nick wasn't chummy with, that would probably not have happened.

Yes, lawyers refer to friends, but not all or most of them have monetized YouTube channels with their colleagues as guests.

Nick handled it poorly and his seethe sessions at Vic were unhinged, but from a legal perspective this is entirely Ty's L to hold and frankly if Nick wanted to have a public fight with anyone it should have been Ty for making him look like an asshole.
That likely would have happened, but for the familial connection. Nick was very passive-agressive towards Ty whenever he would criticize him, and not the full-on raging asshole aggressive he normally is.
 
One of the things that clinches it for me is he wanted Vic to come on his show to discuss the case. As a lawyer yourself, surely you would agree that is a monumentally fucktarded idea. There is a good reason why "due to active litigation, we/I can not discuss this matter" is boilerplate language in these situations.

Also, for a long time now I have believed that the referral to Ty was colored, at least in part, by a desire to have Ty as a frequent guest on his show (which is exactly what happened). If Vic hired some other attorney Nick wasn't chummy with, that would probably not have happened.
The whole thing was certainly part of a scheme to feed his show. I think that was pretty open and there were some (fundraising, mostly) reasons that Vic would want to do that even if he had his eyes open.

As far as the having him on the show goes - yeah generally commenting about your litigation is a bad idea. Nick has this opinion that he keeps pushing that public people need to be way more open about their litigation because it would help them in both the lawsuit and the PR battle. He's like sort of on to something, IMO but it wouldn't work the way he wants it to. Making measured statements that you and your attorney are prepared to live with later can be a good idea if you need to get out in front of something as a public person. nick basically wanted hem to come on and call Jamie and Monica hussies and that's obviously a bad idea.

Having Ty on frequently to set a media narrative could have been a good idea. But, like - only if it was done totally differently and didn't entirely distract Ty from his actual work he had to get done.
 
Last edited:
Nick needs to learn that his faggy little word games don't work in a court of law, and they sure as shit don't work in the court of public opinon!

And I think the reason he took Sunny's body home is because he was going to serve his kids some authentic Korean BBQ!
 
The whole thing was certainly part of a scheme to feed his show. I think that was pretty open and there were some (fundraising, mostly) reasons that Vic would want to do that even if he had his eyes open.
His whole meltdown over Vic was that Vic acted in accordance with his Christian beliefs and wasn't seeking vengeance. Nick wanted drama and fights. Vic just wanted to save his reputation and career. Nick threw a tantrum.

This was overlooked at the time, in no small part because Nick actually apologized for his tantrum. Whatever part of his brain that caused that has now been obliterated. Nick now just constantly does utterly vile things without any brakes on his behavior. He successfully killed his conscience with drugs.

He's like another Nick, Nick Reiner.
Having Ty on frequently to set a media narrative could have been a good idea. But, like - only if it was done totally differently and didn't entirely distract Ty from his actual work he had to get done.
Even at the time, I was fairly disgusted with Ty showing up on some gloatstream at the same time as his firm was filing absolutely mangled shit, late, and even before Sam Johnson (the only competent lawyer in the entire case) had discovered the affidavit deficiencies.
 
For anyone smart enough to stay home tonight, MLC will go live at 9 Eastern and there is sure to be ample shitting on Nick in any annual retrospective. (If you’re a Smiling Friends fan, comic/actor Mike Bocchetti will also be on.)
 
Nick has this opinion that he keeps pushing that public people need to be way more open about their litigation because it would help them in both the lawsuit and the PR battle.
Which, again, is self-serving for a guy who has a monetized YouTube channel, and expects such a campaign to be waged on said channel. This is the same asshole that unironically said he wanted to be Rittenhouse's PR guy? Can you imagine?

Handled very delecately, I could maybe see an argument for it, but Nick is definitely not the guy to have helped Vic navigate through that, and there was an indisputable ulterior motive.

Nick basically wanted hem to come on and call Jamie and Monica hussies and that's obviously a bad idea.
Yes, and that's also self-serving, in a way, because a lot of Vic's enemies were also Nick's enemies.

Mind you, I don't think Nick wanted Vic to lose. Certainly a win would have allowed him the bonus of gloating before those same people.

However, I think if given the choice of a scenario where Vic loses but Nick makes bank, or a scenario where Vic wins, but Nick makes less, he would chose the former. He's just that sort of guy. Selfish. Greedy. Sociopathic. After the whole thing fell apart, he nonchalantly moved onto other things.

His whole meltdown over Vic was that Vic acted in accordance with his Christian beliefs and wasn't seeking vengeance.
I mean, there's that, but the other thing is you have to tread carefully in these sorts of situations, as a practical matter, so as to not supply ammunition to the opposing side. Vic was under a microscope.

I have often wondered if Ty quietly told Vic NOT go on Nick's show. That might be giving him too much credit, but cucking Nick in that fashion would be a rare example of him doing something right (and funny).

For anyone smart enough to stay home tonight, MLC will go live at 9 Eastern and there is sure to be ample shitting on Nick in any annual retrospective. (If you’re a Smiling Friends fan, comic/actor Mike Bocchetti will also be on.)
Thanks for the tip. I'll do that.
 
Last edited:
Nick is wearing the swinger ring again!
He hasn't worn it since April was out of the picture.
But here it is ... what kind of vacations/agreements have been made with Lady R? Are they a couple still?
 

Attachments

  • swinger ring dog died 2025-12-31 214628.png
    swinger ring dog died 2025-12-31 214628.png
    940.2 KB · Views: 82
[/QUOTE]
Nick is wearing the swinger ring again!
He hasn't worn it since April was out of the picture.
But here it is ... what kind of vacations/agreements have been made with Lady R? Are they a couple still?
Somebody had to be cooking the food that Qayla gorged upon. Nick also hates fatties so he is trying to even the score since Chef Bull arrived.
 
I still don't think there was anything wrong with handing the case to Ty. Referring cases to your friends is the done thing in the legal profession and by all appearances Ty should have been able to handle that case. He was both an experienced litigator and a local guy with local experience. His total failure to adjust under fire was flabbergasting at the time and indicates that his true experience probably lies in negotiation/client relations rather than courtroom stuff. Which then begs the question why he didn't ride his associates like normal?

Nick handled it poorly and his seethe sessions at Vic were unhinged, but from a legal perspective this is entirely Ty's L to hold and frankly if Nick wanted to have a public fight with anyone it should have been Ty for making him look like an asshole.
Ty probably had good intentions but completely fucked it and never should have gone on stream with Nick. However I put most of the blame on Nick for recommending Vic a family friend instead of anyone in Texas who had experience with defamation cases.
 
20251228_212747.jpg
Even when I'm walking through a store I was stopped by a rather odd greeting card facing the main aisle reminding me of the news regarding poor little Sunni...the wording even more eerie let alone the type of Dog on the card as well.
Oh yes...I'm MATI.
 
I get what you are saying, but I think the point here that's being made is that Nick cared less about whether Vic prevailed, and more about the $$$.

One of the things that clinches it for me is he wanted Vic to come on his show to discuss the case. As a lawyer yourself, surely you would agree that is a monumentally fucktarded idea. There is a good reason why "due to active litigation, we/I can not discuss this matter" is boilerplate language in these situations.

Also, for a long time now I have believed that the referral to Ty was colored, at least in part, by a desire to have Ty as a frequent guest on his show (which is exactly what happened). If Vic hired some other attorney Nick wasn't chummy with, that would probably not have happened.

Yes, lawyers refer to friends, but not all or most of them have monetized YouTube channels with their colleagues as guests.


That likely would have happened, but for the familial connection. Nick was very passive-agressive towards Ty whenever he would criticize him, and not the full-on raging asshole aggressive he normally is.
The whole thing was certainly part of a scheme to feed his show. I think that was pretty open and there were some (fundraising, mostly) reasons that Vic would want to do that even if he had his eyes open.

As far as the having him on the show goes - yeah generally commenting about your litigation is a bad idea. Nick has this opinion that he keeps pushing that public people need to be way more open about their litigation because it would help them in both the lawsuit and the PR battle. He's like sort of on to something, IMO but it wouldn't work the way he wants it to. Making measured statements that you and your attorney are prepared to live with later can be a good idea if you need to get out in front of something as a public person. nick basically wanted hem to come on and call Jamie and Monica hussies and that's obviously a bad idea.

Having Ty on frequently to set a media narrative could have been a good idea. But, like - only if it was done totally differently and didn't entirely distract Ty from his actual work he had to get done.

Nick did do well about not having him on and advising that he NOT be on the show.

As I recall, the rant was NOT that he did not come on the show, but rather that Vic did not post anything to support the WeebWars posters online. I think Nick wanted public thanks and to boost the ego of hi audience that followed Vic.

The rant is lost to time because it was on Twitch, but this is my recollection.
 

If they hadn't slept, it's because he's acknowledging that they were up all night on a coke binge (which is the kind of thing you do when you've got an ounce of cocaine lying around the house). But then he gets behind the wheel of a car (taking his bullet of coke with him in case he starts to get tired, I'm guessing) and drives his children to an appointment?

There's no way he could have been driving without a high level of drug induced impairment at this point. The police in the UK would absolutely have forced him to take a blood test to ascertain whether he was driving impaired or not. But Minnesota is the kind of state that lets Somali immigrants fleece hard working tax payers for billions, and Trust Fund Lawyers to drive their kids around while they're out of their skull on cocaine.

Land of the brave and home of the free...
 
But Minnesota is the kind of state that lets Somali immigrants fleece hard working tax payers for billions, and Trust Fund Lawyers to drive their kids around while they're out of their skull on cocaine.
Minnesota needs to be nuked, especially the part Nick is in.
 
Back
Top Bottom