Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unless the Son of a bitch somehow survives long enough to add augmentations to his body. Speaking of that, what does he think of the comic book character Cyborg? The kid/man who often laments the near half-life he lives?
Luckily for the unsuperior, beetus makes closing wounds virtually impossible, so no one would put him under the knife.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Uncanny Valley
I won't be surprised if an algorithm for analyzing Hollywood fare is within today's technology. The program figures out the genre and the basic gist of the plot, then assign a score based on genre-specific criteria: number of car chases and explosions in action films, jump scares in horror, will-they-or-won't-they moments in chick flicks, etc. You may assign a "diversity quotient" if you want too! It is another matter to review a Japanese or Chilean mind-fuck, but the shit Bobby loves are extremely derivative and transparent. Hence, "critics" like him belong squarely to the Inferior Past -- after all, who wants to watch an obese potato man if you can watch a sexy CGI avatar?
The thing is, Bob tries to look like a fan of gonzo movies. He listed Takashi Miike on his list of favorite directors, sperged about Larry Cohen at one point and he gave The Handmaiden and The Neon Demon respectively the #1 & #2 spots on his best of 2016 list. The thing is, it's so transparent that he prefers the safe, accessible confines of mediocre, big-budget blockbusters that nobody believes his "love" for more of these mindfuck movies.
 
you mean he will eventually become this.....

latest

Only this time he won't be a super genius
 
Bob still on the "Trump voters are subhuman" train, I see:
IMG_7303.jpg


And I'm just gonna go ahead and assume the following is a total reach:
NotEvenWrong.JPG
 
Bob still on the "Trump voters are subhuman" train, I see:
View attachment 237279

And I'm just gonna go ahead and assume the following is a total reach:
View attachment 237280
I've seen, "Voting for x is voting against your own interests," countless times, by dems, repubs and libertarians. It is always an attempt to frame the subject as too stupid to know their own self-interests and near universally violently rejected. It is one of those phrases no politician should ever use.

This Inception version is a new one. "Your primary interests are actually fucking over those other people, but you are going against your interests to do so." If there was a way to incorporate your future interests into the equation, they might be on to something.
 
Dunno about Bob himself, but the rest of the hard left has no problem calling them "Uncle Toms."
I've never read "Uncle Tom's Cabin", and neither has most of the people who use the insult, but wasn't the character a martyr who gave his life to save escaped slaves and the "sentimental about being a slave" was a bastardized version of him from plays around the Civil War by pro-slavery groups? If so, it's an extremely ironic insult.
 
Last edited:
What about minority Trump voters? Are they stupid niggers, Bob?

No silly, they are simply (un-ironically) called "Old Toms" and "Coons" by them and others. Never mind aside from muh representation arguments and possibly more socialist views on economics, that Black Americans tend to have more socially conservative viewpoints.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Adamska
Black people also tend to not like fat white fucks telling them how to think.

How much are ya'll willing to bet Blobbert locks the door when he sees a niggo on the street?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Spellskite
I've seen, "Voting for x is voting against your own interests," countless times, by dems, repubs and libertarians. It is always an attempt to frame the subject as too stupid to know their own self-interests and near universally violently rejected. It is one of those phrases no politician should ever use.

This Inception version is a new one. "Your primary interests are actually fucking over those other people, but you are going against your interests to do so." If there was a way to incorporate your future interests into the equation, they might be on to something.

The first one is kind of neccisary to your own internal logic and is not without historical precident. We have to conceed the posibility of bad choices in terms of voted in as they already have. Democracy creating Nixons, Silvio Berlusconi and frankly, both candidates in the 2016 election is the same as freedom of speech allowing Racism or capitalism producing souless inept mega-corps. The trick is to internalize it within yourself -"we failed to persuade the public, we must try harder next time " is the correct response as opposed to Bob's lashing out "they're voting against their interests because they're stupid."

The inception one is totally bonkers and shows a complete failure to grasp human psychology at a rudementry level.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Begemot and Lorento
The first one is kind of neccisary to your own internal logic and is not without historical precident. We have to conceed the posibility of bad choices in terms of voted in as they already have. Democracy creating Nixons, Silvio Berlusconi and frankly, both candidates in the 2016 election is the same as freedom of speech allowing Racism or capitalism producing souless inept mega-corps. The trick is to internalize it within yourself -"we failed to persuade the public, we must try harder next time " is the correct response as opposed to Bob's lashing out "they're voting against their interests because they're stupid."

The inception one is totally bonkers and shows a complete failure to grasp human psychology at a rudementry level.

Also, it is rather selfish to assume that one knows what their interests are. A farmer may have different needs and interests as opposed to some city-slicker, yet I am seeing this city folk contempt for anything that isn't city grow more and more. Talk about biting the hand that feeds, but I guess Bob instead wants multinational corporations with no local ties to grow his food so it will be cheap and disenfranchise them, rather than realize that the current globalist system is deeply flawed and deeply corrupt. Not to mention going to push for more Post-national policies will further cement that corruption, it is as if the bastard has never read or watched any Science Fiction piece aside from Star Wars and Star Trek.
 
The first one is kind of neccisary to your own internal logic and is not without historical precident. We have to conceed the posibility of bad choices in terms of voted in as they already have. Democracy creating Nixons, Silvio Berlusconi and frankly, both candidates in the 2016 election is the same as freedom of speech allowing Racism or capitalism producing souless inept mega-corps. The trick is to internalize it within yourself -"we failed to persuade the public, we must try harder next time " is the correct response as opposed to Bob's lashing out "they're voting against their interests because they're stupid."

Bob saying that people are voting against their own interests when they vote for the Republicans has always troubled me on a fundamental level. Are we to assume that if Hillary had been elected the public would be currently experiencing a golden age of culture and wealth?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back