Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

Who passes better as a woman?

  • Autphag:

    Votes: 36 9.9%

  • Robert Wayne Stiles

    Votes: 327 90.1%
  • Total voters
    363
Autphag said:
AUTISTS ARE ONLY GOOD AT SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS.
Click to expand...

:story:

Classical mathematics is highly connected with formal logic. You can't compare it with your former school subject. You wouldn't be the first to be terrified after finding out that you don't calculate in mathematics at university. You create logical algorithms and this isn't definitely something you learn at school.

Autphag said:
They're not real subjects as recognized by the Aspergian. I'd literally only have people doing a biological science. Honestly.
Click to expand...

Bitch, please. You have no idea about science whatsoever. You even refuse to learn formal philosophy which is actually also needed to study STEM subjects - its' not only something you need for humanities. But of course, you don't know it, you've never been inside an university.

There's even a term for idiots like you, who refuse to accept certain definitions and try to dodge explicit statements: Loki's Wager. But I don't expect you to understand a single bit of it. You'll bitch and rage again: "O woe is me! 99,99% of humankind disregards my academic input, because I refuse to learn the basics. Whatever, I'll play in my own sandbox and bitch at everyone who tries to correct me - just like the little kid I want to be."
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Anonymus Fluhre and NobleGreyHorse
Miss Hortensia said:
:story:

Classical mathematics is highly connected with formal logic. You can't compare it with your former school subject. You wouldn't be the first to be terrified after finding out that you don't calculate in mathematics at university. You create logical algorithms and this isn't definitely something you learn at school.



Bitch, please. You have no idea about science whatsoever. You even refuse to learn formal philosophy which is actually also needed to study STEM subjects - its' not only something you need for humanities. But of course, you don't know it, you've never been inside an university.

There's even a term for idiots like you, who refuse to accept certain definitions and try to dodge explicit statements: Loki's Wager. But I don't expect you to understand a single bit of it. You'll bitch and rage again: "O woe is me! 99,99% of humankind disregards my academic input, because I refuse to learn the basics. Whatever, I'll play in my own sandbox and bitch at everyone who tries to correct me - just like the little kid I want to be."
Click to expand...
Chinks seem to get by on cramming even at that level so the same should apply for me.

And I bet none of you passed your high school examinations without rote-memorization. The adolescent brain doesn't develop that fast, at least when you're racially K-selected.

Granted I have a lot of r from my Celtic side but my Slavonic genes probably made me a really slow developer to compensate.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Begemot, Florence, LagoonaBlue and 1 other person
Autphag said:
Chinks seem to get by on cramming even at that level so the same should apply for me.
Click to expand...

Thanks for proving that you really haven't understood a single bit. You can't "learn" formal logic/mathemathics. Either you understand logic and thus use it correctly or you'll fail. After you already dismissed logic with the excuse "that's your doctorial conspiracy (or whatever)", I expect you to fuck it up gloriously.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Begemot, Anonymus Fluhre, NobleGreyHorse and 1 other person
Autphag said:
And I bet none of you passed your high school examinations without rote-memorization. The adolescent brain doesn't develop that fast, at least when you're racially K-selected.

Granted I have a lot of r from my Celtic side but my Slavonic genes probably made me a really slow developer to compensate.
Click to expand...

Dude what the fuck do you mean.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
Miss Hortensia said:
Thanks for proving that you really haven't understood a single bit. You can't "learn" formal logic/mathemathics. Either you understand logic and thus use it correctly or you'll fail. After you already dismissed logic with the excuse "that's your doctorial conspiracy (or whatever)", I expect you to fuck it up gloriously.
Click to expand...
Explain the segment of my IQ score concerning verbal reasoning. Certainly I have no inherent logical talent as per implication of autistic learning style none of them do.

LagoonaBlue said:
Dude what the fuck do you mean.
Click to expand...
Racial science you're too stupid to understand.

Concern yourself with sewing, or reciting Burn's poems.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Begemot, Florence, Anonymus Fluhre and 3 others
There are so many straw men up in here (straw women, straw autists, straw everything) that I sure as hell hope nobody ITT is smoking. (Smoking anything.) The idea that autists ONLY do blahblahblah and can NEVER do these other things or they're not real autists is... holy shit, it is literally the "No True Scotsman" fallacy.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Anonymus Fluhre, LagoonaBlue and Miss Hortensia
NobleGreyHorse said:
There are so many straw men up in here (straw women, straw autists, straw everything) that I sure as hell hope nobody ITT is smoking. (Smoking anything.) The idea that autists ONLY do blahblahblah and can NEVER do these other things or they're not real autists is... holy shit, it is literally the "No True Scotsman" fallacy.
Click to expand...
Autists are neurologically Mongoloid. Athough the women do tend towards verbal endeavours (hence preference for biological over physical sciences) none of them really have the wherewithal to understand literature beyond stilted analysis and rote. They tend towards systems.

Neurotyical are neurologically Ashkenazim. Even the men are neurofemale and highly, highly verbal.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Begemot, Florence, Anonymus Fluhre and 3 others
So just tell us really quickly, what does it take to understand literature? Because I have a dark suspicion you couldn't really explain why Burns is superior to William McGonagall. (Not that that's a high bar to clear. I'm admittedly using the extremes here.)
 
NobleGreyHorse said:
So just tell us really quickly, what does it take to understand literature? Because I have a dark suspicion you couldn't really explain why Burns is superior to William McGonagall. (Not that that's a high bar to clear. I'm admittedly using the extremes here.)
Click to expand...
THAT PROVES THAT I'M RIGHT. I got by Higher English by memorizing Spark's Notes.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Begemot, Florence, Anonymus Fluhre and 3 others
I honestly believe the entire education system should be based on memorization alone.

North Korea seem to get by on a higher education entrance examination that essentially tests your knowledge of Kim Jong-il's writings and nothing else.

THIS IS WHY SUPPRESSED SOCIETIES ARE BEST.

MEN WORKED HARDER WHEN THEY WEREN'T ALLOWED TO EXHIBIT THEIR EFFEMINATED HOMOSEXUALITY MISREFERRED TO AS "TRANSSEXUALISM". SCOTLAND SHOULD RETURN BACK TO A 1940S-60S SOCIAL PARADIGM WHERE WOMEN'S ROLE WAS TO UPHOLD THE PATRIARCHY, LIKE IN MODERN SOCIALIST SOCIETIES TODAY.

IN FACT, GOING BACK TO STUDIES ON THE SUBJECT (GENDER DYSPHORIA) GOING BACK TO 1959, THE TWO WERE SYNONYMS!

SEE WHAT I MEAN BY "SUPPRESSED SOCIETIES WERE BETTER"?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Begemot, Florence, LagoonaBlue and 2 others
Autphag said:
THIS IS WHY SUPPRESSED SOCIETIES ARE BEST.

MEN WORKED HARDER WHEN THEY WEREN'T ALLOWED TO EXHIBIT THEIR EFFEMINATED HOMOSEXUALITY MISREFERRED TO AS "TRANSSEXUALISM". SCOTLAND SHOULD RETURN BACK TO A 1940S-60S SOCIAL PARADIGM WHERE WOMEN'S ROLE WAS TO UPHOLD THE PATRIARCHY, LIKE IN MODERN SOCIALIST SOCIETIES TODAY.
Click to expand...

Except you've never worked a day in your life.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Miss Hortensia
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back