🤡 Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[JamFlowMan]

I thought this started in 2024 with Kamala? I had no idea it went back that far.

I knew the DNC fucked over Bernie twice (and took it like a bitch both times.)

 

[etcetcetc]

I thought this started in 2024 with Kamala? I had no idea it went back that far.

Once Obama got in they really just moved to picking someone by the party at large rather than with a proper primary. You can thank Hillary for starting this move, since she was hoping to be the pick before Obama pushed her to the side. With her being all butthurt losing the primary stating "it was my turn."

 

[Arjun]

Does anybody know why r/livestreamfail is running with this narrative nowadays?

 

[Netwatch]

I thought this started in 2024 with Kamala? I had no idea it went back that far.

Yeah it goes back to Obama, John Kerry was the last time they ran a mostly fair primary. I think they looked at the 8 years of bush and realized whatever they were doing wasn't working(Kerry was an awful candidate). So they moved forward with this idea to just pick a young promising candidate, and they knocked it out of the park on the first try with Obama. His actual presidential record is dubious, but people look back fondly on him because he was well spoken, cool, jive, and most importantly black.

I really get why so many of the lefties have become so disillusioned with the democrat party considering how they've largely just been ignored in favor of these establishment and "safe" candidates like Hillary, and Joe. And then in 2024, with Kamala just being slapped on the ticket in the last minute, like of course no one was excited to vote for her. They are already heading down the same path with this Newsom shit, and without a doubt he is going to be another John Kerry. He is an establishment shill that has an awful track record of actual governance, but the DNC and their shills(Tiny) are already trying to cram him down everyone throat and shame everyone that isn't already pronouncing their undying loyalty to the future Newsom regime.

A couple of months ago, I remember both Destiny and Kuhiman going on about how based and cool Newsom was, citing that completely unenforceable law that would require federal agents to not wear masks while conducting business in California. Knowing that, these retards will sit around and criticize people like Hasan for not getting onboard the Newsom train. What has newsome actually done to warrant this support? He has said some things on twitter, posted some photos of him at a 3 Michilan star restaurant, and passed a completely performative law, lets not mention all the other horrible governance he is responsible for in the state of California.

Regardless of how stupid Destiny and the bunch claim Hasan is, he isn't the one falling for obvious DNC propaganda, and his fanbase is largely onboard with him. Meanwhile, Destiny, his orbiters and DGGeet are fawning over how great Newsom is, and how Hasan and the lefties are the greatest danger to democracy because they don't support the candidate that, 2 years out, has already been preordained by the DNC as the savior of the Democratic party and the future 48th President.

 

[Nelson]

Does anybody know why r/livestreamfail is running with this narrative nowadays?

LSF is full of DGjeets, they just repeat whatever retarded narrative Molestiny cooks up and get upvoted by the swarm of other jeets, and downvote anything that is against the narrative. You can pretty much expect the upvoted comments to be the exact same opinions as his subreddit, which is complete acceptance of any bullshit Tiny makes up (anything outside of that gets you banned).

 

[Pippa is a spic whore]

LSF is full of DGjeets, they just repeat whatever retarded narrative Molestiny cooks up and get upvoted by the swarm of other jeets, and downvote anything that is against the narrative. You can pretty much expect the upvoted comments to be the exact same opinions as his subreddit, which is complete acceptance of any bullshit Tiny makes up (anything outside of that gets you banned).

Its funny how jeet fanfiction can't not be dialed to 11.
So they claim that he had consent (via supposed implied consent because "melina can see it" means "just send my shit out"),
But also pxie didn't have consent, implied or otherwise (because he first tried saying her boyfiend was wronged by pxie in the same way, and after he likely got told to pound sand, he began kvetching as if his implied shit wouldn't go both ways)
If you ever feel like we are circlejerking like a bunch of leftoids 2 minutes before kyle r got read the innocent verdict, just remember that the average dgjeet believes that destiny is the only victim here, and up until recently they all thought that it was a hack and rose was confirmed to be 19+. A lot of them clearly avoid reading about the case outside of their bubble as it is a test of faith for them, and one which they don't want to go through.

 

[I HATE THE ANTICHRIST!]

Does anybody know why r/livestreamfail is running with this narrative nowadays?

LSF is full of DGjeets

This is not even debatable but an objective fact. There is a website that shows your the overlap between subreddits and a r/destiny user is 34 times more likely to also post on r/livestreamfail

(via supposed implied consent because "melina can see it" means "just send my shit out")

It was actually even worse than that. It was a "Well you know that I'm freaky like that and I like to send nudes to people, and you've sent me some sexual material with your bf(with his consent), and we have recorded something together, so you should have known that I'm going to send it to someone. And because you didn't explicitly state that you don't want me to send it out to random discord kittens you basically gave me the implicit consent to do this.

What I absolutely can not get over however, and what I'm yet to see a DGjeet give any answer to is that Pixie actually DID say that she does not want other people to know that they are hooking up(since she had the reputation of the only female orbiter that didn't fuck Tiny, lol, lmao even). She straight up said that which even if you buy the implied consent bullshit is a directly telling him that he does not have the consent to do that.

 

[GarlicFragment]

A few replies filed before the showdown tomorrow. Nothing new and exciting as far as I can tell.

Defendant's Response in Opposition re: Motion to Continue Trial

Spoiler: LLM summary

• Defendant opposes Plaintiff’s motion to continue the May 18, 2026 trial, arguing there is no good cause or extraordinary circumstance to delay trial.
• He says Plaintiff was not diligent: discovery closed more than four months ago, yet Plaintiff waited until shortly before calendar call to seek a continuance.
• The opposition argues any inability to depose Bonnell is Plaintiff’s own fault, because Plaintiff allegedly failed to appear for her own deposition, which led the Court to stay Bonnell’s deposition and consider sanctions.
• Defendant contends there are no real outstanding discovery issues, emphasizing that Plaintiff never filed a motion to compel and never timely pursued alleged spoliation or foreign discovery.
• He also argues that pending dispositive motions are not a valid basis to continue trial, and says he is ready to proceed and wants to clear his name.
• The filing further argues the motion is untimely and noncompliant with Local Rule 7.6, because it was not filed at the earliest practical date and was not properly supported by a sufficient showing of good cause.
• Requested relief: deny Plaintiff’s motion and keep trial on schedule.

Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion re: Defendant's Motion in Limine

Spoiler: LLM summary

• Defendant replies in support of his omnibus motion in limine, arguing the challenged evidence is irrelevant, prejudicial, hearsay, or unauthenticated, and should be excluded from trial.
• He argues Plaintiff’s claim that he sent the video to a minor is false, saying the supposed minor testified she never received sexually explicit material from him and never communicated with him.
• He contends that even if that allegation were true, the recipient’s age is irrelevant to Plaintiff’s claims and would only serve to unfairly prejudice the jury against him.
• He argues “Abbymc” evidence should be excluded because Plaintiff allegedly obstructed access to that witness during discovery, while still relying on Abbymc for a key jurisdictional allegation.
• He also says the Abbymc text-message exhibit is inadmissible hearsay and unauthenticated, and that Plaintiff cannot use it to prove he transmitted the video.
• Defendant further argues Plaintiff should not be allowed to use a pseudonym at trial, claiming anonymity would unfairly prejudice him and improperly signal to the jury that she is a victim.
• Requested relief: exclude the challenged evidence at trial.

Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion re: Motion to Continue Trial
Exhibit 1

Spoiler: LLM summary

• Plaintiff replies in support of continuing the trial, arguing Defendant is now trying to use the unresolved deposition dispute to deny her any chance to depose him before trial.
• She says blocking a party deposition is extraordinary relief and that Bonnell has not met the heavy burden required to justify effectively denying her that discovery.
• Plaintiff argues she was diligent, and that the reason Bonnell’s deposition did not occur is the Court’s stay pending resolution of Bonnell’s own motion about coordinating the parties’ depositions.
• She contends Defendant’s cases are inapposite, because they involve parties who simply delayed discovery, not a situation where a deposition was stayed by court order while a discovery motion remained pending.
• Plaintiff argues Bonnell’s claim that she had enough discovery is specious, including his suggestion that cross-examining him at a prior hearing was an adequate substitute for a deposition.
• She also says Bonnell cannot show real prejudice from a brief continuance, while the prejudice to her is obvious because she would otherwise go to trial without being able to depose him.
• Plaintiff further argues her motion is not defective or untimely, saying she filed it in good faith while still awaiting a ruling on Bonnell’s earlier deposition-coordination motion, and disputes Bonnell’s affidavit and estoppel arguments.
• Requested relief: grant the continuance so Plaintiff has an adequate opportunity to complete discovery.

Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion re: Plaintiff's Motion in Limine

Spoiler: LLM summary

• Plaintiff replies in support of her omnibus motion in limine, arguing Defendant’s opposition reinforces the need to exclude several categories of evidence before trial.
• She argues Defendant’s “implied consent” theory is legally invalid, because CARDII requires explicit consent, and consent cannot be inferred from Plaintiff’s conduct, past disclosures, or community norms.
• Plaintiff contends sexual history evidence is barred by Rules 412 and 403, saying Defendant is trying to use prior sexual conduct and communications to suggest consent or reduce Plaintiff’s credibility, which she argues is improper.
• She argues Defendant’s self-generated/reconstructed materials should be excluded because they are unreliable, incomplete, allegedly AI-assisted, lack proper authentication, and risk misleading the jury.
• Plaintiff says Defendant’s effort to frame these issues as waived spoliation arguments is a red herring, because she is seeking exclusion of unreliable evidence, not sanctions, and says factual development was limited by discovery disputes and the stayed deposition.
• She also argues Defendant’s “catfishing” and third-party account theories are irrelevant or misleading, and do not defeat disclosure under the statute even if someone else accessed the relevant account.
• Plaintiff further contends Defendant should not be allowed to present disputed timing/account evidence as conclusive proof defeating liability or jurisdiction.
• Requested relief: grant Plaintiff’s omnibus motion in limine in full.

Spoiler: Minor points

It may be that she didn't directly receive material from Destiny, but she did receive some of the videos...

...via what Destiny described as a "go-between [between Rose and Destiny]."


Not quite what she testified to:



Does the evidence reflect that? I mean, we in the thread know better, but what does the evidence on the docket reflect? Solo had a (presumably) British accent according to Rose, and the Discord exports coincides with UK time zones, but that's about it? As far as Solo being an adult at the time, I don't think that is shown in evidence at all?

Destiny has been whining about only having a month to subpoena AbbyMC. It was previously brought up that Destiny didn't move to compel compliance with the subpoena, so now Destiny's excuse is that Plaintiff didn't provide any credible evidence from AbbyMC so why bother?:



I wonder why they say it was "ignored" days before the discovery cut-off. The discovery cut-off was December 16, while the deadline in the subpoena was December 1. I wonder if it's to make it seem like Destiny couldn't move to compel, when he might have had more time than he is letting on:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.684111/gov.uscourts.flsd.684111.212.9.pdf

Lawyers are shameless!:


I didn't catch this last time. Destiny was apparently talking to AbbyMC on matters "concerning the instant litigation" after she became a witness in the case:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.684111/gov.uscourts.flsd.684111.231.1.pdf

---

In other news, Destiny with an impressive display of incomprehension (tweet now deleted):

via https://x.com/SimplySubstance/status/2045327064434459048

 

[Misery Niggas]

"destiny can't read anymore"

you mean he couldn't already? dude was always illiterate

 

[GarlicFragment]

The hearing was apparently a brisk affair. This is how it went, according to a DGGer:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1srmq1h/doe_v_bonnell_hearing_recap_421/

Celebratory tones from in-house lawyer, KafkaEsquire:

...which I don't get? At least based on the summary of a (presumably biased) DGGer above.

- Pxie was not sanctioned for the deposition-no-show kerfuffle.
- While discovery extension was apparently denied, we're getting the most important part of perhaps the whole court case: Destiny being deposed.
- They didn't grant Destiny's MSJ because Pxie filed a 56(d) Motion to Deny or Defer Motion for Summary Judgement instead of a opposition, as Destiny wanted.
- Trial (scheduled for May) will now commence in July or August (a few "2 more weeks" and Andy B invoices left).
- No mention of Destiny's Motion to Dismiss. I'm guessing that's dead at this point?
- "kiwifarms copypasta about the video being fake" Guys, what video are we saying are fake?

Edit:
MrMouton weighs in:

 

[Nelson]

...which I don't get? At least based on the summary of a (presumably biased) DGGer above.

Condition normal, the only reliable information you can get from DGjeets is that they are all 3rd world street shitters that slurp cum. Will have to wait for the court docos.

MrMouton weighs in:

He really is the most spineless pathetic loser of Tinys orbiters. The fact he even still talks to the molested in chief after the cunt didn't even want to come to his good 'friends' wedding is embarrassing, now hes still out there batting for him. Even the people who looked 'normal' around him are revealing themselves to all be gross freaks.

 

[cmzng]

Makes total sense the judge finally just sets the schedule this way for depositions regardless of who is at fault for the scheduling games. I do wonder if the denial for the discovery extension is just because it’s painfully obvious Destiny will just take a negative inference over providing any MSJ defeater; so just let Joan/Carlos try to extract that point for a jury to decide assuming they’re good enough to get it on the day. Atleast the depo should finally get the topic of subpoenas to google/discord addressed for how long it’s just been lingering.

 

[Potentially Criminal]

The hearing was apparently a brisk affair. This is how it went, according to a DGGer:

My prediction was correct. Do the depos and the rest of discovery is dead. Looks like the depos of Pxie and Destiny will make or break this whole thing. We'll know the lay of the land in the next 10 days.



Pxie's team didn't do a good job at pursuing things early on in this case.

 

[Code Cave]

Does anybody know why r/livestreamfail is running with this narrative nowadays?

Destiny has been lying or misrepresenting almost everything about the case this entire time, his retarded audience pick up parts of it and confidently spread misinformation. Any given day will have 4 or 5 different footsoldiers coming up with a new storyline. Nobody cares enough to really cover the case that closely (Destiny doxxes and harasses anyone who does) and Pxie obviously doesn't have the platform Destiny has, so footsoldiers spam twitter and reddit with retarded shit.

A few replies filed before the showdown tomorrow. Nothing new and exciting as far as I can tell.

I thought this was interesting, Pxie was talking to Melina about the case (how does Destiny know this? Did Pxie comply with discovery? He spent a long time saying that she didn't send him ANYTHING!). Melina refusing to help Pxie is, yet again, proof that she is an awful person. I haven't checked her VODs in almost a year but she would complain about how abusive Destiny was every single day.

Court listener hasn't updated yet, thankfully esportsbatman (who is DEFINITELY going to take legal action against Destiny for doxxing him! Any day now! It's coming!) posted the rulings



Looks like:

• Pxie isn't getting in trouble for not showing up for her deposition (too busy FROLICKING)
• Pxie isn't paying Andy B's fees for her no show (-$10k to Destiny. Destiny will also have to foot the bill for Andy B flying out to Miami for a 20 minute hearing today lol, Joan frolicking in new york)
• The footnote about Rose being a minor is a-okay by the judge (this is motion 183 - "DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE" https://storage.courtlistener.com/r...d.684111/gov.uscourts.flsd.684111.183.0_1.pdf)
• Depositions to take place in the next 10 days, any modifications to summary judgement to follow
• Trial pushed back to Monday August 10, it was due to start in May

Destiny plans on trying to get Pxies wife deported once the trial is over

https://x.com/SimplySubstance/status/2046342187768782971 / https://archive.ph/wIBh4

edit:

Does the evidence reflect that? I mean, we in the thread know better, but what does the evidence on the docket reflect? Solo had a (presumably) British accent according to Rose, and the Discord exports coincides with UK time zones, but that's about it? As far as Solo being an adult at the time, I don't think that is shown in evidence at all?

Yeah, I've been wondering about this too. It seems crazy that "Rose" can just say "oh solo? I have no idea who he is, he said he lives in Chicago and England but he had an accent and was in his 20s" and both sides are happy to leave it at that. Maybe there's some other shit in the redacted parts or something.


Rose is basically saying she has no fucking idea who this guy is.

 

[Bert Chintus]

God I hate that fat fuck mrmouton, he’s basically a distilled archetypal dgg faggot

I don't mean to say he is one just that he had the option. I will give credit where it is due in that after oct 7th, Destiny actually sat down and read all the wiki articles and all the data he could to justify his opinion. That's more then hasan or Asmon who only use Twitter.
Where destiny fails is that he his lazy and bases his research off of what will help him instead of having a critical analysis of most issues. I cite the Kisin debate as example of that again. He did do some research but was lazy and half assed it.

no, he didn’t have the option, what the fuck are you talking about. Also you can’t just lie about this shit here, hasan literally has a political science degree and graduated with honors I think, which on its own already makes hasan more credible than destiny, but also hasan has been reading news articles on stream for years now, and doesn’t make a big deal out of it like destiny does whenever he does ‘research’ as if it’s not actually just embarrassing that he had never even bothered to look into any of this shit before, and he fancied himself a ‘politics expert’ basically.

 

[Cisna H. Scumale]

LSF is full of DGjeets, they just repeat whatever retarded narrative Molestiny cooks up and get upvoted by the swarm of other jeets, and downvote anything that is against the narrative. You can pretty much expect the upvoted comments to be the exact same opinions as his subreddit, which is complete acceptance of any bullshit Tiny makes up (anything outside of that gets you banned).

And when they can't turn the narrative into a Destiny shill thread, they poison the well with "Great news for the unemployed" or "I don't care about streamer drama." Any tactic to shut down criticism of Destiny and preserve his image on Reddit.

 

[mooted]

I still think the case will go nowhere, however the amount of money he spent lmao, I wonder if its close to 1 million at this point, he went for expensive fuckers

 

[Beaumont Sinclair]

I still think the case will go nowhere, however the amount of money he spent lmao, I wonder if its close to 1 million at this point, he went for expensive fuckers

Good lawyers aren't just magicians, right? How much can they do anyway? We would never hear the end of it if Tiny were to wriggle his way out of this.

 

[Blue Bottle Red Cup]

God I hate that fat fuck mrmouton, he’s basically a distilled archetypal dgg faggot

no, he didn’t have the option, what the fuck are you talking about. Also you can’t just lie about this shit here, hasan literally has a political science degree and graduated with honors I think, which on its own already makes hasan more credible than destiny, but also hasan has been reading news articles on stream for years now, and doesn’t make a big deal out of it like destiny does whenever he does ‘research’ as if it’s not actually just embarrassing that he had never even bothered to look into any of this shit before, and he fancied himself a ‘politics expert’ basically.

To clarify i dont mean he would get some PhD just that he could have carried him self more professionally but chose to larp instead

 

[twitter clout chaser]

Destiny plans on trying to get Pxies wife deported once the trial is over

im no lawyer but wouldnt this work against him if it was used asd evidence? dudes is actively trying to fuck with the women sueing him by doing weird shit like this. Cant these sort of clips be weaponized against him?