- Joined
- Dec 16, 2023
I am suspicious that this e-mail was tampered with. Why is the "nine" smaller? When you analyze the compression artifacts around that "nine" their distribution is completely different from the rest of the image. If an image has never been tampered with, the compression artifacts should be consistent and random. That randomness is present everywhere except around that "nine", where they are completely different. That would indicate it is not part of the original image of the e-mail.
Why would pat do that?



