Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

[bertram's]

How is it even possible to topple the UK, or say South Korea? You're not even thinking in military terms here.

 

[Miss Hortensia]

counterimperialist

One of these "imperialistic" countries is keeping your sorry ass alive. The most if not all socialistic states in the past hold the duty of working dear. Even the GDR, the state with the highest living standard of all socialist countries, would have forced you to work. Even if it would have meant to drag you to work by police force.

 

[Autphag]

How is it even possible to topple the UK, or say South Korea? You're not even thinking in military terms here.

But I am thinking in strategic ones.

Even an impoverished North Korean scores higher on an IQ test than some of the well-off, highly-built chav-genes who tend to enter the military due to evolutionary pressures; typically that's both somewhere in the low-90s mark but the difference is, in the North Korean example it's more homogenous.

It would deprive you of the ingenius improvisational chav engineers with their vocational qualification in engineering whatever, but Mongoloid IQ is loaded in fluid intelligence (+15, therefore, compensating in effect).

They'd have more natural talent in this, if less training, and in situations of close, guerella combat as opposed to long-range conventional war, they would have a certain tactical advantage in terms of the endurance of their techniques' employment.

I've always wanted to write a few pieces on battle strategy but never find the time or the pressure away from KiwiFarms to either learn more about it or whatever, although I could probably improvise on the fly with just what I know about DPRK military statistics and intelligence profiles alone. It'd be a bit like a more parochial version of Guns, Germs and Steel (which I did read and although disagreed with the liberal environmental stances of the author, his racial-IQ affirming hypotheses were awfully impressive).

One of these "imperialistic" countries is keeping your sorry ass alive. The most if not all socilalistic states in the past hold the duty of working dear. Even the GDR, the state with the highest living standard of all socialist countries, would have forced you to work. Even if it would have meant to drag you to work by police force.

I would agree, but various forces render impossible Asperger employability and one of those happens to be the matriarchy you so dismiss.

 

[Begemot]

I would agree, but various forces render impossible Asperger employability and one of those happens to be the matriarchy you so dismiss.

How do you know you didn't destroy your property yourself in a fir of psychosis?

 

[Cuntster]

a precious race, far more precious than any other race on the planet.

It's a good thing that North Korea will eventually be nuked and glassed within our lifetime with the current bullshit they keep pulling.

 

[Autphag]

How do you know you didn't destroy your property yourself in a fir of psychosis?

If my psychosis was really bad, I'd know I'd still consecrate my work.

Unless my delusions were really bad and I thought Amber might be retroactively manipulating my own work through time or something.

It's a good thing that North Korea will eventually be nuked and glassed within our lifetime with the current bullshit they keep pulling.

I see them as evolutionary perfect-Aspergians, in that 3 generations of the kind of culture I'd envisage coming from a race of homogenized neurological autists (mildish as I keep saying before you bring up childish caricatures) they've been purified intellectually and stylistically. I see the last hope of salvaging Western civilization in the arising, as was mentioned yesterday but in my own theoretical stint, of a Juche-Neoreactionary, pan-Eurasian dictatorship with a European capital in Berlin and a Mongoloid capital probably in Pyongyang.

Which means, yes, we'd need M.A.D. to cleanse the detritus first.

 

[Begemot]

If my psychosis was really bad, I'd know I'd still consecrate my work.

Unless my delusions were really bad and I thought Amber might be retroactively manipulating my own work through time or something.

So I'm guessing lagoona and cuntster went through your flat as agents of the matriarchy?

 

[Autphag]

So I'm guessing lagoona and cuntster went through your flat as agents of the matriarchy?

I wish they'd do so whilst I was awake. I'd like to argue with them in the flesh.

Even if they would be more slick (estrogenic crack and white myelin nerve matter cheaters they are), I wouldn't let it pressure me and show how deeply in consideration I can carry myself.

 

[Begemot]

I wish they'd do so whilst I was awake. I'd like to argue with them in the flesh.

Even if they would be more slick (estrogenic crack and white myelin nerve matter cheaters they are), I wouldn't let it pressure me and show how deeply in consideration I can carry myself.

I was being sarcastic, kid. I guess I helped them as well, somehow?

 

[Miss Hortensia]

Autistic slap fights aren't considered as martial arts.

Despite this, no, you can't "carry yourself". You're the embodiment of work-shy. Nobody asked you to be a waiter, a sporting ace or a marketing/fundraiser specialist. There are more than enough careers where a autistic constitution can be nothing but beneficial. It will be harder for you than for "normies", but it isn't impossible. There are even NGOs and boards that would help you, if you were somewhat sane and amicable. In the last 900 pages I've seen no real efforts of you to get an actual life - only diverse REEEEing and NO U stunts.

I've nothing but contempt for your homicidal views. I'm rather happy that you can't even get minor shit done, otherwise I would be deeply concerned for world politics. Good luck nobody is willing to lend an ear to a paranoid shut-in who shit himself and has no real self identity.

 

[Cuntster]

If my psychosis was really bad, I'd know I'd still consecrate my work.

Unless my delusions were really bad and I thought Amber might be retroactively manipulating my own work through time or something.

It's interesting to think about how future historians will eventually deal with the digital remnants of our past. Classical archeology has studied physical artifacts that have signs of wear and tear, scars that are a testament to their age and place in history. We can carbon date almost anything and acquire fairly accurate results about its relative age. Event more recently, technology has allowed us to delve even deeper and look even closer at these objects. We can recover pollen and other microsocopic elements from things like papyrus and cloth that can not only help ascertain chronological placement, but also geographical placement. Microscopic but tangible, physical facts which are left behind, tiny clues for us to discover.

But the digital world is different. The immutable 1's and 0's that make up our recent history are constantly refreshed, moved and duplicated on the physical level. A website from 2007 probably doesn't live on the same physical server that first hosted it, and even if it does, those bits and bytes have probably moved into different places on its storage mechanisms over time. In many ways it's not the same site it was in 2007 unless those 1's and 0's are located on same device in the same place and same order they were back when the site existed, which is almost never the case. The captured archive of that same site is just an imprint of those bits and bytes, digitally perfect but living on a device that could be halfway around the world from the original host. How could future historians ever guarantee the chronological history of any piece of digital material in any real sense? Unlike a physical artifact that can be tested and measured giving quantifiable results, the digital artifact never degrades, never collects dust, it is always as perfect or imperfect as it was when first created.

Think of this example: imagine you stumble across a forum discussing Aspergia in some Google search results. You click the Google link look around the now seemingly defunct forum and its past threads. You see dates and times, the site seems to have been created around 2001, with activity dwindling by 2005. You can see the date on every post and every reply, just like this forum, and piece together a timeline. But how can you ever measure the accuracy and more importantly, the validity of those dates? For all you know that forum may have been created a month ago, with every post handcrafted to appear legitimate. Even the HTML metadata could have been backdated to look authentic. You, or anyone else for that matter, could only ever take the authenticity of that sites chronology at face value. There's no kind of test or measurement you can use to verify what the site claims.

 

[Autphag]

It's interesting to think about how future historians will eventually deal with the digital remnants of our past. Classical archeology has studied physical artifacts that have signs of wear and tear, scars that are a testament to their age and place in history. We can carbon date almost anything and acquire fairly accurate results about its relative age. Event more recently, technology has allowed us to delve even deeper and look even closer at these objects. We can recover pollen and other microsocopic elements from things like papyrus and cloth that can not only help ascertain chronological placement, but also geographical placement. Microscopic but tangible, physical facts which are left behind, tiny clues for us to discover.

But the digital world is different. The immutable 1's and 0's that make up our recent history are constantly refreshed, moved and duplicated on the physical level. A website from 2007 probably doesn't live on the same physical server that first hosted it, and even if it does, those bits and bytes have probably moved into different places on its storage mechanisms over time. In many ways it's not the same site it was in 2007 unless those 1's and 0's are located on same device in the same place and same order they were back when the site existed, which is almost never the case. The captured archive of that same site is just an imprint of those bits and bytes, digitally perfect but living on a device that could be halfway around the world from the original host. How could future historians ever guarantee the chronological history of any piece of digital material in any real sense? Unlike a physical artifact that can be tested and measured giving quantifiable results, the digital artifact never degrades, never collects dust, it is always as perfect or imperfect as it was when first created.

Think of this example: imagine you stumble across a forum discussing Aspergia in some Google search results. You click the Google link look around the now seemingly defunct forum and its past threads. You see dates and times, the site seems to have been created around 2001, with activity dwindling by 2005. You can see the date on every post and every reply, just like this forum, and piece together a timeline. But how can you ever measure the accuracy and more importantly, the validity of those dates? For all you know that forum may have been created a month ago, with every post handcrafted to appear legitimate. Even the HTML metadata could have been backdated to look authentic. You, or anyone else for that matter, could only ever take the authenticity of that sites chronology at face value. There's no kind of test or measurement you can use to verify what the site claims.

I skimmed this as general science-sperging bores me, but I should probably clarify both Chac and I abhorred Edinism, as it was neurodiverse.

Chac's was wholly indigenously developed.

I was made aware of Aspergia through the neurodiversity movement but always had my own ideas for which I was essentially banned by Amy for on AFF in 2006. Did I mention that doesn't expire in a retarded amount of time whilst the forum is dead (archived, same thing) anyway?

 

[Cuntster]

I skimmed this as general science-sperging bores me, but I should probably clarify both Chac and I abhorred Edinism, as it was neurodiverse.

Well I can understand why you skimmed, it deals with legitimacy and validity which are hot-button topics for someone in your position, "Sophie".

 

[Autphag]

Well I can understand why you skimmed, it deals with legitimacy and validity which are hot-button topics for someone in your position, "Sophie".

Invalidation and illegitimation are the behaviours of psychopaths, Buffalo Bill.

@Cuntster is a testament to how low arousal theory contributes to the predation of the psychopath on the scientific fields. They may barely know the significance of that which they superficially and glibly discuss, but, with endurance (it's always Cuntster making the text-walls with his estrogen abuse), the sensory input of extending a pathological lie under the guised pretences of assuring authenticity are, in metaphor as well as stupidly in the literal content when one interprets it convolutedly enough, abundant in his hack-job work.
Well done for basically writing a manifesto about how to utilize psychopathy within the sciences to manipulate outcomes to favour you, tranny.

 

[MormonofID]

Invalidation and illegitimation are the behaviours of psychopaths, Buffalo Bill.

First, illegitimation isn't a word. Second, Mr. Kettle, there's a call on line one for you from Mr. Pot.

 

[Miss Hortensia]

Invalidation and illegitimation are the behaviours of psychopaths, Buffalo Bill.

You are a psychopath, or more correctly a sociopath.

• You assaulted your former psychiatrist.
• You assaulted your mother.
• Your nephew is safeguarded from you, 'cause authorities identified you correctly as a threat due your aggressiveness and mental instability.
• You posted several death threats, one of your posts is a video showing you screeching about butchering Haselgrove with a knife.
  
• You've shown genuine glee about butchering, nuking, abusing, destroying and starving people to death.
• You're promoting slavery, sexual abuse, torturing and killing for everyone who isn't in agreement with your views; you are even willing to punish their offsprings.
• You called humanbeings repeatedly as detritus, dirt and garbage that should be eliminated.
• You used emotional force to make your "friends" act in accordance with your will. You lied about suicide threats, past abuse in your family and other stunts. You insulted them and wished them harm.

And you weren't pretending. You were always absolutely fuckin' serious about it.

Cuntster doesn't treat you with respect. And hell, she doesn't need to. You've done nothing to earn her politeness. She's harsh but fair; she was always honest to you and never wished you any harm. She hasn't shown any real interest in destroying you.

 

[Keerakh]

Invalidation and illegitimation are the behaviours of psychopaths, Buffalo Bill.

whats to invalidate? Not coddling you and humoring you is not denying a truth about you Chris.
I dont understand why you keep returning.

 

[Autphag]

You are a psychopath, or more correctly a sociopath.

• You assaulted your former psychiatrist.
• You assaulted your mother.
• Your nephew is safeguarded from you, 'cause authorities identified you correctly as a threat due your aggressiveness and mental instability.
• You posted several death threats, one of your posts is a video showing you screeching about butchering Haselgrove with a knife.
  
• You've shown genuine glee about butchering, nuking, abusing, destroying and starving people to death.
• You're promoting slavery, sexual abuse, torturing and killing for everyone who isn't in agreement with your views; you are even willing to punish their offsprings.
• You called humanbeings repeatedly as detritus, dirt and garbage that should be eliminated.
• You used emotional force to make your "friends" act in accordance with your will. You lied about suicide threats, past abuse in your family and other stunts. You insulted them and wished them harm.

And you weren't pretending. You were always absolutely fuckin' serious about it.

Cuntster doesn't treat you with respect. And hell, she doesn't need to. You've done nothing to earn her politeness. She's harsh but fair; she was always honest to you and never wished you any harm. She hasn't shown any real interest in destroying you.

sans the "past family abuse being false" claim, yes, that's all true, and i've now accepted it

with the number of diagnoses i've suspected haselgrove of clandestinely diagnosing me with, psychopathy is the least of my worries

but i would argue it wasn't natural. i was nothing like this before age 15 which is one major criterion. this all emerged in adulthood because i grew an awareness of what neurotypicals were like and sought to emulate it for protective purposes.

so it's your fault, really. and i mean, really, don't try to blame-deflect on this one, or turn it around. as a society, neurotypicals are responsible for the desocialization of autists.

 

[MormonofID]

sans the "past family abuse being false" claim, yes, that's all true, and i've now accepted it

with the number of diagnoses i've suspected haselgrove of clandestinely diagnosing me with, psychopathy is the least of my worries

but i would argue it wasn't natural. i was nothing like this before age 15 which is one major criterion. this all emerged in adulthood because i grew an awareness of what neurotypicals were like and sought to emulate it for protective purposes.

so it's your fault, really. and i mean, really, don't try to blame-deflect on this one, or turn it around. as a society, neurotypicals are responsible for the desocialization of autists.

Mr. Kettle, Mr. Pot is still on the line waiting to talk to you. Should I tell him to call you back?

 

[Autphag]

Mr. Kettle, Mr. Pot is still on the line waiting to talk to you. Should I tell him to call you back?

piss off sperg, you're beneath me