Correspondent Dinner shooting

It's literally just a question of whether you want to conserve traditional morals and values or "progress" to idealistic fairy tale bullshit.
When niggers stopped being slaves was that progressive or conservative. Are free niggers idealistic fairy tale?

It's literally just conservatism vs progressivism.
Is China conservative because they have no intention to get rid of CCP.

Does that mean China is right wing.
It's baked into their narrative that they're freedom fighters against a fascist empire
Well that means we are freedom fighters against censorship.
Making us progressives.
Wait, that can't be true.
You only think of "violent extremism" as "right wing" because the left has had near total control of the media for... well, at least as long as I've been alive.
If you are shown images of violence without any political details of the people involved, can you deduce from the action what wing the people belong to.
 
When niggers stopped being slaves was that progressive or conservative.
I don't know, did it serve to conserve a social institution that had to that point existed for virtually all of human history, or to progress away from the perceived state of nature in pursuit of an ideal?

Are free niggers idealistic fairy tale?
I'll let someone else answer this.

Is China conservative because they have no intention to get rid of CCP.

Does that mean China is right wing.
That's an attempt to conserve power, not conserve values/morals.

Well that means we are freedom fighters against censorship.
Making us progressives.
You're conflating libertarianism with progressivism. They are two separate axes of the political compass. Fascism in particular is necessarily right-wing, being a combination of conservatism and authoritarianism; that does not make authoritarianism necessarily right- or left-wing, nor libertarianism. Censorship is an aspect of authoritarianism, opposing it does not make you progressive nor conservative, it makes you libertarian, at least in that regard.

If you are shown images of violence without any political details of the people involved, can you deduce from the action what wing the people belong to.
Wasn't that your argument in the first place? That progressives conducting violence in service of progressive ideals somehow makes them right wing?
 
You're conflating libertarianism with progressivism. They are two separate axes of the political compass. Fascism in particular is necessarily right-wing, being a combination of conservatism and authoritarianism; that does not make authoritarianism necessarily right- or left-wing, nor libertarianism. Censorship is an aspect of authoritarianism, opposing it does not make you progressive nor conservative, it makes you libertarian, at least in that regard.
kf 2nd alter ego RETARDS.webpkf 2nd alter ego translation.webp
stolen from the political compass thread
 
When niggers stopped being slaves was that progressive or conservative. Are free niggers idealistic fairy tale?
Progressive at the time. Left wing fairy tale insofar as believing that niggers, or any race, are totally the same as other races outside of appearance.
Is China conservative because they have no intention to get rid of CCP.

Does that mean China is right wing.
Yes. The conservative/progressive dichotomy is culturally bound. I don't know enough to call them right or left wing, but conservatism is not inherently right wing, and progressivism is not inherently left wing. Right and left wing have more to do with hierarchy, with the left being against hierarchy and trying to destroy it and the right accepting/embracing it as natural law. (I'm making sweeping generalizations but right/left wing and conservative/progressive are becoming useless as terms since nobody can agree on what they actually mean)
Well that means we are freedom fighters against censorship.
Making us progressives.
Wait, that can't be true.
Depends on where you live. It is a conservative position in the United States, given that free speech is a traditional belief and constitutionally enshrined. It is conservative to want to preserve that, progressive to increase censorship. In North Korea, being in favor of free speech would be progressive, and it was progressive when the U.S. was founded. The progressive/conservative dichotomy is more about wanting the values of your culture or policies of your nation/state to change or stay the same. Debatable whether free speech is inherently left or right wing. Left wing in that it treats speech equally, right wing in that it inherently implies that ideas will succeed or fail based on their merits and that government intervention is not required to squash "incorrect" ideas. I lean towards it being a right wing ideal.
If you are shown images of violence without any political details of the people involved, can you deduce from the action what wing the people belong to.
Don't really know what you're asking here.
 
When your job is 99.9% sitting at a checkpoint and scanning ID Cards and .01% maybe getting to shoot your service weapon, what need have you for physical fitness?
Yeah, that's fair enough, but some very important jobs exist solely in the realm of "I hope we never need this but we need to be prepared".

Like teachers having to take first aid classes, but when push comes to shove, some kid chokes to death in their class. "Well I never thought I'd actually have to do it" isn't a good excuse.

Them shooting their service weapons is a good example, actually. I'd be comparably annoyed if they're shit at shooting too, for the same reasons.
 
Like teachers having to take first aid classes, but when push comes to shove, some kid chokes to death in their class. "Well I never thought I'd actually have to do it" isn't a good excuse.
Morbid actual excuse is that just as they teach kids to pass the test and braindump, they were taught to pass the test and braindump, and that is the *one* thing where they actually live by the bullshit they pass on to others.
 
Fascism in particular is necessarily right-wing, being a combination of conservatism and authoritarianism
First time I've ever been tempted to "dumb" a post. (Never have, never will.)

Fascism (actual/historical) is radical anti-communism in the form of state syndicalism. It's only "conservative" if your definition of that is "anti-communist." That makes no sense, not even historically. The present-day ideologies fascism maps best to—but not well to, because actual fascism had a real "populist" element—are the establishment-left shit conservatives call "far left," "cultural Marxist," "critical race theory," etc.—the "ideology" of banks, to put it bluntly.

"Fascism" (current_year insult) is whatever non-Jewish white dudes' preferences/interests are, so it can't be categorized ideologically. It signifies a kind of people, not the content of anybody's thoughts.
 
"Fascism" (current_year insult) is whatever non-Jewish white dudes' preferences/interests are, so it can't be categorized ideologically. It signifies a kind of people, not the content of anybody's thoughts.
fascism is benito mussolini's government that's distinctive in its nationalization of successful private businesses that have established monopoly status and suppression of private business in the interests of state business

when trump forced TikTok to sell to jews, that's fascism. When the FBI infiltrated Google and turned it into an arm of the US government that was fascism. When the government nationalied Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that was fascism. The government's controlling interest in Lithium America, Trilogy Metals, Vulcan Elements, Westinghouse, and ReElement Technologies is fascism.

Words have meanings and the meanings don't disappear just because retards use them, and they also don't disappear because retards like you don't understand when they're used properly and think everyone but themselves is an idiot.
 
Why the fuck do we have so many fat people working as security guards? Obesity should be an immediate disqualification/fireable offense.
I am shocked at the level of security for this event.

Compared to when Putin went to see Trump in Alaska, and how top notch and expected it was.
 
First time I've ever been tempted to "dumb" a post. (Never have, never will.)

Fascism (actual/historical) is radical anti-communism in the form of state syndicalism. It's only "conservative" if your definition of that is "anti-communist." That makes no sense, not even historically. The present-day ideologies fascism maps best to—but not well to, because actual fascism had a real "populist" element—are the establishment-left shit conservatives call "far left," "cultural Marxist," "critical race theory," etc.—the "ideology" of banks, to put it bluntly.

"Fascism" (current_year insult) is whatever non-Jewish white dudes' preferences/interests are, so it can't be categorized ideologically. It signifies a kind of people, not the content of anybody's thoughts.
This needs to be expounded on more.

Fascism is a product of the enlightenment in much the same way liberalism and communism are. Its why there is such a reflexive hatred by the true believers of both. Fascism is a logical expression of both liberal democracy and communism/socialism. That fact that it holds a mirror to the entire enlightenment project creates a visceral reaction.

Fascist market theory is very similar to modern money theory, and their theory of the State as an extent entity that exists above the material, as a stand in for the dead Gods, is very similar to how modern European liberal democracies view the liberal state.
 
First time I've ever been tempted to "dumb" a post. (Never have, never will.)

Fascism (actual/historical) is radical anti-communism in the form of state syndicalism. It's only "conservative" if your definition of that is "anti-communist." That makes no sense, not even historically. The present-day ideologies fascism maps best to—but not well to, because actual fascism had a real "populist" element—are the establishment-left shit conservatives call "far left," "cultural Marxist," "critical race theory," etc.—the "ideology" of banks, to put it bluntly.

"Fascism" (current_year insult) is whatever non-Jewish white dudes' preferences/interests are, so it can't be categorized ideologically. It signifies a kind of people, not the content of anybody's thoughts.
barbie2.png
 
Its not bait because its actually true KEK. You have ragepiggies in here talking about "OH GOD, THEY WANT TO FUCKING KILL US. WE NEED TO MAKE THEM PAY!!!" But nobodies going to pay. Only the assassin of charlie kirk got anything, and Democrats got to grave dance with no consequences while you all seethe, while when you do it they get you fired.
You're all weak.
media_HF0K5cqXIAET-Rj.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom