US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I do think straight anal sex in black community plays a big role, along with DL culture though.
Funny you mention this because HIV/AIDS burned through the black community a lot harder than white gay people because white gay people at least tried not to get it. "DL culture" is such a hardcore thing in the black community that HIV/AIDS spreads without being detected. Also, they're black. Feel good chemical is more important than not infecting other people with a terminal disease. That's why HIV/AIDS transmission is currently highest among blacks than whites.
 
I think I finally figured out what I dislike about the Republican support for Israel: it's no different than the Democrat support for Islam.

In the Democrat mind, Muslims are like amoebas, incapable of thinking beyond stimulus-response. If they do something, it's not because their stone-age religion and pedophile prophet told them to- it's because America did something. Likewise, to the Israel-loving wing of the Republicans, the Jews aren't acting in accordance with Talmudic principles when they smash statues of Jesus (or when Kiryas Joel quietly annexes entire neighborhoods)- they're doing this in response to antisemitism! Both Jews and Muslims are incapable of having their own thoughts, motivations, and ideals, according to the Powers That Be.

Horseshoe theory is real. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise.
One thing i like about democrats is that they aren't sucking islam constantly like europe's left parties. They mostly just tolerate it.
 
I never said heterosexual transmission was a main vector.
And I never rebutted this point in my reply. I am pushing back against this "rapid pace" and exponential heterosexual transmission spread. You also seem to conflate heterosexual spread (PIV) and non-homosexual spread (needles).
I am married to a woman
I will tell her to get tested.
Funny you mention this because HIV/AIDS burned through the black community a lot harder than white gay people because white gay people at least tried not to get it. "DL culture" is such a hardcore thing in the black community that HIV/AIDS spreads without being detected. Also, they're black. Feel good chemical is more important than not infecting other people with a terminal disease. That's why HIV/AIDS transmission is currently highest among blacks than whites.
Sounds like more cope since the fags in SF refused to close their bathhouses and treated it like a civil rights issue. Plenty of them knew they had it and went on to super spread everywhere.
(more than expected, at the very least)
Research says this isn't true. They'd actually overblown the fear by then and warned everyone. Probably to protect the fags responsible and make it seem like we were all equally culpable.
Health officials realized in 1982 that blood supplies could be tainted and it took until 1985 that they developed proper screening techniques to prevent it. Once they figured out how to screen for HIV in donated blood, they started doing it immediately and it was easier to implement because they could control how blood is donated. What they could not control was people shooting up for the rest of the decade.
What? The gays lobbied and used political power to donate their blood. Even though the Red Cross or whoever didn't want to, the pressure forced them to because gays donated money. Again, 50% of the hemophiliacs in the country subsequently got it, with 80% of those dying. They could also screen for Hep B as a proxy.
 
Last edited:
Shrug! No reason to be mad, the system is what it is
  • DC and Puerto Rico can easily be added as states, which means right wing states like Texas will split up to gain more senators and people will lose faith in the system
  • If the Democrats win in 2028, they bias the Census with open borders to allow California and other blue states to maintain population and congressional representation via illegal residents
  • If the Democrats pass their Popular Vote Compact, voting won't even matter unless you live in Los Angeles, Minneapolis, NYC, etc.
There are many reasons why the USA should already have collapsed. The fact we haven't collapsed yet is either pure luck or destiny. But, focus on your family and your community rather than dwelling on the state which will inevitably become illegitimate.
The problem with the right is they seem to only focus on the presidential election and don’t show up for the local elections or primaries which in some ways are more important. If everyone on the right participated in the process and in the local politics America would be objectively better than it currently is. We can’t control the entire country but if enough of the red areas were more organized we could be a massive thorn and bully our policies through.
 
yeah, you won't die from it. you'll just wish you had. I had RSV a few years ago. was the most miserable month of my life. the sickness passed in a about a week, but the coughing lasted for a month. I could hardly breathe and every muscle in my torso was so sore. I had no stamina or cardio ability so I could barely work. that whole spell i don't think i was able to work more than 5 hours a day before i was completely exhausted. you can't eat because of the coughing. you cant sleep because of the coughing. you can't do anything.
 
Vivek's face rubs me the wrong way and not just because he's a disgusting filthy jeet.

It's just inherently off putting like those 1920s books on physiognomy with an example of a deceitful face or whatever.

That's Vivek.
 
Is there a source for this? I'm really surprised.
- replacement
A short while ago, in full coordination with the local community of Debel in southern Lebanon, the damaged statue was replaced by IDF troops. The Northern Command worked to coordinate the replacement of the statue from the moment it received the report of the incident.The IDF expresses deep regret over the incident, and is working to ensure that it does not happen again in the future.

- punishment of soldiers
Findings and Conclusions of the Inquiry into the Conduct of an IDF Soldier Who Damaged a Christian Symbol in Southern LebanonThe inquiry found that during IDF activity in the area of the Christian village of Debel in southern Lebanon, an IDF soldier damaged a Christian religious symbol while another soldier photographed the act. Six additional soldiers were present at the scene and did not act to stop the incident or report it.The inquiry determined that the soldiers’ conduct completely deviated from IDF orders and values.The IDF expresses deep regret over the incident and emphasizes that its operations in Lebanon are directed solely against the Hezbollah terrorist organization and other terrorist groups, and not against Lebanese civilians.From the moment the report of the incident was received, the IDF has been working to assist the local community in replacing the statue.Accordingly, it was decided that the soldier who damaged the Christian symbol and the soldier who photographed the act will be removed from combat duty and will receive 30 days of military detention. The remaining troops who stood by have been summoned for clarification discussions that will be held later on, after which further command-level measures will be determined.Procedures regarding conduct with religious institutions and symbols were reinforced to the troops prior to their entry into the relevant areas, and will be reinforced again for all troops in the area following the incident.The findings of the inquiry were presented to the Chief of the General Staff and the Commander of the Northern Command.The Chief of the General Staff condemned the incident and stated that it constitutes unacceptable conduct and a moral failure, far exceeding any acceptable standard and contradicting IDF values and the expected conduct of its troops.

The IDF
 
Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy doesn't say he has any regrets after furious backlash to his X post calling reports of Iranian ships slipping past the U.S. naval blockade "awesome."

"I guess I just have to be more careful about sarcasm on Twitter," Murphy exclusively told FOX News.

 
I don't use Twitrer. What?!
basically there is an addon for twitter that reveals blocked tags.

it's weird they would store illegal data like CP in the CDN where it can still be accessed by the public instead of taking it down into an offline data storage if they really need to keep it for legal reasons.

I don't know what to call that level of stupidity.
it would be an easy fix.
 
You can call it whatever you want, but the AIDS epidemic is a well-studied historical topic. I'm not trying to convince you of anything, I'm just history sperging at this point.
I was in academia for some time, I trust it as far as I can throw the data (and the collection of the data) myself or the results contradicts the views of the authors (or prove their null hypothesis).

History is a textbook example of a pseudo-scientific cargo-cult science.
 
Noticing that this war of choice is a disaster is not "rooting for Iran." The idiots cheering it on have made Iran the new regional hegemon in the Middle East not those who tried to warn this would happen.
I agree, being critical of a war isn't cheering on our enemy in this war. The problem is, all too many of these scumbag fucks are very much cheering on our enemies. Posting Iranian lies as truth, taking what they say at face value, that's very much throwing in with our enemies and should be treated as such.
 
I agree, being critical of a war isn't cheering on our enemy in this war. The problem is, all too many of these scumbag fucks are very much cheering on our enemies. Posting Iranian lies as truth, taking what they say at face value, that's very much throwing in with our enemies and should be treated as such.
I see all this traitor talk to be nothing more than a pathetic attempt to silence those of us who knew from the start this would be a catastrophe. It blows up their whole "whocouldaknown!" tripe. Retards could see this outcome a mile away and they really dislike being reminded of that. So it's "only a brown traitor could oppose our glorious sneak attack assassination strike! Only bigger traitors will oppose the ground invasion and resulting thousands of US dead! This is all your fault for not believing hard enough on the internet!"
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom