Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

[Miss Hortensia]

Please don't go to the library, you reek of shit and are physically an embarrassment.

I'm not sure if he was really refering to a library. Maybe his local tavern has WLAN and he's just sitting there, doing his usual business.

I'm rather amused he's taken a liking in psychoanalysis despite its clearly jewish roots.

 

[LagoonaBlue]

A meme for dear Chrissy.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

So I just got back home from my date and there's three new pages. I'm glad that even with a new psychologist Chris will always remain the same. Hope there will be more today as I'll be in a food coma from all of the sushi I ate yesterday.

 

[Autphag]

A meme for dear Chrissy.

View attachment 249032

I know I've cited the wrong post but

JUST FUCK OFF WITH THAT

I'M DRESSED FORMALLY IN MY DRESS-SHIRT AND BEST SUIT WHICH WERE BOTH JUST PRESS-IRONED BY MOTHER WEARING MY JUCHE BADGE

I'VE RECENTLY WASHED AND I'VE EVEN GONE TO THE EFFORT OF WASHING MY HAIR AND PERFECTLY TYING IT

I'M SLIGHTLY UNSHAVEN, BUT SINCE I HAVEN'T COME OUT YET, THAT'S LIKE "WHATEVER", WHEN I'M DOING SOVIET-WORKER-HEROISM-OUTING THIS BOOK THROUGH BRUTE-FORCE, THEN I'LL CONCENTRATE ON TRANNY STUFF

THIS WILL BE THE PROOF OF MY SELF-RELIANT INTELLECTUAL PRESTIGE. NOBODY NOTICED ME AND THE LIBRARIAN WAS EVEN CHARMED BY MY COURTEOUSNESS JUDGING BY HER AMIABLE REACTION; UNFORTUNATELY, NO PLUGS WERE AVAILABLE FOR A LAPTOP SO I HAD TO TRANSFER MY FILE USING MY KINDLE AND THEN USE ONE OF THE LIBRARY COMPUTERS AS A GUEST, IN THE ABSENCE OF MY CARD.

I CAN CARRY MYSELF CIVILLY AND I HATE, NAY, I'M MORTIFIED AND MOURNFUL OVER YOUR UNDERESTIMATION OF ME.

Sub-chapter of chapter 1:

1a. A CAVEAT ABOUT THE MANNOSPHERE'S MISUNDERSTANDINGS OF BORDERLINE-AUTISM INTELLECTUAL DICHOTOMY

The channosphere’s cultural toxicity has led us to a belief that the two conditions are mutually exclusive on lines of gender alone, much how psychiatrists had practiced in the past, and still do in America, the splitting of diagnoses Borderline and Anti-Social Personality Disorder on whether you are female or, respectively, not.

Ignoring all other criterion, of course.

I will be using equalities to discuss the IQ profile differentials of these conditions, to clarify terminologically, IQ in all instances refers to the whole-scale score irrespective of profile, whilst “P” (formerly “VS” or visuospatial) refers to performance sub-set aggregate score, and “V” (verbal) refers to verbal subset aggregate score. Borrowing an argument from a recent correspondence of mine:

[Cohen diagram again lol; I've no independent picture on my kindle for it -- I embedded it hard-state onto the word file -- so you'll just have to make do]

“As for my racism, that too is, for me, a science as opposed to exclusive prejudice. Mongoloid, Caucasoid, and Negroid (East Asian, White, and Black in today's language) scores on IQ test can be gradiated downwards in a correlantial reliability. Mongoloids tend towards intellectually autistic talents (IQ = Performance>Verbal), Whites are generalizers (IQ = Performance=Verbal), and Blacks tend towards intellectually "schizoform", but since most aren't psychotically ill, let's say, "personality disordered" intellectual talents (IQ = Verbal>Performance). Even if means did converge one day due to cultural efforts and the elimination of prejudice, these profiles are genetically ingrained. To define Verbal and Performance, as Charles Murray of the Bell Curve says, Verbal is 'how it sounds', Performance is 'manipulation of geometries in the mind'. This is a bit of an oversimplification, however: firstly, Verbal is split into Verbal Vocabulary and Verbal Reasoning/Analogies (having been tested semi-formally which was a drain on my pocket, I do better in the latter, far, far better, my score here is in supergenius levels whilst my vocab is trailing of average); Performance encompasses a number of subtests many of which I haven't a recollection of, but here are the most common I've looked into -- Raven's Progressive Matrices (I've scored 118 on a replica and 122 on a pen-and-paper version), Block construction, Scanning (this tends to be a female rather than male strength), and a few others I struggle to recall without the literary material and my private IQ test results on hand. Other than the fact Processing Speed drags them all down (I'm admittedly slow as a thinker, but somehow this doesn't affect my rapid absorption of facts), I don't do too badly when that's taken out of the equation. I won't tell you my exact score. It's categorically in the wider-average range, the good end of that.”

- Planned correspondence to a college discussing an admissions oversight, using the data of racial science to argue the point of how prejudice is indeed non-existent in the light of objectivity

A common argument I had encountered in my informal excursions on autism discussion boards on the channosphere was that Asperger’s syndrome, being “hypermale”, must entail an IQ=P>V (and in the majority it does, but in a significant minority -- ~25% -- unlike the rest of the spectrum, it does not; males exhibiting this profile are at nearly half of all of them, whilst females with the condition are almost always V>P), whilst Borderlines, being, literally and unironically, on the border between the schizophrenia spectrum and the furthest end of neurofemininity, must entail IQ=V>P (which generally speaking is true, but not universal by any means, as I will follow): these premises seem to imply a mutual exclusivity between ASD and BPD despite co-morbidity being observed in 18% of a study sample involving the former. This might be a slight under-estimate if we are relying on intellectual profiles alone, but the emotional must be considered: autism generally invites neglect due to a perception of coldness, more sensitively inclined or greatly abused autists would then later go to lengths to compensate for such negligence. This is a far better aetiology than pretending that the neurofeminine “Mannosphere’s” dichotomization of the two means much more than a heuristic.

The association between verbal intellect and empathy, and performance intellect and systematization, is problematic, as it is a classic “correlation, therefore causation” fallacy which doesn’t take into account the individual encapsulation of these concepts and measures in relation to each other. Verbal intellect is sub-divided into two parts on the Weschler; vocabulary, and analogies. What we see in Borderlines is that they tend towards vocabularic propensity, but this is almost never the case in Mongoloids (who are, by far, verbal reasoners); well, that simply means a symptomal incongruity, not a differentially diagnostic exclusion. Empatheticness should be regarded a separate skill altogether in that the reciprocal socio-emotional relationship with a person can sometimes be exhibited in the lowest intelligence individuals with universally poor scores, yet they learn the names of their cohorts, act normally, play normally, etc. The high verbal-vocabulary of Borderlines may be coincidental Histrionic traits, per the “PRAISE ME” mnemonic; the Speech is superficial and designed to impress.

Similarily should this fallacy be untangled for the association between systematization and performance intellect, which is a bit trickier, but one does have two arguments up their sleeve: systematization can occur on anything given that the definition of systematization is merely “to reify a concept into a systematic entity”, explaining the high verbal-reasoning scores of many Aspies. Yet, by comparison or even in the absolute, they can, and do, often exhibit performance deficit in key areas (scanning, processing speed; making White Aspies in this respect anachronistic to Mongoloids). If systematization is devoted to the cultivation of verbal skills, it would therefore make sense that performance would either decline in parallel on the whole, or, be preserved only in key aspects useful to this systematization (a common profile is IQ=(verbal reasoning + Raven’s fluid intelligence + block construction) > everything else).

The absolution of a correlation of empathy in this regard therefore cannot be affirmed given the ambiguities of the disparity of sub-types within whole-scale IQ profiles, and hence the caveat in the diagram sources from the 8chan’s /cow/, why it could never denote absolute low empathy, demonstrating an Asperger-Borderline comorbid is indeed feasible.

 

[Miss Hortensia]

Look what the cat brought in, Captain Caps and the Shift Crew.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Look what the cat brought in, Captain Caps and the Shift Crew.

 

[LagoonaBlue]

I know I've cited the wrong post but

JUST FUCK OFF WITH THAT

I'M DRESSED FORMALLY IN MY DRESS-SHIRT AND BEST SUIT WHICH WERE BOTH JUST PRESS-IRONED BY MOTHER WEARING MY JUCHE BADGE

I'VE RECENTLY WASHED AND I'VE EVEN GONE TO THE EFFORT OF WASHING MY HAIR AND PERFECTLY TYING IT

I'M SLIGHTLY UNSHAVEN, BUT SINCE I HAVEN'T COME OUT YET, THAT'S LIKE "WHATEVER", WHEN I'M DOING SOVIET-WORKER-HEROISM-OUTING THIS BOOK THROUGH BRUTE-FORCE, THEN I'LL CONCENTRATE ON TRANNY STUFF

THIS WILL BE THE PROOF OF MY SELF-RELIANT INTELLECTUAL PRESTIGE. NOBODY NOTICED ME AND THE LIBRARIAN WAS EVEN CHARMED BY MY COURTEOUSNESS JUDGING BY HER AMIABLE REACTION; UNFORTUNATELY, NO PLUGS WERE AVAILABLE FOR A LAPTOP SO I HAD TO TRANSFER MY FILE USING MY KINDLE AND THEN USE ONE OF THE LIBRARY COMPUTERS AS A GUEST, IN THE ABSENCE OF MY CARD.

I CAN CARRY MYSELF CIVILLY AND I HATE, NAY, I'M MORTIFIED AND MOURNFUL OVER YOUR UNDERESTIMATION OF ME.

Raymond.

You bastard.

 

[Autphag]

and this is why I hate you; immature children, feigning intellectualism based on convention and pseudointellectual source and namedropping without properly syncretizing your theory (Hortensia is the biggest projector I've ever seen; so the German secondary philosophical curriculum is shit whilst Scotland's tries to make it continue to the University curriculum, so what?), WHO CAN'T DISCUSS A SINGLE NUANCE ABOUT THE HIGHLY VALID BIO-ETHNOLOGICAL REALISM DETERMINING THE VERY CHARACTER OF OUR HUMAN VOLKISCHNESS ACCORDING TO EACH BREED

 

[LagoonaBlue]

and this is why I hate you; immature children, feigning intellectualism based on convention and pseudointellectual source and namedropping without properly syncretizing your theory (Hortensia is the biggest projector I've ever seen; so the German secondary philosophical curriculum is shit whilst Scotland's tries to make it continue to the University curriculum, so what?), WHO CAN'T DISCUSS A SINGLE NUANCE ABOUT THE HIGHLY VALID BIO-ETHNOLOGICAL REALISM DETERMINING THE VERY CHARACTER OF OUR HUMAN VOLKISCHNESS ACCORDING TO EACH BREED

FRESSE HALTEN DU GEHÖRST NICHT ZUR HERRENRASSE!

 

[Begemot]

and this is why I hate you; immature children, feigning intellectualism based on convention and pseudointellectual source and namedropping without properly syncretizing your theory (Hortensia is the biggest projector I've ever seen; so the German secondary philosophical curriculum is shit whilst Scotland's tries to make it continue to the University curriculum, so what?), WHO CAN'T DISCUSS A SINGLE NUANCE ABOUT THE HIGHLY VALID BIO-ETHNOLOGICAL REALISM DETERMINING THE VERY CHARACTER OF OUR HUMAN VOLKISCHNESS ACCORDING TO EACH BREED

Because I don't judge based on mere haplogroups. I haven't created an over-arching system to define me. I engage in daily improvement.

 

[Aristophanes]

Fucking hell, Autphag is absolutely exceptional.

As someone who is currently writing a peer-reviewed research paper, Aut's attempts at research/academic writing come off as embarrassing and dare I say batshit crazy. His ramblings above would most likely be rejected if he sent it to a publisher or academic journal.

Good lord, why is it now that cows are trying to write academic papers/books? First it was Johnathan Bishop, now it is Lucas Werner (who is writing 700 page-long word salad) and now Autphag.

 

[Autphag]

Because I don't judge based on mere haplogroups. I haven't created an over-arching system to define me. I engage in daily improvement.

Neither do I per se. This is a psychiatric/psychoanalytical analysis presuming a general typological model of race (the 4; Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongoloid, and Australoid -- this book will be about Mongoloids but I may make future ones about other races) without accounting for the specific genetic strands as that would be too burdensome upon the research requirements.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

and this is why I hate you; immature children, feigning intellectualism based on convention and pseudointellectual source and namedropping without properly syncretizing your theory (Hortensia is the biggest projector I've ever seen; so the German secondary philosophical curriculum is shit whilst Scotland's tries to make it continue to the University curriculum, so what?), WHO CAN'T DISCUSS A SINGLE NUANCE ABOUT THE HIGHLY VALID BIO-ETHNOLOGICAL REALISM DETERMINING THE VERY CHARACTER OF OUR HUMAN VOLKISCHNESS ACCORDING TO EACH BREED

Don't be upset that Germany is better than Scotland when it comes to the school system.

Fucking hell, Autphag is absolutely exceptional.

As someone who is currently writing a peer-reviewed research paper, Aut's attempts at research/academic writing come off as embarrassing and dare I say batshit crazy. His ramblings above would most likely be rejected if he sent it to a publisher or academic journal.

I could see about sending it into one

 

[Autphag]

Fucking hell, Autphag is absolutely exceptional.

As someone who is currently writing a peer-reviewed research paper, Aut's attempts at research/academic writing come off as embarrassing and dare I say batshit crazy. His ramblings above would most likely be rejected if he sent it to a publisher or academic journal.

Semi-informal pop-science novel. I'm going to be sending it to a 'tard wrangler publisher, there's one in Britain which had already published Luke Jackson's idiotic pontifications of his condition.

Don't be upset that Germany is better than Scotland when it comes to the school system.

You jump from axioms and maxims in secondary to formal logic in University, setting certain students up for failure.

You're to teach everything early, as is the Scottish approach.

 

[UncleFezziesPantsPuppet]

and this is why I hate you; immature children, feigning intellectualism based on convention and pseudointellectual source and namedropping without properly syncretizing your theory (Hortensia is the biggest projector I've ever seen; so the German secondary philosophical curriculum is shit whilst Scotland's tries to make it continue to the University curriculum, so what?), WHO CAN'T DISCUSS A SINGLE NUANCE ABOUT THE HIGHLY VALID BIO-ETHNOLOGICAL REALISM DETERMINING THE VERY CHARACTER OF OUR HUMAN VOLKISCHNESS ACCORDING TO EACH BREED

Yet you're always here.

 

[Miss Hortensia]

Heilige Scheiße, Chris, tut mir einen Gefallen und höre auf über deutsche Philosophie-Lehrpläne zu schwafeln. Du hast keine Ahnung. Du würdest nicht einmal ein Semester bei uns überleben.

"Volkishness", my ass. Stick to German or to English, but not to both. That's secondhand embarassement at its best.

 

[Aristophanes]

Semi-informal pop-science novel. I'm going to be sending it to a 'tard wrangler publisher, there's one in Britain which had already published Luke Jackson's idiotic pontifications of his condition.

If you're sending it to a publisher with standards that low, it certainly says a lot about the "quality" of your work.

 

[Autphag]

Heilige Scheiße, Chris, tut mir einen Gefallen und höre auf über deutsche Philosophie-Lehrpläne zu schwafeln. Du hast keine Ahnung. Du würdest nicht einmal ein Semester bei uns überleben.

"Volkishness", my ass. Stick to German or to English, but not to both. That's secondhand embarassement at its best.

Never did it at school, learned most of what few terms -- maybe in the hundreds -- I know from psychology texts, Hitlerianism, and Chac incessantly babbling about it.

If you're sending it to a publisher with standards that low, it certainly says a lot about the "quality" of your work.

A work with a hypothesis in mind doesn't rely so great on citation or the linguistic presentation -- I'm assuming you love homosexually florid purple prose -- but it is merely to have an impact on individuals who could carry this sort of work further, in mainstream academia in particular rather than the bloggosphere. It has autobiographical elements for the reason it is semi-informal and ties into the experiences of fallacious arguments I've encountered.

 

[LagoonaBlue]

Heilige Scheiße, Chris, tut mir einen Gefallen und höre auf über deutsche Philosophie-Lehrpläne zu schwafeln. Du hast keine Ahnung. Du würdest nicht einmal ein Semester bei uns überleben.

"Volkishness", my ass. Stick to German or to English, but not to both. That's secondhand embarassement at its best.

He is an arschgeige with a backpfeifengesicht, no?

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Heilige Scheiße, Chris, tut mir einen Gefallen und höre auf über deutsche Philosophie-Lehrpläne zu schwafeln. Du hast keine Ahnung. Du würdest nicht einmal ein Semester bei uns überleben.

"Volkishness", my ass. Stick to German or to English, but not to both. That's secondhand embarassement at its best.

I really don't get Chris's need to combine words and come up with his own. It just makes him look stupid when he does it.

By the way, I loved the way Munich University looked, such a perfect atmosphere to learn in.