💰 Grifter Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

Yea, looks like comeback season is finally over for Nicholas. I knew he wouldn't make it out of January without clipping his own wings yet again. And of course he went about it in the most optically fucked, normie-repellant way possible: Trying to argue that a middle-aged man fucking girls 14 to 16 "ashually" isn't really even pedophile. Barring the fact that this isn't even true and some of the victims were preteens, this sort of ephebo-apologia only works on /pol/ or in Groyper Discord servers and Telegram channels. Literally nothing Nick says about this after trying to explain that raping minors is completely different from raping minors is going to get through to anyone except his retarded fans. Even the Left-wing publications fluffing his balls and the astroturfing bot army can't save him this time.

Looks like it's back to the dissident right sewers again.
 
MikeyNohMore said:
Yea, looks like comeback season is finally over for Nicholas. I knew he wouldn't make it out of January without clipping his own wings yet again. And of course he went about it in the most optically fucked, normie-repellant way possible: Trying to argue that a middle-aged man fucking girls 14 to 16 "ashually" isn't really even pedophile. Barring the fact that this isn't even true and some of the victims were preteens, this sort of ephebo-apologia only works on /pol/ or in Groyper Discord servers and Telegram channels. Literally nothing Nick says about this after trying to explain that raping minors is completely different from raping minors is going to get through to anyone except his retarded fans. Even the Left-wing publications fluffing his balls and the astroturfing bot army can't save him this time.

Looks like it's back to the dissident right sewers again.
Click to expand...
Okay but raping minors is akshually different than raping minors
 
Screenshot 2026-01-15 at 8.20.49 AM.png
This is a great time for Milo to drop it ngl.
 
Rapesputin said:
Nick's a Technocrat now?
Click to expand...
No, just HOI4-brained. Watching color spread across a map makes his pp hard.

Laughing Putin said:
It seems Nicholas still is under the impression that grown men having sex with 15 or 16 year old girls is somehow acceptable today, just because it may still be legal somewhere in the world, or maybe because "the church" used to think this was acceptable. I hope for his sake that he is just reading from a script the feds gave him, because if he really thinks this is acceptable he is way more socially retarded than I thought.
Click to expand...
On Monday he was saying 2026 would be a year of "refinement," i.e. kicking people who don't 100% subscribe to groyper ideology out of the movement. Statements like this are designed to drive away normal people.
 
Fruit Merchant said:
No, just HOI4-brained. Watching color spread across a map makes his pp hard.


On Monday he was saying 2026 would be a year of "refinement," i.e. kicking people who don't 100% subscribe to groyper ideology out of the movement. Statements like this are designed to drive away normal people.
Click to expand...
I think he's just retarded bud. He only strategizes when it it's time to plan his route to McDonald's for the day
 
Last edited:
If Nick didn't have a long history of defending marriage and sex with minors on his livestream maybe you could make an argument about his Epstein comments just being him taking the most contrarian stance he can to be edgy but it's well established how he feels about the age of consent. He doesn't think Epstein was a horrible pedophile because the girls were in their teens and like 6 years old. That's his worldview. It's a retarded one too. "Well actually I only want to have sex with teenage girls half my age not children! I'm no creep!" like lol okay bud.
 
MikeyNohMore said:
Yea, looks like comeback season is finally over for Nicholas. I knew he wouldn't make it out of January without clipping his own wings yet again. And of course he went about it in the most optically fucked, normie-repellant way possible: Trying to argue that a middle-aged man fucking girls 14 to 16 "ashually" isn't really even pedophile. Barring the fact that this isn't even true and some of the victims were preteens, this sort of ephebo-apologia only works on /pol/ or in Groyper Discord servers and Telegram channels. Literally nothing Nick says about this after trying to explain that raping minors is completely different from raping minors is going to get through to anyone except his retarded fans. Even the Left-wing publications fluffing his balls and the astroturfing bot army can't save him this time.

Looks like it's back to the dissident right sewers again.
Click to expand...
It is funny that whenever he gets to a zenith, and there's a read upward trajectory for him, he feels the almost compulsive need to ruin it for him and all of his associates. I suppose it remains to be seen on how effective this will be. The blowback on this is mostly on Xeeter and he has a huge fanbase of relatively "tuned out" and disengaged GenZ guys on Instagram, and all of those clipfarmers won't be posting this take on there.
 
MikeyNohMore said:
Yea, looks like comeback season is finally over for Nicholas. I knew he wouldn't make it out of January without clipping his own wings yet again. And of course he went about it in the most optically fucked, normie-repellant way possible: Trying to argue that a middle-aged man fucking girls 14 to 16 "ashually" isn't really even pedophile. Barring the fact that this isn't even true and some of the victims were preteens, this sort of ephebo-apologia only works on /pol/ or in Groyper Discord servers and Telegram channels. Literally nothing Nick says about this after trying to explain that raping minors is completely different from raping minors is going to get through to anyone except his retarded fans. Even the Left-wing publications fluffing his balls and the astroturfing bot army can't save him this time.

Looks like it's back to the dissident right sewers again.
Click to expand...
Welp, go home everyone.

See y'all in 2028 when it's time to try and fracture the right wing.
 
The most ironic part about the age of consent takes from Nick has always been that Nick is obviously gay, doesn't like women, constantly countersignals normal and healthy heterosexual relationships between men and women, and would never sleep with a woman of any age. He himself wouldn't even benefit from men once again being legally able to sleep with girls in their early teens (and younger, because let's keep it a buck: he and many of his Groypers want the AoC abolished entirely). This position does nothing but damage his reputation, his movement, and his brand, but - like a Liberal coming to the defense of Somalis stealing American taxpayer money or trans athletes in sports - he is committed to die on this doomed hill for some retarded reason.

Maybe it's a test tube baby thing or something idk.

The Gene Genie said:
The blowback on this is mostly on Xeeter and he has a huge fanbase of relatively "tuned out" and disengaged GenZ guys on Instagram, and all of those clipfarmers won't be posting this take on there.
Click to expand...
Any influencer who has talked negatively of Fuentes recently and doesn't run with this is either an incompetent doofus, complicit in trying to inorganically prop Nick up, or they just share his views on the issue and don't want to publicly lambast the idea of lowering/abolishing the age of consent. There's no other reason. There hasn't been a better opportunity to blast Nick in months and he just offered the perfect money shot to anyone who's been looking for one.
 
harmy.kook said:
Nah, later in the year.

Remember: Midterms are coming :lossmanjack:
Click to expand...
american-psycho-willem-dafoe.gif

Sometimes I truly wonder how groypers don't see the cycles with Nick. That fog of war down there must be thick.
MikeyNohMore said:
Any influencer who hates Fuentes and doesn't run with this is either an incompetent dumbass, complicit in trying to inorganically prop Nick up, or they just share his views on the issue and don't want to publicly lambast the idea of lowering/getting rid entirely the age of consent.
Click to expand...
After watching the 2025 run on the podcast circuit, even ones that could've hypothetically hostile, I'm convinced most are complicit assets of some kind. Will we ever have proof of this in concrete writing? Probably not. But you don't ignore all of your #1 Op's dirty laundry thats just sitting there unless it's for a reason.
 
sozjak said:
I think Nick is misinformed because the youngest victims were 8-11 years old, they weren't 17 years old and 364 days.
Besides I do agree with Epstein being a spy has far more dangerous implications than just being a pedophile.
Click to expand...
There are coincidences and there are coincidences, but Jeffrey Epstein just happening to have Mossad asset Robert Maxwell's daughter as his right hand procuress is not a fucking coincidence.
 
prollyanotherlurker said:

Here's the link to the video in the screenshot above

10:30 Great idea saying out load that the comments do bother you in a video.
Click to expand...
I unironically thought for the first week that these two mfs were the same mf, double dipping on the grift.

They're both monotone Zoomer groypers who rant about the same, Nick-approved topics with the standard Dissidant Right talking points. The only distinction from watching their content is that RWC actually knows how to be relatively concise, while all of Tom's videos are 20 minutes longer than they need to be cause he can't stop rambling.

That is very funny though, they both need to be bullied more.
 
MikeyNohMore said:
The most ironic part about the age of consent takes from Nick has always been that Nick is obviously gay, doesn't like women, constantly countersignals normal and healthy heterosexual relationships between men and women, and would never sleep with a woman of any age. He himself wouldn't even benefit from men once again being legally able to sleep with girls in their early teens (and younger, because let's keep it a buck: he and many of his Groypers want the AoC abolished entirely). This position does nothing but damage his reputation, his movement, and his brand, but - like a Liberal coming to the defense of Somalis stealing American taxpayer money or trans athletes in sports - he is committed to die on this doomed hill for some retarded reason.

Maybe it's a test tube baby thing or something idk.


Any influencer who has talked negatively of Fuentes recently and doesn't run with this is either an incompetent doofus, complicit in trying to inorganically prop Nick up, or they just share his views on the issue and don't want to publicly lambast the idea of lowering/abolishing the age of consent. There's no other reason. There hasn't been a better opportunity to blast Nick in months and he just offered the perfect money shot to anyone who's been looking for one.
Click to expand...
Let's say Nick's consistent/bizarre messaging is sincere for the sake of argument, but even if not, this still works:
Nick is a human wrecking amendment/poison pill.
In legislative debate, a wrecking amendment (also called a poison pill amendment or killer amendment) is an amendment made by a legislator who disagrees with the principles of a bill and who seeks to make it useless (by moving amendments to either make the bill malformed and nonsensical, or to severely change its intent) rather than directly opposing the bill by simply voting against it.
In the United Kingdom, a wrecking amendment can take the form of the words "this House declines to give the Bill a Second Reading" inserted into the text. If such an amendment passes, the bill is not reviewed any further and is removed from the list of bills in progress. [1]
An important character of wrecking amendments is that they are not moved in good faith, that is, the proposer of the amendment would not see the amended legislation as good legislation and would still not vote in favour of the legislation when it came to the final vote if the amendment were accepted. Motives for making them include allowing more debate, delaying the enactment of the legislation, or just sometimes a straightforward attempt to make the initiator of the legislation give up.
Some opponents of particular amendments will describe them as wrecking amendments because they regard the amendments as undermining the unity of the original proposal. Proponents of the amendment may seek to deny the charge by saying that the original proposal brings together different steps, and while personally they oppose all the parts, some parts are even worse than others and legislators should have an opportunity to consider them separately.
Wrecking amendments can pick up more votes than motions against, because observers tend to focus on who voted in favour and against the Bill in the final count, rather than looking at the amendments made during the passage through the legislature.
The US Civil Rights Act of 1964 was amended at the last minute by Rep. Howard W. Smith of Virginia to add "sex" as a protected class. This was regarded as a wrecking amendment by those who thought that labor unions would oppose that aspect. The author of the bill claimed otherwise and it passed with the amendment intact.

Examples​

See also​

Click to expand...
We've mentioned his being a poison pill in this thread before, but it bears repeating.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom