TED Entertainment Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber, Morgan Kamal Majed, and Kasey Caviness, California 2:25-cv-5564, 2:25-cv-5565,Missouri 4:25-cv-459 - Ethan Klein Suing three women and 10 redditors for Copyright Infringement.

  • 🔎 If you see an alert for analytics.usips.org, this is a self-hosted system I am running as a test. It is GDPR compliant and collects no invasive information.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber 2:25-cv-05564 — District Court, C.D. California

  • Docket No.
    2:25-cv-05564
  • Court
    District Court, C.D. California
  • Filed
    Jun 18, 2025
  • Terminated
    Jul 12, 2026
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Both
  • Last Filing
    Aug 18, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
Does, Alexandra Marwa Saber, Ted Entertainment, Inc.

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 57)

# Date Description Filing
55 Aug 18, 2026 NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 6/5/2026 2:05 p.m re Transcript 54 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ym) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 08/19/2026)
54 Aug 18, 2026 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 6/5/2026 2:05 p.m. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: JAMS Certified Transcription, phone number (661) 609-4528. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 9/9/2026. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/21/2026. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/17/2026. (ym) (Entered: 08/19/2026)
— Aug 18, 2026  
52 Aug 6, 2026 TRANSCRIPT ORDER re: Court of Appeals case number 26-5059, as to Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc. for Court Smart (CS). Court will contact Rom Bar-Nissim at Rom@HeahBarNissim.com with further instructions regarding this order. Transcript preparation will not begin until payment has been satisfied with the transcription company. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 08/07/2026) PDF
53 Aug 5, 2026 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 26-5059 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 51 as to Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc. (iv) (Entered: 08/08/2026) PDF
View all 57 filings

Ted Entertainment Inc. v. Morgan Kamal Majed 2:25-cv-05565 — District Court, C.D. California

  • Docket No.
    2:25-cv-05565
  • Court
    District Court, C.D. California
  • Filed
    Jun 18, 2025
  • Terminated
    Sep 7, 2026
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Sep 7, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
Does, Ted Entertainment Inc., Morgan Kamal Majed

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 46)

# Date Description Filing
43 Sep 7, 2026 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Copyright. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Dismissal) (iv) (Entered: 09/08/2026) 1 2
42 Sep 7, 2026 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 09/08/2026) PDF
41 Sep 3, 2026 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.to Text Only Scheduling Notice,, 40, Order to Show Cause,,, 38 (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 09/04/2026) PDF
40 Sep 3, 2026 TEXT ENTRY ORDER by Judge John F. Walter: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Response to the August 31, 2026 Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal [ECF #38] filed September 3, 2026 (Docket No. 39 ), and declines to discharge the Order to Show Cause at this time. Counsel fails to understand or appreciate that it is for the Court, not counsel, to make a determination whether cases are related. By ignoring Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and not checking the appropriate box IX(b).Related Cases on the civil cover sheet, the Court is deprived of the opportunity of making such a determination. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jloz) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/04/2026)
— Sep 3, 2026  
View all 46 filings

Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Caviness 4:25-cv-00459 — District Court, W.D. Missouri

  • Docket No.
    4:25-cv-00459
  • Court
    District Court, W.D. Missouri
  • Filed
    Jun 18, 2025
  • Terminated
    Sep 29, 2026
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:101 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Both
  • Last Filing
    Sep 29, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
Does 1-10, Kacey Caviness, Ted Entertainment, Inc.

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 39)

# Date Description Filing
29 Sep 29, 2026 The Court hereby acknowledges receipt of Doc. No. 28, NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed on 9/30/26 by Chief District Judge Brian C Wimes. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (TLD) (Entered: 09/30/2026)
28 Sep 29, 2026 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Ted Entertainment, Inc. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 09/30/2026) PDF
— Sep 29, 2026  
27 Dec 7, 2025 ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron only. In the event that the settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days of the date of this Order. In addition, the Court retains jurisdiction over enforcement of the settlement agreed to by the parties. Signed on 12/8/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 12/08/2025) PDF
26 Dec 1, 2025 STIPULATION of dismissal without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron by Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 12/02/2025) PDF
View all 39 filings

In re. Subpoenas to Reddit, Inc. and Ddiscord, Inc. 3:25-mc-80296 — District Court, N.D. California

  • Docket No.
    3:25-mc-80296
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. California
  • Filed
    Sep 21, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    890 Other Statutory Actions
  • Cause
    Civil Miscellaneous Case
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Jul 7, 2026

Parties (2)

Parties
Doe Defendants, Ted Entertainment, Inc.

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 61)

# Date Description Filing
50 Jul 7, 2026 USCA Case Number 26-3513 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for 47 USCA Case Number. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2026) (Entered: 07/09/2026) PDF
48 Jun 1, 2026 USCA Case Number 26-3553 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 46 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Doe Defendants. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2026) Modified on 6/3/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/03/2026) PDF
47 May 31, 2026 USCA Case Number 26-3513 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 49 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Doe Defendants. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2026) Modified on 6/3/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/4/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/02/2026) PDF
49 May 28, 2026 Petition For Writ Of Mandamus filed Directly with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2026) Modified on 6/4/2026 (cjl, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/04/2026) PDF
46 May 28, 2026 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Doe Defendants. Appeal of Order, Terminate Motions 45 (Appeal fee of $605 receipt number ACANDC-22041800 paid.) (Vulic, Leah) (Filed on 5/29/2026) (Entered: 05/29/2026) PDF
View all 61 filings

Doe Defendants v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco 26-3513 — Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    26-3513
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • Filed
    May 31, 2026
  • Last Filing
    Oct 11, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
TED ENTERTAINMENT, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO, DOE DEFENDANTS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 25)

# Date Description Filing
25 Oct 11, 2026 RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss (DE 22) filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Entered: 10/12/2026 05:50 PM] 1 2
24 Sep 20, 2026 ORDER FILED. The joint motion (Docket Entry No. 23 in 26-3513; Docket Entry No. 20 in 26-3553) for an extension of time to respond to the motion to dismiss is granted. The response is due October 12, 2026. The optional reply in support of the motion is due October 26, 2026. Briefing is stayed. [26-3513, 26-3553] [Entered: 09/21/2026 10:32 AM] PDF
23 Sep 16, 2026 MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss (DE 22.1) filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Entered: 09/17/2026 02:06 PM] PDF
22 Sep 14, 2026 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Real Party in Interest Ted Entertainment, Inc.. [Entered: 09/15/2026 04:29 PM] PDF
21 Aug 24, 2026 ORDER FILED. Sidney R. THOMAS, Marsha S. BERZON, Danielle J. FORREST The motion (Docket Entry No. 11 in appeal No. 26-3553) to dismiss appeal No. 26-3553 for lack of jurisdiction is denied without prejudice to renewing the arguments in the answering brief. See Nat’l Indus. v. Republic Nat’l Life Ins. Co., 677 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1982) (merits panel may consider appellate jurisdiction despite earlier denial of motion to dismiss). The opening brief in appeal No. 25-3553 is due September 30, 2026. The answering brief is due October 30, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. The clerk will calendar petition No. 26-3513 and appeal No. 25-3553 together. [26-3513, 26-3553] [Entered: 08/25/2026 09:11 AM] PDF
View all 25 filings
I have been waiting for an update to the Subpoena case and what happens?
The latest filing is a glorified out-of-office notice by the lawyer for the Jannies.
FML

1772567191881.png

Nothing ever happens.
 
Terrifik said:
Good news
Edit on that lie actually reddit got extensions it's on ice like josh case.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=J-sRIHl75qg
View attachment 8652466
View attachment 8652485
Click to expand...
There is nothing more overinflated and unwarranted than the confidence of a FAT ugly woman.

I cannot wait until Ethan beats her like an unwanted stepchild in court and everyone replies to her with her dumb ass boasting.

I really hope Ethan makes her suffer for that with something much more embarrassing than Kasey’s hostage video.
 
Does anyone think that Denims and The Turkroach might have a Friends with Benefits arrangement and that he is going to pay for her legal costs?

I ask because Denims does not seem that stressed out by the lawsuit Ethan has brought against her and she has a combative manner when she talks about the lawsuit.
 
SargonF00t said:
Does anyone think that Denims and The Turkroach might have a Friends with Benefits arrangement and that he is going to pay for her legal costs?

I ask because Denims does not seem that stressed out by the lawsuit Ethan has brought against her and she has a combative manner when she talks about the lawsuit.
Click to expand...
Probably. She is the least ugly and fat out of his three orbiting sirens. Kaseytron folded like a cheap lawn chair and Frogan can’t seem to decide if she’s going to fight it or give in.
 
SargonF00t said:
Does anyone think that Denims and The Turkroach might have a Friends with Benefits arrangement and that he is going to pay for her legal costs?
Click to expand...

No, Hasan is only in it for himself. He'll pretend to be friends with these creatures on stream, but he'll never give them a dime and if Ethan crushes and leaves them all in the gutter, Hasan won't even look at them as he strolls by and finds a new batch of retarded orbiters.
 
Irene and 22 others said:
No, Hasan is only in it for himself. He'll pretend to be friends with these creatures on stream, but he'll never give them a dime and if Ethan crushes and leaves them all in the gutter, Hasan won't even look at them as he strolls by and finds a new batch of retarded orbiters.
Click to expand...
People are confused if they imagine that Hasan thinks Denims is on his level. She's uglier than girls he's dated by a lot and a lot smaller fanbase wise. He's probably annoyed he even has to think about her ever. Hasan is a number-obsessed clout chaser who's primarily focused on the most new-money type of show-off image, that's why he's willing to date literal pornstars like a gooner freak. It's also why he links chinks so much, because they're all like that too since they burned all their culture away and became consoomers.

The ONLY reason Hasan might ever help Denims is if he thinks he can dunk on Ethan in some way, but I doubt he wants to entangle himself in a lawsuit that could harm his reputation if it doesn't go well. He likes to hold the controller so he can hit the eject button at any time because it's all about him.
 
SargonF00t said:
Does anyone think that Denims and The Turkroach might have a Friends with Benefits arrangement and that he is going to pay for her legal costs?
Click to expand...
No. Compared to Kaceytron and Frogan, Denims is in a much better financial position to pay for her own shit (the biggest female leftist streamer allegedly, but only because Shoeonhead doesn't stream), in addition to the fundraising she managed to get. I don't think Hasan would ever do anything more than a pity bang, since he's already with a streamer who's much bigger than Denims to leech off of (Valkyrae). There's nothing Denims can offer Hasan except her holes, and I don't think she can do that, either.
SargonF00t said:
I ask because Denims does not seem that stressed out by the lawsuit Ethan has brought against her and she has a combative manner when she talks about the lawsuit.
Click to expand...
You forget she (like the other defendants, as well as Hasan, as well as breadtubers in general) has the worst combination of being really fucking smug and really fucking stupid. She has a delusional idea of how the law regarding copyright works (which includes "Copyright doesn't apply to Twitch streamers"), and everything she's done stems from it.
Irene and 22 others said:
No, Hasan is only in it for himself. He'll pretend to be friends with these creatures on stream, but he'll never give them a dime and if Ethan crushes and leaves them all in the gutter, Hasan won't even look at them as he strolls by and finds a new batch of retarded orbiters.
Click to expand...
The best option for Hasan optically (but worst financially) is to give all three of them financial support. If he doesn't support specific defendants, it looks like he's throwing them to the wolves (and you should, because every single one of them sucks), and critics would be right to shit on him for trying to cosplay as someone who seemed to be open to giving them shekels to defend themselves from Lex Jewthor while refusing to support them in reality. Any money Hasan gives to them would be going down the drain, and it could be spent on things he actually cares about, like every single excess of capitalism he claims to hate but indulges in at every single opportunity.
 
Maraschino said:
I don't think Hasan would ever do anything more than a pity bang, since he's already with a streamer who's much bigger than Denims to leech off of (Valkyrae). There's nothing Denims can offer Hasan except her holes, and I don't think she can do that, either.
Click to expand...

Hasan wouldn't fuck Denim's with Destiny's dick. She was trying to hook up with Destiny at one point and there are old clips of Denim's talking shit about Hasan before Destiny shot her down and she switched camps. How much of a hedonistic Hasan might be isn't precisely known, but everyone knows how much of a sex maniac Destiny is and if he wouldn't fuck Denims that should say how desirable she is. If Hasan were ten years older and had lost much of his popularity he might throw a fuck in her if no one else was picking up the phone.

Maraschino said:
The best option for Hasan optically (but worst financially) is to give all three of them financial support. If he doesn't support specific defendants, it looks like he's throwing them to the wolves
Click to expand...

Hasan giving any of them money for the lawsuit would come out during a deposition and he's not going to give Ethan any rope if he doesn't have to. Even it it would matter, it still gives him the perfect excuse not to give any of them a dime. He's almost certainly told them that he can't donate anything for those reasons, but would be glad to promote their funding campaigns for all that's worth. He doesn't care if it looks like he's throwing any of them to the wolves and if they get crushed some other worthless grifters will gladly take their place. The left eats their own all the time, so why should these three dumb bitches get any special treatment?

Hasan will give them nothing and they'll all forgive him and still suck up to him because they're clout chasers. They won't talk shit about Hasan because they know they'll get mobbed by their own side because as pathetic as they are, there are plenty of other clout chasers happy to move up. Frogan gets practically no viewership and is completely irrelevant. Kaceytron is well past her heyday and is a complete burnout at this point. Denims isn't as washed up as the other two, but the shelf life on female streamers is a few years at most. None of them have intelligent or insightful takes on anything and a younger, better looking streamer that can deliver the same shit takes that lefties lap up will always be able to replace them. None of them are worth investing in.
 
It does not matter at this point.
It just means that Ethan is allowing Denims, despite the case being stayed pending the resolution of the subpoena case, to motion for partial summary judgement on one of the counts of copyright infringement.

So all we know is right now that they are asking the court to allow this.
Once the actual motion if filed we will learn more about what the purpose is, and/or if they have come to some form of agreement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom