I love that you got mad because you know I'm right
Well, clearly the solution to this problem is importing infinity Indians. They'll work for less and still have kids so we can keep the same economic policies with no consequences. What's that you say? The Indians are doing a rape? Obviously this is white women's fault. We should take away their rights to punish them.
do not make moids work hard and earn money you gold digger xd
ugh I do not know on one hand it's cruel on the other hand I've seen some photos of families mass producing children when they cannot afford 1. Like they live in an apartment that is literally 1 room they don't have toilet in the house (they share it with neighbors) and then they are having 5 children. And then the woman is pregnant because condoms are sin or something. And then the children are slowly being taken away. Or they explicitly don't want any children but they are too retarded to buy a condom. I have read a story of a boy born with HIV and given up for adoption and nobody wanted him in Poland and he had to be adopted in France by a nurse.
no because sometimes the felon is a woman who beated up her cheating husband.
nooo we say pajeets. But yes we should stop importing pajeets like what are they useful for.
Like in many other cases, Disco Elysium script exists, so I can read from it as if it was holy scripture:
I replied because your point is that "bringing children into poverty" is immoral, but having a child in the United States guarantees them a base line level of sufficiency and social security never seen before in human history at any other time. By your logic, if we presuppose that poverty in the US makes having children immoral, having children any time before the administration of FDR was an immoral and selfish act. This is either a ridiculous and ill-thought out perspective, or a nihilist and anti-natalist perspective reserved for only the most spoiled and bored humans alive. If you personally don't want kids because you're angry at men or whatever, it would be less ridiculous to simply say so instead of pretending what you have to say is based on any merit.
Idk where you pulled anything about sterilization out of, what I'm saying is obviously that noone can afford kids because moids have trashed the economy and allocate 8 million dollars for the average ceo while workers make less every year. That your mind goes to forced sterilization and lab viruses rather than fixing this garbage heap is telling.
x 3 x 5 x 3 x 1
By my logic, reliable contraception only exists since the 60s and marital rape wasn't a thing.
People are having less kids because their standard of living keeps going down and they can't afford houses, and I was commenting on the internet misogynistic talking point about birthrates and abortion and feminism while ignoring how the world/economy goes to shit (due to moids in power).
False. Workers are making less because of powerful moids extract as much value as they can for themselves. Note that the article I posted said CEOs make 54% more while workers make 12% less. Scapegoating immigrants is ultimately retarded because they're just the cheap labor the rich scrotes use. If AI could one day be cheaper than human labor, they'll slack every human and use that to cut costs to extract the value for themselves.If they can offshore jobs to the third world, they do that. When it was legal to use kids for cheap labor, they did that. When it was legal to underpay women, they did that. When it was legal to use **IMMIGRANT** slaves, they did that. Obviously exploitation, not its effect, immigration, is the cause.
Ok, we like math. Nigger hotels contain 93% males. 56% white and 38% black. Moids again. The majority of welfare recipients are white boomers. 39% of recipients of snap are children, and 35% are white to 25% black. They may be overrepresented but it's dishonest to say that niggers are costing you when lots of white kids, which are your panacea, are eating thanks to these programs. Their fathers aren't paying for them so someone has to.
I was just about to post that. Of course it was a court in Louisiana, a state that voted in 2018 that there is no state constitutional right to abortion. What this means is that you'll have to get abortion pills mailed from "illicit" sources like Los Libres/ Plan C or doctors on international waters if you're in Red states. Considering the precarious laws I'm sure women were using those methods anyways. They're trying to get the FDA to ban it and get providers to turn over patient information so they can prosecute them.I am just going to leave this here thought you would want to know.
https://apnews.com/article/abortion-pills-mail-louisiana-ruling-40d60a9bf6212480e527480757b603c3
https://archive.is/4Iwyw
Megalodon
What is mifepristone?
Mifepristone is a medication that ends an intrauterine pregnancy (up to 70-75 days gestation) by blocking progesterone, a hormone necessary for maintaining the pregnancy. It is typically the first step in a two-drug regimen (followed by misoprostol) to induce a medical abortion, causing the uterine lining to shed
BY GEOFF MULVIHILL AND HANNAH SCHOENBAUM
Updated 8:10...Reactions:
I think crazedaze is a mother, so I'm not sure this would apply.
I agree, but I think many people are using "can I give my kids a better life and opportunities than I had?" as a barometer, rather than "can I give them a better life than my great grandparents had?" For Indian and Nigerian immigrants, the answer to the former question is an automatic yes, because the conditions they grew up in were so awful. For many Americans, it's a no, partly because of the problems you pointed out in your post. Maybe we do need to adjust our standards to fit a larger global and historical metric of human success, rather than just our own childhoods. But many people feel frustrated about being told to lower their hopes for their children due to someone else's fuck ups. That frustration comes out in a lot of different ways, some of them nihilistic, but it doesn't always mean they're personally determined to not have kids.
One thing I wanted to add, as someone from a third world country, is that the average American spends hundreds of dollars a month on things that can be downgraded or eliminated without affecting their standard of living, in some cases it's thousands of dollars instead of hundreds, I like telling the story of an American friend I used to had that complained about his finances, yet he bought $3000 night vision googles, 500 rounds for his rifle and a used truck just for fun, and he was making 80k a year (which is not out of this world) and his wife didn't work.
CEO pay is a meme, Walmart's CEO earns 27.5 million a year and Walmart has 2,1 million employees, if he was earning $0 a year then his employees would get an extra $13 a year. Also movie stars and athletes make more money than CEOs all the time yet there is no movement complaining about how Rihanna has a billion dollars, this is because the people who put these ideas in your head want to replace CEOs but can't replace artists and athletes.
Idk where you pulled anything about sterilization out of, what I'm saying is obviously that noone can afford kids because moids have trashed the economy and allocate 8 million dollars for the average ceo while workers make less every year. That your mind goes to forced sterilization and lab viruses rather than fixing this garbage heap is telling.
Doubtful. People love blaming the economy or feminism or both for the declining birth rate but as Null pointed out, people managed to reproduce above replacement rate in what we would consider untenable conditions.
you live in a fabricated reality. if you cannot accept the fact that more workers accepting less money = lower wages for everyone (a well-documented phenomena known as "saturation"), there is no purpose in discussing anything.
I'm not sure they "managed to" so much as they didn't have a choice. They needed kids to help with the physical labor of survival, because everyone kept dying of diseases and accidents. We don't just pretend death doesn't exist. It's actually less of a problem for us, because the child mortality rates are so low and life expectancy in most developed countries is at an all-time high. If every person you knew who's dead died at 60 or 70, you at 25 are not likely to think "oh shit, that could be me soon, better have kids right away."
Of course there isn't, because you're blaming imported workers and I'm blaming the scrotes at the top who made the decisions and did the planning and hired them. Your reality is that everything is about race and my delusional fantasy is that powerful men who organized the world to work this way and offshored all the jobs and promise to build the data centers that'll make human work obsolete are responsible. I get it.
I used the number 27.5 million, which includes what you talk about, not just the 1.5 million salary, that's still $13 a year if it's divided among all the workers. 27.5 million divided by 2.1 million workers is 13.
I never implied that workers can influence how much CEOs earn, I'm saying it's irrelevant because if they made $0 nothing would change, CEO could be paid five times more money than now and it wouldn't matter.
Even if I accept all of those things as fact, still if they made $0 a year nothing woud change.
The healthy scrotes probably also have other interests, priorities and relationships. It's the unhealthy scrotes and the chronically online femoids that hate post on Xitter / shit socials like that constantly imho. I do agree with your take though.
I know this is a moid hate thread, but I'd like to point out that in most Western countries it's emotional libtard women voting retarded green party type dudes into power. The tanking of the economy is mainly caused by retarded women.
I specifically acknowledged this - called it out, even.
No, you didn't; my point was that the situations are dramatically different, not just a matter of dollars.
They are fact.
Which is not the point. The point is more complex than specific dollars. For instance, when you multiply the salaries/ comp of those losing their jobs, and the resulting impact, the loss far outstrips the basic bitch "CEOs make x." The concern is the impact.
I don't care about them. If you don't understand the immense impact of corporate decisions on the health of the workforce, that's a you issue. Messi or Rihanna making x is a completely different concept, with different impact.
Not my concern. I'm talking about real dollars, real jobs, and real economic impact.
Agreed this is a tangent to the thread topic, but in no moment did I say anything about this being about hating men. @crazedaze's point that corporate world/industry is largely headed by men is factual, but my comments were in response to your very simplistic arithmetic and low comprehension assertions.
Just to be clear; I am a wamen, in case you also included me in this comment.>Multiple unabashed scrotes within one singular page
Your De-moidified Zone, ma'am
