💰 Grifter Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

Big Miss Steak said:
"I'm just telling the truth here... women are most fertile at 15. Not, you know, 28."

This data comes from studies done in the 1700s, where they cobbled together birth records from churches in France and from there calculated how likely women were to get pregnant at certain ages. It should go without saying that in the age of modern medicine, fertility assistance, nutrition, etc. that these archaic numbers should no longer be regurgitated. We know now that a woman's ability to get pregnant and have a healthy pregnancy peaks around age 24. Hm, a lot closer to 28 than 15. We also know that the vast majority of couples in their mid to late 30s are able to conceive within a year of trying (https://www.med.unc.edu/timetoconceive/how-long-can-you-wait-to-have-a-baby/).

What is notable is that IVF is far less successful for women in their 30s. Perhaps this is why Nick advocates for teen pregnancies.
Click to expand...
That wouldn't even be an argument though. Just because they're fertile doesn't mean you should desperately empregnante them as soon as you can
 
onebigone said:
That wouldn't even be an argument though. Just because they're fertile doesn't mean you should desperately empregnante them as soon as you can
Click to expand...
I'm just refuting what Fuentes said, which is a worryingly common belief: that peak fertility for women is in the mid teens. I even hear my Southern Baptist family say this sometimes. They don't advocate for child marriage mind you, but they try to defend how my grandmothers got married at 15/16. Interestingly enough, my great-grandmothers got married at 19/20.

This belief is used to justify teen girls being shoved into the role of mother and wife. It is used to justify child marriage. Women are not psychologically or physically ready for motherhood at the age of 15, not even close. Which then leaves us with the only, true reason to advocate for marrying 15 year old girls: you're a pedophile. When you point out that science does not back this "peak fertility at teen years" myth, you remove a common shield that these creeps hide behind.
 
onebigone said:
There's probably some cope and enabling going cause he's catholic. A surprising amount of them don't like looking down on pedophilia too much because of all the kiddy diddling the Popes do. Same thing Muslims do whenever you bring up Muhammed
Click to expand...
Without a doubt. Catholicism is an outfit that Nick wears to feel better than others. The previous pope was quoted with the claim that roughly 2% of all catholic clergy are pedos, and plenty more are aware of the problem but refuse to speak out.
Big Miss Steak said:
We know now that a woman's ability to get pregnant and have a healthy pregnancy peaks around age 24. Hm, a lot closer to 28 than 15. We also know that the vast majority of couples in their mid to late 30s are able to conceive within a year of trying (https://www.med.unc.edu/timetoconceive/how-long-can-you-wait-to-have-a-baby/).
Click to expand...
Nick's little cult of freaks refuse to even do a google search because basic biological facts don't help them justify their pedophilic tendencies. The groyper movement thrives by collecting the fools and degenerates, then giving those people a place in the cult of Mutt Fuentes. Every groyper "general" is a pedophile or an STD-riddled homosexual.
 
asipasip said:
He is being wrangled.
Click to expand...
1768675678647.png
Even Tucker felt bad for him :story:
taxedbrass said:
Anyway atp I think it's fairly obvious that Nick is working backwards from a conclusion he's already committed to. He's just trying to make what's basically his evident pedophilic fetish sound principled. Like he spends half the time here insisting he's not defending pedophilia while obsessively returning to defend it and reframe it and minimize it, and then of course blame everyone else for being supposedly hysterical about it, which is obviously some form of rationalization. It's all motivated reasoning.
Click to expand...
What I'm still confused by is the sheer amount of pedophiles or pedo-sympathizers out there. The number would seem absurdly high. What is it with pedophiles seeking fame and power?
gaysexenjoyer said:
Nick literally doesn't have a dad, so I'm leaning towards the "insane mother" explanation.
Click to expand...
Wait, what do you mean? I've seen pictures of his father and, according to Nick, both parents were present growing up. Am I missing something?
Kofi Drinka said:
Men bond through sex. Having sex with someone is bonding with them to men.
Click to expand...
Do you bond with your fellow men by getting fucked in the ass?
Gibs said:
Nick Fuentes doubles down and states, “Epstein is my boy, dude. Lets be honest, Epstein was cool as fuck."
Click to expand...
Ew. Oh my God, ew.
mayuyu’s sweetie pie said:
can someone explain to me whatever happened to this? it wasn’t so long to justify a whole 180 on this like that
Click to expand...
Awesome find, thanks :3
 
Null said:
He almost comes close to making very good points and then just chokes on cock. It's really incredible. He's terminally unlikable.

Edit: It's an 18-minute clip so I should have expected people not actually watch it, but it's actually worth a watch if you're interested at all about why Nick Fuentes has both a huge cult following and is also roundly despised with zero real path forward towards being a credible political ally for anyone. He gets close to saying things that make sense but then spikes it into the ground with some immediate follow-up dipshit statement. It's a really good capsule for his identity.
Click to expand...
He makes a bunch of good points with things like how untrustworthy society is and the protections are put in place specifically to counteract external factors without solving the core issue.

E.g. Stuff like onlyfans is so normalized people want to make age of consent 21 because we don't want 18 year olds on onlyfans or on escort websites, but that's just a race to the bottom.

The argument that the problem isn't really the age of consent itself as much as the modern society considers acceptable even for adults (escorts, prostitution, onlyfans, whoring, etc) is a reasonable one but then has to ruin it with shit like calling epstein a "baller ass nigga." and complaining about pedo definitions.

The way he intentionally fucks up the point he's making is a good argument for him being a plant.
 
Last edited:
Endless Blabbery said:
View attachment 8436229
Even Tucker felt bad for him :story:

What I'm still confused by is the sheer amount of pedophiles or pedo-sympathizers out there. The number would seem absurdly high. What is it with pedophiles seeking fame and power?

Wait, what do you mean? I've seen pictures of his father and, according to Nick, both parents were present growing up. Am I missing something?

Do you bond with your fellow men by getting fucked in the ass?

Ew. Oh my God, ew.

Awesome find, thanks :3
Click to expand...
Fame and power allows them to exploit others easily
 
Elwood P. Dowd said:
Jesus Christ, why doesn't he just come out and say that if there's grass on the field they're ready to play? Maybe that'll be the next video.
Click to expand...
If she's old enough to bleed, she's old enough to breed. Not that Nick Fuentes would ever impregnate a woman of any age. He's into thin. Little twinks.
Nick Fuentes, a pedophile defender Bronze Age pervert, is A pedophile defender. Is there anybody on the right or the left in the radical spaces who is in a closeted child molester? We have grinder Greg Johnson. Gaul. From TRS. Adam Kukinski. Hassan Paiko. Contra points is most likely a pedophile. I have no evidence for that. They just look like one.
 
Oilspill Battery said:
The way he intentionally fucks up the point he's making is a good argument for him being a plant.
Click to expand...

I felt this way about “TERF”/anti trans people they’d feature during the height of the tranny hysteria. They’d start out with a great argument about health risks to kids or entrenchment of toxic stereotypes or something…. Only to choke in bizarre ways, like mixing up transman (woman who says she’s a man) with transwoman (man who says he’s a woman), or say something about how troons are bad because they’re all faggots (wrong…everyone knows the most noxious troons are the transbians), etc.
 
The whole "ephebophilia" and "pedophilia" argument is such a classic textbook argument of a predator. Are they technically right in that its not the same thing? I guess, yes. But it doesn't make dating/raping a minor right. At all. It is an attempt at distancing one's self from a phrase that people use to identify creeps and people preying on children and teenagers. Ephebophilia is as bad as pedophilia. Minors' brains, even when they're 15 or 16, are still not developed enough yet to truly understand the weight of their actions. Nick Fuentes does not understand this.

And of course he uses the whole "well people practiced it for hundreds if not thousands of years" argument.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom