Chibi Reviews / Jacob "Jake" W Seibers / Chibi Otaku - Lolicon grifter, attention whore crybaby, victim of snarky snappy, cuck, victim of AI skeleton chairs

chibi steals a popular quote tweet because he's an unoriginal faggot
1777910025068.png1777910003916.png

 
ono said:
Jacob will never admit it but now it's out of the bag that "Mimi" is a Br*tish man named Jordan, he must feel like a total faggot for whiteknighting him. Then again, Jacob is so mentally ill that he probably felt like he was defending the honor of a real little girl. Sad!
Click to expand...
So a br*tish man named Jordan was larping as a girl named Alexandra Williams who larps as a fucking anime toddler that pays artists to have their oc being railed and Chibi went to defend them? :story:
 
Hanged Man said:
It's worse than that, the tranny vtumor is a predator for toddlers in general where they have vivid, realistic depictions of obscene material fantasizing about babies. The bongs most likely have more incriminating stuff on hand than what kiwis were able to obtain. This is more similar to that time chibi blindly defended a convicted pedophile that got caught with CSAM, but chibi hyper focused that the guy was actually convicted from some video game while glossing over the CSAM part.
Click to expand...
so an lolicon who has a VTuber model who was a toddler also was into toddlers, does this nigger have his own thread
 
Null said:
Honestly the OP of the thread does't include the worst thing I saw on his favorites.


what a fucking sleeze
Click to expand...
He’s just covering his ass. Considering this guy had pictures of real children on his fucking deviant art, I have no doubt that he has no real objections to CSAM other than him possibly getting arrested for it.

I have no proof but I bet he has indulged in the real stuff and keeps it on an external drive so the cops can’t find it
 
btw I'd love to know what the logical distinction is between child (drawing) and child (drawing) with "child porn" written on the character. because to him this is apparently a deal-breaking change, but in his logic and personal ethos, what is the actual difference? The character is drawn the same way.

1777916207814.png

These character tags have 3600+ images on this Pixiv mirror, and `kei_(blue_archive) ` on Danbooru has 4100+ (1000+ of those are `rating:explicit`). What exactly is the logical distinction between this artist's work and the other thousands of images of this character?
 
The comment section of Chibi's retraction Xeet is a goldmine for some really fucking insane people if anyone is bored. There's still people in that shit defending the art itself.
 
Null said:
btw I'd love to know what the logical distinction is between child (drawing) and child (drawing) with "child porn" written on the character. because to him this is apparently a deal-breaking change, but in his logic and personal ethos, what is the actual difference?
Click to expand...
The "it's a 2000 year old vampire dragon that's just a petite adult!!" excuse doesn't work anymore is my guess
 
This is unrelated to the current happening. I simply want to point out Chibi Reviews has actually made a good tweet for once. It's a picture of his dog.
1777916485276.png1777916505893.png N/A
 
Null said:
what the logical distinction is between child (drawing) and child (drawing) with "child porn" written on the character
Click to expand...
So you get a bunch of these guys saying that anime characters look nothing like humans because of the big eyes. But dogs and horses exist in reality. Chibi has his out.
Imagine I'm posting a gif of a guy with a squirt gun to his head and with ketchup comping out the other side in a non-threatening manner.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom