Who is to say if the authorities are involved or they just never were in the first place.
The lack of a case number, criminal record or history, court proceedings, records of any attempt to prosecute, etc. is what I base my "no report to police" assertion on.
Same as online "harassment" and "death threats" when the alleged victim "totally has an active FBI investigation going because of it" -- if you
actually involve the authorities by reporting a criminal act, they tell you to
shut the fuck up about it in public and get away from the alleged perpetrator ASAP. They certainly do
not tell you "oh yeah go ahead and do your best to spoil any possibility of prosecution by smearing unproven haphazardly in a Google Doc for the world to see and start dragging the guy publicly to rally public support (and conveniently taint any potential jury pool)." They don't tell you that. Because that would be fucking stupid.
It's a reason why this crime is one of the most lowly convicted crimes not that its not reported almost immediately and it's possible these allegations are false.
The reason it's such a rare crime to see successfully prosecuted is because the criminal act described by the relevant statutes rarely ever actually happens. The crime is hard to prove because it's hard to commit. I know it's flippant and crass to just say "you can't rape the willing," but one of the most successful defenses people mount against sex crime allegations comes when they can prove the alleged "victim" continued to spend time with the alleged rapist after the event happened, and continued to seek sexual encounters with them. You know what a rape victim never does?
Begs for more in private with no witnesses. "What you are in the dark" and all that...
Remember "Mattress Girl"? Ugly bitch claimed some hapless white guy raped her and the school refused to do anything about it ... except everybody believed her, the school suspended him (convicting him in a private kangaroo court), initially denied him a diploma but eventually relented, and allowed the slag to walk around the whole campus for a year dragging a stupid mattress around on her back (including at the graduation ceremony) despite how obviously disruptive that performative bullshit is, and continued to allow students to harass the accused (including at the graduation ceremony). He quietly took his diploma and fled to a better university to continue his education, and sued the original university's fucking asses off and pounded them into the dirt (he refused to settle, took them to trial, and he won a juicy fucking payout).
The most damning evidence he provided against them was the proof he provided to them that she was not afraid of him, didn't think he was raping her, etc., which comprised text messages she sent him
after the alleged rape, in which she begs him (literally) to fuck her in the ass again because of how much she loved it. That is not the act of a rape victim. That's the act of a person who enjoyed themselves immensely during a sexual encounter and is desperate for more.
This happens
constantly. Normal women hold grudges, but BPD women are vindictive little cunts, and society is conditioned to "always believe women," so sexual crime accusations are the easiest available way to ruin a man's life. The mere accusation is enough to do it, too; convictions not required. That's by design. If you could only ruin a man's life with sex crime accusations if you can actually
prove he did the deed, they'd never bother, because those crimes are so vanishingly rare to begin with (they're so rare, they get special attention on all those Youtube True Crime channels). Feminists worked overtime to make sure just accusing somebody would do the job, because the actual crime itself is rare.
