Swedish Liberals Fight to Legalize Incest and Necrophilia

  • Thread starter Thread starter RI 360
  • Start date Start date
Wtf is going on over there? Whenever I hear a story about Sweden they either got attacked, someone got raped and the government doesn't care, or they come up with stupid ideas like dark colored band aids so dark people with cuts won't feel discriminated against.
 
Frank: I got a question about you morticians. You bang the dead bodies?”

Mortician: Mmmm... no.

Frank: I imagine stuff like that goes on all the time. I mean, I don't give a shit. If I was dead, you could bang me all you want. Who cares? Dead body's like a piece of trash. I mean, shove as much shit in there as you want. I won't care. Fill me up with cream. Turn me into a cannoli. Make a stew out of my ass. What's the big deal? Bang me, eat me, grind me up into little pieces, throw me in the river. Who gives a shit? You're dead, you're dead.
I gotta side with Frank on this one.
 
Incest is illegal because it leads to birth defects and has too many possibilities of people being abused due to familiarity with the people propositioning them (i.e. parents forcing children, older siblings forcing younger ones, etc.)

Necrophilia is diseased and could spread illness and would have too many problems relating to consent and ultimate ownership of the corpse. Also there would have to be a whole new slew of laws to regulate buying and selling corpses for this purpose.

There's some reasons why it's illegal I thought of the top of my head beyond "disgusting" you filthy perverts.
 
Necrophilia is diseased and could spread illness and would have too many problems relating to consent and ultimate ownership of the corpse. Also there would have to be a whole new slew of laws to regulate buying and selling corpses for this purpose.

There's some reasons why it's illegal I thought of the top of my head beyond "disgusting" you filthy perverts.
Disease is a dumb argument against necrophilia. It's not illegal to fuck a christmas ham.

Regarding consent and ownership of the corpse, that's a well trod area of law. We've been dealing with it for as long as people have been dying.

Like, right now, you can have someone cremated and you can usually do whatever the fuck you want with the ashes at that point. Keep them in an urn, scatter them, snort them, ingest them; do whatever you want, the sky's the limit. And then there's all sorts of stuff like plastination and embalming (why do we embalm bodies we're just going to bury?) and whatever soviet magic they used to preserve Lenin's corpse for display.

Really the "eww it's gross" argument is all that's left. And I genuinely don't care about that anymore.

I really can't find the effort to care about some weirdo selling the rights for someone to fuck his cold butt after he dies.

Heh, also, this reminds me that, up until recently, it used to be legal in my neck of the woods to bury dead bodies without notifying anyone of the death.
 
Disease is a dumb argument against necrophilia. It's not illegal to fuck a christmas ham.

Regarding consent and ownership of the corpse, that's a well trod area of law. We've been dealing with it for as long as people have been dying.

Like, right now, you can have someone cremated and you can usually do whatever the fuck you want with the ashes at that point. Keep them in an urn, scatter them, snort them, ingest them; do whatever you want, the sky's the limit. And then there's all sorts of stuff like plastination and embalming (why do we embalm bodies we're just going to bury?) and whatever soviet magic they used to preserve Lenin's corpse for display.

Really the "eww it's gross" argument is all that's left. And I genuinely don't care about that anymore.

I really can't find the effort to care about some weirdo selling the rights for someone to fuck his cold butt after he dies.

Heh, also, this reminds me that, up until recently, it used to be legal in my neck of the woods to bury dead bodies without notifying anyone of the death.
We get it, you wanna fuck a corpse, Jim.
 
Disease is a dumb argument against necrophilia. It's not illegal to fuck a christmas ham.

Regarding consent and ownership of the corpse, that's a well trod area of law. We've been dealing with it for as long as people have been dying.

Like, right now, you can have someone cremated and you can usually do whatever the fuck you want with the ashes at that point. Keep them in an urn, scatter them, snort them, ingest them; do whatever you want, the sky's the limit. And then there's all sorts of stuff like plastination and embalming (why do we embalm bodies we're just going to bury?) and whatever soviet magic they used to preserve Lenin's corpse for display.

Really the "eww it's gross" argument is all that's left. And I genuinely don't care about that anymore.

I really can't find the effort to care about some weirdo selling the rights for someone to fuck his cold butt after he dies.

Heh, also, this reminds me that, up until recently, it used to be legal in my neck of the woods to bury dead bodies without notifying anyone of the death.

I will admit I'm not up to date on my corpse fucking rules, but I still assume human corpses preserved in a fuckable state have gotta create a lot more legal problems than hams/ashes. I'm honestly more concerned about the incest problem of the two things to be pissy about. Honestly if all the paperwork is in order you should be allowed to blast your corpse from a cannon for all I care, though I fully respect the rest of society being less tolerant about that sort of thing.
 
Back