Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.

If a company is willing to pay someone to sit in a '90s office park,' the market has decided that person's labor is more valuable than your opinion of it.
the market has decided
You don't think that hordes of astroturfed paper-pushing non-jobs have a bit more in common with Soviet bureaucracy than they do with an actual free market? I can see why you people never got a foothold in the Square Mile, let alone Central. Real capitalism's been tried and you're bad at it.
 
View attachment 8930705
look at all the people of color. (not that it's a bad thing) The liberals are far whiter and more respectable. Liberalism is peak whiteness. They've got the education, they've got the big bank accounts, they are just better white people all around.
To be fair this is an article spotlighting disillusioned Trump voters, so we're bound to see a higher concentration of non-white people in a sampling of that block. Trump has been far more successful in crossing racial lines than his predecessors, however, and he's attracted a great number of insecure Latinos and socially conservative migrants to his tent.


View attachment 8930630
Like this girl is incomprehensibly retarded. Trump ran on ending the department of education.

Read the article you referenced just now, and lmao, I am genuinely astonished. Some of the disenfranchised voters seem like otherwise decent people afflicted with comically poor faculties, best advised not to hurt themselves exercising their democratic rights again. They're terminally uninformed but reading the news might be useless for people this abysmally stupid anyway, as they can't utilize information to observe simple patterns or forecast obvious outcomes. I've come away from this article thinking all voters should be forcibly subject to a recap of events, clockwork orange style, and administered a series of basic shape-fitting tests before they are allowed access to a booth. Think I'm being meanspirited?

Screenshot 2026-04-29 9.55.12 AM.png

"I knowingly voted for a dangerous tard who would have to be restrained by the government like a wino in the police station's drunk tank"

LMAOOO.png


"I thought the overt narcissist who extols the unrivaled greatness of his first term would learn from his mistakes and emblazon his name in America's canon of great presidents, like the redemptive montage for a flawed romcom protagonist on lifetime."
Lol the followup question makes the interviewer, who isn't trying to patronize, sound like a preschool teacher gently lecturing one of her more disruptive students after he'd spent some time in the corner to reflect.

There is no introspection regarding what habits, thought patterns, or sentiments caused them to make such a mistake, and most, despite their regret, seem like they might be inclined to vote Trump a third time if he were on the ticket. Many are obvious chuds whose social media diet consists of MAXIMUM LIB OWNAGE.
 
Last edited:
I swear to God having an anime avatar is like voluntarily putting a pink triangle on yourself.

Does being obsessed with little anime girls lead to a man becoming worthless? Or does being a worthless man lead to an obsession with little anime girls? Regardless, the result is the same.
My Gojoru pfp is probably the perfect balance between my blatant autism and thread shitting

They're literally the guy in the cartoon.
“Most Charities suck and don’t actually support the cause I want”

THEN GRAB A LADLE NIGGA, THE SOUP KITCHEN NEEDS YOUR ASS
 
We had certain beliefs, but Trump shit all over them and we prefer sucking him off than being consistent

Yeah it is a bit hypocritical that Ben Garrison supported Trump for not going into a full on war with Iran in the 2010s.


iran_war_cartoon.jpg



The globalists continue to push for war.

Had Hillary been elected, we probably would be mired in several of them by now. Fortunately she lost but the globalist Deep State still promotes war and they will continue to commit false flags to lure America into them. The propaganda will continue to fly about Iran and there will be much confusion. Some will urge war with that theocratic state while others will recommend restraint.

I hope President Trump chooses restraint.


It doesn't take much to put 2+2 together, and they will pivot their grift to something else (although potentially just as retarded, considering Tucker is grifting for Russia???)

I guess unhinged Candace Owens can be funny on a few occasions.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I didn't mean shift on the war. I meant shift on Trump. You can always just stay silent and/or focus on other issues without clearly signaling a break. The fact that a break is signaled means that, afaic, they're done with MAGA (or will try to reframe what MAGA means, idk)
I didn't just mean the war, I feel like the war is a part of the bigger picture here. It really comes down to what Trump sold himself as, vs what he actually ended up doing. Part of the problem with it was Trump just said whatever the people he was talking to at the time wanted to hear. If it was the Jews, he talked about how bad Iran was, if he was talking to a normal crowd, or criticizing his opponents he was the antiwar candidate. He said he was anti-corruption, and all of these other things, when really they were just things people wanted to hear at the time, and it would change if he thought something else would make him sound good to the people he was talking to.

The war just made it inevitable that this was going to happen. Along with his fragile ego. He's someone that views anything other than constant affirmation as a personal attack. When people didn't completely change their beliefs to continue supporting him or at least his policies, he took that as a personal slight. And made it impossible to only criticize his policies and not him. There was a pretty clear divide in the right before this happened, which essentially breaks down to the paleocons, and the jew alligned neocon side. It became pretty obvious it was there around the time Charlie Kirk was shot, but it was there long before that. It just wasn't as out in the open. It's Trump, and his decisions that led to this.
 
Calling for the government to 'ruin the lives' of thousands of workers because they fit a meme archetype is a fucking retarded way to admit you don't understand how velocity of money works. If we purged every job that didn't involve getting your hands dirty, the 'real' economy you’re fetishizing would evaporate in a week. But please, tell me more about 'grifters' while you advocate for state-sponsored economic suicide lol. Even if a job is "fake" in whatever fantasy world you live in, that worker pays rent, buys groceries, and pays taxes. This is exactly what I mean when I say you drooling subhumans don't know how market economies work. I just can't fathom rightwing logic of economics where they advocate for destroying the consumer base. Just lmao
Yeah as much as I wanna make the hecking evil foids who hire indians and stop me from calling my coworkers niggers and making bomb threats in the workplace pay, I don't think even they deserve to be without jobs/struggling, not even going into consideration the economic consequences like you said.

Right wingers want a high-trust society yet vigorously makes groups of people into others and moves to hurt them. If you want people to be nice to you, give you things, and otherwise be pleasant you need to extend the olive branch and make the first gesture of goodwill, not uh... advocate for millions of them to lose their jobs because they're paperwork gimps instead of white collar engineers/blue collar maintainers/fixers. I kinda agree that HR doesn't really do much except handle liability stuff/recruiting, but I also don't know what they actually do so what do I know.
 
Last edited:
Yeah it is a bit hypocritical that Ben Garrison supported Trump for not going into a full on war with Iran in the 2010s.


View attachment 8931975







I guess unhinged Candace Owens can be funny on a few occasions.
Ben Garrison has always been a faggot, and the fact that he worked with "the Online Hate Prevention Institution", which is basically the Australian version of the ADL to get edits of his cartoons removed should have thrown any idea of him being a "principled libertarian" out the window over a decade ago.
 
Ben Garrison has always been a faggot, and the fact that he worked with "the Online Hate Prevention Institution", which is basically the Australian version of the ADL to get edits of his cartoons removed should have thrown any idea of him being a "principled libertarian" out the window over a decade ago.

He only did that because he thought Will Stancil and Patrick Tomlinson’s were too extreme even for him.
 
It really comes down to what Trump sold himself as, vs what he actually ended up doing.
To add on to your post, there can, of course, be nuance as situations change over time. The US we live in today isn't the same as it was a year ago or two years ago, and not every promise can be upheld. With Trump, however, it doesn't matter what external factors are at play; he just does whatever he wants. He said he was going to lower gas prices, but he didn't. He said he was going to deport all illegal immigrants, and he didn't. He said he was going to refill the strategic oil reserve, and he didn't. He said he was going to release the Epstein files, and after multiple excuses and lies, he still didn't. He said he was going to be anti-corruption, and he isn't. He said he was the pro-peace candidate and wouldn't start any wars, and he started a war. He destroyed US-NATO, US-EU, and US-Canada relations, but that's okay because they're weak, but Trump still demanded they help him, but they're weak cowards, but he still needs their help. Anyone who disagrees with Trump is the enemy. It doesn't matter who they are, how long they worshiped him, or how much they've given him; it's him or nothing. They aren't free thinkers; they're cattle who blindly follow their leader.

They won't learn, though. They'll say all politicians are liars and they'll never vote again, but they'll still vote for whatever Republican candidate is next.

He promised MAGA the world, and in return, they got MIGA.
 
Yeah as much as I wanna make the hecking evil foids who hire indians and stop me from calling my coworkers niggers and making bomb threats in the workplace I don't think even they deserve to be without jobs/struggling, not even going into consideration the economic consequences like you said.

Right wingers want a high-trust society yet vigorously makes groups of people into others and moves to hurt them. If you want people to be nice to you, give you things, and otherwise be pleasant you need to extend the olive branch and make the first gesture of goodwill, not uh... advocate for millions of them to lose their jobs because they're paperwork gimps instead of white collar engineers/blue collar maintainers/fixers. I kinda agree that HR doesn't really do much except handle liability stuff/recruiting, but I also don't know what they actually do so what do I know.
not all of them are like this, just the alcoholic ones with 20 different hernias who can't understand why someone who sits at a computer has a bigger house, a nicer car etc.
 
Are you a negro, comrade?
Nah. I actually got the pic from an old 8chan pic.
1000115423.jpg
But I've been called a cracker, a nigger, a kike, a pajeet, a spic, an arab, an asian....pretty much every general race I can think of other than pacific-islander (not sure if being called an aborigine counts, though).
At this point, I make sure to pretend to be any and every race I want online because who gives a fuck. Also, allows me to be racist against everyone, while not really being racist because "how can I be racist against my own race?"
I don't begrudge anyone for collecting welfare and I expect that some people are going to exploit a system if it's open to being exploited, but half the US budget goes to Social security and medicare(it is dwarfed by nothing as far as I know), and ostensibly money is taken from everyone's check to fund that. When a lowly wagie working a service job sees a cracked out customer buying scratch tickets and alcohol and then are asked to do a separate transaction for their EBT, they shouldn't find that upsetting? They should have some retarded notion about "class consciousness" instead of thinking "Gee, I wish the government wouldn't be taking money out of my check to fund these people's lifestyle"?. What I'm saying is their concerns are legitimate even if they don't see the bigger picture.
I might also be incorrect, but IIRC, it was shown that a lot of the taxes for Medicaid and shit aren't even being used efficiently or are given to programs doomed to fail, because it is how Big Pharma and their govt lackeys are able to legally get more money.
HEAR HEAR SERFS! President Donald J Trump DOJ has declared the following:
“The National Trust for Historic Preservation” is a beautiful name, but even their name is FAKE because when they add the words “in the United States” to the National Trust for Historic Preservation, it makes it sound like a Governmental Agency, which it is not. In fact, the United States refused to continue funding it in 2005 because they strongly disagreed with their mission and objectives. They are very bad for our Country. They stop many projects that are worthy, and hurt many others.
You know the funny thing. The exact same thing could actually be said about the Chamber of Commerce and it'd be as, if not more, true. But I imagine the CoC hasn't gone against Trump (and is likely lobbying for or funding many of his closest associates), so he won't say shit about that.
“Most Charities suck and don’t actually support the cause I want”

THEN GRAB A LADLE NIGGA, THE SOUP KITCHEN NEEDS YOUR ASS
TBF, given how many of them are, I'm not sure I'd trust them in a soup kitchen behind the counter.
 
4-500 rubles on their paychecks.
That would be abysmal wage in rural India, unless it is paycheck per day. A hundred rubles are 1 dollar.
Right wingers want a high-trust society yet vigorously makes groups of people into others and moves to hurt them. If you want people to be nice to you, give you thing
The problem is that you can't make a high trust society by force. It evolves in centuries coming out of shared culture, shared religion, shared ethnicity, shared history, shared values etc.

If you are nice to a jeet he will just exploit it. Now I'm not saying it can only work when all these match, but the US just doesn't have enough "commonalities" for it to work. If all the US were lets say made out of lutherans conservatives or liberal atheists or even Ufo belieiving lolberts, it may overcome race, history etc, but currently it is too much dissonance.
 
If you are nice to a jeet he will just exploit it. Now I'm not saying it can only work when all these match, but the US just doesn't have enough "commonalities" for it to work. If all the US were lets say made out of lutherans conservatives or liberal atheists or even Ufo belieiving lolberts, it may overcome race, history etc, but currently it is too much dissonance.
I would say before H1B and other mass immigration programs meant to lower wages and raise profits we had a pretty trusting society. Overtime immigrants used to integrate into american culture. But now theyre isolated into specific communities and know they're only going to be here for a minimum of 6 years so why bother integrating?
 
Back
Top Bottom