Iran Crisis & the 2026 War between Iran and the United States, Gulf States, and Israel - Please focus on news and coverage, not argumentation.

Aside from everything, how can they even determine such? Can't a plane bomb some other targets and the bridges?
tl;dr: It'd be up to the US to prove they didn't.

This is retarded diplomatic slapfighting. If this was Japan or Thailand I would expect that with a wink and a nod. This is Queer Starmer, a sleazy lawyer from the ICC who made it so you can sue his own soldiers even if they were following lawful orders. He is trying to set himself up for private practice suing Trump and trying to get him on warcrimes after.

E-4B was also in flight during the '12 day war'. Could be nothing as the USAF claimed when that happened.
AFAICT this is a case of unit does routine mission.
Retarded Journoscum & most civilians cannot grasp the concept of preparation. If things are even remotely spicy that plane will be in the air.

If that plane is needed to be in the air and isn't, it will be too late.

Same reason you move a quarter of the US surface fleet off the coast of Venezuela, when really we only needed one ship. (And hell, we didn't even need that, the mission could have taken off from PR.) But if VZ hadn't folded, we'd need those assets even if US boot never got any mud on them so it was better to have them an not need them than need them and not have them.

I'm definitely surprised that the protests before the air campaign began didn't end up balkanising Iran like they did Syria. The state did chimp out and gun a lot of people down, just like in Syria. The state of their economy is even worse than Syria's was in 2010-2011. And yet, nothing happened.

I wonder what went wrong. Or rather, right
Completely different situations. Syrian Separatists were always there, but the same conditions that lead to the rise of ISIS gave them a huge boost in power and recruits. The Syrian civil war was more like the US Civil war, the rural western part of the country going to war with the urban east - but the population disparity wasn't as wide, and foreign aid showed up.
Basically a lot of Good Ol' Boys out in the mountains away from the watch of Achmed Law - lots of guys who can get their hands on an AK. And most of the early "Free Syria" was out in those boonies with limited state control.
The Syrian Army was also not unified. there were "ethnic units" and most of these defected to the Rebels early.

Iran is mostly urban bugmen, disarmed and cucked since even before the IRGC took over.
As @BigJoey41X points out, Iran's borders are more-or-less natural instead of imposed so there is less ethnic strife; the demonstrations weren't an ethnic war masquerading as anti-government. The people were completely cucked and disarmed with no weapons to resist, and the IRGC had pulled in Iraqi fighters early on to massacre them. the IRCG units were also rigorously indoctrinated; none of them were going to turn for the protestors because "their people" wouldn't be among them.

tl;dr: Syria's resistance was armed. Iran's was not. Lynch any leader who wants to disarm you.

Could just be a sheer numbers/size thing. Syria isn't as big as Iran, and it didn't have multiple proxy groups that it could call up for emergency mass suppression.
not just size. Syria was much more fractured, and the bordering ethnic groups were for working with the separatists not backing the government.

Despite being ethnically diverse, Iran has remarkably historically avoided the typical inter-ethnic strife that plagued a lot of nations, the modern borders of Iran has more or less stayed the same for the past 150 years, the modern borders of Syria is pretty much a colonial product born after WW1 and the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire before becoming fully independent after WW2, the previous Assad regime previously had to use a lot of heavy handed force to suppress the internal ethnic and religious divisions that had been bubbling for decades before finally exploding in 2011.

Iran never really had to do that, or at least to the same extent and brutality as what happened in Syria, the ethnic groups of Iran are broadly fine with living in the same country, and have been for hundreds of years even before the modern borders were formed, while Syria's borders are an artificial colonial byproduct.
You can pretty much stop at "Iran's borders formed more or less naturally, Syrias were imposed by France". But even then, Iran still has to deal with Kurds, Balochs, Some other northwestern group I forget (I don't think its pashtuns) separatists who do effectively run fiefdoms and blow stuff up from time to time (part and parcel you know). Its not all sunshine and nightsticks, but the restive minorities are vastly, vastly outmatched and out powered.

Iraq has 3 principal ethnic groups, none of the others had enough power, and given that if any two of them teamed up they'd be able to genocide the third, its kept them in a Mexican stand off.

IIRC the USAF has extremely limited graphite bombs in inventory
US Marines as we speak are having their diet changed from crayons to green colored pencils.
Airforce paper pushers rubbing pencils on blank sheets of paper over paper cups furiously r/n.
US army taking cheese graters to black soldiers this very moment.
Navy has press-ganged every 3rd-world port whore into the galley to burn all the food to a black crisp.

Graphite bomb production is maxed out.


Trump has said multiple times, both yesterday and today, that Iran will be given no more extensions. Then that WSJ article came out (yeah, shitty source) saying that even he is pessimistic at the prospect of a deal being done in time, especially after seeing that ten-point list of nonsense Iran sent back, and he's always raving about how close they are to a deal.
The only way I could see him cucking out without completely tanking his reputation is to claim that they had to pull back because Iran used civilians as human shields, but even then, he could just use graphite bombs.
That's exactly what I'm saying. I don't think Trump folds unless there is something solid & actionable from the regime, but if he does and its more worthless negotiations after that posturing I'm going to have to side with the retarded leftoids and agree that's a shameful TACOing.

Difference I'm not losing my mind (or working those beads against my prostate) until we see what happens.

Continuing from this, even Ravid and Axios can only squeeze a "maybe if he sees a deal coming together" to justify an extension, followed immediately by saying the admin is skeptical of it happening and that Trump is more hawkish on striking them than anyone.
View attachment 8818979
Source | Archive
I think something will happen, I think Trump is having a big mad. I'm just willing to entertain the possibility it won't and we're back to pointless negotiations.

Total.
Muslim.
Death.

Yom Kippur war was needed to establish a peace with the Egyptians btw, it would have never happened without Egyptians regaining their "honor" after 67/war of attrition. This is why they absolutely lose it over the idea that they didn't win it and name multiple cities after it.
I partly agree but dispute you on why it was needed for the peace deal to go through; 73 made Egypt realized how absolutely fucked they were. They had the initiative, they had allies, they have EVERYTHING in their favor, and they still got rolled. Sadat had a full on melty, he was afraid he was going to get couped in the aftermath. Egypt was also being raped economically and couldn't keep up.

Also with Nassar gone, pan-arab "Nassarism" was something that was just too expensive for Egypt.
then the government realized how much better everyting was when you weren't trying to prop up ungrateful shiftless arabs and could buy weapons that worked from the US instead of Soviet copeboxes and never looked back.

Except that small period when Obama let the muslim brotherhood take over.
 
That's not in the Masoratic Text, seems to be a septuagint addition. Not a fan of it being made explicit, the subtlety is a central feature.
Looks like they added in the concept of two lots being cast for the Jews and the other nations too. Neato rereading it. Recently read Josephus telling of it but it's interesting to revisit in this context.
 
Queer Starmer, a sleazy lawyer from the ICC who made it so you can sue his own soldiers even if they were following lawful orders
Queef Starmer leaned his craft from the socialists @Australian Labor Party. This just happened a few hours ago. I hope Trump trolls our government with this news.

IMG_20260407_155145.png
ABC News

IMG_20260407_155721.png
News.com.au
 
He is trying to set himself up for private practice suing Trump and trying to get him on warcrimes after.
I wish him luck, we reject the ICC's jurasdiction and even have federal laws saying fuck the Hague.

The only roundabout way they could try to force it is getting a case referred through the UN but guess what we have veto power there.

International law has no power over us other than reputational standing.

As many even here at home have been learning this year. It turns out, we can just do shit.
 
1775541498336.png1775541505205.png1775541558465.png
Strikes at or around Mehrabad Airport. This is Tehran largest airport, but there are a few others and a handful of small ones.
Supposedly some kind of "fuel" was hit. This would explain the point of the strike.
 
I can cite the Talmud and such but that's going too deep. I heavily suggest reading the book of Esther, it's an essential book that's often overlooked.
Okay I'm catching stuff I never saw before. Parallels between the queen and the king, the people and God, and the Jews and the Nations, and Hamon and Mordechai.

Edit: and two decrees
 
Last edited:
I wish him luck, we reject the ICC's jurasdiction and even have federal laws saying fuck the Hague.

The only roundabout way they could try to force it is getting a case referred through the UN but guess what we have veto power there.

International law has no power over us other than reputational standing.

As many even here at home have been learning this year. It turns out, we can just do shit.
Sorry let me clarify. He would never actually get Trump in their gay little court. But he'd go through to the motions like he could.

What happens is Queer Starmer hangs his shingle at the ICC and requests to be the prosecutor to determine if anything in Iran is Heckin' war crime and gets it. He never leaves London, but he gets an ICC-paid for flat. He gets an office, a staff, a budget but most importantly for that little grubbing faggot he gets power. He will spend two decades compiling worthless bullshit testimonies (see: the seething of our own local brown contingent) , "evidence" and "expert testimony" from America-hating communists, and after two decades will finally publish a report "We think there is enough evidence to try President Trump for war crimes and have the facts (snort) we gathered in this case heard in court but because the US refuses to completely cuck to our authority and we don't want the US to nuke us if we even attempted to enforce our gay faggot club's will, I guess it'll never go before the court. Rest assured, I will tirelessly continue to waste the European taxpayers money on his pointless endeavor until I retire or die".

I doubt they even have the balls to try him in-absentia.

Queef Starmer leaned his craft from the socialists @Australian Labor Party. This just happened a few hours ago. I hope Trump trolls our government with this news.

View attachment 8819376
ABC News

View attachment 8819412
News.com.au
you think you hate Eurofags, but it turns out you don't hate them enough.
 
you think you hate Eurofags, but it turns out you don't hate them enough.
We have a right wing party that's suddenly exploded with support, people have had enough. The equivalent of the Democrats rule here (ALP) and the equivalent of the Republicans (classic liberals LNP) has collapsed and turned to hard right One Nation party. Deport immigrants and unfuck HR lady culture.

Screenshot_20260407-163206_Brave.jpg
 
Last edited:
I wish him luck, we reject the ICC's jurasdiction and even have federal laws saying fuck the Hague.
As someone that has recently been working in The Hague with the ICC, they are truly extremely cucked and retarded. They gloat to visitors about having the most fair system, but never even imagine the importance of a jury of peers or the need for physical evidence or cross examination of witnesses.

And theyre only ever used for lawfare in Africa anyways. Africans defer to the ICC to arrest and punish their former leaders and warfighters and the ICC loves it because they claim it gives them validation as an international court helping the supposedly unprivileged African justice systems that cant handle these cases. Totally not reminiscent of a white savior complex.
 
Back
Top Bottom