4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC and LOLCOW, LLC, d/b/a KIWI FARMS, Plaintiffs, v. THE UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS, a/k/a OFCOM

4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC v. UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS 1:25-cv-02880 — District Court, District of Columbia

  • Docket No.
    1:25-cv-02880
  • Court
    District Court, District of Columbia
  • Filed
    Aug 26, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    440 Civil Rights: Other
  • Cause
    28:2201 Declaratory Judgment
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Jan 15, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
LOLCOW, LLC, UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS, 4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
13 Jan 15, 2026 REPLY to opposition to motion re 8 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, filed by UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS. (Kry, Robert) (Entered: 01/16/2026) PDF
Jan 1, 2026 Set/Reset Deadlines
Jan 1, 2026 Set/Reset Deadlines: Replies due by 1/19/2026. (tj)
Dec 31, 2025 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
Dec 31, 2025 MINUTE ORDER granting 12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall file its Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on or before January 19, 2026. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 1/1/2026. (lcrc2)
Typos are actually intentional. It gives lawyers some leeway to make ‘corrections’ and rephrasing later if the case isn’t going the way they were hoping for.
Scrivener's errors are disregarded, if you request leave to amend on those grounds you're going to get some funny looks.
 
why doesn't ofcom tell it's domestic isps to block 4chan and kiwifarms like it does with pirate iptv sites? is the OSA on a different statutory level compared to copyright/piracy laws?
 
Didn't see this posted
View attachment 8356978
View attachment 8356979

New deadlines, new lawyer (technically not new as he has worked with the complaint, but this is his formal appearance)
Screenshot 2026-01-03 194740.png
 

Attachments

why doesn't ofcom tell it's domestic isps to block 4chan and kiwifarms like it does with pirate iptv sites? is the OSA on a different statutory level compared to copyright/piracy laws?
Because they don't give a shit about their citizens being exposed to it, they want to control the entire Internet, despite being weak cucks who can't do shit about anything.
 
OFCOM uses the fact that Elon Musk happily allows Grok to create nonconsensual child pornography involving real children as an excuse as to why all American communications should be regulated by the British Parliament. Musk has repeatedly praised Grok's nonconsensual undressing capabilities.
View attachment 8378137
can grok even make porn?
 
why doesn't ofcom tell it's domestic isps to block 4chan and kiwifarms like it does with pirate iptv sites? is the OSA on a different statutory level compared to copyright/piracy laws?
They could easily do that but they specifically do not want to. They want to intimidate people all over the world to comply with their orders voluntarily, so they don't take on any of the cost or blame. They are faggots and treating them with utmost disrespect is the only correct course of action.
 
Grok can take images of real girls (minor ones too) and put them in hair thin bikinis. I don't want to know if it can go a step further still.
Someone posted some examples. One of them (an adult) was basically in a completely transparent "dress" and was basically porn.
 
Last edited:
can grok even make porn?
Allegedly people already saw CSAM being made by Grok.

Screenshot_20260106_030124_Firefox.jpg
Screenshot_20260106_030045_Firefox.jpg

Notably the person is complaining that Grok unclothed her and the person (feminist tranny?) is not a minor. Take this specific tweet with a grain of salt

Screenshot_20260106_025343_X.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom