Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

[Miss Hortensia]

Also also, what is the "Sophic philosophical mythos?"

Aut doesn't know anything about philosophy. Either Chac told him nothing but bullshit or Aut didn't listen carefully (or listened at all, that is; he has a knack for only marking words he actually like). Concerning his severe misunderstandings about basic philosophical concepts and tools I'm quite sure he never read any handbook about philosophy. We pointed a long range of mistakes out, but he never showed any awareness about it except his usual REEEEing.

Spoiler: Let's see

Aut repeatedly described logic as an antonym to empiricism, which is false in so many ways I don't really know how to dumb it down to describe why. Logic is the teaching of consistent thinking and thus arguing; basic logic - or just philosophical logic - is a tool. Empiricism is one way of obtaining knowledge that can be used to understand the world - it's a part of epistemology. It's a different matter, although you usually use logic to argue why empiristic insights can be correctly used to get truth anwsers about the world or not.

Aut stated idealism as synonym to logic, which is also false. Idealism is a part of epistemology. Idealism is not the opponent school of thought to empiricism - that was the job of the classical rationalism. My guess is, Aut confused idealism with rationalism.

Aut has no knowledge about logic whatsoever. You don't need to be a crack in formal logic to understand basic teachings of logic. He's often contradicting his own statements. He doesn't notice that a statement can be formally correct but still untrue and vice versa. He seems to be incapable of identifing true logic fallacies; he even tried to slap wrong fallacies on arguments he couldn't invalidate (I haven't forgot his embarassing "argumentum ad longitudinalitum " stunt - that isn't even correct latin, you can't inflect "longitudinalis" in that way).

Well, who cares? Tl;dr: He knows jack shit about basic philosophical concepts, no matter if it's about idealism, empiricism, formal logic or even mythos and logos. If he weren't such an insufferable arrogant cuck and misanthrop I wouldn't mind teaching him one thing or even two - or even give him just some reading advice. Provided he would show any signs of willingness to learn.

@Kanako Masuda
Well, whenever you remember a story we'll be willing to lend you an ear.

 

[LagoonaBlue]

I think my favorite part of that video is when, interspersed between screaming like a lunatic and bellowing insults and threats, he meekly says "I take no medication".

autphag confirmed earlier in the thread he was on medication during that video.

 

[Miss Hortensia]

autphag confirmed earlier in the thread he was on medication during that video.

I'm rather sceptical about Aut's statements. Besides, he has shown a great tendency to ignore his physician's advice to take his drugs regulary and to abstain from illegal substances. Maybe he was on medication, maybe not. Hard to tell. His past aggressive stance is pretty much the same today.

 

[AnOminous]

lastly anyone who so much as deigns to call me christopher facetiously or under the pretense of formality just to be facetious will be the last person i take seriously enough to consider their requests

kthx

You're misusing "deign," Christopher.

 

[Begemot]

Holy SHIT.

Spoiler: Powerlevel

My brother used to be friends with him back in about '08. He never really talked much about him to me, though.

Yes, very interesting indeed.
Are we going to have to update ASPERGIA: JUCHE'S RECKONING to show David Chac's betrayal of his former acolyte?

 

[Pikimon]

I can pop whatever I please, write whatever I want within reason, and give those who need a sore telling that the last thing they need to do is admonish people for their own sins, ones they've kept silent about to have Jafaican Kitty-Kats or whatever is his mutilation fetish of the week.

I mean hypothetically we could convince a staff member to lock this thread and leave you without the thing you crave the most: attention.

It would be pretty hilarious depriving you of the last group of people willing to give you any sort of attention, even though they're all laughing at you.

 

[bertram's]

When did Chris start consuming drugs?

 

[Begemot]

When did Chris start consuming drugs?

After you left him.

 

[LagoonaBlue]

After you left him.

That sounds like the plot of a cheesy novel.

 

[Begemot]

That sounds like the plot of a cheesy novel.

Autphag stared at David's retreating form, his pipe blowing a soft grey cancerous cloud of smoke.
"Master!" He cried. "Master, without your will Aspergia is but a dream. I'm not strong enough for this."
"Aspergia is a nightmare, my child, haven't you realised. It is a vicious hellscape of degradation and it will ruin you."
"No, I don't believe you! It's not possible."
"I have found a new successor. A wiser choice. More in sadness than in anger. An Australian woman, educated, blonde, stable: everything you could not be. Goodbye, my child."
Autphag screamed to the heavens. He rent the very earth with his fists. His tears would never stop. The betrayal would never end.

 

[Miss Hortensia]

The film adaption will be a masterpiece, I'm sure. Someone's already looking forward to it.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Autphag stared at David's retreating form, his pipe blowing a soft grey cancerous cloud of smoke.
"Master!" He cried. "Master, without your will Aspergia is but a dream. I'm not strong enough for this."
"Aspergia is a nightmare, my child, haven't you realised. It is a vicious hellscape of degradation and it will ruin you."
"No, I don't believe you! It's not possible."
"I have found a new successor. A wiser choice. More in sadness than in anger. An Australian woman, educated, blonde, stable: everything you could not be. Goodbye, my child."
Autphag screamed to the heavens. He rent the very earth with his fists. His tears would never stop. The betrayal would never end.

Meanwhile a cover of Kansas - Carry On Wayward Son is playing in the background (because Chris isn't worth the actual classic)

 

[Autphag]

Lagoona's chromosome profile is a well-guarded secret in their family safe.

Aut doesn't know anything about philosophy. Either Chac told him nothing but bullshit or Aut didn't listen carefully (or listened at all, that is; he has a knack for only marking words he actually like). Concerning his severe misunderstandings about basic philosophical concepts and tools I'm quite sure he never read any handbook about philosophy. We pointed a long range of mistakes out, but he never showed any awareness about it except his usual REEEEing.

Spoiler: Let's see

Aut repeatedly described logic as an antonym to empiricism, which is false in so many ways I don't really know how to dumb it down to describe why. Logic is the teaching of consistent thinking and thus arguing; basic logic - or just philosophical logic - is a tool. Empiricism is one way of obtaining knowledge that can be used to understand the world - it's a part of epistemology. It's a different matter, although you usually use logic to argue why empiristic insights can be correctly used to get truth anwsers about the world or not.

Aut stated idealism as synonym to logic, which is also false. Idealism is a part of epistemology. Idealism is not the opponent school of thought to empiricism - that was the job of the classical rationalism. My guess is, Aut confused idealism with rationalism.

Aut has no knowledge about logic whatsoever. You don't need to be a crack in formal logic to understand basic teachings of logic. He's often contradicting his own statements. He doesn't notice that a statement can be formally correct but still untrue and vice versa. He seems to be incapable of identifing true logic fallacies; he even tried to slap wrong fallacies on arguments he couldn't invalidate (I haven't forgot his embarassing "argumentum ad longitudinalitum " stunt - that isn't even correct latin, you can't inflect "longitudinalis" in that way).

Well, who cares? Tl;dr: He knows jack shit about basic philosophical concepts, no matter if it's about idealism, empiricism, formal logic or even mythos and logos. If he weren't such an insufferable arrogant cuck and misanthrop I wouldn't mind teaching him one thing or even two - or even give him just some reading advice. Provided he would show any signs of willingness to learn.

@Kanako Masuda
Well, whenever you remember a story we'll be willing to lend you an ear.

I'm aware of the definitive use of these concepts, but we had reinvented philosophy, so that philosophy was no longer malleable into an anti-Aspergian form.

 

[MormonofID]

I'm aware of the definitive use of these concepts, but we had reinvented philosophy, so that philosophy was no longer malleable into an anti-Aspergian form.

Futurama clips aside, philosophy is too broad of a concept to be "reinvented." You may have come up with your own form of philosophy that was not "malleable into an anti-Aspergian form," (Dear Lord, I can't believe I had to type that.) but you didn't reinvent it, you arrogant sperg.

 

[Autphag]

Futurama clips aside, philosophy is too broad of a concept to be "reinvented." You may have come up with your own form of philosophy that was not "malleable into an anti-Aspergian form," (Dear Lord, I can't believe I had to type that.) but you didn't reinvent it, you arrogant sperg.

But in doing so, we render other philosophies invalid.

 

[Cuntster]

I'm aware of the definitive use of these concepts, but we had reinvented philosophy, so that philosophy was no longer malleable into an anti-Aspergian form.

And such a noble philosophy it is that sanctifies child-rape.

 

[Autphag]

And such a noble philosophy it is that sanctifies child-rape.

No, it sanctifies consensual notions of sex between a noble and his pederast.

Try again, you catastrophising weird pomobabbling modfem post-op disaster.

 

[Miss Hortensia]

I'm aware of the definitive use of these concepts, but we had reinvented philosophy, so that philosophy was no longer malleable into an anti-Aspergian form.

No, you were not. Besides, there's never been something like a "we". Chac used you like a trash can to dump his exceptional worldviews. He never cared for your inputs - it's clearly visible whenever you show yourself to be too anxious to alter or even discard some of his ideas. In all this time you've been sperging around the farms you've never "invented" something together with friends. No matter, if we're speaking about Negi, S-Chan, Walter or some other remains of your vanished fellowship - you never heeded their words. Whenever they showed small amounts of reluctance, you instantly dismissed them. You aren't capable of working together with others.

And to deepen MormonofID's argument: Philosophy isn't something you can "reinvent", 'cause its never been something "definitive" that can be written down like a fuckin' dictionary. It always had its bonds with historic ideas and concepts. It can be developed, altered, discussed, but it can never be cut off from its roots. It's especially not possible to discard logic just because you're too dumb to use it. It's like to throw a hammer away while building a house because you hurt yourself just another time. Philosophy as "love of wisdom" need its teachings of consistent thinking.

But in doing so, we render other philosophies invalid.

That statement is pretty revealing.

You've been found wanting. And instead of learning to better yourself (what would be the normal human way) you decided to react like a little kid. You're inventing your own words so no one can ever communicate or even argue with you. You dismiss 99% of humankind's knowledge and experience, because you're too much of a pussy to bear any critique. You're like the bratty kid some of us used to had as a little sibling (or we were like that, too) that screeched "UUUU WROOONG!" just to annoy the shit out of everbody.

No, it sanctifies consensual notions of sex between a noble and his pederast

It's still paedophilia for the rest of humankind, you sick fuck. Sex with children is bad and you should feel bad about it. We've been telling you for ages why there can't be consensual sex between adults and kids and you're either too dense to understand it or you're truly a horrible person.

You may screech the whole day that you aren't a paedophile apologist, but is doesn't change the worldwide agreement that you're indeed one. You're so fuckin' exceptional that you can't see and understand other people's feelings and beliefs. You're hiding behind your nightmarish phantasms, because you're unwilling to be truly a part of humankind.

 

[Begemot]

No, it sanctifies consensual notions of sex between a noble and his pederast.

Try again, you catastrophising weird pomobabbling modfem post-op disaster.

Nah, it's still sickening paedophilia, your consistent lust of choice.

What do you think of the excerpt from my novel, kid, true to life?

 

[Autphag]

No, you were not. Besides, there's never been something like a "we". Chac used you like a trash can to dump his exceptional worldviews. He never cared for your inputs - it's clearly visible whenever you show yourself to be too anxious to alter or even discard some of his ideas. In all this time you've been sperging around the farms you've never "invented" something together with friends. No matter, if we're speaking about Negi, S-Chan, Walter or some other remains of your vanished fellowship - you never heeded their words. Whenever they showed small amounts of reluctance, you instantly dismissed them. You aren't capable of working together with others.

And to deepen MormonofID's argument: Philosophy isn't something you can "reinvent", 'cause its never been something "definitive" that can be written down like a fuckin' dictionary. It always had its bonds with historic ideas and concepts. It can be developed, altered, discussed, but it can never be cut off from its roots. It's especially not possible to discard logic just because you're too dumb to use it. It's like to throw a hammer away while building a house because you hurt yourself just another time. Philosophy as "love of wisdom" need its teachings of consistent thinking.



That statement is pretty revealing.

You've been found wanting. And instead of learning to better yourself (what would be the normal human way) you decided to react like a little kid. You're inventing your own words so no one can ever communicate or even argue with you. You dismiss 99% of humankind's knowledge and experience, because you're too much of a pussy to bear any critique. You're like the bratty kid some of us used to had as a little sibling (or we were like that, too) that screeched "UUUU WROOONG!" just to annoy the shit out of everbody.



It's still paedophilia for the rest of humankind, you sick fuck. Sex with children is bad and you should feel bad about it. We've been telling you for ages why there can't be consensual sex between adults and kids and you're either too dense to understand it or you're truly a horrible person.

You may screech the whole day that you aren't a paedophile apologist, but is doesn't change the worldwide agreement that you're indeed one. You're so fuckin' exceptional that you can't see and understand other people's feelings and beliefs. You're hiding behind your nightmarish phantasms, because you're unwilling to be truly a part of humankind.

Now you're just being proselytically patronizing for its own sake.

Shut the fuck up, sociopathic femalewhore, and don't be presumptive about the extent of understanding of a discipline someone has merely because they disagree with you.

You aren't critiquing anything, you're going on a self-indulgent display of redundancies I've frankly already covered elsewhere and decided to use the time I've been medicated as a form of ambush.