The Kiwifarms Unofficial Sci-Fi/Fantasy Book Club

Too bad The Ark didn't win, I'm partial to generation ships but two Fatrick books are too much (admittedly one Fatrick book is too much).

Fuck it, I'm facetanking the philosophical horror of Permutation City to put off Tomlinson a bit longer.
Please post your impressions!

Here's a fun question, how many of you all have read Lovecraft, Robert E. Howard, or Clark Ashton Smith?
Some Lovecraft, some Howard, CAS's 5-volume collection (🏴‍☠️) back to back, plus a Stephen King short story (which was the first Lovecraftian thing I've read and a cut above King's other writing).

The best/scariest of the CAS collection were The Vaults of Yoh-Vombis (supposedly very popular — looking back, it'd be standard horror fare but for my crippling fear of slugs, people stumble in the dark and get eaten but the monsters don't present a danger to the outside world) and The Double Shadow (superb visuals, it can make for a great short horror movie, not that CAS would've taken it as a compliment).

(Egan's Permutation City is scarier still, utterly bone-chilling. I later found out there's a sequel in which the guy who memed himself into suicide to get to the anime girl dimension actually got to the anime girl dimension, which retroactively spoiled some of it.)
 
>long ago the evil WHITE walkers nearly destroyed the hecking world!
>some people are old enough to still remember!
>but there are many young people now who never saw the Na- I mean, the dark winter, and don't believe it could happen again!
>oy vey, well what if it DID happen again?!


He is literally the epitome of Boomer WW2 obsessives unable to tell any other story except to relate it to Nazis and WW2. I can't believe I actually gave this slop a read, I should've known something was up when normies were seal clapping for it!
71nK5FjjYVL.jpg
 
Last edited:
(Egan's Permutation City is scarier still, utterly bone-chilling. I later found out there's a sequel in which the guy who memed himself into suicide to get to the anime girl dimension actually got to the anime girl dimension, which retroactively spoiled some of it.)
Admittedly it’s been a while since I read Permutation City, but I don’t remember it being particularly scary. I first read it before I ever tried cannabis, and it had a similar mind-expanding effect.

Nerds discover a computer science trick they think will achieve them an afterlife, they die, I think gruesomely in a murder-suicide that is more sad than scary, they wake up and discover their insane plan actually worked and they are in an afterlife of sorts, then at the very end some other creatures figure out the same trick but use it in a way that deletes the afterlife of everyone who had used it before

(Damn, now I gotta re-read it and see if my memories are failing me and it’s actually horrifying…)

I do remember Egan’s short stories about the math wars being very very scary. The titles are “Luminous” and “Dark Integers”.
 
Please post your impressions!
I might effort post later, but my first impression was one of vicious solipsism; the ending of part 2 where the Autoverse life being smarter and denying their creators somehow alters Permutation City's causal relationship with the Autoverse sets up an actively antiwondrous cosmos where any hint of strangeness (beyond the strangeness of your own pattern's subjective persistence) is not just epistemologically but ontologically corroded by Occam's Razor, the way Redditors believe the maxim works. It's both smug in that new atheist mode, yet also hellish in ways that Greg refuses to explore: by Greg's own reasoning there should be some subjectively continuous post-disembowelment Durham pattern somewhere out there, too, but probably experiencing godawful hallucinations as his sensorium gets waterboarded by the conditions "his" substrate snapshots keep remanifesting within; after all, it's much more likely that something functionally equivalent to just his brain pop into existence somewhere, than his brain's functional equivalent and a series of pleasant, continuous sensory inputs manifest simultaneously. In fact, given Durham's delusions and the solipsistic themes of the book in combination with the ending implication that sufficiently justified belief can affect ontology, I might even argue that Permutation City exhibited consistency because Paul Durham was deluded enough to expect it to, not because it had any reason to continue coherently.

In short, despite being lauded as hard sci-fi it's weirdly Idealist and new-agey (in the "it's all in your head maaaan, your belief makes it real" way) if you ignore the technobabble and only pay attention to all the retarded stuff that's happening.

There's also the issue that identity over time as anything "real" seems to get bodied (is subjective continuity really sufficient?) but I don't have the chops to extract all of Greg's positions on it.
 
Last edited:
There's also the issue that identity over time as anything "real" seems to get bodied (is subjective continuity really sufficient?) but I don't have the chops to extract all of Greg's positions on it.
It has been awhile since I read it, but I got the impression that he didn't take the base idea seriously and got a little sloppy in the story telling because of that. He entertained the idea but wasn't as stringent as he normally is.
 
(Damn, now I gotta re-read it and see if my memories are failing me and it’s actually horrifying…)
Well, scary is subjective, but I'll try to explain why I find it scary.

I'm not into computer stuff, I don't get the philosophical implications and whatnot (but maybe that's for the best).
I'm also not into hard cyberpunk at all. So, the cyber-content I've seen comes in two varieties:
(1) Shadowrun style: yeah megacorps are bad. It's funny, it's sad, it's prescient, it's not very scary. (Loren L. Coleman is a fraud, and David A. Hill Jr. is a pedophile.)
(2) homogay philosophical normie baby's first sci-fi. An example: there's a game titled "Soma" where the big tweeest, meant to be UNEXPECTED and HORRIFYING and THOT-PROVOKING, is when a cyber entity (you the player) is copied into an evacuation pod, and the copy you get to see to the game's ending is the original that doesn't get rescued. Overwhelmingly Pozzed! 6 million copies sold! The acclaim this game's enjoyed makes me hate humanity so much IHNMIAMS's AM should be asking me for tips to maximize hate per Teraflop.

Also, at the time I first read Permutation City, I was, well, not so much bullish on AI as bearish on biological immortality: specifically, a game designer / doctor who I was a fan of said that however fantastical AI was, physical immortality was (is) even more implausible, we'd have to get used to the notion of robot children conquering the universe. All the drawbacks about being a robot I knew at the time were either homogay baby's first bullshit (see above) or no different from challenges faced by contemporary organic humans (reprogramming, memory manipulation, viruses, etc). Even Leiji Matsumoto (picrelated, he created my space angel waifu) couldn't really offer a meaningful drawback to robothood other than "it's expensive, only rich assholes become robots mechanical humans" (fact: they're "mechanical humans" because "robot" comes from the Slavic root "work").

Permutation City has:
  • poorfags who can't afford computer time and have to live in extremely slow mode, with IRL centuries passing for every subjective second
  • a guy who gets cucked and locks himself in an infinite loop (I've always found unwinnable states in gamebooks scarier than the standard "you're dead!")
  • a guy who committed murder and feels performatively-regretful about it so creates a copy of himself to get tortured
  • a guy who gets too much into citizen computer science that he disembowels himself to go to the anime girl dimension
This last guy reminded me of Fermatists (the t is not silent) and (they don't have a special name but) Quantum Mechanics. As in, normies who get into some famous scientific problem and go crazy trying to solve it, ambush and attack mathematicians, etc. AI psychos might qualify, too. The notion works on me especially well because I can't follow Egan's science in the book:
  • if I could and thought it made sense, I'd disembowel myself (lol fat chance)
  • if I could and thought it didn't make sense, it would be less scary, dude goes insane and 41%, yeah whatever, happens all the time in the troon thread
But I can't, so the possibilty that there's a meme that can talk intelligent people into disembowelment remains real, and if I keep thinking about it, I just might get it, too. (Hypothetically, of course.)

I do remember Egan’s short stories about the math wars being very very scary. The titles are “Luminous” and “Dark Integers”.
It has been awhile since I read it, but I got the impression that he didn't take the base idea seriously and got a little sloppy in the story telling because of that. He entertained the idea but wasn't as stringent as he normally is.
About math and sloppiness: I've read one short stort of Egan's, The Infinite Assassin. (I'd found Egan through this story via Tvtropes (yeah), looking up fiction about retries.) In it, the protagonist survives getting killed by manipulating reality and picking one of the infinite timelines where he didn't get killed. This is somehow tied to fractals, even though the concept doesn't rely on fractal dimensions at all and is perfectly explainable by ye olde 17th century infinitesimals.

In the end, he gets killed when the antagonist "projects him into Cantor dust" (a 0-dimension fractal) -- this is unbelievably soft-sciencey and cringeworthy! The story's premise, explained over and over and over and over and over, relies on the "dimensions" of reality staying the same, this is what supposedly guarantees the protagonist's immortality! Like, imagine a square. You cut half off, you get a rectangle. Cut half off, get a smaller square. It's still a square/rectangle, it's still 2d. If Cantor dust was a known possibility, the protagonist wouldn't be so sure of his invincibility. If it wasn't (as it happens in the story), then it's technobabble against technobabble.

“You’re a coward and a pup. I’ll tell my big brother on you, and he can thrash you with his little finger, and I’ll make him do it, too.”
“What do I care for your big brother? I’ve got a brother that’s bigger than he is—and what’s more, he can throw him over that fence, too.” [Both brothers were imaginary.]
The condensed plot is this:
P: "I always win because I can't be projected to a lower dimension."
A: "I just projected you to a lower dimension, you lose."

The le epic tweeeest doesn't rely on fractals (or infinitesimals):
P: "I always win because I'm a hedgehog and I can't be buggered at all."
A: "I just buggered you, you lose."

What I'd go with if I wrote the story:
  • delusions of omnipotence (protagonist or protagonist's faction)
  • escalating difficulty of problems in need of optimization (why not lol, we're omnipotent)
  • escalating difficulty of picking the right timeline (takes exponentially more attempts)
  • lack of brain space to store branches that have been tried
  • insanity
  • stuck trying at random for (effectively) ever
  • somewhere out there is page 400, 1/10^100^10 chance to find it, good luck lmao
I also attempted to come up with a more illustrative fictional bad example of a soft plot. What I came up with is this:
  • you get infinite wishes from a cyber genie
  • integer overflow
See!? This is better than The Infinite Assassin, because the tweeest engages with the premise, it's not a flavor of technobabble!


I'm torturing myself reading Divine Hammer, an atrocity of a book. Disembowelment and Gate Crashers don't look too bad now.
 
The more I engage with Egan, the more I get the impression that he's smart enough by half: he clearly grasps the jumping-off points for interesting ruminations, but then fails on the deliveries either because A. it wouldn't make for a normie-pleasing story without all the standard twists, turns, and peril (premise consistency be damned!); or B. he gets distracted by his own spittle-flecking diatribes against theists and humanities departments (understandable? Not with how artlessly he shoehorns it in.)

...And on the topic of theists and humanities departments, Dan Simmons! I'm finally starting the Hyperion Cantos, and so far it is a pleasing turn from Egan's sneering attitude towards the human drive to fruitlessly hope and worship.

Tomlinson is beginning to feel like a nasty college project; I'd put it off by doing more gratifying things within the same ballpark.
 
Tomlinson is beginning to feel like a nasty college project; I'd put it off by doing more gratifying things within the same ballpark.
I’ve read worse but there’s twists and turns to his stories that get much funnier as you get involved with his thread here.

I don’t know anything about Dan Abnett so when I read his Eisenhorn stories I enjoyed them on their merits without having any issues with the author. Patrick’s stories are adequate sci-fi stuff though as you read more his politics are clear - endless strong brown women in charge, lots of stilted banter between groups that is supposed to come off as cool and quippy like a Joss Whedon scene, and the clumsy attempt to portray dude bros as bad guys. Thanks to this clumsiness he ends up writing a Zapp Brannigan knockoff that’s one of the few competent and likable characters in the story. In his book “Starship Repo” he takes a poke at Donald Trump and makes him into a ridiculous blowhard android. Except that android saves the day through self sacrifice and noble actions, unlike his thieving main character or trans space crab who are mostly useless during the big heist. Oops!

For me, I can overlook a lot more of the tedium of reading his stuff because I can picture Patrick smugly chortling to himself at a bar as he crafts his next big scene. He’s done it again! He’s exceeded both Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams and crafted The Greatest Story Ever! As a professional prison enjoyer and felonious stalker child I get to laugh at his buffoonery as he almost makes a fun sci-fi story but in the end if you don’t know who he is it’s probably a real slog to read.

I guarantee there’s worse out there.
 
Sorry if this is off topic to what the thread is currently discussing but it annoyed the shit out of me so much and this seems like one of the only places on the internet that you can discuss these things candidly.

I recently made the mistake of picking up a copy of Harlan Ellison's greatest hits published by Union Square. Not having read Ellison before I thought getting a good spread of his short stories which this seemed to have would be a good start. My first warning signs should've been the cover being plastered with quotes from Stephen King, Neil Gaiman and G.R.R Martin I then open the book to find three different pre ambles and a note about how some of the texts are outdated and use outdated terms and the like which is to be expected for any book edition made post 2015. Then I read the first pre amble by the executor of Harlans foundation and he spends more time going on about how progressive Harlan was and how he spent his life fighting misogyny and the like it just left a bad taste in my mouth but that was fine.

Then I went onto the second preamble by Neil Gaiman doing more of the same highlighting how much of a feminist trailblazer Harlan was in the space which was fairly funny because this edition was published in 2024 the same year Gaimans own sexual abuse scandal would be revealed.

At this stage I was getting fairly tired of the modern dayisms in my collection of sci fi golden age short stories but then I came on to the third and final preamble written by some lesbian literally who and the first page is literally her trauma dumping about how tough her life was as a closeted queer kid with parents with unresolved trauma due to their conservative upbringing and at that point I just put the book down those preambles had worn me down so much and left such a bad taste in my mouth I just couldn't continue reading.

Really it's my own fault for picking up a collection published in 2024 with the way the publishing world has gone but fuck me man. It just tainted my whole view of the texts inside. I will actually read the short stories and judge them on their own merit but I just had to vent a little about how dog shit of an intro those preambles gave to Harlans work.
 
My first warning signs should've been the cover being plastered with quotes from Stephen King, Neil Gaiman and G.R.R Martin
This is my clue to not buy a book. "NY Times bestseller", "Now a major motion picture", any sort of gay praise on the cover, heaven forbid actors on the cover, I just nope out. It's not a condemnation of the content but I don't want this physical object in my possession.

Also (not applicable to collections), I hate when the the book is a novel and the name of the author on the cover is bigger than the title.
 
Really it's my own fault for picking up a collection published in 2024 with the way the publishing world has gone but fuck me man. It just tainted my whole view of the texts inside.
Well that’s your first mistake. You got a copy of the new collection with the fancy cover and everything. It’s cheap and plentiful, but if you want unfiltered, unbridled Ellison schitzo rambles then you’ve gotta purchase a copy of The Essential Ellison on eBay. Published in 1991 with Ellison being heavily involved with this collection, it’s probably the best short story sci-fi collection I can recommend. Pick up a copy for like 50 bucks on eBay right now. Looks great on shelves too.

I think it also contains IHNMAIMS too but the story you want is “A Boy and His Dog”. The world of Fallout was basically stolen from that one short story. Fantastic collection, free of faggotry. Pick up a copy today.
 
Really it's my own fault for picking up a collection published in 2024 with the way the publishing world has gone but fuck me man. It just tainted my whole view of the texts inside.
Don't buy retard shit from >current year.

You should have just bought Ellison Wonderland.

Or Strange Wine.

Or Gentleman Junkie.
 
I recently made the mistake of picking up a copy of Harlan Ellison's greatest hits published by Union Square. Not having read Ellison before I thought getting a good spread of his short stories which this seemed to have would be a good start. My first warning signs should've been the cover being plastered with quotes from Stephen King, Neil Gaiman and G.R.R Martin I then open the book to find three different pre ambles and a note about how some of the texts are outdated and use outdated terms and the like which is to be expected for any book edition made post 2015. Then I read the first pre amble by the executor of Harlans foundation and he spends more time going on about how progressive Harlan was and how he spent his life fighting misogyny and the like it just left a bad taste in my mouth but that was fine.

I just skipped all the intros/commentaries anyways.

I think it also contains IHNMAIMS too but the story you want is “A Boy and His Dog”. The world of Fallout was basically stolen from that one short story. Fantastic collection, free of faggotry. Pick up a copy today.
I had to get an ancient paperback copy of the collection, "The Beast Who Shouted Love at The Heart of The World" just to get "A Boy and His Dog", lmao.

Well that’s your first mistake. You got a copy of the new collection with the fancy cover and everything. It’s cheap and plentiful, but if you want unfiltered, unbridled Ellison schitzo rambles then you’ve gotta purchase a copy of The Essential Ellison on eBay. Published in 1991 with Ellison being heavily involved with this collection, it’s probably the best short story sci-fi collection I can recommend. Pick up a copy for like 50 bucks on eBay right now. Looks great on shelves too.
one day I'll get a copy of that, but it's not the highest priority. Ellison stuff seems to be perennially expensive.
 
Damn, I'm slow. I just realized that --
"NY Times bestseller"
-- the NY Times bestselling writers Margaret Weis and Tracy Hickman, primary authors of
I'm torturing myself reading Divine Hammer
Dragonlance, wrote a series of novels about a protagonist with
manipulating reality and picking one of the infinite timelines where he didn't get killed
this exact power and
the antagonist "projects him into Cantor dust" (a 0-dimension fractal)
this exact counter, and the first two books were published before The Infinite Assassin! Not only Egan's "hard" short story not very hard, it got conceptually owned by elf/dwarf/IRA Mormon doorstopper fantasy!
 
I’ve been reading Tomlinson and I’ll be real, I have to take breaks from the book and do other shit. Not because it’s terrible, it would be more fun if it was, but because after a few chapters every other sentence being quippy blends into white noise and I just zone out.
It falls into the very common trap of trying to explain how all the technology works without actually having a really having a reason to, it’s just boring, and of thinking that just because Douglas Adams had a gift for a fun turn of phrase you do as well.
It’s so mediocre it’s average, what can I say?
 
Not entirely sure why, but I asked a buddy to let me access all the old Dragonlance books I gave to his kids years ago. I picked up Autumn Twilight, and remembered why I fell in love with this series. Weiss and Hickman hit such a great stride out of the gate with the story, and I actually burned through the original trilogy in about a day and a half. Which left me wanting more, and being Dragonlance there is a ton more to absorb. Its very basic fantasy wise, but the characters and story is relatable so its hard to turn away from. Easily on of my personal best, and favorite, fantasy series.
 
I was about to pick those up and a few of the World of Darkness stories. How are the dragonlance novels when compared to non-dnd fantasy stories?
They're pretty basic overall on the surface, but once you deep dive into the entire series there is a LOT to work with. It's not all swords and fireballs, there is a lot more to it. You have deep readings on brotherhood, philosophy, emotional trauma, political turmoil, seeing how massive tragedy can change the entire outlook of a people ( @Dante Alighieri mentioned the Kender, and they change to an insane degree in the end), and tons of other things. Yah, it's overall good vs evil type shit but it shows there is a lot of grey area to be worked with.
 
Back
Top Bottom