Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

Who passes better as a woman?

  • Autphag:

    Votes: 36 9.9%
  • Robert Wayne Stiles

    Votes: 327 90.1%

  • Total voters
    363
It's not sexual harassment to detail the facts of transsexualism, but this is a great implicit admission. Your IQ on the WISC-III was 112; I know it was this test because you were only 16. Stupid you for admitting that on PULL. Age-normed today, that'd be 95. You're of below average intelligence and don't eserve to be transsexual. Cheers.

I'm off for the night.

You've mis-remembered literally everything.

Also you're the one that posted that you wanted to piss on everyone in the PULL chat.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
It's not sexual harassment to detail the facts of transsexualism, but this is a great implicit admission. Your IQ on the WISC-III was 112; I know it was this test because you were only 16. Stupid you for admitting that on PULL. Age-normed today, that'd be 95. You're of below average intelligence and don't eserve to be transsexual. Cheers.

I'm off for the night.


IMG_2475.JPG
 
I've the PM still, I'll screenshot it.

I was IQ tested as a toddler you dumb shit.

I was diagnosed with Asperger's at 16.

I do not know what type of test my parents used.

I do know, however, that regardless of what you might think I am still a better person than you.
 
Dude, I don't care about your rather awkward bragging about your Scottish school grades. I hail from Germany and made my degrees at a German university with a strict and wide-ranging curriculum.

But it doesn't matter if you're at a German, Scottish or American school: It's always a place were you actually learn only basics which are often outdated by modern academic standards. Little example: Many history books are still painting greek and roman temples as boring white halls, while they were in fact quite colourful. But the technique that allows to find even littlest traces of old paints is new.

School education gives you some ideas about the world and teaches you ways to aquire new knowledge. It's a curriculum about things you should have heard about to be counted as a well informed modern day member of society, nothing more and nothing less. If there's a place where you may bitch about rote learning, it's your everyday school - but not the university.

Now I know why you believe you passed as a philosopher - because you got some neat grades at school. But sorry, you just heard something about philosophy at school. Maybe Plato's Cave and Theseus' ship - but you clearly have no idea how to implement it. You will now bitch about my "German finickiness", but I couldn't care even less. This is something the most graduates would tell you.

I mean, you still think arithmetics ist the main part of mathematics - nothing could be farther from the truth.

Edit: Aut really has a boner for his meaningless IQ-tests, hasn't he?
We mostly learned about fallacies and logic-tables, actually. It was very formalized. Only one unit was eventually going to be dedicated to continental philosophy and I blew my chances before completing the course.

D
I mean, you still think arithmetics ist the main part of mathematics - nothing could be farther from the truth.

Edit: Aut really has a boner for his meaningless IQ-tests, hasn't he?
No, I just knew it was a prerequisite to perform well in Accounts.

But as for Mathematics, that stops becoming important from middle-stream Standard Grade onward.

I was IQ tested as a toddler you dumb shit.

I was diagnosed with Asperger's at 16.

I do not know what type of test my parents used.

I do know, however, that regardless of what you might think I am still a better person than you.
Which will make your age-norming LOWER; it stabilizes then in neurotypicals (which is what you are misdiagnosed) and then flat-lines and drops gradually -- you'd have had a short boost of about 5-10 points in adolescence were you a MAN (and HAH, the only advantage of keeping my testosterone levels past the point most transseuxuals are treated).

You're in the low-90s somewhere. A try-hard North Korean. This is hilarious.

My IQ is categorically high-average, in a test as recent as a year ago, conducted courtesy of a proctor-testing service I actually had to pay for, IN MEATSPACE.

So piss off.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We mostly learned about fallacies and logic-tables, actually.

Well, either you're lying or you're to dumb to apply it. Many of your posts are textbook examples of Loki's Wager and No true Scotsman, not to mention your "invention" of "Argumentum ad longitudinalitum", which simply doesn't exist. You can't decline longitudinalis in that way.

I blew my chances before completing the course.

I'm hardly suprised.
 
Well, either you're lying or you're to dumb to apply it. Many of your posts are textbook examples of Loki's Wager and No true Scotsman, not to mention your "invention" of "Argumentum ad longitudinalitum", which simply doesn't exist. You can't decline longitudinalis in that way.



I'm hardly suprised.
I got As in unit-tests for both. I'm just not a fan of "by the book" debate because in viewing actual academic debate recordings of, for instance, Rushton, Valberg, etc. against their opponents, that doesn't seem to matter. Rhetoric is far, far more important.
 
Which will make your age-norming LOWER; it stabilizes then in neurotypicals (which is what you are misdiagnosed) and then flat-lines and drops gradually -- you'd have had a short boost of about 5-10 points in adolescence were you a MAN (and HAH, the only advantage of keeping my testosterone levels past the point most transseuxuals are treated).

You're in the low-90s somewhere. A try-hard North Korean. This is hilarious.

1.jpg
 
*yawn*

I have some excellent drugs to abuse to pass prison time now. It means nothing to me. Don't you dare try to threaten me or you'll find out its pointlessness when I leave, to return to the necessary destruction for you out of revenge for undermining the blossoming of what should have been my prestige.

축지법
축지법
장군님 쓰신다
 
*yawn*

I have some excellent drugs to abuse to pass prison time now. It means nothing to me. Don't you dare try to threaten me or you'll find out its pointlessness when I leave, to return to the necessary destruction for you out of revenge for undermining the blossoming of what should have been my prestige.

Come with me,

and you'll be,

in a world of pure imagination.
 
My IQ is categorically high-average, in a test as recent as a year ago, conducted courtesy of a proctor-testing service I actually had to pay for, IN MEATSPACE.

So piss off.
Your IQ is a meaningless number as you are a lazy violent do-nothing who threatens and assaults professionals trying to help you and set you straight.
The dumbest wage slave is more intelligent and useful than you.
 
Your IQ is a meaningless number as you are a lazy violent do-nothing who threatens and assaults professionals trying to help you and set you straight.
The dumbest wage slave is more intelligent and useful than you.
It's not so much my IQ which is meaningful, but how it's structured, imparting me gifts people of a similar whole-scale IQ range don't have, like perseverence, philological prognostication, and a penchant for the memorization of esoteric philosophical works.

At the minimum, do I so successfully get committed by Lagoona, it would provide me with an opportunity to get an education; I just hope the charges she presses exceed a year sentencing time, then I can think about getting some kind of sociological credentials under my belt at the very least.
 
I got As in unit-tests for both. I'm just not a fan of "by the book" debate because in viewing actual academic debate recordings of, for instance, Rushton, Valberg, etc. against their opponents, that doesn't seem to matter. Rhetoric is far, far more important.

Yes, and I stated that your school grades mean nothing, because you got them simply for rote learning some concepts without actually applying them. It speaks for your lack of education that you really think a basic understanding in philosophy of science is only needed for debates "by book", although every kiwi can clearly see that you fail even in minor coherent arguing. It's truly amazing. Rethoric without real facts and coherent logic is logorrhoea.

Btw, Valberg was debunked long time ago, but of course, you're more into religion than into science. "I want to believe", that's your credo. Not "I want to know".

A new stay in prison will also utterly destroy your last chances to enroll in university the next years. But well, suit yourself.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Begemot
I got As in unit-tests for both. I'm just not a fan of "by the book" debate because in viewing actual academic debate recordings of, for instance, Rushton, Valberg, etc. against their opponents, that doesn't seem to matter. Rhetoric is far, far more important.
Rhetoric is only important to demagogues who wish to abuse power and inflame the rage of those who they govern.
 
Yes, and I stated that your school grades mean nothing, because you got them simply for rote learning some concepts without actually applying them. It speaks for your lack of education that you really think a basic understanding in philosophy of science is only needed for debates "by book", although every kiwi can clearly see that you fail even in minor coherent arguing. It's truly amazing. Rethoric without real facts and coherent logic is logorrhoea.

Btw, Valberg was debunked long time ago, but of course, you're more into religion than into science. "I want to believe", that's your credo. Not "I want to know".

A new stay in prison will also utterly destroy your last chances to enroll in university the next years. But well, suit yourself.
You can't rote-teach formal logic, that I do know. The logic table stuff was fairly fluid and can't be described as rote learning if each examinable example is different, as it was in the modular test.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Begemot
Back