Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

[Autphag]

Cry more Christopher.

Someone's very homosexual for a conception of me that isn't really valid.

I wonder with all this rambling about 'autopaedophilia' whether or not you all just want to fuck me as an adult malle baby or something.

It's putrescent.

 

[Begemot]

This is why I like to say trolls have Eugene Valberg's "negroid time" syndrome. They only consider the collateral of their damage in terms of its current effects rather than the reality of the individual in their own context that they're dealing with. I know you homosexual aut-sperg types don't do flowery sociological things quite like I do though, so of course it'd fly above you.

Lots of projection, here, bairn, very interesting information about your sick deep-web milieu and subsequent arousal thereof. I doubt anyone here has advocated for a paedophile slave state and has admitted to being aroused by lipstick on a child. You're fucked, son.

 

[Autphag]

Lots of projection, here, bairn, very interesting information about your sick deep-web milieu and subsequent arousal thereof. I doubt anyone here has advocated for a paedophile slave state and has admitted to being aroused by lipstick on a child. You're fucked, son.

There are plenty of contexts where I've looked at lipstick on children sexually.

Most of them were in the early 2000s and were on boys, not to mention photoshopped.

Such was early sissy subculture.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Someone's very homosexual for a conception of me that isn't really valid.

I wonder with all this rambling about 'autopaedophilia' whether or not you all just want to fuck me as an adult malle baby or something.

It's putrescent.

You think very highly of yourself Chris. No one wants to sleep with a guy who doesn't bathe and shits himself on a daily bases. You're not a child Chris, no one wants to put up with garbage.

 

[Autphag]

You're not a child Chris

You paedophiles will imagine anything, though.

 

[Begemot]

There are plenty of contexts where I've looked at lipstick on children sexually.

Most of them were in the early 2000s and were on boys, not to mention photoshopped.

Such was early sissy subculture.

STOP WRITING THIS DEGENERATE SHIT. THIS ISN'T HELPING.

 

[Autphag]

STOP WRITING THIS DEGENERATE SHIT. THIS ISN'T HELPING.

SO LONG AS CHILDREN AREN'T VIOLATED, HAVING SUBCONSCIOUS GENETIC PREDILECTIONS TO THEM IS OKAY

the crime is fucking them, not looking at clothed pictures of artificial depictions of them, or writings about them prior to 2012

and I should emphasize, most paedo activity I did was whilst I was a teen and is therefore definitively not paedophilia

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

SO LONG AS CHILDREN AREN'T VIOLATED, HAVING SUBCONSCIOUS GENETIC PREDILECTIONS TO THEM IS OKAY

the crime is fucking them, not looking at clothed pictures of artificial depictions of them, or writings about them prior to 2012

That's not what the law says Chris. May want to look that up.

STOP WRITING THIS DEGENERATE SHIT. THIS ISN'T HELPING.

Chris can't help being a shitty human being, emotionally, mentally and physically.

 

[Autphag]

That's not what the law says Chris. May want to look that up.



Chris can't help being a shitty human being, emotionally, mentally and physically.

Indeed, it isn't what the law says now. This was mostly prior to the 2010s.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Indeed, it isn't what the law says now. This was mostly prior to the 2010s.

No Chris, try longer. You're just hoping that it's okay for you to look at children. It's not you sick piece of shit.

 

[Autphag]

No Chris, try longer. You're just hoping that it's okay for you to look at children. It's not you sick piece of shit.

None of these were anything more than literary depictions of children, and/or computer generated depictions of children, fictional ones at that, in a forced-sissification setting, primarily between the years 2003-2005 but generally prior to 2012 when written child pornography laws were changed in Britain.
Besides, Jason, I thought you were German?

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

None of these were anything more than literary depictions of children, and/or computer generated depictions of children, fictional ones at that, in a forced-sissification setting, primarily between the years 2003-2005 but generally prior to 2012 when written child pornography laws were changed in Britain.
Besides, Jason, I thought you were German?

Yes Chris I am, why are you changing the subject? It's not okay for you look at children the way you do. If I ever saw you in person you wouldn't make it out of the encounter without harm. People like you need to be executed for the harm you cause children.

 

[Autphag]

Yes Chris I am, why are you changing the subject? It's not okay for you look at children the way you do. If I ever saw you in person you wouldn't make it out of the encounter without harm. People like you need to be executed for the harm you cause children.

I'm not changing the subject, you're evading that you were outwitted.

Harm to children would, in a logical chain of cause and effect, imply the medium be photographs of physically extant children, the legal subject of child pornography in the main which I have never purviewed.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I'm not changing the subject, you're evading that you were outwitted.

Harm to children would, in a logical chain of cause and effect, imply the medium be photographs of physically extant children, the legal subject of child pornography in the main which I have never purviewed.

Chris, you haven't outwitted anyone. Through out this thread you have stated multiple times that you endorse sex with children, viewed underage porn and downloaded it. Go back and read your comments, after that, overdose so you can make the world a better place. We don't need another Nate walking around.

 

[Begemot]

I'm not changing the subject, you're evading that you were outwitted.

Harm to children would, in a logical chain of cause and effect, imply the medium be photographs of physically extant children, the legal subject of child pornography in the main which I have never purviewed.

Which typically leads to abuse. It's a slippery slope, Chris.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Which typically leads to abuse. It's a slippery slope, Chris.

Just viewing the shit leads to abuse. Just because you're not the one filming it or taking pictures of it doesn't mean it's not abuse. Chris is too bloody stupid to understand that.

This piece of shit has no idea what the thought of your children being hurt for people like him to jack off to does to a father. I would personally beat the shit out of him if did that to any of my kids.

 

[Autphag]

Just viewing the shit leads to abuse. Just because you're not the one filming it or taking pictures of it doesn't mean it's not abuse. Chris is too bloody stupid to understand that.

This piece of shit has no idea what the thought of your children being hurt for people like him to jack off to does to a father. I would personally beat the shit out of him if did that to any of my kids.

Gaslighting me into beleiving I've "admitted to downloading child pornography several times in this thread" is the definition of childish Machiavellianism, James.

 

[Begemot]

Gaslighting me into beleiving I've "admitted to downloading child pornography several times in this thread" is the definition of childish Machiavellianism, James.

James isn't here, Chris, you're going to have to face up to the fact there's a whole international array of people judging you for your degenerate dysgenic behaviour.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Gaslighting me into beleiving I've "admitted to downloading child pornography several times in this thread" is the definition of childish Machiavellianism, James.

When are you going to stop calling me James Chris? How fucking stupid are you to think that random people you know are on this forum? Everyone who has ever commented on this thread you have claimed to have been someone you know or knew one of those people. Hell, I believe at one time you thought this forum was made just for you.

You know why I came this thread Chris? I came here because there was no longer anything to talk about on Donny Long and Oliver D. Smith's threads. Donny alone was the reason why I came to this forum because of the information I had on the guy. Other than that, I'm here to make Vordrak's life as miserable as possible by commenting on his thread when it's up, to help with searches on Google and various other browsers to make sure people know what he does to underage girls.

 

[introman]

Stay away from the playground near your flat! Nambla wannabe Stephonknee