That thread is overwhelmingly anti-Trump, they're just gonna post that one picture of Trump and Epstein and say "of course he did they were best friends". I wanted to see what a more pro-Trump group would say about the whole situation. It seems like everyone on the internet, from 4chan, to Reddit, to random YouTube comments thinks he's a kid diddler (I know all those places are overwhelmingly filled with retards, but still, that's a big chunk of the internet) and I've never heard a comprehensive explanation of the situation from the Trump side.
I'll give you my take as someone who doesn't think Trump is a good person, but does view him as the lesser evil, doesn't think there's any merit to accusations of him diddling kids, and would call for his public execution if I genuinely thought he was guilty.
So, any explanation of any event needs to provide a rebuttal to seemingly contradictory facts. The "Trump is not a kid diddler" position needs to explain away two, namely the fact that at one point in the past, Trump was acquaintances and possibly even friends with Epstein, and the utterly botched handling of the release of the files.
In no particular order, and completely non-exhaustively, here's a sampling of things the "Trump is a kid diddler" position needs to explain away:
>Why Epstein didn't attempt to parley any sort of blackmail to get out of jail when he was imprisoned on Trump's orders by federal agents in 2019
>Why Trump was the only person in those circles to testify against Epstein in his first trial
>Why, if there's evidence of Trump diddling kids in the parts of the files Trump
didn't release, didn't democrats ever once even CONSIDER leaking that evidence despite knowing Trump was running for re-election the entire 4 years Biden was in office
>Why Epstein constantly talked about in his emails how there was no one he hated in the entire world more than Trump
>Why Trump personally banned Epstein from all his properties long before opinions of him shifted
>Why there isn't a single scrap of evidence Trump even visited Epstein's island
>Why despite 12 of the last 16 years since the first Epstein case, there has been a democrat in the white house, and Trump being a thorn in saint Obongo's side most of his presidency, did they upend the entire media apparatus to censor Trump and resort to fanning the flames of multiple assassination attempts rather than even
accuse Trump of being involved with Epstein
The first one can be pretty easily answered with "Trump was a rich New York real estate mogul, Epstein was a rich New York finance mogul, it's likely they ran in the same circles, and Trump
did turn on Epstein before anyone else in those circles did" and "Through a combination of the files including every single anonymous tip ever filed, no matter how blatantly implausible, and the utter retards like Pam Bondi and Kashapp Patel running things, it was always doomed to be a shitshow." I don't think you can so cleanly explain away everything that would seem to contradict the other position.