Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

[Begemot]

He's lying @Fareal , look at how he flips on a dime between obsequiousness and anger. This is a dangerous individual with a drug-addiction. To quote David S Gallant: 'Be wary'.

 

[Cuntster]

Is this because I am advising you not to send that letter if you plan to follow it up with some type of legal action around your admission to college?

This is nothing to do with threats in the letter, btw. I am advising you not to do that because sending that letter will make your position immeasurably worse.

I am willing to rewrite the letter for you if you feel you want to send one. But you will totally fuck yourself if you send that letter.

You are smart enough to realise that if tou are sending a letter saying "my psych says i am a normie and i dont need a tard wrangler", that letter cannot contain references to tranny conspiracies. I know you know this. This is what i mean by totally fucking over any lawyer you might subsequently approach to represent you.

I specialised in representing folks like yourself who were vulnerable, and I can tell you my respinse to you showing up with that letter would be that there is no way I could undo that type of damage. It may as well be written in green ink. I know these are your legitimate thoughts and feelings on the matter, amd I know this has hurt you badly and disappointed you, but you need to ca' canny here if you are going to try and talk them round.

The offer of a rewrite is on the table.

And stop being ridiculous about claiming everyone is transgender. Honestly. It upsets Lagoona. There are people on this thread concerned about your welfare and willing to help you if they can. Please try not to respond to this with bizarre allegations about their gender. It is not constructive.

You had seemed calmer and more in control of your thinking the past few days. I really hope this improvement continues.

I know this is coming from a good place, but at what point do we stop artificially propping Autphag up? I mean, if he can't even write a reasonable letter detailing why he should be accepted without a 'tard wrangler what chance does he have even completing a single assessment or essay without sounding like a lunatic?

 

[Autphag]

I know this is coming from a good place, but at what point do we stop artificially propping Autphag up? I mean, if he can't even write a reasonable letter detailing why he should be accepted without a 'tard wrangler what chance does he have even completing a single assessment or essay without sounding like a lunatic?

You'll see in my book that I can be rational. That's my only urge.

 

[Miss Hortensia]

You'll see in my book that I can be rational. That's my only urge.

Do you classify your letter as rational?

 

[Autphag]

I'm back with Rockstar, caffeine pills, nicotine lozenges, Strongbow Dark Fruits (very low alcohol volume so just enough to give me focus), and a bacon roll.

Time to get writing this damn thing. I haven't heard back about the Chollima picture permissions but as I said to you in PM, I'm proclaiming fair use at the beginning of the book.

 

[Miss Hortensia]

I'm back with Rockstar, caffeine pills, nicotine lozenges, Strongbow Dark Fruits (very low alcohol volume so just enough to give me focus), and a bacon roll.

So your thoughts are fueled by alcohol, drugs and caffeine? Yes, that will be truly a rational masterpiece...

 

[Cuntster]

I'm back with Rockstar, caffeine pills, nicotine lozenges, Strongbow Dark Fruits (very low alcohol volume so just enough to give me focus), and a bacon roll.

Time to get writing this damn thing. I haven't heard back about the Chollima picture permissions but as I said to you in PM, I'm proclaiming fair use at the beginning of the book.

Good for you! I hope you have enough crayons left to finish the first chapter. Try not to smear the pages with too much shit either.

 

[Autphag]

Good for you! I hope you have enough crayons left to finish the first chapter. Try not to smear the pages with too much shit either.

Is this one of your infantilistic fetishes or something? Don't be coy; I couldn't care if you stick them up your pooper.

So your thoughts are fueled by alcohol, drugs and caffeine? Yes, that will be truly a rational masterpiece...

Eugene Valberg wrote his first book and delivered his main sermon at the American Renaissance meeting of 2004 basically having drunk a 6 pack of beer; he had to, in potentially dealing with liberal shit-smearing from questioners.

 

[Miss Hortensia]

Eugene Valberg wrote his first book and delivered his main sermon at the American Renaissance meeting of 2004 basically having drunk a 6 pack of beer; he had to, in potentially dealing with liberal shit-smearing from questioners.

Which is wrong. Valberg didn't publish any books - unless you count his dissertation "Rationality and Self-Deception" from 1973 as a book, although there's no copy available. Since 1977 he hasn't wrote anything. There are only 2 articles existing. A pretty low archievement, if you ask me. You could know that, if you could be arsed to use search engines. And no, I don't count random ramblings at a white supremacist meeting as a book.

Besides, Valberg is a crackpot, who hasn't studied any languages, still he thinks he can make any assumptions about "the one and only african language", which doesn't even exist (which we already told you). Valberg and Rushton are both racist idiots, who are only cited by stormfront. That's really pathetic, but I don't expect better from you. Even the cover of your book was contributed by LagoonaBlue and Cunstster. You were even unable to do a simple reverse search.

 

[LagoonaBlue]

I'm back with Rockstar, caffeine pills, nicotine lozenges, Strongbow Dark Fruits (very low alcohol volume so just enough to give me focus), and a bacon roll.

Time to get writing this damn thing. I haven't heard back about the Chollima picture permissions but as I said to you in PM, I'm proclaiming fair use at the beginning of the book.

You've seen how I write after 2 cans of Rockstar, mostly hyperactive nonsense.
This is gonna be fun.

 

[Autphag]

Which is wrong. Valberg didn't publish any books - unless you count his dissertation "Rationality and Self-Deception" from 1973 as a book, although there's no copy available. Since 1977 he hasn't wrote anything. There are only 2 articles existing. A pretty low archievement, if you ask me. You could know that, if you could be arsed to use search engines. And no, I don't count random ramblings at a white supremacist meeting as a book.

Besides, Valberg is a crackpot, who hasn't studied any languages, still he thinks he can make any assumptions about "the one and only african language", which doesn't even exist (which we already told you). Valberg and Rushton are both racist idiots, who are only cited by stormfront. That's really pathetic, but I don't expect better from you. Even the cover of your book was contributed by LagoonaBlue and Cunstster. You were even unable to do a simple reverse search.

Not unable, I just CBA.

Anyway, here's the first chapter, which is only intended to be introductory hence its brevity, to set a prepositional basis for the rest of my arguments; please tell me if my psychiatric theory is wrong:

THE FACTS DETAILING THESE CONDITIONS
There is an etymological history of both autism and Borderline Personality Disorder which warrants pre-emptive discussion before further reasoning can be explored with respect to the application of its symptomal postulates in analysis of these highly intricate and nuanced cultures, which is, for the record, the primary aim of this book. Autism was first coined in the late 19th century to describe the behaviour of what later came to be known as Childhood Disintegrative Schizophrenics; so presumed because autistic regression was inevitable in the absence of acculturation and a psychodynamically influenced school of thought (still practiced in provincial France as recently as 5 years ago, sadly) that it was better to leave them to disintegrate into their vegetative states; we will discuss later why this is important in distinguishing White autistics from the wider Mongoloid phenotype, in which discipline is, nay, not only culturally ingrained, but encouraged.

Autism has gone through three epistemological revolutions as described in two of my previous works, both uncompleted: Final Retrospections, and the Autistic-Neugrotypical Power Dynamic. The first was one of psychodynamic regressionism which was seen to be inevitable per the psychiatrists' of the time's reckoning, highly influenced by Freudian psychodynamology; the second brought us Applied Behavioural Analysis as a mechanism of behaviourally modifying autistics, with the primary problems in methodological approach being that it would inevitably end up being excessively abusive rather than disciplinary, and an excuse upon people for whom mediation was too late anyway to harm them, unleashing the masochistic wiles of carers; lastly, we now have neurobiological science and the Simon Baron Cohen model of Empathy and the Neurogendered Dichotomy. This is the approach I shall be taking in this work.

Caveat: Although ABA is still applied today, this is a fringe-intervention mostly practiced on infantiles and by non-intrusive means where necessary, that is, sans the electroshock elements, but it by no means behavioural modification of anything of a sort other than to bring about adaptable behaviours to autistics further down the line, though some report traumatization from the experience and do go on to develop Personality Disorders and C-PTSD, recollection barring.

This takes us to Borderline. Coined in 1897, it was so-named to detail an area on the Kraeplinean dichotomy that is just outside of it, between Personality Disorder and Psychosis. Borderline Personality Disorder was once speculated to be the female analogue of autism, but is now understood to be the female and feminine-male analogue to Anti-Social Personality Disorder; the two share coincidental traits of responsibility-absence and authoritarian disrespect, but not for the inherent reason of their disdain, but as a reactive response to feelings of neglect by various sources, both paternal and institutional. Borderline Personality Disorder is characterised by intense "feelings of empathy", implying the conflation of an intuition of feelings and the intensity of feelings suffered by the patient (emotional lability) with empathy; some of the suspicious intuitions arising therefrom end up being coincidentally correct, therefore, it is conflicted as to whether BPD is a manifestation of absolute high affective empathy (which would mean no incompatibility with Asperger's; it'd be a coincidental trait, the difference being BPDs can't "handle it"), or "absolute-zero empathy" per Cohen's reckoning. This aspect of Cohenitic theory I will be rejecting given the data adduced. Borderline often has the trigger of childhood neglect and involves the criteria of 3 traumatic episodes (versus 1 for PTSD and 2 for C-PTSD; it is on the stress-disorder spectrum, being associated with high cortisol levels) to be experienced; using myself in autobiographical example, my father beating me senselessly at the age of 16 over a phone-recording of his abuse of my mother in which he smashed my phone, my mother's incessant splapping of me at age 12 for calling her a lesbian in anger, and numerous incidents involving school-friends in which I was emotionally affected by their remarks (Nicole Davidson nee Nadine Morris saying my intellectual abilities were a "trick", as if I was some cheap rote-automaton; an ambush on MSN Messenger in which I was simply invited to be denigrated by Amie Borge, there are more if my memory's traumatized state could so willingly open up to itself). More than anything, BPDs seek affection and love, but owing to these intuitive distortions, end up finding it in the wrong places, and engage in risky behaviours in order to do so; promiscuous sex, poor judgment of potential partner, some Histrionic and Narcissistic feature ones deliberately embarass themselves for attention (myself case in point). Other secondary characteristics include an absence of identity, the desire to forge an identity by whatever means even if it means co-opting, idiosyncracies of identity rooted in this self-reformation, and mild dissociative traits; legal ascriptions of name are nothing more than placeholders for them, as they reinvent themselves to become whomever it is they desire regardless of it -- traumatic childhood experiences lead them to believe their inherent selves are worthless and so, this is required in adaption.
In the greater analytical context of the regime and the race's history, we may see both in combination, which is my primary working hypothesis.

 

[Cuntster]

New mockup for Autphag's forthcoming book.

EDIT: I will admit I have no idea what Songbun is he just says it a lot.

 

[Begemot]

Not unable, I just CBA.

Anyway, here's the first chapter, which is only intended to be introductory hence its brevity, to set a prepositional basis for the rest of my arguments; please tell me if my psychiatric theory is wrong:

Shorter paragraphs would be better.

 

[LagoonaBlue]

New mockup for Autphag's forthcoming book.
View attachment 249019

@ash_and_stone please draw this

 

[Autphag]

New mockup for Autphag's forthcoming book.
View attachment 249019
EDIT: I will admit I have no idea what Songbun is he just says it a lot.

Class hegemonic system, you used it in the right context earlier, dimmest-wit.

 

[Cuntster]

@ash_and_stone please draw this

I'm more than willing to help create a Sonichu style comic about Autphag in any way I can. I wonder, who could possibly play the part of Mary Lee Walsh? Hmmmmm, I wonder.....

 

[Autphag]

I'm more than willing to help create a Sonichu style comic about Autphag in any way I can. I wonder, who could possibly play the part of Mary Lee Walsh? Hmmmmm, I wonder.....

This is infantile. I'm taking my laptop to a semi-local library -- not Blackburn -- to write my work in peace. I'll come back to you with the rest of my work. But fuck Sonichu. This isn't even the Sonichu of academia. I just feel Rushton was too wide in his investigation of the races and since I'm a monotrough on Korea, I may as well use it along with my psychiatry obsession from '07-'13 (psychoanalysis thanks to Chac from '12-'13; he taught me tonnes about Freud and Jung) to synthesize this important analysis.

I'll be back in a few hours with more.

 

[introman]

Baby girl, @Autphag, if this "my mother's incessant splapping of me at age 12 for calling her a lesbian in anger, and numerous incidents involving school-friends in which I was emotionally affected by their remarks (Nicole Davidson nee Nadine Morris saying my intellectual abilities were a "trick", as if I was some cheap rote-automaton; an ambush on MSN Messenger in which I was simply invited to be denigrated by Amie Borge, there are more if my memory's traumatized state could so willingly open up to itself)."

are issues that caused you irreversible mental stress and damage - you need to buck up and get stronger. Because those should be blips in the past. Sophie, screaming that your moms is a lesbian is hurtful to women, especially to fat chicks. She's not a butch queen, and to be yelled at by her special needs ghetto daughter is not right. I'm not codoning all the physical action done to you, but that was justified. You know how you can go overboard without restraint. Also, getting dissed on MSN messanger back in the bebo days and acting like that is traumatic is childish.


EDIT: Pages back you talk about bullying people in high school. Yea, you DEF deserved the treatment you got.

I'd almost upload an image of all my used textbooks but I don't want you stealing my reading list and using my references.

Fun fact: In secondary, I'd deliberately sabotage the performance of other students by ruining their work, pushing them over, ripping their bags and destroying their textbooks so that they couldn't recover the precious time they'd placed into it. It'd work: their grade ranking would submerge beneath mine as should be natural, and they'd ask for extensions, proving the r3tards that they are. It would irk me to see these petit-bourgeois students so overly privileged by their additional tutoring and other nonsense to make up for their deficient talent and inherited wealth. Checks and balances, my friends.

Checks and balances to instil songbun to elevate the proper classes who should inherit the Earth.

Nobody had dreamed about doing that to me. To give you a clue: I had the nickname 'Gillonator' at school (from "Terminator" + "Gillon"; they considered me a robot as was the persona I adorned). Despite my diminutive form, my violent reputation was well known, and I was only close to expulsion for it once, writing a pity-letter to the acting principal to beg for my place so that I'd look respectable and deferential. There's value to appealing illegitimately to power.

Protip: I learned this technique from some South Korean gangster film I watched in the mid-2000s, couldn't tell you its name. If you ever want to be a good student, just tarnish your compatriots; it's work, especially since in America you do grade-curves rather than criterion-based grade-bands.


With this in mind I probably am marginally sociopathic, but you need to be with my background. Also it does highlight one of my male traits: my competitiveness.

Enough self-indulgence, I need to do what I originally set out.

 

[Miss Hortensia]

Yes, the hatred he once recieved was well deserved. It's really sad, but it's still the truth. I have the creeping suspicion, he'll react the same way at university without proper medication/counseling. All what is needed to make him apeshit crazy is a forward fellow student or a lecturer, who dares to criticize him. Not to mention his deadly jealousy of people, who won life's lottery (or at least, had better chances at success and fucking used them).

 

[LagoonaBlue]

This is infantile. I'm taking my laptop to a semi-local library -- not Blackburn -- to write my work in peace. I'll come back to you with the rest of my work. But fuck Sonichu. This isn't even the Sonichu of academia. I just feel Rushton was too wide in his investigation of the races and since I'm a monotrough on Korea, I may as well use it along with my psychiatry obsession from '07-'13 (psychoanalysis thanks to Chac from '12-'13; he taught me tonnes about Freud and Jung) to synthesize this important analysis.

I'll be back in a few hours with more.

Please don't go to the library, you reek of shit and are physically an embarrassment.