KINKiwis - A thread for genuine kink/fetish information and discussion

Dojima's Dragon said:
This

User has a video of him masturbating to @Hellwalker beaner anus in a maid outfit!
Click to expand...
20260308_072533.jpg

Only @Null can see my maid dress.
 
femboy fart huffer said:
Humiliation - Has been somewhat of a running theme in the past few. There is a certain aspect of humiliation in being submissive, accidentally or intentionally wetting yourself, wearing things that most of society would consider embarrassing. Humiliation fetishism is often seen as a way to cope with certain things. A lot of fetish content that appeals specifically to coomers involves a heavy theme of humiliation. Deep down these people have some sense that sitting and wanking over more and more exotic fetishes is not socially acceptable, instead of simply stopping they will instead fetishise the idea of being socially unacceptable and talked down to. Another common version is SPH, small penis humiliation, something that tends to go hand in hand with chastity fetishism, essentially being aroused by the idea that your penis is too small to pleasure anyone. Why be sad about having a tiny cock when you can be horny about it instead?
Click to expand...
This is the most important fetish in the list.
 
tbh, has anyone gotten the urge to impregnate shampoo bottles. I love shampoo bottles, as someone whos a shampoosexual. Shampoos of all shapes and forms turn me on! I remember losing my virginity to a woman that was actually a shampoo bottle and oh lord! I had sex with that thing FOR HOURS! like seriously the shampoo bottle had such a massive ass that i broke the shampoo bottle in half with how much i nutted! I really wish i could find a woman that's like a walking shampoo bottle for me to have fucky fucky 24/7!
 
OH GOD, THE HUMANITY! YOU'RE NOT FUCKING YOUR WIFE IN MISSIONARY YOU FUCKING FREAK?!?!?!
 
Justa Grata Honoria said:
Son you need to go out , touch grass and log off

Also this thread needs to be renamed to: my mom needs to throw the router in to the sea .
Click to expand...
Look. I'm just gonna say it. Bestiality is hot and if you disagree, you're literally not human. So much judgemental over something so minor. Honestly you need to let people enjoy things.
 
>[]Look son, it is time for us to have the talk.[/]
>Some of you have a fucking abysmal understanding of fetishes and kinks and what those words even just fucking mean and are shitting up threads because of it. You are a big boy now and it's time to change this.

>

>[]What is a fetish and what is a kink?
>[/]In the most clinical of terms to start with. A fetish is something outside of culturally accepted things that causes arousal. A kink is something that is not a normal sexual act but can still be considered normal. For example feet are a fetish, no one would ever say that feet are a sexual organ or a commonly agreed upon sexy body part. However something like facesitting would be considered a kink, everyone already agrees that asses and wide hips are a sign of femininity but wanting to shove your face in there isn't exactly a regular sex act. It's not something that would cause you to be socially ostracized if it was found out, but it's something that might cause a shock to the person you do it to if not discussed beforehand.

>The problem with this definition is that all fetishes are kinks. If a kink is something other than things on the level of incredibly plain missionary type sex then sucking toes is also outside of that despite being a fetish. To put it in kf terms, a kink is a brown person, something unusual and if you mentioned it in the bedroom you'd get a strange look, a fetish is an indian, something that no one would ever want to do unless they were the same as the person proposing it, a smaller more niche part of a large topic.

>Where the boundary is is both hard to really define and entirely pointless. Is having anal sex with a woman a fetish or a kink? I would say that it's certainly not a normal sex act so is definitely a kink, whether it is abnormal enough to be a fetish is something only you can decide on. And before anyone says 'but you just said an ass was an agreed upon turn on', let me ask if you would drink a woman's breast milk or stick your penis in her urethra? This also brings up the problem of what the fuck a 'norm' is. We are all on kiwifarms so fucking none of us know let's be honest. The main reason is because something like anal is abnormal for a heterosexual relationship but a requirement for a gay one.

>In general the words fetish/kink get used in a different context online, specifically in circles of people that enjoy them. The more colloquial definition of a kink is something that you like and a fetish is something you need. For example if you liked kissing feet but were otherwise completely normal then it would be a kink. If you cannot cum without having someone's toes shoved up your nose then it's a fetish.

>There is another colloquial definition. The one that I will use. That is of the words being completely interchangeable and just meaning 'non standard sexual activity'. I am also using the word gay to be two male homosexuals and specifying lesbian if I am talking about lesbians.

>I also want to do a quick aside to talk about the words coomer and gooner. These words mean different things to different people depending on where you first heard them. I personally use the description of a gooner as a person who spends a large amount of time masturbating and a coomer is a person who spends a lot of time orgasming. The main difference is that a gooner will try to masturbate for as long as possible to have one large orgasm at the end of a multi hour session, a coomer is someone who seeks out more and more depraved material chasing a quicker orgasm. Gooners often have large amounts of regular porn playing simultaneously for a long time, coomers have one fetish porno at a time for a short length.

>

>[]The main thing I want you to take away from this.

>Neither a fetish nor a kink are 'normal'. They are both, by definition, abnormal.
>The majority of the time that it gets discussed on kf is in regards to fetishes. You will not understand the appeal behind a fetish unless you have it.
>People struggle to explain what exactly arouses them about niche fetishes in a way that the general public can even begin to comprehend.
>You will not be able to fully understand the appeal of a fetish.
>Shitting up threads with posts like 'ewww thats so gross how can anyone wank to this' is fucking retarded.
>You are doing the equivalent of a nigger going into a thread about ceiling birds and saying that you don't understand it. We know. That is the point. No one gives a shit outside the fact you are shitting up threads. We get it, you didn't have breakfast this morning.

>One of the main things that drew me to this website is it's impartiality and the ability to call someone retarded if they are being so. Making broad assumptions about a fetish that you 'dont understand' will at best shit up a thread and at worst tank the reputability of the information on the site. If you want to make up assumptions on your own personal beliefs when the truth is something completely different then keep that shit on reddit where it belongs. This site is known for it's critical thinking and objective documentarianism. Jumping to conclusions because you 'dont understand' a fetish is the antithesis to that.
>Humans are incredibly complex, our psychology even moreso. You do not know everything. Your instinct is normally not correct. Speak from understanding and knowledge, not a kneejerk reaction. You are presumably white, you should have the ability or desire to empathise and understand people well enough to at least attempt to inform yourself on what they are saying.[/]
>

>[]Now to instantly backtrack on what I just said.[/]
>Technically all fetishes are paraphilias. However the word is colloquially used to mean a specific type of fetish that is either dangerous or illegal. The most obvious example is paedophilia. Sometimes these harmful/illegal acts will be called paraphilic disorders to distance them from the less abnormal. The main ones that would be discussed on this site are paedophilia, zoophilia/zoosadism, rape (biastophilia) and voyeurism. This post is not about discussing these. This post is about regular legal fetishes.

>

>[]The more normal kinks and fetishes.
>[/]Feet - You're on kiwifarms, say hello to Null. Foot fetishes are the most common type of fetish. The easiest way to describe it is by showing you an image of gross hairy feet, you'd say they were unattractive right? If something like that can be unattractive then the opposite therefore is more attractive, the existence of 'ugly' feet implies the existence of 'pretty' feet. Take that to a slightly higher level and you have a foot fetish. This is the basis of most types of partialism, a fetish based on a specific bodypart. Hair, hand and armpit fetishism are other common types of partialism. You almost certainly have a partialism fetish, you just do not know it is classed as such. Have you ever seen a woman's long smooth legs and found it hot? Congrats that's called crurophilia. Ever wanked over an image of just boobs? Also partialism. Do you remember media and fashion in the 2000s? Remember how everyone was wearing crop tops and how Britney Spears getting a belly button piercing was the headline for gossip magazines for months? That's a result of belly/bellybutton partialism (Alvinolagnia/Alvinophilia). There chances of someone having at least a mild partialism fetish is almost 100%. The only difference between you, a 'normal' person, and a foot fetishist is that you like the curves of a waist instead of a foot, you want to play with boobs instead of toes, all four of those are types of partialism. Obviously some partialisms are more socially acceptable but that is heavily dependent on culture. One prominent example is ankles, certain cultures said women should not show any leg skin, that lead to people fetishing the small peeks of ankle skin that did show through. Another one is the Japanese fetish for necks, most hair and clothing leaves the neck completely covered, as a result wearing certain clothing and having your hair in a way that leaves the nape of your neck exposed is seen as erotic.

>Latex - Latex is another one of the most common fetishes. The easiest way to explain it is that it highlights and accentuates the body. By covering everything it accentuates what is left, mostly the curves and figure of the body. If that person was to then unzip or leave a certain area uncovered it will naturally draw your focus to that area. The shine also helps, similar to how 'normal' porn will oil both of the people up to create a shiny skin, latex is just naturally more reflective than skin. The nature of latex also helps to 'smooth' out the body, by being so tight it can help to spread/cover any natural folds or creases, effectively creating a more Barbie doll or photoshopped appearance. I'm not going to include images of fetish pornography but if you look up latex catsuit on any image search I would be willing to bet most people find it more attractive than they are expecting. There's also a side of latex fetishism that is more focused on the latex itself. Instead of being focused on how the latex looks on other people is is a more internal fetish based on how it makes you feel. Latex is skin tight and somewhat thick, it has specific noises too, those are erotic for some people. Essentially some people find wearing latex erotic, some people find others wearing latex erotic. The most common piece of latex clothing for this is a catsuit, these are specifically not gimpsuits, that comes later. This sort of fetish doesn't have a specific name but there is a subset of fetishes that are colloquially known as material fetishes (though this term brings up marxist philosophy for some reason?). There are several closely related fetishes in this group. PVC fetishism is essentially the same as latex, effectively a poor man's latex. Leather fetishism is also incredibly common in gay communities, though not exclusive by any means, though once again it is dependent on culture hence why there seems to be a disproportionally large number of straight women into wearing leather from Germany. Wetsuit/neoprene fetishism is rather similar to latex but with an added bondage aspect from the thicker material. One material fetish that you have probably seen in certain threads here about strange images found online is satin fetishism. It is primarily an older person thing and is one of the reasons that the 50+ year old trannies will all be wearing satin clothing. Another common fetish is spandex, though a lot of similar types of material get grouped in with this, basically anything tight and stretchy that isn't rubber. Arguably it's one of the more common types, a lot of the more normal clothing that gets eroticised is made of something spandex adjacent, think yoga pants and cycling clothing, this also includes certain types of swimsuits, the thicker more serious one piece types. Something that most people would not even consider a fetish, it's just normal to them right? I just find swimsuits erotic, this is how the other types of material fetishists think too, you have just never stopped to consider you might be one of them. Which leads into another type of common fetish.

>Clothing - A clothing fetish is yet another fetish that you will almost certainly have without realising. Have you ever seen someone in lingerie and thought they looked erotic? That's a clothing fetish. Lingerie stores are clothing fetish stores. It is something outside of regular heterosexual sex that causes arousal. If the presence of lingerie makes it more erotic then that is because of a fetish. It is simply just a normal fetish to have. You think lingerie makes a someone more erotic, I think them being barefoot has the same effect, the only difference is the type of fetish. Looking it up and apparently 60% of the population have a clothing fetish, I would honestly be willing to bet it is more and the rest of the people don't consider it a fetish because they have never thought about it before. Other than lingerie/underwear common examples are uniforms. Essentially anything you would find in a store like Anne Summers. A maid outfit, a playboy bunny, police uniform, school uniform, things like that. Things like tight jeans, swimsuits/bikinis and dresses are all subjects of clothing fetishes. Even wet tshirts are a type of clothing fetish. There is obviously a large cross over with the previously mentioned material fetishes, though they are distinctly different even if the item being fetishised is the same. A material fetish is based in the material it is made of, how that feels to touch or wear. A clothing fetish is more focused on how the clothing looks as a whole. The easiest example to use is a swimsuit. If you look at someone wearing a swimsuit and fantasise about how they look, the way the swimsuit highlights their curves and such, that is a clothing fetish. If you look at them and want to feel or touch it then that is a material fetish. There is a large overlap in these two and a lot of the time the answer is that you have both, though normally to a very mild degree. There is also a large crossover with partialism. If you have a foot fetish you are also probably going to have some level of sock or shoe fetishism, though shoe fetishes are fairly common outside of foot fetishists, think high heels mostly. If you have a fetish for legs then you're probably going to find tights or leggings attractive. Once again it can be hard to definitively say that someone has a clothing fetish as well as a partialism fetish, are they sniffing socks because the socks are erotic to them or is it just because that's where feet were? There are less normal types of clothing fetish though, things that are exclusively made for

>Bondage - To start off I want to differentiate between two similar terms. Bondage and BDSM. BDSM has two meanings depending on who you ask. The more common one is bondage domination sadism masochism. Other people will tell you that it stands for b/d d/s s/m, with those being bondage/discipline domination/submission sadism/masochism. Sadism being a sexual pleasure in causing harm, masochism being a sexual pleasure in being harmed. Bondage itself is just a smaller part of bdsm. Bondage itself is any form of physically restrictive item. The most common one you have probably never even thought about is handcuffs, that is the lightest and most common type of bondage. There is then things like corsets, which have a large crossover with clothing and material fetishes. Some more obvious cross overs are sock gags and latex vacbeds (imagine sous vide, you are the food, the bag is made of latex) as well as the previously mentioned innate restrictive nature of certain materials like latex and neoprene. One of the more popular types of more intense bondage clothing is a straight jacket. There are also groups of people that find the look of wearing only rope appealing, those will mostly refer to is as shibari if they speak English, though some types of shibari will be done over the clothes and normally done as a crossover with other fetishes. Shibari does not have the same meaning in Japanese as it does English, in Japanese it literally just means to tie or bind, essentially the Japanese word for bondage, not the specific more artistic meaning it has in English. Bondage is anything from handcuffs to being wrapped in a full body plastercast for days. There are then people who enjoy the loss of control that comes with allowing someone else to tie them up. Those people are more on the side of

>BDSM - As described above. The main difference is that bdsm specifically focuses on the loss of control and the dynamic behind that. The most important thing to remember when it comes to this sort of thing is that it is entirely consensual and that both people are enjoying it. Just like how you think someone kissing feet is gross and not enjoyable, just because one person is being 'hurt' that does not mean that they are not consenting and enjoying it. There is a large difference between a sadistic act and a sadistic person. Most bdsm sadists are not actually sadistic, they do not enjoy bringing other people pain in a normal setting. They exclusively enjoy it in a sexual setting. The same for masochists, they will not enjoy if you go and punch them for no reason. There is also a large difference between sexual sadism (spanking someone for mutual pleasure turns me on) and sexual psychosadism (psychopathic sadism; spanking someone turns me on and I do not care if they don't want it) or sadistic personality disorder (causing pain in general makes me feel good, not just sexually), though those terms are not strictly accurate in the 100% medical field. Essentially, a bdsm sadist will only enjoy causing pain if the person it is being done to also enjoys it. The exact details and nuance for this sort of stuff is cut out of most mainstream pornography depicting it. At any point if the submissive wishes they can completely stop the session. There is also normally a lot of aftercare. Essentially making sure they aren't sore or in pain and that they enjoyed it and feel good. This is also where gimps belong, a gimp is a specific type of bdsm fetish that involves latex. A gimp is not just a person wearing a black latex catsuit, it is someone who is doing so to get further into a submissive mindset. Bdsm isn't really a fetish, it is more a loose group of fetishes, similar to how a latex fetish is a material fetish but not the same as a leather fetish. Some of the common subgroups in bdsm is impact play (spanking or caning etc), temperature play (ice cubes on nipples or dripping a specific type of low temp melt wax), estim (licking a 9v battery but with your nipples), orgasm denial / edging / chastity and femdom.

>RACK / SSC - These aren't fetishes, they're more mindsets or ethos in bdsm communities. Ssc stands for safe, sane, consensual. Essentially, don't do anything dangerous, don't do anything crazy, don't do anything without permission. The problem is that sometimes shit is just inherently not safe. Being whipped or whatever is inherently unsafe. So it's more common to hear rack nowadays, which stands for risk aware consensual kink. Essentially do things that might be unsafe if you know it's unsafe and have taken steps to minimise that risk. There's plenty of other terms but those are normally rather self explanatory, a safe word is something you say to completely pause whatever is happening. There's other things like safe gestures and such, essentially if you can't speak because of a gag then grunt or move a part of your body in a specific unnatural and obvious way.

>Omorashi - A specific type of bdsm that revolves around having someone else control your ability to piss and being forced to hold it in until told otherwise or until wetting yourself. A surprisingly common fetish compared to what you would expect, mainly because it is a rather female fetish, when I say this I mean that there is a larger than average amount of women with this fetish, not that it is exclusively women or even majority women, just that there is a larger number of women than you would expect and also that specifically women have the fetish, not just that they partake in it for someone else's pleasure. Essentially imagine chastity or orgasm denial, now instead of cum it's piss. Bodily fluid fetishes, other than having a terrible name, are actually much more popular than you would think. A fair number of this comes from sweat or sexual fluids (mostly cum) but there is a large number of people aroused by pissing or shitting too. The general term for any urine involved fetish is watersports, golden showers are specifically being pissed on. One of the main reasons it is a thing is because of it being taboo. In simple terms, even if you are in a relationship you are probably not watching anyone pee, even if you are then you're not really seeing very much of it. Because it's something you're not meant to do or see that can lead to some people finding the idea of finally being able to see something like that as erotic. Remember being a child around puberty, the talk would always be around if a girl had started wearing a bra yet, being allowed to see something like that was the peak of erotic right? This is something similar. Though there is also a bdsm aspect to it, a toilet is not an object held in very high regards, if you were to be transformed into an object a toilet would be fairly low down the list, therefore for some submissives that concept is the peak of submission. Or it is done in the same way that a dog pisses on a lamppost, to mark territory and to establish dominance. There are also people who simply find the feeling of pissing to be erotic, or they just simply enjoy the taste. Maybe it sounds gross, eww who would drink piss right? Have you ever licked a vagina or sucked a dick? Are those really any less gross?

>ABDL / diapers - Somewhat similar. Another surprisingly female fetish. A number of diaper fetishists are simply just piss fetishists, those are the DL side, standing for diaper lover. Those are the people that just enjoy the feeling of using a diaper or the submission that comes from not being allowed to use a toilet. The AB side stands for adult baby, these are people that enjoy the mindset of diaper usage, they are not so much using diapers for the feeling, but they are seeking a specific mental state which is helped by, and often includes the use of, diapers. There is a significant nonzero number of these people who simply wear diapers and do not use them. There is also another significant section of them that do so as a form of what I will losely call meditation, ie not for sexual enjoyment but instead because it makes them feel better mentally, these people are rather often victims or suffer with other mental conditions that desire to go back to a time when they were a child and they had no worries or problems. If you live outside of america and hear someone call them diapers instead of a nappy then they probably have this fetish too.

>Humiliation - Has been somewhat of a running theme in the past few. There is a certain aspect of humiliation in being submissive, accidentally or intentionally wetting yourself, wearing things that most of society would consider embarrassing. Humiliation fetishism is often seen as a way to cope with certain things. A lot of fetish content that appeals specifically to coomers involves a heavy theme of humiliation. Deep down these people have some sense that sitting and wanking over more and more exotic fetishes is not socially acceptable, instead of simply stopping they will instead fetishise the idea of being socially unacceptable and talked down to. Another common version is SPH, small penis humiliation, something that tends to go hand in hand with chastity fetishism, essentially being aroused by the idea that your penis is too small to pleasure anyone. Why be sad about having a tiny cock when you can be horny about it instead?

>Giantess / vore - Giantess fetishism is the fetish for impossibly large size dynamics, essentially a normal person and anyone over 7ft, normally larger than a building, or a normal person and someone a few inches tall or less. Vore is the fetish of being swallowed whole and alive and often goes hand in hand with each other. Another surprising fetish once again due to the rather large amount of women who enjoy it. The reasoning being that they are essentially trying to become the dominant one, in a society where women are normally seen as at least somewhat sexually submissive, some women flip that around and want to become overwhelmingly dominant. Being a 50ft tall giant is incredibly dominant, vore is often a similar story where the submissive one allows the dominant one to fully consume them, they have submitted as entirely as is possible.

>Pegging - is an even more common form of the above logic. Normally society expects men to be doing a lot of the work when it comes to sex, they're the one doing all the thrusting. So some women decide that they are going to take that role instead. There is a fair crossover with bdsm dynamics too though. It's hard to really say without just asking but most women who are into pegging for pegging's sake will use a strapless dildo, essentially a double ended dildo so that they can get regular sexual pleasure at the same time. Bdsm pegging that is more for domination is almost exclusively with a regular strapon, the idea being that the submissive has to do all of that work for something that cannot ever feel sexual satisfaction and is basically just putting on a show. In general men are more prone to liking anal sex anyway. Mostly because there is no alternative, if a woman wants penetrative sex then she has a vagina for that, a man 'doesn't have that option'. Combine that with the fact men have a prostate and thus the ability to orgasm from exclusively prostate stimulation, an anal/prostate orgasm.

>Sounding - 'doesn't have that option' I say. Incorrect I say. What is a man's urethra if not a male vagina? If it was not made to be fucked then why is it possible? Sounding is the fetish for inserting things into your urethra. Normally it's a metal rod but also includes silicone rods or catheters, though with a catheter it does start to cross over into watersports territory. It's another fetish that a surprising amount of women like, for the same reasons as above. Being able to penetrate and dominate the person that would normally be penetrating and dominating you. Though it is on the more risky side of things, mostly bacterially, if the sound is not properly sterilized it can cause some nasty problems, as well as the sensitivity of the flesh in general requiring thorough lubrication. It's not exclusive to men, women also have urethras, but in general it tends to be more of a fetish done to men.

>Post orgasm / glans - The glans is the tip of your cock. I know most of you are probably american but normal penises are normally incredibly sensitive when the foreskin is pulled back, specifically the glans. If you were to tickle it or poke it or rub it with something it would be incredibly sensitive. And that is what, yet again, a surprising amount of women enjoy doing. That alongside post orgasm torture. Essentially after orgasm continuing to masturbate the guy's penis or glans specifically. It's mostly for the same reasons, women sometimes enjoy role reversal, tormenting the most sensitive part of a penis after an orgasm that causes an increase in it's sensitivity is just a logical step in that.

>Here is a graph of fetishes by gender.

>

>I will leave it there for the common things. There are many many more fetishes. Some of them are so niche that they simply have no name. What I want to get across is that a lot of these things might sound strange to you but when you actually stop and try to understand why someone might like them you might see yourself reflected in there somewhat. As well as the fact that unless the only thing that turns you on is genitals and the use of them in the most normal way possible (ie hetero penis in vagina or gay penis in ass, I guess fingering for lesbians?) that you have some sort of mild fetish at the bare minimum. That whether you realise it or not, you have much more in common with the people you would call disgusting than you realise.


>There is another reason as to why some men in particular are aroused by things that you might find disgusting. It doesn't have a specific name that I can find. But think about things in evolutionary terms. Back in caveman days we did not have showers or soaps or anything like that. If you wanted to have sex it was with something that would smell bad and be unwashed and such. As a result our brains have evolved to temporarily numb the feeling of disgust when aroused. This happens to women too but is less pronounced. You might find something gross but to someone else because they are horny the part of their brain that says it's gross shuts off and to them it is just erotic. That's part of why post nut clarity is a thing especially in fetish communities. It is also why, for the most obvious and extreme example, a person who finds consuming shit erotic would not be constantly streaming cum out if they visited india. It's why a lot of fetish acts involve a lot of foreplay too, getting someone aroused enough that their inhibitions are lowered and can do something that they would not do otherwise.

>

>[]Some of the fetishes that are somewhat misunderstood on kf that are worth highlighting.[/]

>Diapers / abdl / ageplay - A fetish for pissing and shitting in a diaper, wearing adult sized versions of children's clothing and acting like a child. This is the main reason I am making this post. The fucking pamperchu thread is full of faggots coming in and saying it's gross and they don't know how anyone could find it erotic. Once again the entire point is that the average person will never be able to understand why it is erotic. It is also very distinctly not paedophilia. Watering down the pamperchu thread with baseless accusations of paedophilia because he has a diaper fetish only ever gives these sorts of people a way to deflect from the fact he is a self admitted paedophile who actively wants to rape children and consume child pornography. Once again, as long as this is between two consenting adults it is not paedophilic in any way. This is not reddit. Accusing people of paedophilia because you do not like something they do is redditor behaviour. Stop it. This is also a very heavily autistic fetish with a lot of transgenders in the community too. From what I can tell there is something about the 'hug' of a diaper that calms the autist in a similar way to a tard hold or weighted blanket. As well as it involving mental regression (getting into the mindset of a baby) which is probably more appealing to an autist who is probably closer to that mindset than the general population. Mental regression is also more popular for people suffering from mental illnesses, autism often causing those sorts of things.

>Vore - Vore is the fetish for being swallowed whole, mostly through the mouth but sometimes with the ass or vagina too. It is distinct from cannibalism and vore is not a literal desire to eat human flesh which is a separate fetish with very little crossover. The best way I have heard it described is that it is an extension of bondage. Instead of being restrained by ropes and such it is instead the stomach doing the restraining. Vore itself isn't a problem as far as I'm aware. The reason why I bring up vore specifically in the 'what to watch out for' section is because a large number of children were knowingly exposed to this content. One large culprit being kphoria. This is one of the most interesting videos on the impacts of children being exposed to this sort of content and features an interview with a now adult who has had her sex life severely impacted by this channel specifically. There are few videos I would specifically tell someone to watch, this is one of those. There has also been ironic memes based on vore that became sincere fetishism in the same way femboy memes have. The biggest example I can think of is Sandy Cheeks cock vore, here is the original image of the giantess Spongebob squirrel with a giant penis acting as a vacuum. This image was taken and turned into a meme, I believe it stayed mostly on reddit. What started out as people laughing at a funny surreal image ended up with the subreddit being full of posts about people saying they now find it genuinely arousing. The subreddit has since been deleted and it's basically forgotten at this point, unless you are one of the people that posted slightly too 'ironically'. Both of these are hard examples of exposure to fetish content permanently changing a person's sex life.
>Piss / shit / farts / pregnancy / injections - I am grouping these all in the same category as well as diapers as they were heavily featured in elsagate content with the same fetishistic undertones. I predict that there will be a large increase in people coming out with these fetishes as the elsagate kids reach adulthood.
>Inflation - Another commonly 'ironically' posted fetish that is also shoved into the faces of children in the same way as elsagate, just in a slightly different way. Yet another fetish that is too obscure and hard to detect so slips by any sort of age verification very easily.

>WAM (wet and messy) / sploshing / feet - Wet and messy is a fetish that can easily be summed up by two things you will remember from your childhood. Quicksand and, depends where you grew up but, slime or gunge etc, the thick goopy stuff that would be poured onto a contestant of a children's gameshow, especially nickelodeon. I'm sure you can see where this is going putting it alongside feet. Everyone knows that dan schneider has a foot fetish and abused his position to satisfy that fetish and push it to the general public in a way that is just subtle enough to retain the benefit of the doubt. Whether slime was as intentional I do not know. What I do know is that the prevalence of both of these things has lead to a number of children developing fetishes for them. In a similar way to how kphoria created vore fetishists just it is national television channel instead of a niche youtube channel. One of the more famous examples of WAM content is cakefarts, though obvious there is a fart fetish aspect to that too.
>Wedgies / bullying - Another fetish heavily based in childhood. There is a concept in whatever sexology bullshit name that a common response to fear is to sexualise the cause of it. Once again, sounds retarded to you but is backed up with a lot of examples and evidence. What was lightheartedly used as a quickly recognisable and visual cue, as with seemingly everything, has lead to a number of people fetishising it. The logic being that bullying is scary, wedgies are an easy cue for bullying, fear to fetish pipeline happens, I now get aroused over wedgies and bullying as a coping mechanism. One of those that also causes problems if not properly tagged as fetish porn does show up in search results for wedgies, something that a child might be innocently searching up.

>Feederism / fat fetishism - Take a look at the bp. There's a decent number of these sorts of people featured on shows like My 600lbs life. They are mostly men who fetishise watching either the act of eating large amounts of food (feeder) or the weight gain that comes with it (fat fetishist). A number of the 600lbs life patients are heavily handicapped or outright die from this sort of shit. It is an incredibly selfish and frankly abusive fetish that prioritises the fetishist's fetish over the life and wellbeing of the other participant. With my 600lbs patients specifically a lot of them have their diets ruined and sabotaged by feeders, as well as a lot of them becoming reliant on the feeder which only creates a feedback loop. Also a fetish that is commonly onesided, the woman is often not sexually into feederism but is essentially having an addiction fed so doesn't leave or recognise it as quickly as a more traditional form of abuse. Fat fetishism also seems to be another one of these 'ironic' memes that is just actually posted by people with that fetish. Ala ASCAS and pyrocynical. Both of whom have posted this content to nonconsenting people, children in pyro's case, under the guise of being an 'ironic' meme, I do not need to repeat myself over the impact of this.

>Voyeurism - Everyone can agree that sexual activities in public, surrounded by a crowd of inherently nonconsenting people is bad right? The thing that most people overlook is the overlap between fetishes and voyeurism. Ok, wearing a full gimp suit in public is probably not good right? What about something less obvious, what about latex cosplay? Or Japanese kigurumi? Those things are not necessarily fetishes but they can be fetishised. There's a fair few things that I see where it's a bit gross, it's something that maybe the person doesn't see as a fetish but a lot of society would interpret as a fetish. This entire section is full of fetishes that have grown from unknowing exposure. Also to be frank involving the general public in any form of fetish is fucking vile and rapey. Especially vile are the voyeuristic diaper fetishists. I cannot imagine being a non elderly person and having to wear a diaper let alone if people grouped you in with voyeuristic fetishists.

>Findom - Findom is capitalism's answer to coomers. Porn addict? No that's a walking wallet. There are certainly more 'ethical' findoms than others but at the base of it the fetish is around taking money from people for nothing. Imagine if a benefit scrounger came up to you and demanded you give them their dole then spat in your face and kicked you in the balls. That but you get off to it. Personally I would say that these people have some level of porn addiction or something seriously wrong with their brain in general (not just sexually) and exploiting people like that is inherently immoral. There is also a lot of 'consensual' and nonconsensual blackmail in both findom and bnwo communities. Regardless of what you think about the people that this is happening to at the end of the day there is still an addict being blackmailed and extorted.

>EPI - Early porn introduction/induction. Something that probably doesn't need much of an introduction. A common grooming technique dating back before the invention of the internet. Showing a child pornography as a way of perverting their sexual development to be more in line with a paedophile's desires or as a sadistic act of 'ruining' a child. The most famous example of regular EPI is the AnkhaZone 'meme' that was an animation which on the surface looked child friendly but was simply just cropped porn. This was also incredibly common in the brony community. The most infamous EPI perpetrator is GigglyGoonClown, someone that endorsed both of the above as easy ways to show children pornography.
>Femboys / traps - Most femboys are grooming victims. The majority of the community were victims of EPI. That or they are either generally socially maladjusted or autistic. There are many 'memes' about femboys/traps, most of them are made by people with the fetish. A large number of these brand themselves as being 'ironic'. People will tell you they aren't seriously into X and that it's just a funny ironic meme. This quickly spirals into genuine fetishisation. Yes, the 'traps aren't gay' meme is intentionally or not doing something in the middle of grooming and fetish mining. The easiest example I can point to for this being a problem is the boykisser meme that quickly became a paedophile/groomer dogwhistle. If you are a parent and your son asks you to buy a blahaj (ikea plush shark) or a pair of thigh high socks especially striped ones then immediately check their entire internet usage as they are being groomed. The term 'otokonoko' (meaning 'male daughter' in Japanese) in English speaking circles is used somewhat akin to a femboy shota (anime male child). Probably the most infamous use of the word on this site is by a brazillian tranny selling bootleg hrt and including cropped anime porn of a child on the packaging alongside 'joke' instructions to keep away from parents. The thread got stuck in pg and ended up deleted, here's a post with basically all of the relevant information.
>Force feminisation / sissification - The next step in the femboy to necrotic crotch hole pipeline. Sissification seems to be more popular with the older men and has a large crossover with satin fetishism. These are the people who will be wearing frilly pink dresses and heels while having a receding hairline and a mortgage to pay. There is a large amount of both femboys and sissies that overlap with other fetishes mentioned in this post already. One of the more strange ones is a penis fetish. Not homosexuality. Not the desire to have sex or relationships with men. But a specific fetish on playing with a penis. There is a distinct difference in that these people do not want genuine relationships and will instead constantly seek out hookups to get access to a penis without having to date a man which they don't want to do. It is genuinely fucking baffling how many people you see that want to have sex with a penis but not have sex with a man. I think that's why the following is popular in some cases.
>Transgenderism / egg cracking - Everyone knows what a tranny is. I bring it up only because a large number of them started out as either of the above. There are subtle grooming techniques used in both communities to push the fetishist further down the line. A lot of femboys will be called 'good girl' and such and eventually become more accepting of the idea of 'being' a woman. Sissy shit is incredibly easy to see where the line goes, you enjoy being forcibly feminised externally, now it's internally too.
>Drone / hexcorp - A seemingly normal latex/bdsm based pseudogimp non tranny related fetish until you dig a bit deeper. The concept is to have your personality 'wiped' through some scifi procedure or hypnosis so that a hivemind can be installed into your body. It becomes tranny related when you realise that a large number of these people want their 'male' personality to be 'wiped' to become part of a 'female' hivemind. It was not invented by hexcorp but was heavily popularised by him. These people tend to be incredibly autistic and will write in incredibly an annoying and forced style and force the person they interact with to go along with it. It is exclusively third person and androgynous, it's shit along the lines of 'drone:28553 says it is feeling horny now'. It is incredibly annoying and it just drips with autism. Those in glass houses I know
>Puppy/pet play - While not strictly a tranny adjacent fetish there is still a large overlap. This is why a lot of the trannies will own a random dog cage that seems to be decorated strangely or wear a collar. Why a lot of them enjoy being called 'good girl' too, the same as you would for a dog. Another dissociative fetish that revolves around stripping personality, something that is rather telling. It is also why you will get clips of 'group meowing discord sessions' and such come out of transgender communities.

>Big black cocks - Blacked is a porn studio founded and funded in israel that created this fetish. It is jewish demoralisation propaganda disguised as a fetish and is pushed heavily by porn sites. White women do not go for black men, only slightly higher rates than indian men. You will see lots of this content posted 'ironically' alongside cuck fetish shit in a similar way. Once again this becomes not ironic for a lot of people. It is incredibly tiring and unfunny and even if done 'ironically' it is still spreading unironic propaganda.
>BNWO - Black new world order. These are people who take the bbc fetishism further. Instead of fetishing large cocks they instead fetishise the concept of black people as a whole. They see them as 'superior' because the only thing that a woman (which are all cock hungry whores) would care about is penis size. There are different levels to it, the lowest level is obviously set in a deep lack of self worth. The worst of it is some of the worst content you will find. Many cases of people being goaded into self harm, giving large amounts of money, reports of suicides. Though the suicides should be taken with a grain of salt as these sorts of people will try to portray themselves as bigger and meaner than they really are for the fetish. There are also many many instances of people masturbating over black on white fight or gore videos as well as including children into their fetishes. There are many screenshots of bnwo fetishists masturbating over images of children and fantasising about them growing up to be raped or beaten by a nigger. Remember that Ukranian girl that was randomly stabbed to death on a bus by a nigger? Yea these people wanked over it. Bnwo faggots are some of the most obnoxious and will openly reply to or repost images of random people and inject their fetish into it. There is a very large rapey undertone to what these people do. Dedicated bnwo thread.
>Plapping - A subfetish of primarily bnwo fetishists. There are large groups of gooners online, mostly in femboy circles, that will start large video calls on discord. In these calls the gooners will beat their balls, normally with a bbc dildo, alongside the group. Most of the time while in chastity too. Be thankful I am writing this through tor and uploading video is almost impossible. Many of them fantasise about being made infertile so that a nigger can rape the person they 'should' have inseminated.

>This thread touches on more general and sadistic forms of content posing as 'ironic'. People that 'ironically' pretend to be child rapists to the point of posting actual child pornography and such. A similar form of irony to sincerity occurs in fetish content too, just with obviously less horrific results, most of the time. If you look in to the void long enough the void will look back. And it's got a fucking massive tentacle boner.

>



>

>[]With that being said what is the point of this thread?

>This thread was mostly created as a counterpart to the lgbtqiwi thread.

>This is not a lolcow thread. This is not a community watch thread. This is not a thread to post wacky fetish shit and laugh, there are other threads for that. This is a thread for serious and earnest questions or discussions of fetish topics.

>Specifically as a place to discuss kink/fetish topics in a singular thread in a serious and genuine manner, as well as objective discussion and explanation of topics that are incredibly misunderstood on here. As well as being a single localised catalogue of fetishes and fetish terms relevant to the rest of the forum without it being full of shitposts and trolls like other websites. Everyone here is an adult. No one cares if you find something gross or haha faggot. If I wanted something shitting up I would be on grindr not writing threads. The site is ran by a toe sucking feeder, we are mature enough to have a serious discussion about fetish topics.

>Hornyposting is fucking retarded and if you want to fuel your goonsesh through the thin veil of asking 'questions' then fuck off back to r/askreddit.

>If you want to ask a question about fetishes to people that will potentially be able to give you personal help or just talk about your own experiences. Or if you just want to start the millionth debate on if talcum or silicone oil is best for latex. Or maybe you just want to commiserate with your fellow gimps after being given a legal order to not 'crawl, wriggle or writhe on the ground wearing a full-body covering or mask'[/]
>

>I also just want to talk about some of the fucking wack shit I have seen in my time. I have seen people using milk as an enema and squirting it out in public. I have seen the same thing but nasally. I have seen nasal shit packing, completely filling the nostrils with shit. I've seen nostril penetration, using a hook to pull the nose up to allow someone to insert things into the nostril. Latex masks with breathing pipes that go into your nostrils and all the way through your nose, past your fucking mouth, down straight into your airways. Seen people filling their bladder with random liquids through a catheter so they can pretend to cum half a litre in one go. I've seen people using lifesize 6ft horse dildos. Countless diaper fetishists shoving bananas and marshmallows into their ass because they're too pussy to actually commit and just shit themselves. Diaper fetishists putting on other people's shitted diapers, sometimes on their fucking face. People putting gas mask breathing tubes into bottles of piss so every breath is full of piss smell. Lesbian manure field wrestling. Seen a guy that froze blocks of his liquid shit to shove back into his ass so he can still make scat porn on demand despite having ibs. Seen someone fuck up sterilising a urethral sound and his urethra got infected to the point his cum way yellow and clumpy. Kneepits.

>So tell me. Which foot do you prefer to slobber on, left or right? Who's your favourite fat bitch and do you want to be smothered by her ass or tits more? And which type of cheese makes you willy wobble hardest?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom