Funny this is the same thing as was talked about in the boogie situation of a million years ago with Frank Hassle. He willfully opened the door to what he later tried to say was a threat he needed to fire a gun at(retard also fire a warning shot) You'd think people on this site would recall this and know that castle doctrine isn't a piece of paper saying you can shoot anyone you don't like knocking on your door.
Right; you like the idea of harassing people at their houses, but you don't want to explicitly say that, since it's weird and sociopathic. So you keep autistically looping on this legalistic defense of harassing people at their houses.
This just starts at the exact same time as the phone camera video. I was hoping that it would show what happened in the preceding minutes. There must be more to this, surely?
I never realized since it was from her phone and he took it that she just was unaffected by that pepper spray. What weak sauce shit did he use?
No. I'm fine with her being hurt for being an annoying faggot. I just think that the general legal statutes happen to be right and you can't just jump right to that. Odd that you call me autistic when you're the one who cannot reason with basic nuance. You have to give people a chance to fuck off when they walk up to your door and knock on it. It's a point I've now made about 4-5 times but since you seem to be allergic to a good point I have to keep making it.
I'm calling you autistic for repeatedly looping on this legalistic framework that everyone already understands. (You're still doing it btw. You're also angrily neg-rating people for saying she got what she deserved, despite claiming yourself that you're "fine with her being hurt." Very autistic behavior.)
Why would you assume I'm angry when rating people negatively? Is that because you're mad when you rate peoples posts?
If the same shit argument is made it calls for the same rebuttal.
Honestly. Kinda based.
>Retarded brown fed gets in legal trouble for being a low impulse control faggot
Leftie type of argument. "You like the idea of trans people dying, but you don't want to explicitly say that, since it's weird and sociopathic, so you have to come up with excuses... Like about the biological truth, or the medical procedures being harmful, or something! But you 100% just want trans people dead!"
If you look at this as an isolated incident, its debatable whether she posed an imminent physical threat. That isn't really my point.
She was at his house to harass him, so by reducing this to "just knocking at your door," you're revealing that you support the idea of harassing people where they live. You just don't want to admit it explicitly, but it's quite obvious from what you've said. Sick and disgusting.
They hate Fuentes, and therefore, everything that happens to Fuentes is completely acceptable, regardless of the context or the wider consequences. They are too dumb to understand second and third order effects, they just want the guy they don't like to be harassed with impunity.
It's crazy how many threads on here have a faggot janny that camps it and chimps out any time someone disagrees with their opinion on the relevant celebrity/lolcow. I had something similar happen in the J.K. Rowling thread as well.
