💪 Tough Guys Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

If the Judge accepts it, then the city either appeals or it goes to trial where they'll plead the same theory before a jury

So is whether or not the judge accepts it really down to the judge?

As in its not necessarily something that an educated, experienced, rational person like a judge would just dismiss on hearing it?

I ask because so much of Fatrick’s 100% certain claims are usually things which would annoy a judge.
 
IMG_3138.jpeg
lol, wtf? I don't remember that one. Hahaha.

I was listening to Josiah 5 again, and I can’t stop laughing about how Pat - after bragging in that smug tone about how Huffington Post were gonna make a huge hit piece on him - had to admit to everyone that the trolls got him again.
I've been re-watching Cryptic Web Chronicles from the beginning and can confirm the ribs are just as delicious on the second helping.
 
In them the city agreed that if the police officers aren't liable, the city might still theoretically be liable, unless no constitutional violations occured.
And this theory is nonsensical. If no constitutional violations even occurred, and they didn't, then a municipality cannot be vicariously liable for constitutional violations that never even occurred.

tl;dr Rick loses.

He probably realizes this, because look how he is furiously seething.

I am honestly somewhat confused at the judge's decision not to dismiss the case entirely.

I am sort of hoping the judge shares my opinion that tolerating eternal swatting is actually a violation of Constitutional rights, but that it wasn't "clearly established law," so Rick wins a victory that benefits future swatting victims, but doesn't get a dime.

That has always been my favorite outcome.

(If you know Section 1983 law you know what I'm talking about.)
 
Last edited:
And this theory is nonsensical. If no constitutional violations even occurred, and they didn't, then a municipality cannot be vicariously liable for constitutional violations that never even occurred.
I'd call you a sweet summer child, but I'll just child you. We know that direct copyright violations aren't necessary for contributory ones, so everything's on the table.

I do think the judge is taking this as a "this case is shit, but you fuckers should think about the question and get a plan together" perspective.
 
If no constitutional violations even occurred, and they didn't, then a municipality cannot be vicariously liable for constitutional violations that never even occurred.
I'm pretty sure the judge already decided that some of them did actually occur, just that the officers can't be held liable personally. I think they were fairly minor though (it was a huge document and I don't remember it vividly), shit like peeping into his cellar without valid probable cause, so even if he wins I would be surprised if the award would be anything substantial. IANAL though, obviously.
 
IMG_20260427_214611.jpg
On a related note, I am now thoroughly convinced that each and every swatting at Niki's house was staged by Patrick. It is not a normal human response to rush out of your house naked, gesticulating wildly, while police try to move your wife to safety. Patrick was waiting to do an assigned task with his leaky faucet.
 
I reckon I'm in for some top hats. Meh.

"My wife and I's" <possession> is so very incorrect, and in several ways.

-My and my wife's <possession>
-My wife's and my <possession>
-My wife and me, our <possession>
-Me and my wife, our <possession>

So many ways to say it correctly. And yet Piggy gets it completely wrong. My wife and I = We, not Our.

And while MATI posting, Idiots who say, and write, "aren't I" instead of am not I, or am I not, or even ain't I. Ain't can be a contraction of 'am not' in addition to 'is not', but who says amn't? or I are for that matter.

Six weeks to the trial start. Do we have any Kiwis in the area that might attend? I predict a massive category 5 oink-out outside of the court room (The court room was hot, again. Like, swamp ass hot.) Possibly on the first day. Piggy will be livid about something that the judge ruled, or some other aspect of the proceedings. We need the video of that, if filming is allowed in the courthouse. It won't be in the court room. Don't even try.
 
I'd call you a sweet summer child, but I'll just child you. We know that direct copyright violations aren't necessary for contributory ones, so everything's on the table.
I disagree and if it gets to a jury I hope even a jury of pure Negroes will agree with me.
 
1777347724136.png
New lore of our late magnum DONG PCJ. Fly high, you magnificent bastard :semperfidelis:

Posting these pictures of both Rick's fat fish lips and the big cock Jon, because it can't be Farty Tits without the ole' Lappening. ALERT: FAT.
1777347806709.png1777348031256.png1777348066432.png1777348118576.png1777348176545.png1777348209148.png1777348235951.png1777348254751.png1777348274503.png1777348283236.png1777348299130.png
1777348319200.png1777348337061.png1777348351362.png
1777347830820.png1777347873915.png1777347881061.png1777347887626.png1777347911758.png
1777348101134.png
 
I fucking hate Internet trough goys who have never actually dealt with anything even resembling video of a live shooter situation - half the people never know anything was going down, because gunshots don't sound like gunshots in the movies.
Remember, Rick has never dealt with anything remotely tough. He is a pussy and a fag. Plus he's fat.
 
Quit worshipping Mohammed you fucking weirdo.

The real God, who has Christ as his Son, hates the fuck out of you mudslimes.

The real God LOVES dogs. If you don't you're an evil, stupid faggot.
What the fuck are you talking about
Apartments are too small for dogs
 
Back
Top Bottom