Jesus and his deciples, but they're quirked-up millennials:
View attachment 8903335
Not gonna look it up but are you sure they are the disciples or whether it was just a quote on some OC artwork? Especially because the poster isn't the OG artist
I always thought it was one of two things; a conscious rejection of "euro centric beauty standards in art" where clear, symmetrical, even faces are the ideal and eyes are the biggest/most expressive part of the face, so they always take priority, so these guys are like "I'm gonna be different and emphasize the mouth!"
OR!!
Mouth fetish
Sort of hard for me to say, as I don't personally mind when things get exaggerated, I really adore caricatures and certain graphic styles... But in this case, I think these drawings just have a.) a specific style she imitates from around her 'art circles' and b.) anatomical problems.
Sort of like tunnel vision on the facial expression but then the whole head gets forgotten so the face looks big in comparison. Maybe she really likes focusing on expressions and finds it harder to do it smaller, especially if drawing digitally, but that does sort of lean into similar artists who instead focus more on teeth, but still the mouth. But liking something a lot is, especially teeth, is very hard for me to say if it's a "fetish", like compared to some guy who specifically focuses on inflation or feet. It just seems worlds apart?
Idk, just an average dysgenic mulatto artstyle
Jumpscared
Anyway, am I the only one who thinks also that these have huge anatomical problems as well? Like, maybe some of the vags look .. like something but it looks like someone who never saw one just drew one
and some of these are just incomprehensible as hell
(fem cloud looking anything but fem lolol part and parcel)
That clit on that blue thing is bothering me because I am not entirely sure if It's anatomically wrong or not. I'm leaning towards "yeah"
Reminder that these people really believe "fiction affects reality".
Edit to not double post:
Saw this and It got me thinking. what did the murder of that CEO even accomplish?
View attachment 8908531
Fiction has its place in reality, and does influence people. All arts do. Some realist writers I've read had even argued that all fiction is based on reality (In the fiction vs realism writing wars)
Perhaps it didn't accomplish anything, maybe it did. Atleast the deed was what the perpetrator himself wanted to do, so whatever.
1 dead ceo? cool. millions of dead city smoochers? beautiful. Always a silver lining. The reminder is to just never live in a city.
Saw this in the Rowling Derangement thread and apparently the guy firmly believes that Rowling has enough influence to sway UK legislation and actually enact a real tranny genocide.
Still, i'm rooting for the chimpout troondom will throw if there is a new HP game
I'm manifesting for Rowling to achieve total victory