Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

Zero self awareness.

IMG_0045.jpeg
 
To be fair to John, I think this is his only real grift/career path.

He is a shit developer, awful journalist and terrible politician.

Being a professional delusional troon is his only marketable (kinda) skill.
 
FinnSven said:
To be fair to John, I think this is his only real grift/career path.

He is a shit developer, awful journalist and terrible politician.

Being a professional delusional troon is his only marketable (kinda) skill.
Click to expand...
Even then, he sucks at it because he's so aggressively combative in every interaction. Anyone who does not immediately call him the most stunning and brave tranny that ever trooned or suggests that troons should not just be given everything they want without question is subjected to seething vitriol of such a hyperbolic level, where John will either claim that they want to genocide him, that they secretly want to fuck him, or that they're just a stupid uggo who wishes they could be as beautiful as him.

It's why his attempt to pivot to the "reasonable tranny" angle has failed so miserably, because there is no reasonable position with him. Anything less than total acquiescence to whatever John demands is simply not good enough. And wouldn't you know it, people really don't like to be told that they need to submit to deranged men in dresses. You can't position yourself as reasonable when there is no possibility of a compromise, and when push comes to shove, people would much prefer to stick with the option that doesn't involve changing society at large to suit the whims of fetishists.
 
John's delusions are the exact opposite of what the research actually says.

Screenshot 2026-04-18 070856.png

Buck is correct Kermit. Having the biologically correct word MALE on your driver’s license and passport does not impact your ability to drive or travel in any way whatsoever.

IMG_0047.jpeg

Troops do not belong in women’s spaces either Kermit.

IMG_0051.jpeg

But all of you are the exact same thing Kermit. Each one of you have a delusion about yourself that is inconsistent with reality.

IMG_0048.jpeg

Man who is basically retarded has an opinion on other people’s intelligence..

IMG_0049.jpeg

Ouch! That is going to leave a mark. Telling a raining narcissist that their opinions do not matter is like a kick in the nuts.

IMG_0050.jpeg

Here. Is John lying about his imaginary family as a “better than you” flex.

IMG_0052.jpeg

Ironicallly, John does not have any opinions that are worth hearing and he also has no life experience.

IMG_0053.jpeg


Has John ever made an actual point?

IMG_0054.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Not Dr. Evil said:
Here. Is John lying about his imaginary family as a “better than you” flex.

IMG_0052.jpeg
Click to expand...
I actually think the fake family might be the saddest of John’s lies. I mean, flexing about being the Queen of the Democrats or Netanyahu’s best mate is more obviously deluded. But to invent something as ordinary as a loving family, then use that to lord it over other people? To consider it a triumph to make someone think your life is happy in such an ordinary way when in reality, you’re lonely and miserable? That’s the kind of empty existence that almost makes me feel sorry for the guy.

Almost. He’s still an unlikeable tosser.
 
Last edited:
Not Dr. Evil said:
Of course John's imaginary family has all of the exact same views and opinions as him.

View attachment 8883702
Click to expand...
What the fuck is he talking about anyway?

It’s been clearly established that the Catholic Church would have landed in serious troubles if they facilitated adoption for profit.

Further to that. Unless I am misinformed, the Catholic Church have never been a governmental body in the US, with a capacity to set public policy of this nature.

This man is a crazy eunuch and he and his homosexual husband should be arrested immediately.
 
Not Dr. Evil said:
Of course John's imaginary family has all of the exact same views and opinions as him.

View attachment 8883702
Click to expand...
So what, is John going to try to pivot to a civil rights grift on behalf of adoptees now? I mean, it's not like this is the first time he's completely lied about his background in order to feign expertise. Like, oh, I dunno, literally all of the period from 2008-2024 where he lied about being a true and honest woman, to say nothing of his fake software engineering experience.

Thing is, it's a lot more complicated than his complaining about women in tech was. Parents might have any number of reasons for giving up their child, good or bad, but, in my admittedly uneducated opinion, I feel that for most couples, it tends towards acknowledging that they would be unable to provide for their child properly. The foster care system has its issues as well, but I doubt John knows anything about it. And for every case where a child ends up adopted into a terrible home (highest per capita in gay households but John won't want to talk about that), there are plenty more where they lead a happy life with a loving family.

And even if we took John's word as true (which it's not), how would this have affected him at all? By his story, he was basically pulled away from his (fake) birth family seconds out of the womb and handed over to the evil Joel and Laura Flynt. It's not like he knew his (fake) family for years before they gave him away, he would have literally never known them at all. And then he ends up with wealthy parents who fund everything he wanted for almost thirty years until his faggotry got too far out of hand and they finally cut him off, so clearly he didn't have a terrible life. Why go on a crusade attempting to ban adoption when he's the last person who should be used as an example of why it's bad?

And really, what's his alternative? "Help mothers keep their children through subsidies and assistance." John, the government already pays out the ass for single moms on welfare. If a family needs financial assistance, they can get more than enough. Money isn't the issue here, or at least not the core of it. John wants to force families who may not be able to properly care for a child to keep it regardless, yet at the same time he has also bemoaned the death of Roe v. Wade. So which is it, John? Should a couple be forced to keep their child, or should they be allowed to abort it and avoid the problem altogether?

I wonder how the Catholic Church would feel about hearing they were being accused of child trafficking by John. I know he's a small fish in the end despite how much he pretends otherwise,
 
FinnSven said:
Further to that. Unless I am misinformed, the Catholic Church have never been a governmental body in the US, with a capacity to set public policy of this nature.
Click to expand...
The whole things sounds like a goddamn Lifetime movie.

Give it a title, I can't think of one.
"Brianna Man comes home at last" something like that?

And cast the movie while you're there.

Mean nun who snatches the baby away = Margo Martindale
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom