💰 Grifter Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

The most ironic part about the age of consent takes from Nick has always been that Nick is obviously gay, doesn't like women, constantly countersignals normal and healthy heterosexual relationships between men and women, and would never sleep with a woman of any age. He himself wouldn't even benefit from men once again being legally able to sleep with girls in their early teens (and younger, because let's keep it a buck: he and many of his Groypers want the AoC abolished entirely). This position does nothing but damage his reputation, his movement, and his brand, but - like a Liberal coming to the defense of Somalis stealing American taxpayer money or trans athletes in sports - he is committed to die on this doomed hill for some retarded reason.

Maybe it's a test tube baby thing or something idk.


Any influencer who has talked negatively of Fuentes recently and doesn't run with this is either an incompetent doofus, complicit in trying to inorganically prop Nick up, or they just share his views on the issue and don't want to publicly lambast the idea of lowering/abolishing the age of consent. There's no other reason. There hasn't been a better opportunity to blast Nick in months and he just offered the perfect money shot to anyone who's been looking for one.
It took me forever to realize you were saying age of consent instead of the lady in politics lol. Most politicians are obviously into fucking teenagers. He's just trying to blend in
 
I suppose it remains to be seen on how effective this will be.
Not very. He's obviously correct that the Epstein affair is being covered up by both parties because it was an intelligence operation to gather blackmail material, that's not even new information. Also not new information is that Fuentes doesn't really care about 16-year-olds having sex, and yes, that actually is the age of consent of many states and countries no matter how one feels about it. This is all mostly playing to people who blindly a-log him and slobber over anything they feel they can twist to his disadvantage. Those people are welcome to leave the trash cans and top hats below.
 
Those people are welcome to leave the trash cans and top hats below.
Tsk tsk, you deserve better than that, you big brain, you.
 

Attachments

  • 32fjxg.jpg
    32fjxg.jpg
    88 KB · Views: 16
"Alex is built like a bull, all muscle" :story:

Never beating the gayllegations
He probably thought "bear" in his mind and changed it to bull when speaking at the last moment to not make it too obvious. Now instead of sounding like a gay porn reference it sounds like a cuck porn reference.
Man, Alex Jones looks and sounds horrible.
He sounds like he chain smokes, maybe that's it?
 
Nick talks about it on his show:

View attachment 8430904
He's one hunrend percent gay it's like watching an epsiode of South Park. I've never watched South Park though cause I'm not that retarded

He probably thought "bear" in his mind and changed it to bull when speaking at the last moment to not make it too obvious. Now instead of sounding like a gay porn reference it sounds like a cuck porn reference.

He sounds like he chain smokes, maybe that's it?
It's probably all the tranny cock he's choking on
 
LMAO, flip-flopping so hard he is starting to sound like his arch nemesis, Bronze Age Pervert :story:
View attachment 8417388
For context, here is the full section.

A clip where he talks about Jeffrey Epstein "not being a pedophile."

EDIT: Here is a transcript for the video.
Dude, brother, so true, so true. That is so absolutely true. And listen, you niggas are not ready for that conversation, but Jeff Epstein, not a pedophile, but you're not ready for that conversation. All of his victims, 14 to 17, that's not pedophilia. But y'all niggas ain't ready for that conversation. People say that's normalizing pedophilia, no, that's defining pedophilia.

Pedophilia is sex with children. Children are people that are before the age of sexual maturity. Now you can have your opinion and your taste and your ethics and your morals, but after the age of 14, that is past the point of sexual maturity, just period, biologically. And all of these feminists and all of their accomplices, the simps, they all want to say there's only two genders. They want to talk about reproduction and genitals. Okay, let's talk about reproduction and genitals.

When do men and women reach the age of sexual maturity? It ain't 18. It isn't 20. I've seen women say a 20-year-old girl is a literal child. No, sorry, she's not even a figurative child, let alone a literal child. You know what canon law in the Catholic church says? It says the minimum age to get married is 14 for women, 16 for men. That's the canon law of the Catholic church. So you want to pull rank on me with morality, I would take you there. And by the way, that's how it was for thousands and thousands and thousands of years. Do you know when age of consent became a thing? Like 30 years ago.

That is a second wave feminist artifact. But you people are not ready for that because ultimately feminism is the matrix. And that is how women have browbeaten men with this pedo, rapist, misogynist, all these words, all these words to prop up women's rights. That's ultimately what it's about. It's about women completing high school and going to college. That's what it is. You know? The only reason, and let me tell you this, I'm not in favor of like everybody go have sex with 14-year-olds. I'm not saying that. I'm saying that the only reason that people are so horrified when people talk about like 16 and 17 not really being immoral, it's because we have a culture of casual sex and pornography and hookups and prostitution.

That's why. Why is it considered completely depraved at age 17 and a half versus 18? Because we hate the idea of young, vulnerable girls being preyed upon by strange men, by pimps, by pornographers. That's why it is abhorrent. Because there is something true about that. If you are grooming a child into sex, if you are—or I should say a teenager. If you're grooming a teenager into sex, if you're grooming a teenager into prostitution, pornography, that is especially wicked because teenage girls are vulnerable. Teenage girls arguably cannot make those decisions. But that is only because we live in a society where that kind of predation is happening. And that's where it starts to make sense when women say, a 19-year-old is a child. Well, no, a 19-year-old isn't a child. However, a 19-year-old teenage girl might be just as susceptible to grooming as a 17-year-old. That's why it seems arbitrary.

A 19-year-old teenage girl, an 18-year-old teenage girl might be just as susceptible to manipulation and grooming as a 17- or 16-year-old girl by a man who only wants sex from her without marrying her, by a man that wants to pimp her out, that wants, you know, whatever, all these things that are happening in our society. So what are we really talking about? What we're talking about is women being taken advantage of. And we're saying that it is especially heinous when a younger, more vulnerable girl is taken advantage of.

Consent is not—I don't think that's really a real thing. I think that's like a feminist construct. And these, like, legal limits, I think that's very arbitrary. What we're talking about is younger girls that are sexually mature being taken advantage of. But take that up with a society that doesn't value marriage. Here's the difference. In the old days, girls would get married at 16. And I think far fewer people would object to that. Some people still might. Girls would get married at 15, 16, 17. But you recognize that that's different. If they're in a marriage where they're being provided for, they're going to have kids, they're going to become a mother, they're going to build a life with a man who's going to love them.

That's different, actually, than the society we have today. And the only reason you need age of consent is because we have a society that's built on the pill. We have a society that's built on birth control. We have a society that's built on abortion, pornography, increasingly, all these other things. And so now when we think of, like, sex and women, we think, oh my gosh, make the age of consent 21. Because why would we want an 18-year-old girl to have her 18th birthday and then get on OnlyFans? It's insane.

Why would we want a girl to turn 18 and be able to become an escort or sleep with any and every guy in college? It's gross. But that's only because we hate the idea of women being taken advantage of. But you know what? Women can be taken advantage of at any age because women are emotional, trusting, more so than men. Women are easier to manipulate. And younger women easier than more mature women. And that's really the issue. So don't take it up with, you know, people love to say pedophilia. That's really the wrong lens. No, actually, that's not pedophilia. And I think that there is such a hysteria about that and obsession with that on the right. And I think, like everything else, it defines down what a heinous crime pedophilia really is and what a perversion it really is. And I'm not, like, raising a flag for child marriage or something, but I'm saying let's just get our history straight and let's start to understand sexual immorality.

Let's start to understand some of these sexual issues. Why do you think we are such a sexually dysfunctional society? It's because men and women become sexually mature and active years, years before they're even supposed to consider getting married. You're setting them up for failure. Men and women are able to have sex. And by that, I mean reproduce, want to have sex far earlier, years earlier. And we're telling them it's not even lawful to do that for years. And don't even consider doing it licently until way after that. What's the average or median age couples get married in the United States? It's like 28. Does that make any fucking sense? So if a man and a woman reach the age of sexual maturity in their teens, we're telling them you have to wait 10 years.

And what, they're going to be chased that whole time? What are they going to do for those 10 years? When are women most fertile? It's not at 28. I'll tell you that much. And we wonder why we have a fertility crisis. We wonder why we have all kinds of other sexual dysfunction. And that is the uncomfortable truth that nobody wants to talk about. That is second wave feminism all day long. That is all this bodily autonomy. All of that is basically first and second wave feminism. Because if you go to the old world, if you go to Europe, it ain't like that. And if you go to the Catholic church, it's not like that. If you go to the history in Europe and basically every other society, it isn't like that. And people say, well, you just really want a child bride. I really don't. You know, if or when I get married, it's not going to be to a 15-year-old. It'll probably be to somebody that's in their 20s, honestly. You know, that being said, I am a tireless defender of the truth. And, you know, a lot of people don't like this. It's an unpopular take, but it is the truth. So, and that is a feminist issue. So, and people don't even realize they're peddling feminism when they say this. That's a literal child.

Oh, my God. It's like, no, it's actually not a literal child at all. You can say that they're vulnerable, but they're not vulnerable. You could say that they should be protected, and I would agree with you. You could say it's particularly heinous that a teenage girl is trafficked and groomed. Absolutely, it is downright evil, millstone and everything. I'm in absolute agreement with you. It is particularly heinous because they're more corruptible. I agree with you. You could say, well, it's still illegal, and I agree with you there, too. But when people say it's pedophilia, it's a child as if there's no distinction, well, that just fucking isn't true at all, and it's creating hysteria. And you know what? I also think it's hurting society in general.

I feel like, and I'll just say as a guy, you feel like society is becoming so paranoid because of this obsession with pedophilia. How can you really have a family-based society if every guy is terrified of being called a pedophile or a rapist? And that's kind of the society that we live in, don't you think? I mean, and I don't think I'm the first one to say this either, but you really cannot have a society that has any kind of communal fabric or anything like that if every man lives in a constant state of terror that they will be accused of being a rapist, of being a pedophile. How can you have a society where there's many generations of people all living among each other, all over the place? You can't even talk about these issues.

People are terrified. People are terrified to even say it. They dare not say it out loud. People are terrified because of this hysterical stuff that goes on. And then people wonder why we're such an anti-life society. It's because we are puritanical about this kind of stuff, puritanical in a feminist way about this stuff. And now we have a society where when and where is sex supposed to occur? I guess it's supposed to happen after college or something, when everybody's ready to settle down. After women have gone to high school and gone to college, and they're all having sex anyway and hooking up, and women are being liberated. You know, it's totally insane.

So no, we have to deconstruct all of feminism, not just, not just, oh, well, you're a blue-haired raging feminist. Okay, you're a woman with a talk show screeching about pedophilia and misogyny and all. Like, how are you literally any different? But this is why Western civilization is dying. Every decadent civilization that gives itself over to feminist women dies. And I think it dies because it becomes impossible to fight against. And the reason nobody wants to fight against it, because if you're a man and you go against the matriarchy, the gynocracy, you are ostracized. So nobody wants to do it. Nobody wants to upset their wife, girlfriend, daughter, prospective partner. Nobody wants to offend. Nobody wants to offend their friend's wife, you know, because women are the gatekeepers of society. And so then nobody wants to say it because they don't want to be that guy. But, you know, I'm already that guy.

So, so I'll say it. So yeah, I mean, look, Epstein, baller-ass nigga. And look, yeah, okay, criminal. But when people say, oh, he's a, he's this pedophile satanic. Candace Owens put out this tweet. She said he was given triplets. That is a fabrication. That was made up by Virginia Giuffre, a serial fabulist who makes up a ton of shit. Not a reliable person at all. It just isn't true. But you're a fucking dumbass who believes everything you hear on the internet. No, Virginia Giuffre, not everything she said is true. What was proven in court is that the victims were between the ages of 14 and 17. Yeah, that is evil. I mean, don't get me wrong. It's absolutely evil. Grooming vulnerable girls from broken homes who are younger than they should be into prostitution. It's like one of the most evil things. I never for a second defended it. I didn't say it wasn't evil or criminal. I said, but it's not ritualistic, pedophiliac, satanic abuse. It's a different category. And the reason I, the reason you even make the distinction is because one has to do with like magic. One is like, oh, they're sacrificing infants to ball to drink their blood for adrenochrome because they're just that sick.

Another is like, why are they looking for underage girls for blackmail? Obviously. Why are they scouting out the youngest girls? Because it's illegal. Because it's barely illegal. Why does that matter? So that they pass so that you can trick people so that you can blackmail them. That is the purpose. Some people say you're defending it. I'm not defending it. It's still evil. It's still heinous for all the reasons you think.

But the reason you draw a distinction is because the kind of abuse that was occurring is bound up with the purpose of it. Why were they selected from that cohort? Why were there none younger than 14? Why was that? Why were the majority of them in that age bracket? Because it was a blackmail ring. If you can find girls that are on the cusp of being legal, you can get someone on Lolita Express to have sex with them, record it, and then blackmail them because that's what Epstein was. And that's the point, which I said yesterday and I said the night before, not to get it twisted and get hysterical and sensational. The claims about Epstein just get crazier and crazier. He was given triplets to rape for the devil and blah, blah. And it's ritualistic, satanic abuse. No, no. One person claimed that. She's a serial liar. She made tens of millions of dollars in settlements. None of that has been proven.

What was proven in court, why Jeffrey Epstein was charged and convicted based on interviews with hundreds of people, is that the age bracket was 14 to 17. They're filming everything because they're running a blackmail ring. And so it's important to understand what you're talking about. It's not to say that it isn't bad, evil, predatory. Obviously it is. Of course it is.

No one would suggest otherwise. But women, man, oh man, so touchy about that subject. And why do you think it is? Because women are vulnerable, and so they're very sensitive about any subject like that. And so as a result, they try to attack everything. Everything is rape and pedophilia. Okay, so how are young men supposed to get along in this day and age? It's crazy. Because the amount of hysteria about abuse, think about how abuse has been redefined. If a guy is shitty to his wife, he's an emotional abuser, he's a baller, she leaves. If a guy has sex with a woman and she doesn't want it 10 years later, it's rape.

I have seen it recently. If like a 21-year-old guy is in a relationship with a 17-year-old girl, he's a pedophile, it doesn't matter, that's lower than the age of consent. What? And everything is like this, and it's always hysterical, and no one can argue the other side because then you're a creep. I don't give a shit. Call me a creep. I don't care. I only defend myself. I only tell the truth, women. I only tell the truth, feminists. Feminists, hysterical freaks. So anyway.
🧹: any off-topic sperging about politics will result in a threadban. This is a lolcow thread.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He almost comes close to making very good points and then just chokes on cock. It's really incredible. He's terminally unlikable.

Edit: It's an 18-minute clip so I should have expected people not actually watch it, but it's actually worth a watch if you're interested at all about why Nick Fuentes has both a huge cult following and is also roundly despised with zero real path forward towards being a credible political ally for anyone. He gets close to saying things that make sense but then spikes it into the ground with some immediate follow-up dipshit statement. It's a really good capsule for his identity.
 
Last edited:
For context, here is the full section.
A clip where he talks about Jeffrey Epstein "not being a pedophile."
Is this it? Is this the downfall of Nicholas Gay Fuentes?

Jesus this is just disgusting. He's encouraging his dumb fans to start raping minors. That's literally going to be their only takeaway from this. They're too mentally challenged to think for themselves, and now their Mexican gay saviour is giving them the thumbs up to go and lure on teens.

"I don't think consent is really a real thing" NICK WTF ARE YOU DOING JESUS CHRIST???
 
I give it to Sunday morning before Tucker Carlson claims he was right about Nick being a federal asset during the interview they had together. What the fuck was he thinking?
 
Back
Top Bottom