Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

[Coconut Gun]

Brad(4) Watson(6) is a dumb(4) faggot(6). THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

In my eternal soul's previous incarnations, I was Pythagoras who was a contemporary of Buddha and the Hebrew prophet Daniel.

View attachment 251706​

If by "contemporary", you mean "lived a century earlier" then yeah sure.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

In my eternal soul's previous incarnations, I was Pythagoras who was a contemporary of Buddha and the Hebrew prophet Daniel.

View attachment 251706​

So Siddhārtha Gautama was 170 years old when he met Pythagoras?

Either learn some damn History or shut the fuck up Brad about the subject.

So this fool linked a wiki article on Retrocausality when talking about Quantum teleportation on his Facebook....Serious man, stop talking about science and history. Here's a simple explanation of what Quantum Teleportation is in more simplistic terms.

http://lightlike.com/teleport/

Even comes with a .pdf of the math involved so you can prove to us just how smart you are (hint, he will fail fucking HARD!)

 

[Mr. X]

He also claims that because thoughts are massless, they can travel faster than light. Massless things can only travel at the speed of light in that same medium, no faster or slower. To be fair, he's not the only moron I've seen make that mistake.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

He also claims that because thoughts are massless, they can travel faster than light. Massless things can only travel at the speed of light in that same medium, no faster or slower. To be fair, he's not the only moron I've seen make that mistake.

Yay for things like weyl fermions

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

Pythagoras c. 570-495 BC (74 or 75 years)
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoras

Buddha born c. 563 - 483 BC or c. 480 – 400 BC (79 or 80 years)
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddha

Conclusion: There's two different potential dated lifespans for Gautama Buddha 82-83 years apart. This is the first time I've seen this. The 1st timeline for Buddha directly conflicts with Pythagoras, whereas the 2nd one doesn't cross timelines.

Anyone got any better sources/links than this Wikipedia crap?


Synchronism: 16:37 "Tea at 4, dinner at 7." - The Roosevelts - Intimate, The Storm (1920-1933, S1/Ep4) (2016) - PBS

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

Pythagoras c. 570-495 BC
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoras

Buddha born c. , died c.
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddha

Conclusion:

==INCOMPLETE==

I noticed how you conveniently dropped the biblical figure of David from your calculations.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Pythagoras c. 570-495 BC (74 or 75 years)
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoras

Buddha born c. 563 - 483 BC or c. 480 – 400 BC (79 or 80 years)
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddha

Conclusion: There's two different potential dated lifespans for Gautama Buddha 82-83 years apart. This is the first time I've seen this. The 1st timeline for Buddha directly conflicts with Pythagoras, whereas the 2nd one doesn't cross timelines.

Anyone got any better sources/links than this Wikipedia crap?


Synchronism: 16:37 "Tea at 4, dinner at 7." - The Roosevelts - Intimate, The Storm (1920-1933, S1/Ep4) (2016) - PBS

Wrong Brad. No one actually knows when Siddhārtha Gautama was born or died. The earliest teachings of Buddhism were verbal and later written on cave walls before making the switch to more modern mediums. Again, pick up a damn history book and avoid Wikipedia.

You see that discrepancy in the birth/ death of Siddhārtha Gautama? That's because scholars are unsure of it.

If you want to know when the first Buddhist canon was written (The Pāli Canon), it was around 20-30 BCE. That's quite a number of centuries for things to change when it was originally a verbal thing.

 

[Batman VS Tony Danza]

Pythagoras c. 570-495 BC (74 or 75 years)
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoras

Buddha born c. 563 - 483 BC or c. 480 – 400 BC (79 or 80 years)
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddha

Conclusion: There's two different potential dated lifespans for Gautama Buddha 82-83 years apart. This is the first time I've seen this. The 1st timeline for Buddha directly conflicts with Pythagoras, whereas the 2nd one doesn't cross timelines.

Anyone got any better sources/links than this Wikipedia crap?


Synchronism: 16:37 "Tea at 4, dinner at 7." - The Roosevelts - Intimate, The Storm (1920-1933, S1/Ep4) (2016) - PBS

http://masonarchives.org/Buddha

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

http://masonarchives.org/Buddha

Very informative.

 

[nad7155]

Very informative.

Debatable.

 

[Mr. X]

Anyone got any better sources/links than this Wikipedia crap?

Stay off of the site, Brad: you as a person are blocked and not welcome here. We do not care about your beliefs nor do we want them on this site.

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

Stay off of the site, Brad: you as a person are blocked and not welcome here. We do not care about your beliefs nor do we want them on this site.

Dick Jr. is such a reknown "scientist", Wikipedia tells him they deem his knowledge not even worthy of a discussion side on his own user profile and that he diminishes their reputation by posting there.

So, @Brad Watson_Miami, how does it feel when all the scientific "recognition" that you ever will get boils down to: "Please stop shitting up Wikipedia"?

 

[Mr. X]

Another tasty reply from Ian. Similar to things we've told Brad, but I dig the wording:

Calling your beliefs "truth" does not justify your actions, which is why no one supports your additions and everyone who comes across your additions reverts them before either warning or blocking you. If your additions were the truth, you could find sources for them. You have presented no sources, and no, your blogs do not count. If your claims were still true despite the lack of sources, you could get professionals to recognize your "truth" and publish it in a reliable source. They haven't, and again, your blogs do not count. From the perspective of everyone but you, you are wrong. If you want to egotistically believe that you are the only source of truth in the universe, that's your problem, but we are not having it here. Your ideas are useless to this site, your efforts here are a waste of everyone's time, stop it and get whatever help you need.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Dick Jr. is such a reknown "scientist", Wikipedia tells him they deem his knowledge not even worthy of a discussion side on his own user profile and that he diminishes their reputation by posting there.

So, @Brad Watson_Miami, how does it feel when all the scientific "recognition" that you ever will get boils down to: "Please stop shitting up Wikipedia"?

They also said that his blogs aren't a source for information/ citations.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

They also said that his blogs aren't a source for information/ citations.

Ian is amazing. I want to have his baby.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

when all the scientific "recognition" that you ever will get

Who do you think you're kidding? GOD? You obviously have no way of knowing what kind of recognition I'll receive in the future as a scientist, religious leader, politician, musician, golfer, park ranger, or tight-jeans model.

I want to have Ian's baby.

Now there's a devil baby to top Rosemary's.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Who do you think you're kidding? GOD? You obviously have no way of knowing what kind of recognition I'll receive in the future as a scientist, religious leader, politician, musician, golfer, park ranger, or tight-jeans model.

Well first you have to go school for most of those. You have to go a tournament for golf. Training for being a park ranger and 40 years younger and 200lbs. lighter be be a tight jeans model.

In other words, if you are god, then you have no hope of succeeding in any of those because what little remains of the time you have on this earth is short because of your advanced years and poor health.

Some deity you are.

 

[NobleGreyHorse]

In other words, if you are god, then you have no hope of succeeding in any of those because what little remains of the time you have on this earth is short because of your advanced years and poor health.

We have ample evidence that Brad can't even cure his own sunburn. You would think he would want to, you know, not look like a tomato while wearing that purple flog shirt (not Eqfish; I want to flog the designer) and being filmed.

 

[Vorhtbame]

We have ample evidence that Brad can't even cure his own sunburn. You would think he would want to, you know, not look like a tomato while wearing that purple flog shirt (not Eqfish; I want to flog the designer) and being filmed.

It's probably because he can't find an SPF 74 sunscreen. Nothing less will do!