reddit General

IMG_0763.jpeg

The subreddit progressiveMoms is just as histrionic (unhinged) as you’d expect lol

Behold the patriarchy

——

And here’s another one for you. Her daughters are 4 and 1 years old according to her post history. But she’s planning on stocking up on abortion pills.

IMG_0764.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0762.jpeg
    IMG_0762.jpeg
    505.8 KB · Views: 158
Last edited:
View attachment 8947378
According to this, a quarter of gay men in America have had over 1,000 partners. 5 and 25 is basically a rounding error for those degenerates. Also, most gays (the bottoms) end up in diapers by age 24. The more you know
Guess diapers are the litmus test then, horrifying as that age is. At least I'm ahead of the curve, thank Jesus. 🏆🥇
 
The subreddit progressiveMoms is just as histrionic (unhinged) as you’d expect lol
These people cannot be real! Even for Reddit this is unhinged.

Here's one whose life would be so much easier if she lived in reality where the things she's worrying about will never actually happen:Screenshot_20260503-020501.Chrome~2.jpg

Ma'am turn off your phone, place your router in a faraday cage, and go outside.

This next one was a real trip. Her 19 year old son is—GASP!—registered as a Republican! The ultimate betrayal! She's seeking advice on how to reprogram him.

Why do I get the feeling the "spouse" is a man who trooned out in the last 10 years?

Screenshot_20260503-020534.Chrome~2.jpg

She says the son sucks at critical thinking. What she means is that he's listening to who she believes are the WRONG people. If he had accepted her dogma without question then I'm sure she'd feel different about his critical thinking skills and take credit for having given them to him.

Screenshot_20260503-020649.Chrome~2.jpgScreenshot_20260503-020708.Chrome~2.jpg

These people are fucking lunatics.

Edit to add links to posts
 
I decided to browse rightcantmeme, and saw, in order, the most retarded way to "ruin" meme

and this, which, indeed, made me mad with how ridiculous and gross it is
View attachment 8946269
"the epstein files contained rape, cp, and cannabalism"
The right has been talking about this stuff for a decade and the left called them nutjobs, why would they be mad they were proven right. Next are they going to say that they were the ones that pioneered the pizzagate theory. "Alt right" and they are referring to maga boomers, these people are so out of touch.
 
I've seen this a lot with some women i've known. They really go above and beyond speaking about everything bad that can happen with a pregnancy and they jump at the first opportunity to go over their entire repertoire when a woman says she's considering children
I've seen tumblr posts complaining about it long ago, so it may be a weird shit normie thing, but I bet it is not that histrionic

Don't shame people who want to have children
They just know they are not normal and it makes them seethe]


That's just an extension of Woman Brain: "Always assume the worst no matter how drastic the leap of logic may be".
This is paranoid shizo, which I have and hope other women come in saner options

The attempts to ruin these scary, ebil memes is so laughable
Oh, huh, watermark removers work on these
Guys, I was not about the attempt itself, but about the text they used as "censorship", "I READ SFW YURI," which betrays amount of brainworms thoght impossible.
 
These people cannot be real! Even for Reddit this is unhinged.

This next one was a real trip. Her 19 year old son is—GASP!—registered as a Republican! The ultimate betrayal! She's seeking advice on how to reprogram him.

Why do I get the feeling the "spouse" is a man who trooned out in the last 10 years?

She says the son sucks at critical thinking. What she means is that he's listening to who she believes are the WRONG people. If he had accepted her dogma without question then I'm sure she'd feel different about his critical thinking skills and take credit for having given them to him.

These people are fucking lunatics.

Edit to add links to posts
Imagine being being a 7th grade white boy and being forced to read White Fragility.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0765.jpeg
    IMG_0765.jpeg
    262.9 KB · Views: 219
These people are fucking lunatics.
Beyond that. They take the most extreme measures to deal with the most minute problems. I get you don't vibe with a distant relative you don't agree politically. But with your own kid it's really fucked up.
They just know they are not normal and it makes them seethe]
Not only that, much like trannies that need other people to troon out in order for them to feel validated for their actions, these people also need others to be fully convinced of not having children in order to not feel like they are weird and that they have failed in one of the big things in life
 
Screenshot from 2026-05-03 08.24.25 librewolf.png
Hi Parents name,

This is Mr. {My name}. I am {kids name} social studies teacher. I am so terribly sorry to send you this on a weekend, I hope you don’t mind. I wouldn’t have contacted you if I didn’t think it was important.

I wanted to take a moment to reach out to you about {child’s name} and inform you that I had to refer {child’s name} to the Principal for behavioral issues. I’d first like to start off with that {child’s name} brings an enthusiasm to our class and has historically gotten along with his peers in my class. He is always good about doing his work and contributing in class with relevant responses during lectures.

Although, over the last month, many days, {child’s name} has garnered a bit of a disrespectful attitude and it can cause disruptions. I don't want to discourage his positive contributions because I believe that it does foster creativity/helps him, but I wanted to inform you on the synopsis of things. The only reason I’m contacting you right now is because of how he was Thursday.

The last few weeks he has started to be very disrespectful to me and a few of his classmates. I have had to get onto him about calling other students who have language issues “stupid/retarded”

He has started to make random racist jokes on a regular basis in front of class

Thursday, he told me “ You look like you play 5 nights at Epstein”

He has told me that I looked “mentally you know what” and proceeded to say “You’re just stupid bro”

He told me that I looked autistic

Finally, what truly broke the straw on the camels back, is that after he had said something very rude, I told him to take his ear bud out and he said something to the effect of “no can do lil bruh”. Then he proceeded to tell me that I had to let him have an ear bud in or he couldn’t be well behaved. I did send him to the office.

When I informed him that I would be messaging you, he told me that “she doesn’t care” and that he “truly doesn’t care” if I message you.

Anyway, I just wanted to inform you of all this. I don’t take what he says to me personally nor do I think that {child’s name} is this super bad kid haha. I don’t want him hurting other kids feelings because they have dyslexia or something similar though. He’s very smart, I think he’s acting like a middle school boy (as I was too at one time) but I think it’s important to keep him in check and let him know that this behavior can’t be tolerated as a whole in a normal society. Jokes are one thing but this is not that.

Take care!

EDIT: Thank you guys for the advice. I agree that this is too validating and not the most professional. I will be shortening it and making it sound more professional and concise. Feel free to leave any feedback or tips for a first year teacher (who never did student teaching or interacted with kids prior to teaching) Yes I know the original email is littered with punctuation errors and an incorrect idiom. I was very tired and it was late when I originally drafted that.

This post has allowed me to learn more about myself from your guys feedback than I have ever gotten from my boss. That’s a shame to be honest because I’m being entrusted with teaching the future generation.
 
critical thinking
There is this trend on the left that is most prevalent on reddit of abusing words like this. Other examples include media literacy, empathy (a recent one), unpack, educate yourself, etc. You spot this in progressive academia too: structural, systemic, harmful, etc. I've kept a mental list of them over the years as I encounter them.

They're normal words (usually) people use everyday, but they're filtered through a sort of in-group understanding. They're like a weird mix of doublespeak, shibboleth, and weasel words - I suppose they would call it a dog whistle. It's a metalanguage for shifting discussion of what someone said to who that someone is or they're outright obscurantism designed to make the speaker seem erudite or impressive.

The words critical thinking here are not actually being used in their usual sense; think carefully. They're using it to essentially signal that they've absorbed the orthodoxy, reinforce the group image as intelligent and convey that the out group lacks a legitimate position. However the moment you do try to engage in critical discussion with them you're met with hostility for even questioning their orthodoxy or for introducing heterodox views, their supposed 'critical' demeanor will shift to a quarreling and argumentative attitude, typically followed by more shibboleths like educate yourself.

Bit of an unprompted ramble about something most people here are probably aware of, but it's worth noting if you've never recognized this phenomenon before. The amount of dogma within progressive schools of thought dressed in precise, scientific or objective sounding language is so immense it's basically a sort of secular mysticism.
 
>woahthatsinteresting

ANOTHER chinese propaganda sub, most of their top posts at any given time are china glazing. I have noticed a pattern of obvious propaganda subs mimicking the most popular ones, r/woahthatsinteresting for example is a ripoff of r/damnthatsinteresting.
Every time I check Reddit, there's another 50 subs with names like "incredible__" and "wow_amazin". I really wonder how many people are falling for them. I also wonder why we need a constant churn of new, identical subs with increasingly stupid names. Does botting up a new sub offer some benefit over an established one?
 
There is this trend on the left that is most prevalent on reddit of abusing words like this. Other examples include media literacy, empathy (a recent one), unpack, educate yourself, etc. You spot this in progressive academia too: structural, systemic, harmful, etc. I've kept a mental list of them over the years as I encounter them.

They're normal words (usually) people use everyday, but they're filtered through a sort of in-group understanding. They're like a weird mix of doublespeak, shibboleth, and weasel words - I suppose they would call it a dog whistle. It's a metalanguage for shifting discussion of what someone said to who that someone is or they're outright obscurantism designed to make the speaker seem erudite or impressive.

The words critical thinking here are not actually being used in their usual sense; think carefully. They're using it to essentially signal that they've absorbed the orthodoxy, reinforce the group image as intelligent and convey that the out group lacks a legitimate position. However the moment you do try to engage in critical discussion with them you're met with hostility for even questioning their orthodoxy or for introducing heterodox views, their supposed 'critical' demeanor will shift to a quarreling and argumentative attitude, typically followed by more shibboleths like educate yourself.

Bit of an unprompted ramble about something most people here are probably aware of, but it's worth noting if you've never recognized this phenomenon before. The amount of dogma within progressive schools of thought dressed in precise, scientific or objective sounding language is so immense it's basically a sort of secular mysticism.
Reminds me when i was studying specialized language and we got to talk about the lingo economists and the corpo types use. Yet when i got into it i was surprised how several of the terms and words they used had the exact opposite meaning of what a normal person would think.

A good example is "Chinese wall". For the layman it would mean a sturdy separation or division, an impassable wall or something like that. But in economics is the opposite: a barrier between departments that constantly leaks information between them. The term was coined after certain firms started to split their departments and vowed to instill a "Chinese wall policy" of not letting other departments know what the others were doing. But in the end those in charge ignored it because it would mean it would hurt short term profits.

The same can be said to leftoid speak for the most part. A good chunk of what they speak about means the exact opposite of what a normal person would think and they essentially use big boy words in order to agrandize themselves. After all, Critical Thinking sounds more appealing than In Group Conformism.
 
View attachment 8948686

The subreddit progressiveMoms is just as histrionic (unhinged) as you’d expect lol

Behold the patriarchy

——

And here’s another one for you. Her daughters are 4 and 1 years old according to her post history. But she’s planning on stocking up on abortion pills.

View attachment 8948741
Way to give the crazy fundie parents from the 2000s a run for their money. These kids are going to rebel and become conservative and these hysterical, controlling liberal den mothers will blame everything and everyone except themselves.
 
View attachment 8948825
This one has to be taking the piss, right?
"That darn anti-lgbtq+ and pro-fascist Tootle book!" tickled my satire senses too but a lot of libtards hate the rigidity of train stuff. Toddlers tend to like rules and order, they find it comforting because the world is so new and overwhelming to them. But instead of guiding them through this stage of their life, these parents think that type of structure is trying to brainwash children into being little Nazis just following orders. I feel bad for kids not allowed Tootle, tradlife propagandist Winnie the Pooh, or that privileged white male Steve from Blues Clues and instead raised on the new Disney/Pixar product about colonialism or intergenerational trauma. I also feel bad for the teachers who'll have to deal with these terrors who've been raised to defy any authority figure and rebel against any imposed rules or routines.
 
Every time I check Reddit, there's another 50 subs with names like "incredible__" and "wow_amazin". I really wonder how many people are falling for them. I also wonder why we need a constant churn of new, identical subs with increasingly stupid names. Does botting up a new sub offer some benefit over an established one?
It's fairly straightforward: they can mod subs as they please without incurring the wrath of volatile tranny jannies.
Also, it's easier to just set up a new sub (or brigade a smaller one) and bot it to the front page instead of hijacking a large, established one. It offers more control on the audience you want to build, as well as the ability to churn out propaganda without it being "diluted" by fake sex stories and sappy animal gifs.
 
Screenshot 2026-05-03 145624.png

r/AskALiberal may be low-hanging fruit for this thread but going down the anti-natalist/birth rate rabbithole just makes me sad for the future.

Screenshot 2026-05-03 145422.png

Urbanist/consooomerism coping as usual. Shocker. Europe + America + East Asia = Strip malls and Cheesecake Factories entirely.

Screenshot 2026-05-03 145743.png

KILL ALL THE WHITE BABIES COMRADE

Screenshot 2026-05-03 145818.png

Import millions of Africans+Indians and have their kids be taught and raised by androids. The solution is so obvious brotherrr!
 
Back
Top Bottom