Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

Who passes better as a woman?

  • Autphag:

    Votes: 36 9.9%
  • Robert Wayne Stiles

    Votes: 327 90.1%

  • Total voters
    363
It's not so much my IQ which is meaningful, but how it's structured, imparting me gifts people of a similar whole-scale IQ range don't have, like perseverence, philological prognostication, and a penchant for the memorization of esoteric philosophical works.

At the minimum, do I so successfully get committed by Lagoona, it would provide me with an opportunity to get an education; I just hope the charges she presses exceed a year sentencing time, then I can think about getting some kind of sociological credentials under my belt at the very least.
You have no gifts. Your perseverence is merely stubbornness. Your IQ is not meaningful. Youre like a lazier Chris Langan. Your way with language, Im sure Ive said before, is nought much more than cargo cult-esque prattling. Your pemchant for "esoteric" work is just autistic fixation.
 
You have no gifts. Your perseverence is merely stubbornness. Your IQ is not meaningful. Youre like a lazier Chris Langan. Your way with language, Im sure Ive said before, is nought much more than cargo cult-esque prattling. Your pemchant for "esoteric" work is just autistic fixation.
My perseverance is a high forehead accomodating a high forebrain allowing meditative hyperfocus, my memorization skills are a monotrough allowing me to specialize in anything I choose to please, my way with language is actually very stilted, "overly-analytical" ala Cuntster's ramblings, and analytically linear, and my penchant for esoteric work isn't even rooted in interest rather than need, to build my own theories upon it.

Which you all keep distracting. Would you all just drink a cup of cyanide and die already so I can write my book about Mongoloid IQs and why their culture is a manifestation of sub-clinical autism?
 
You can't rote-teach formal logic, that I do know. The logic table stuff was fairly fluid and can't be described as rote learning if each examinable example is different, as it was in the modular test.

Yet you still manage to do No true Scotman, Loki's Wager, A nescire ad non esse, Ignoratio elenchi and Moving the goalposts on a daily basis. It still proves my point that you're either lying or to dumb to use it correctly. Choose what's more suitable for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
Would you all just drink a cup of cyanide and die already so I can write my book about Mongoloid IQs and why their culture is a manifestation of sub-clinical autism?

Let us know when it gets published.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Begemot
Yet you still manage to do No true Scotman, Loki's Wager, A nescire ad non esse, Ignoratio elenchi and Moving the goalposts on a daily basis. It still proves my point that you're either lying or to dumb to use it correctly. Choose what's more suitable for you.
That in itself is a false dichotomy?

I already gave you my explanation. By the book is useless when I've mostly won debates through informal logic (the kind IQ analogy tests measure) and rhetoric. Like it or lump it.
 
For the love of god please do not send that letter. You will put any lawyer you might subsequently seek advice from up shit creek without a paddle if you send that letter.

Please, for your own sake, do not send it.
 
For the love of god please do not send that letter. You will put any lawyer you might subsequently seek advice from up shit creek without a paddle if you send that letter.

Please, for your own sake, do not send it.
It contains no threats, and nothing construed as threats, it only challenges to serve explanations, and at a minimum, to give me my SQA cert back so I can apply for another course whilst I still can.

It might be illegal to make overtly racially offensive remarks, but I do contextualize mine in deep theoretical concerns, and that in itself would probably make this a case-on-file rather than a litigable one, considering this was about getting an education, a consideration I'm sure the prosecution would see.
 
It contains no threats, and nothing construed as threats, it only challenges to serve explanations, and at a minimum, to give me my SQA cert back so I can apply for another course whilst I still can.

It might be illegal to make overtly racially offensive remarks, but I do contextualize mine in deep theoretical concerns, and that in itself would probably make this a case-on-file rather than a litigable one, considering this was about getting an education, a consideration I'm sure the prosecution would see.

This is the physical letter simulcra you're showing the university:

rico-recklezz-gets-a-2000-18k-gold-grill-youtube-thumbnail.jpg
 
My perseverance is a high forehead accomodating a high forebrain allowing meditative hyperfocus, my memorization skills are a monotrough allowing me to specialize in anything I choose to please, my way with language is actually very stilted, "overly-analytical" ala Cuntster's ramblings, and analytically linear, and my penchant for esoteric work isn't even rooted in interest rather than need, to build my own theories upon it.

Which you all keep distracting. Would you all just drink a cup of cyanide and die already so I can write my book about Mongoloid IQs and why their culture is a manifestation of sub-clinical autism?
First, what's a monotrough? Secondly, for someone who claims to have studied dictionaries, I find it hilarious you misspelled accommodating. Third, seriously, what's a monotrough? Fourth, you could just not respond to us "distracting" you. Fifth, no, we won't drink a cup of cyanide. Finally, sixth, what is a monotrough?
 
That in itself is a false dichotomy?

I already gave you my explanation. By the book is useless when I've mostly won debates through informal logic (the kind IQ analogy tests measure) and rhetoric. Like it or lump it.

Alright, you even managed to fuck informal logic up.

:stress:

Informal logic is just a part of logic and you need for it the same understanding of argumentation theory to not embarass yourself in any debate. Despite its name it's not opposed to formal logic, it's just a new way to implement logic in every day life. But well, that you still don't understand that logic isn't something to be used "by the book", but is the fucking way of coherent thinking and arguing which you also need in your everyday life, speaks for itself.

It contains no threats, and nothing construed as threats

It proves you're batshit crazy.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
The more I read of this thread the more I suspect Chris doesn't have a "high IQ". He always go on about it yet doesn't know that in academia no one cares about such tests. Hell look at what Stephan Hawking said about it.
I said I had a high-end mediocre IQ with a profile leaning towards fluid intelligence and verbal reasoning.

I never said I was a generalized super-savant.
 
First, what's a monotrough? Secondly, for someone who claims to have studied dictionaries, I find it hilarious you misspelled accommodating. Third, seriously, what's a monotrough? Fourth, you could just not respond to us "distracting" you. Fifth, no, we won't drink a cup of cyanide. Finally, sixth, what is a monotrough?
Read up Temple Grandin, I'm not going to baby you by holding your hand.
 
Back