If you removed all of the men, nothing would ever get fixed, or built in the first place. No electricity, no HVAC, no roads, or cars to drive them on.
I guess there are no men in africa, because they aren't capable of maintaining their own electricity or roads and never invented anything of note.
It seems to me like you're giving every man on the planet credit for the culture of europeans, while also painting technology as an unimpeachable good with no down sides.
You'd look awfully silly huddling under a tree trying to stay warm in between scavenging for berries, since I'm sure you know fuck all about how to actually create any of the creature comforts you take for granted.
90% of humanity relies on infrastructure to live, and the majority of modern men have no idea how to build houses, either. You started this post by insulting the OP as not being a deep thinker, but you conclude that people are incapable of figuring out how to build a shelter and would resort to huddling under trees. The only people too dumb to reliably create housing are australian aboriginals, and they have evolved the ability to withstand temperature extremes as a result.
I don't particularly want a world without men and I am grateful for the time and place I live in, but I would never argue that basic needs like housing are beyond the grasp of women because that flies in the face of observable reality. A lot of technology would go by the wayside, for sure, but not housing. I would anticipate the quality of housing being poorer in general, but it is harder to gloat about that.
Men’s Lives Get Worse After Spousal Loss, Women’s Lives Generally Get Healthier
This isn't the first study to suggest this association.
I don't see this information as men being a net drain on a marriage, I see this as a difference in average skill sets. When your spouse dies, your job becomes taking care of yourself. Men are not usually great care takers and usually assume a different set of duties within a marriage, and they also don't usually enjoy introspection so even figuring out how to care for themselves adequately is more difficult. Women typically excel at both those things. What happens when your spouse dies is so radically different from what it is like to be married that it is hard for me to draw conclusions about marriage from this.
pparently the most likely to pop pills to cope with man wrecking your life is widows, divorcees among women lmao
QuickStats:Percentage of Adults Aged ≥20 Years Who Used Antidepressant Medications* in the Past 30 Days, by Sex and Marital Status — National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, United States, 2015–2018
Additionally, I am tempted to interpret this as seeing the correlation in the other direction. Perhaps the people most prone to divorce are more likely to have mood problems, or seek out doctors for help with their mood. Perhaps people who are unlikely to get married in the first place are also less likely to seek out medical help for their problems. There are many ways to explain this data that doesn't reflect poorly on men or women, but it is valuable in that it debunks many claims about the demographics of SSRI enjoyers.
I am a woman. Social science "research" is not as compelling as you think it is, which you'd know if you were familiar with the field, nor can it replace real world experience. Statistics devoid of context are meaningless. Unfortunately for you women are going to continue to be heterosexual pair bonders, and no amount of "science" will stop that.
100%. The only real definitive "men suck" statistics and research that matter are crime statistics, especially sex crimes, and everyone is aware of that information at this point.
x 32 
