Russell Greer vs. Viatron Corporation, A-26-937678-C

[Pee Cola]

tl;dr-Mr. Hardin now has access to more information about Russell that could be helpful in the proceedings against the Farms & ViaTRON and with luck also lead to Russell facing extortion or sexpest matters he has to answer to.

I'm pretty sure Hardin can't use the information discovered in the Viacom case directly without going through legal hurdles, but he can ensure that Greer knows that he knows and push the right buttons to make Greer reveal that information directly.

Even if Hardin can leverage information gleaned from ViaTRON v Greer that is relevant to GvM and successfully extracts corroboration of said info from Greee himself in the form of plightsperged filings, those two mollycoddling halfwits in Utah will still breeze past it all just to keep the abortion of a case that is GvM on life support.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

See how much livelier this thread is when we know we're allowed to talk about both Russell and ViaTRON's fuckups freely?

 

[Betonhaus]

Even if Hardin can leverage information gleaned from ViaTRON v Greer that is relevant to GvM and successfully extracts corroboration of said info from Greee himself in the form of plightsperged filings, those two mollycoddling halfwits in Utah will still breeze past it all just to keep the abortion of a case that is GvM on life support.

Can Hardin start mentioning GvM in GvV and indirectly shame Bennett just by pointing out the things that by all rights should receive case ending sanctions?
Just mentioning that the case has dragged on for six years has got to get the judge wanting to deal with GvV quickly

 

[obsdj]

Can Hardin start mentioning GvM in GvV and indirectly shame Bennett just by pointing out the things that by all rights should receive case ending sanctions?
Just mentioning that the case has dragged on for six years has got to get the judge wanting to deal with GvV quickly

I dunno, that might have the opposite of the desired effect. State court might look at that shit and defer to how federal court is handling Dipshitforlips with kid gloves, especially when they see how the case got appealed to the 10th Circuit and bounced back.

 

[The Garden]

I'm struggling to imagine how "I don't like people looking at me" could ever be seriously considered something for which an employer has to provide a reasonable accommodation.

Russ is claiming that the porn shield was an ADA accommodation, but I think it's just as likely that he asked his manager if he could put it up, the manager said, "whatever, I don't want to fight you on this and I'm out looking for another job anyways," and that was that, until the new manager decided she didn't like the shared workspace looking like a trash dump..

If Greer had any documentation of this being an actual accommodation for ADA purposes, he would have included that in his complaint. I don't think we've seen that, we just have his post hoc justification for it.

If any conversation happened (remember, his "notifying" his latina manager about his class schedule was a single email sent to the wrong address), it was probably along the lines of Russ whining to the teacher so often that Aaron just said "Yeah, sure. Just hit your quota." and not actually hearing that day's Reciting of the Plights.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

A privacy screen is incredibly cheap and would have no impact on other workers, the fact that they apparently took it away for seemingly no reason is weird.

At work we removed these when they were abused, and the ADA shit was always abused.

For example, a common way to get out of work at a call center I managed IT for was to claim to be anemic, so we'd have to take the staffer to the medical room and wait for them to recover. Once the dindus figured that one out every single one had a fainting spell every time hard work came in or they got tired or were just mad at something. But we couldn't do shit because the policy ("always treat a medical emergency like an actual emergency unless HR says otherwise") assumes a high trust society, which means it's only really useful for Whites and the Japanese long term.

If Russ was looking at insta-thots on his phone using his privacy screen to hide it, they would have removed the screen the second they noticed. They might not have even mentioned this if they were gathering evidence to punish him for it or fire him for it later, and they would have coached this in very vague language the entire time until they had proof to spring it on him. His coworkers would have probably known (they would have seen and reported him, resulting in the screen being removed) and gossipped, resulting in everyone knowing he was "looking at porn on his phone all day" or something.

Since there was discussion of him not working as hard as his coworkers I suspect that was probably something similar to what happened.

 

[DavidS877]

Once the dindus figured that one out every single one had a fainting spell every time hard work came in or they got tired or were just mad at something. But we couldn't do shit because the policy ("always treat a medical emergency like an actual emergency unless HR says otherwise")

Seems to me that the emergency should have been properly triaged and the ambulance called and require them to be taken for evaluation before returning to work.

 

[Exegesis]

At work we removed these when they were abused, and the ADA shit was always abused.

For example, a common way to get out of work at a call center I managed IT for was to claim to be anemic, so we'd have to take the staffer to the medical room and wait for them to recover. Once the dindus figured that one out every single one had a fainting spell every time hard work came in or they got tired or were just mad at something. But we couldn't do shit because the policy ("always treat a medical emergency like an actual emergency unless HR says otherwise") assumes a high trust society, which means it's only really useful for Whites and the Japanese long term.

If Russ was looking at insta-thots on his phone using his privacy screen to hide it, they would have removed the screen the second they noticed. They might not have even mentioned this if they were gathering evidence to punish him for it or fire him for it later, and they would have coached this in very vague language the entire time until they had proof to spring it on him. His coworkers would have probably known (they would have seen and reported him, resulting in the screen being removed) and gossipped, resulting in everyone knowing he was "looking at porn on his phone all day" or something.

Since there was discussion of him not working as hard as his coworkers I suspect that was probably something similar to what happened.

I thought courts dealt with people abusing ADA shit by just calling it fraud or something of that nature? Last I checked it's illegal to call yourself anemic as a means of not doing work; but I suppose it's easier for companies to just ignore the abuse most of the time as opposed to punishing the person as they will likely respond by bringing the matter to court which is a pain in the ass for everyone involved.

 

[Swole McPole]

Also he apparently needs a lot of cash so that he can get a reputation management service lol

This is so archetypally Greer. Most people want to improve their employment prospects, they just work harder and do a better job. But Greer, who has a reputation for bringing vexatious lawsuits, decides that the best way HE can improve his employment prospects is to sue his current employer and use some of the money to pay a charlatan who pretends they can clean up his image.

Nigger, you're here for LIFE. You'll be wearing that scarlet letter until you're dead.

 

[Irene and 22 others]

This is so archetypally Greer. Most people want to improve their employment prospects, they just work harder and do a better job. But Greer, who has a reputation for bringing vexatious lawsuits, decides that the best way HE can improve his employment prospects is to sue his current employer and use some of the money to pay a charlatan who pretends they can clean up his image.

Nigger, you're here for LIFE. You'll be wearing that scarlet letter until you're dead.

Greer is lying about spending any money on rehabilitating his image. He only says that to garner sympathy. Everyone here knows that if he received any kind of large lump sum payment like this it would go towards whores in one way or another. As stupid as Russell is, he at least knows that explaining to the court what the money would really be used for would be a bad idea.

Greer is stupid enough to waste money on reputation management services, but is there a reputation management service foolish enough to take Greer as a client. Is the $5,000 they might squeeze out of a sucker like Russ worth the costs of the lawyers they'll need to hire when Greer does what's in his nature and sues them for imagined grievances and other plights when they fail to change anyone's opinion of him?

If Hardin does as much investigation work and digging for this case as he's done in Greer v. Moon, Russ is in for a world of hurt. Even just the internal emails discussing Russ are going to be a massive treasure trove of information. Imagine how much Greer will rage at the court when Hardin discloses multiple potential witnesses who will claim that Greer was sexually harassing them at work.

Hardin doesn't even need to include them in any actual motion himself, because if the past is any history, Greer will fly off the handle and put it into the record himself. Even if their testimony weren't that relevant to the case before, Greer suddenly makes it appear that way through his own filings where he'll claim they aren't and that Hardin needs to be sanctioned for doing what he's legally required to in notifying Greer.

 

[Napoleon III]

Consider now that Mr. Hardin represents ViaTRON, he has FULL access to anything & everything they know about the retard along with access to his co-workers. His personnel file, communications, pay amount, perhaps other pieces of information.

I'm pretty sure Hardin can't use the information discovered in the Viacom case directly without going through legal hurdles, but he can ensure that Greer knows that he knows and push the right buttons to make Greer reveal that information directly.

Even if it's not useful, Hardin may still want to put as much as he can get away with into the record just to salt the earth. Even if it doesn't help him in Greer v. Moon, Russ will file additional lawsuits in the future. Having as much in the public record as possible that makes it difficult for Greer to get anywhere with those lawsuits or that shows a history of lies, bad faith actions, etc. on Greer's part will make it that much easier to swat down his litigious harassment in the years ahead.

Discovery being released publicly and releasing details that people might want to keep secret to the public has been an accepted legal tactic. In fact with someone like Greer who is a vexatious litigant who should have basically no access to file lawsuits it could be an acceptable tactic to get him or others to stop filing bullshit lawsuits.

You could say something like "if you keep filing x sorts of lawsuits against me or my clients embarrassing Discovery will inevitably come out as part of the process so if you have to accept this if you want to keep filing these sorts of lawsuits". You'd have to be careful how you praised it because you wouldn't want it to seem like you were extorting him of course of course. You are just informing him of the nature of the process.

I think Greer is less stupid or at least more cunning than we give him credit for. If he knows that bad things will 100% happen to him if he does something he actually won't do it. The problem is when judges don't hold him to account for being a sneak retard and playing poor little wussel. Everyone is so mean to me for no weason.

 

[ScooterL]

iirc Russell said that someone removed his self-made privacy screen because she'd thought it was trash. He had a bunch of cardboard or styrofoam stacked up and someone just recycled the lot of it.

He says it was styrofoam, but I think it's just an assumption that he made it himself. I can definitely picture him piling literal garbage on his desk and hiding behind it.

He also says that it was photographed before it was recycled, so hopefully we'll have that to look forward to if the case isn't thrown out.

 

[Butters scotch]

Another Saturday, another afternoon of the kids kicking a ball around whilst I catch up on all things Russtard.
Thank you all for keeping me sane whilst the other dads chat about football or shout at their moron kids for not being pro-level at the age of 12.

I'm hoping Hardin goes full discovery and some absolute gold comes out in the wash.

 

[Tinidril]

This barrier business all sounds very suspicious. I'm not completely ignorant of ADA workplace requirements for accommodation, but I've never heard of such a thing as a barrier being placed to keep someone from being laughed at by normies. Can you imagine the uproar if the *company* put up a barrier to keep the normies from having their eyes assaulted by Greee's face?

I used to look forward to weekends. Now they're just the desert time when I have no ECFs to read.

 

[It's Never Leprosy]

@Tinidril Laur Trueman filed ~120 ECFs in about 30 days re: their eviction and, as best we can tell, they're still in the damn apartment. She owes the landlord around $68k. It's currently in a holding pattern but there for a bit she was easily pulling Russ numbers.

Sorry the link was broken, here:

💥 Trainwreck Post in thread 'Laur Trueman / RVT01'

Mar 18, 2026

We're five days out from Laur's next court date. Filings are still holding steady at 111, but I was reviewing Laur's "evidence" to date, and discovered something interesting.

Laur has made several false claims that were rejected by the lower court, resulting in the 2/9/26 eviction: that her forwarding the $28,800 HRA loan funds to Vincent Jin in July 2025 constituted a new tenancy; and that the $28,800 loan money was an advance payment for rent from 7/1/25 - 12/31/25.

Both Lawyer Dong and Laur's lawyer acknowledged that no new tenancy was created in July 2025, and this was confirmed in...

• multiverse

Reactions: x 15 x 4 x 1 x 1

 

[Tinidril]

Laur Trueman filed ~120 ECFs

She sounds exhausting!

 

[Harvey Danger]

He says it was styrofoam, but I think it's just an assumption that he made it himself. I can definitely picture him piling literal garbage on his desk and hiding behind it.

Very likely, considering that's what he did to make the "barricade" to keep his landlord out of his room.



Big flat pieces of styrofoam are typically used in boxes that ship computer monitors, to cover the screen on front. I think one of the exhibits mentioned that newer equipment arrived but was given to other employees, so it's possible he salvaged monitor packing materials to make his Fortress of Solitude.

 

[Iron Hamster]

He says it was styrofoam, but I think it's just an assumption that he made it himself. I can definitely picture him piling literal garbage on his desk and hiding behind it.

He also says that it was photographed before it was recycled, so hopefully we'll have that to look forward to if the case isn't thrown out.

My theory is he was stacking old diner containers on their sides after the orders were consumed and licking the leftovers.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

I found a picture of the styrofoam barrier they wanted Rusty to use. I think it's perfect.

View attachment 8464200

I still like my rendition of how the barrier was applied.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

I thought courts dealt with people abusing ADA shit by just calling it fraud or something of that nature? Last I checked it's illegal to call yourself anemic as a means of not doing work; but I suppose it's easier for companies to just ignore the abuse most of the time as opposed to punishing the person as they will likely respond by bringing the matter to court which is a pain in the ass for everyone involved.

Companies leave that to the HR department, and they're slow to respond to abuse (or in the case of the Dindus and Jeets and Women, they want to let their tribe get away with shit).

We've seen something similar in hospitality -- fucking Karens bringing their fucking dogs to the casino/restaurant/hotel. No, I do not believe your fucking pitbull is a service dog, but they learned the magic word "emotional support animal" and unlike a service animal, those are unregulated. In my region every single grocery store has a sign up that says "no you can't bring your fucking great dane into the store, if you have a registered and trained service animal they're allowed."

IIRC, this is what Yaniv has been doing to force landlords and stores to let him keep his dog with him, with the added VexLit + Canadian retard bonus rider of suing for $20k a pop any time anyone tells his ass no.

Very likely, considering that's what he did to make the "barricade" to keep his landlord out of his room.

View attachment 8878508

Big flat pieces of styrofoam are typically used in boxes that ship computer monitors, to cover the screen on front. I think one of the exhibits mentioned that newer equipment arrived but was given to other employees, so it's possible he salvaged monitor packing materials to make his Fortress of Solitude.

With the revelation (which I had missed before) that the HR department didn't have the ADA paperwork on file for Greetard, I'm absolutely certain that's what this all is.

He basically made a little wall of trash to block view of him from his coworkers, since they are either male (beneath him), nonwhite (not worth his time), or not a 9/8/conditional7 and thus unworthy of him his penis. He decided the ADA gave him the right to do this, so it became an ADA accommodation becuase that's the magic word-spell he heard once that justifies him doing what he wanted to do anyway. They probably were just fine letting the little tard stew in his juices since they didn't want to listen to him talk at him and the trash blocked the spittle. Until word got out he was looking at whores and thots on his phone at work, or his productivity was shit and people started asking why.

Viatron is a sweatshop style working environment. Pay people as little as possible, cutting as many corners as possible, working them as hard as possible, until they burn out and are replaced with the next sucker willing to sell time they will never get back to the company. The kind of work that will be first up to be replaced by Jeets and AI as the former continue their infestation of the world and the latter becomes economically feasible. They're the same as your bog standard tech support callcenter or the like.