Responsive Editorial to the Piece of GethN7
Jul21by
Cde. Sophie
http://gethn7.blogspot.co.uk/2016/07/my-opinion-on-lolcow-known-as-chris.html
A fellow by the name of GethN7 has written commentary, in response to authoral commentary posted on a subsidiary third-party forum, rather pettily forged in light of the wholly inessential remarks thrown away in brief reminiscence of a temporaneous chat encounter, which GethN7 has had to turn into the size of a small article, so it felt fitting to be rebuked accordingly.
It is one thing to remark of the fool playing brilliance, and quite another to play in a laughably blatant hypocrisy in revealing the real origin of such jestership.
The ideology posited has been wholly misinterpreted through the eyes of somebody limitedly and narrowly read, in this instance, my ideas have been compared to Neitzche. There exist limited aspects between the Juchesasang, the basis upon which forms the foundation for a fork in the form of the Aspergian socialist ideology borrowing therefrom, and Neitzchean transcendentalism.
Both are man-centered ideologies, which call for a calmuniation of God. Both call for the very reformation of that nature, on the basis of ownership and utilization to its own benefit that once misattributed to God’s divination. A key component of the nature of the Aspergian is the affordance of his superior will to the negrotypical; this is where the departure from idealistic collectivism, wherein men must together strive for ultimate manifest-superiority, to pragmatic individualist-collectivism, where the overcoming of human diffculty is regarded a foolish superstition, to be better supplanted with the idea of technical-overcomings, begins. In the instance where GethN7 engages in a stereotypically neurodiversitarian pity-party where, using this mischaracterisation of my ideology as a proxy, he dare suggests that his ‘syndrome’ have any of the psychiatrically-pseudoscientifically ascribed ‘symptomology’ play at matter at all as a means of arguing against any form of transcendency, is where he becomes an idiotic renegade calling for his own excusal of self-degeneration.
Racism is a nature to man and not a flaw, nor was regarded as a flaw in traditional Marxism, the railing against which only started with Leon Trotsky’s departing from Soviet party line in the 1930s, ramblings against Hitler conducted before the Soviets ever entered a coalition with the Anglo-American alliance of traitors. It is Jewish word-salad, uninspired from a pseudo-academic. There is no merit to the idea that critiques of race are valid. It had started with schizophrenic, disingenuous gibberish from an island-exilee Ashkenazic Khazar scumbag rightfully banished there by Soviet power, and ended with a stupid consensus built into contrivance during the 1960s by UNESCO’s pseudoscientists, to be subsequently shoehorned down the throats of every generation of academics until those undertaking undergrad by the late-1980s had finally started swallowing it unquestioningly. At no point had any regime disagreed with Hitler even retroactively after-the-fact of his defeat. Many of the things misattributed to flaws of Hitlerism are even regarded truisms in modern socialist democracies such as the DPRK. Even mighty Mugabe’s Zimbabwe concurs with the work of Hitler, a Black democracy.
The Learned Elders of the Protocols of Zion is not a hoax. It is commonly misattributed as a forgery of the work Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Motegeui. As a matter of fact, the latter does not precede the former work; the latter had emerged in the course of some 40 years after the former work, revealing itself to have been the forgery all along. The Protocols or as alternatively called, The Elders came first.
Also a non-sequitur is to point out of the supposed connectivity between racism and sexism. There is none. Nor is there a link between mental stability and contempt for women. Most contempt for women is derived on the basis of the latter’s inferior stability in itself; confusing, mixed signals elicit only distrust for their kind, and they wonder why anybody would hate them as if their pretenses to amiability, ‘cuteness’ and ‘sweetness’ were enough to fool the discerning mind. T4 had no predication on whether one or not was a misogynist, indeed, women-realism/contempt was seen as a sign of a rationally intelligent mind highly grounded in National Socialist reality.
There is no inconsistency between female gender identity and a contempt for women. Intrasexual competition hypothesis aside, there need be no inherent grand social strategem behind this simple phenomenon for it is a mere matter of clearing one’s emotional reservations and looking at the objective reality of the deplorable behaviour of most women content with indulging in the most pettily base of feminism-enabled hypocrisies. To the female with integrity, all behaviour of that sort would come to the disgust of the truly smartly-clothed individual whose clothes did indeed reveal their true candour, unworn and never worn by any fool, except the one so-accusing them.
No pretensions were harboured by any man, or woman, of superiority, endorsing the views of the one you so-call ‘Autphag’, but we have witnessed you from afar, GethN7, and even small-time Juche ideologues, let alone their White-nationalist cadres in arms, laugh at you in tandem unison.