A reminder that the MSM originated "fake news" and then pretended Trump did it after the fact when he turned it around on them.
Specifically to suppress pizzagate.
Like they knew they were sacrificing media credibility, but they were protecting something more important.
There’s been a pretty concerted campaign against her since the murder, with a lot of it happening in normie spaces.
From what little I know of it, her reaction to his assassination does seem a bit strange, but who knows how any of us would respond. They were part of a media bubble themselves and I think she’s probably always been a bit weird, she’s now just got a lot more focus on her.
If she was a part of a larger conspiracy it would’ve been far easier to tell her to stay at home and shut up so as not to give the game away, why risk putting her out there when she’s so ‘unconvincing’/performative? And obviously, all the compilations that do the rounds are specifically edited and framed to make the narrative that she’s strange and suspicious.
She does seem pretty inauthentic, she was on a Bravo reality dating show called Summer House - acting like the women on those shows do - around the time she met Charlie, then seemed to switch to ‘trad’ upon meeting him. She seems to now be mudsharking with some Fox journalist.
Don’t give her a pass for everything ever just because her husband got murdered. The hatred towards her from the left has been pretty specific and nasty though.
Maybe
@Lemmingwiser can add some insight.
It's worth pointing out that Erika Kirk said in an interview with Glenn Beck that though there were always death threats against her, charlie and their kids, that she went through his phone and he had no messages of thinking he was going to be killed. And then it turned out he did send messages thinking he was going to be killed, confirmed by various TPUSA loyalists and messages shared by Candace (one of the few good things she has done).
I always think what would I do if I were a propagandist in the employ of transnational people that control countries. How would I move the needle in emotion for the masses?
You think generationally.
You want war waged in Iran, you want to deplete american strength, because controlling the world through china will be easier as they're more comfortable in suppressing liberties. How would you shore up support for this unpopular war? Well you need to get rid of Charlie Kirk, because he was one of the most influential men in america and he jusr convinced the president to stop making more strikes on Iran.
Erika Kirk was willing to accept the donations that Charlie refused. She was willing to align the organization with war on Iran. Deeply unpopular and you see it in people not showing up to TPUSA events, and chapter presidents quitting.
So maybe if she was almost a victim again of a shooting?
But then what really clinches it, is if you prod a couple of leftists to be extra deranged and hateful towards her. A good propagandist has his fingers in both pies. This way you can say, anyone criticizing it must be a leftist, must be a tranny. That's what happened to me in the charlie kirk thread, despite my history on this site with deepthink threads where I was autistic enough to group research the origins of the evils of transgenderism rooting back to Magnus Hirschfeld.
It's a way to say, you're either with us or against us, and we're throwing you out if you criticize our sacred cows. And Erika is one of them.
This assassination attempt was fake and gay, btw. Americans get to vote between leftwing demons or Israel. I don't envy you, even id things are no better here. The tree of liberty needs watering, but we're too disconnected from each other to be willing to water it.
If you want to understand Erika, you have to understand the fag Tyler Bowyer that introduced her and Charlie to each other.
Also we're in war time and there's extra propaganda everywhere. If you're certain of your point of view in any direction, it just means you're aligned to a specific cause, not that you're close to the truth.
x 228 
