حلال Alex Figueroa / Idominatio / Red Inside the Brownhole - Pedophile Ween from Mexico, likes Sewer Orgies

Xerxes IX said:
Keep in mind his original intent with that anecdote was to call Stephen King a pedo but he ended up outing himself instead :story:
Click to expand...
I hadn't even noticed that last sentence where he made his actual point in the lolcow resume he surrounded it with. He should have both led and ended with that.
IMG_2911.JPG
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Apteryx Owenii, Johnny Bravo and 3 others
Alex "Idominatio" Figueroa said:
How much time do you think it took to find her Twitter? It was that same day, I didn't thought about it, I was just bandwaggoning like a fucking kid, not knowing what I was doing, like a fucking kid, just trying to impress and be edgy, like a goddamn kid, secondly I don't get close to children, shit I don't look at them, and after all this, all you've managed to find was done either years ago before I was an adult or denouncing pedophilia like the awful shit it is.
Because is deviant? No that's subjective.
Because is phisically harmful? Yes but mostly because ITS FUCKING SLAVERY. That's the conclusion I came up with all this time and that I've been preaching whenever asked.
I know its bad shit, I wanna have discussions about it to make sure people know it' whenever I find a pedo in 8ch I always engage in discussion with him, to make sure he knows this, because I've spend years trying to find a tangible reason why is it bad.
Do I feel bad, of course I grew up, but I won't lie to you, a 16yo me is laughing at me right now with you guys trying to ruin me, is it karmic, definitely, is it fair? No. I'm a lolcow, now, I'm under heavy scrutiny by you guys you'll know if I fuck up.
Click to expand...

pendejo
 
  • Winner
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and Super Collie
You know whats even funnier, Stephen King till this day admits that he had no idea what the fuck he was doing when he wrote that scene and considering he was high off his ass on cocane when he wrote Cujo ( and has no memories of writing Cujo) one can only imagine.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: FuckedUp, Bunny Tracks, Vicki V and 16 others
Satan said:
I think his productivity is hella impressive. Just because some deviant likes his works does not make him a bad writer. No shit he's not Nobel Prize material but I've seen a lot, lot worse.
Click to expand...

His work ethic is admirable, but he's almost a victim of his own success in that he doesn't seem to have editors willing to chop the stuff that's crap. Most of his super long books could use with about a third fewer pages. And then there are just things that shouldn't even be in there at all, like that scene from It that started this tangent.

He has also had the excellent luck to have adaptations of his work that were in some cases better than the original. The Shining is a pretty obvious example and it's an excellent book.
 
  • Agree
  • Disagree
  • Informative
Reactions: FataBataRang, limecouch, InnocentPerson and 17 others
AnOminous said:
His work ethic is admirable, but he's almost a victim of his own success in that he doesn't seem to have editors willing to chop the stuff that's crap. Most of his super long books could use with about a third fewer pages. And then there are just things that shouldn't even be in there at all, like that scene from It that started this tangent.

He has also had the excellent luck to have adaptations of his work that were in some cases better than the original. The Shining is a pretty obvious example and it's an excellent book.
Click to expand...

Yeah, "Which is the best movie adaptation of Stephen King" is a fun game, even though he hated practically all of them.

(The Shining; Carrie; Misery)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vocaloid Ruby and kookerpie
AnOminous said:
His work ethic is admirable, but he's almost a victim of his own success in that he doesn't seem to have editors willing to chop the stuff that's crap. Most of his super long books could use with about a third fewer pages. And then there are just things that shouldn't even be in there at all, like that scene from It that started this tangent.
Click to expand...

A case in point is Insomnia. I haven't read a Stephen King book since I was a teenager, and it's because that is the book that turned me off from ever reading anything from him ever again.

It is looooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnngggggggg, the pacing is atrocious, the first several hundred pages involve absolutely nothing happening but a widowed old man seeing auras around people and crazy evil midget doctors that nobody else can see (there is no build up or intrigue or tension, it's the same very slow, very boring, very uneventful shit for literally hundreds of pages with no progression), then suddenly the focus jarringly shifts and the book turns into a pro-choice diatribe about anti-abortion terrorists. Even though it's extremely long, I read 95% of that book before putting it down for good and I never even bothered to Google what the ending was.

I honestly have a theory that Insomia was deliberately written to be an unbelievably terrible book because King was curious if such a book would still sell and/or get good reviews. There is precedent with him playing around with such experiments, the Bachman books being the main example.

AnOminous said:
He has also had the excellent luck to have adaptations of his work that were in some cases better than the original. The Shining is a pretty obvious example and it's an excellent book.
Click to expand...

And funny enough, King has absolutely and unequivocally hated the film for almost 40 years now, more so than pretty much any other film adaptation of his work. I think mostly because it was an extremely personal book that was an allegory for his own addiction issues and therefore he's unable to look at any changes to the source material objectively.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: FataBataRang, KimCoppolaAficionado, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 8 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back